INSERT INTO `tm_wsal_metadata` (`id`, `occurrence_id`, `name`, `value`) VALUES
(250456, 24429, 'MetaValueOld', '<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong><img class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-8021\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/12323.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"4272\" height=\"1747\" />A brief history of stadiums</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The origins of stadiums lie in Ancient Greece in the 8th Century BC where a \"stadion’ (or \"stadium\" in its translated Latin form) was a unit of measurement approximately 200 metres in length. The name of stadion referred to both the elongated U-shaped track of the same length and the sprint race that was run along its distance. The tracks were usually surrounded by rudimentary stands that were sometimes built into hillsides or surrounded by artificial embankments of stone steps in order for spectators to view the race.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Romans later advanced the development of stadiums with the \"circus\", which had a similar, open-ended horseshoe shape to the stadion, but which was used for horse and chariot racing. However, the familiar modern day design was really started with the amphitheatre, which could accommodate much larger crowds, was often multi-tiered and wrapped around the often gruesome gladiatorial, venatio (animal hunts) and naumachia (staged naval battles to the death involving condemned prisoners) events put on for mass entertainment in a circle of blood thirsty noise.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">With the fall of the Roman Empire, \"sports\" and their associated facilities also fell into a steep decline during the Middle Ages with the world more pre-occupied with other matters – with jousting being a notable anomaly.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">It was not until the late 19th Century, with large scale urbanisation and the huge growth in organised sports such as football, rugby and cricket in the UK and baseball in the United States, that the modern era of the stadium began and which drew upon its ancient roots. Although the sportsmen on the field of play now managed to escape with their lives, football stadiums in the UK, at least, retained much of the \"red in tooth and claw\" atmosphere of their Roman ancestors right up to as recently as the end of the 1980s.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">My own first experience of attending a stadium was as a child with my father in 1987 standing in the Gallowgate End at St James’ Park watching Newcastle United inflict a very rare 2-1 victory over Manchester United. The memories of that day remain very vivid – the pitch, the ear-splitting volume of the chants, the soggy meat pies, watching Gazza do his stuff as a young 19 year-old, Gordon Strachan’s long range equaliser on the stroke of half time (with the ball remaining ominously lodged in the top right stanchion of the goal in front of me for the whole of the half time interval) and Paul Goddard’s 90th minute winner which sent the place ballistic in a primeval frenzy – all of which was simultaneously pretty intoxicating and slightly terrifying for a 10 year old.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">As Nick Hornby describes of his first football match in his 1992 novel Fever Pitch, an autobiographical account of his lifelong obsession with Arsenal FC:</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">\"All I saw on the day was a bewildering chain of incomprehensible incidents ... I remember the overwhelming maleness of it all – cigar and pipe smoke, foul language ... I’d been to public entertainments before, of course ... but that was different. The audiences I had hithero been a part of had paid to have a good time and, though occasionally one might spot a fidgety child or yawning adult, I hadn’t ever noticed faces contorted by rage or despair or frustration. Entertainment as pain was an idea entirely new to me\".</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">However, change was afoot. The design of football stadiums and related health and safety legislation in the UK were subject to a massive overhaul following a series of tragedies such as Hillsborough, the Bradford City fire and the Heysel Stadium disaster in the 1980s. Such catastrophes highlighted fatal flaws in stadium design and crowd control at such time. As a result, standing areas were removed from stadiums, which became all-seaters, and an era of much safer, comfortable and more family friendly stadiums was ushered in. The new designs also led to the commercialisation of the stadium with the introduction of hospitality areas and services, acoustics and lighting fit for TV purposes, the hosting of alternative events such as music concerts, and additional commercial facilities such as food and beverage outlets, hotels and conference rooms – all of which increased the frequency and diversity of stadium use.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>A view from pitch side</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Talking of Manchester United, I spoke with Dan Schofield, Head of Venue Operations at Old Trafford and self-confessed stadium geek on the current state of play. Dan provided me with the following insights:</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em>\"Stadium development is such a hot topic at the moment in the football industry with clubs jostling and jockeying for position in bringing the newest and best developments in the quest for commercial gain, footballing excellence and fan experience. The big challenge for us all is to find the right balance of each of those elements and different clubs have taken differing approaches. Some, such as Liverpool, FC Barcelona and Sheffield United are looking at modernising existing stadiums whilst others, including Tottenham Hotspur, Everton and Chelsea are spending huge amounts on developing completely new stadiums. To justify these huge outlays in capital expenditure clubs are looking to \"sweat the asset\" and stage as many different events and activities as they can in the stadium. If managed well the non-matchday business can be as lucrative as the matchday business.</em></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em>If you take a deep-dive in to the new White Hart Lane development, for example, you will see that Spurs have incorporated a skywalk, abseil and a huge Museum experience - all to bolster the non-matchday revenue generating potential of the facility. That is in addition to an average of 27 homes games (across all competitions) and a number of NFL games and concerts which they have contracted to take place. This diversification is always a balancing act between bringing in commercially viable events whilst not impacting on the footballing performance on the pitch. It’s been fascinating to follow the development at Spurs and in particular the retractable pitch they are implementing which will enable them to host NFL games and concerts on an artificial surface whilst the football surface is retracted out of the stadium on a series of mechanical trays, rails and hoists.</em></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em>I’m very fortunate that my role heading up the venue operations at Manchester United allows me to visit stadiums all over the world and I make a point of trying to learn something from every venue we visit. I’m particularly looking forward to a trip to Michigan at the end of July where we are playing a pre-season tour game at the 107,000 capacity \"Big House\" stadium. Every stadium you visit is different and having joked about it for years I’ve certainly got enough Stadium based anecdotes to write a book called \"Around the World in 80 Stadiums\" which one day I may well do….. I recently added a new stadium I want to visit to my bucket-list with the Ekaterinburg Arena in Russia in its World Cup guise with its 147 foot high temporary scaffold stands literally outside the stadium with part of the perimeter cut out allowing fans to see the game. You look at photos, scratch your head and question how it’s possible and I’d love to visit and have a proper stomp all over it in person.</em></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em>I’m blessed with a fantastic facility in the 75,000 capacity Old Trafford and it’s a fantastic time to be involved in the stadium industry with a number of exciting developments happening all over the world and new ones being announced on an almost weekly basis. I’d recommend for anyone interested in the subject to sign-up to a couple of industry newsletters which help keep you abreast of developments and changes in the global stadium industry, I’d particularly recommend www.stadia-magazine.com and www.sportindustry.biz \"</em></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong><img class=\"alignright wp-image-8007 \" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_421751620-1024x682.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"668\" height=\"445\" />E-gaming stadiums</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">As for the future, stadiums will continue to evolve - becoming safer and more technologically sophisticated, diverse in their uses and sustainable; often built with iconic designs (see Qatar 2022) that provide a focal point for cities that are instantly recognisable internationally. They can also help to rejuvenate the economy and attract business in previously run down areas of a city in which they are anchored.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">One example of such evolution in the digital age is with the new phenomena of e-sports stadiums, where professional gamers compete with each other in front of a live audience. Such stadiums are already operational in the United States, China and South Korea and have a huge potential in terms of audience numbers and revenue.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">With a plethora of international standard stadiums already built and construction of the new Dubai Arena well underway, Dubai, ever at the cutting edge of building design and digital technology and soon to be host of EXPO 2020, has also announced the Dubai X-Stadium, a new e-gaming stadium being developed through a joint initiative between Dubai Media Office and TECOM Group.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The features and design of such e-gaming stadiums diverge from traditional stadiums, most notably in that all the action is on huge high definition screens rather than the audience focus being on the competitors, who may be squirreled away in separate booths during play. Use of holographic displays and augmented and virtual reality are also likely to play a significant part in the audience’s experience. Fans are also likely to have a much less sedentary, static relationship with the games – with the freedom to circulate within the stadium and experience other zones and outlets catering to the modern tastes of a new generation - soggy meat pies are likely to be thin on the ground.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Some UAE real estate legal considerations</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em>\"We don’t want people to leave the stadium until the game finishes\"</em></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Jurgen Klopp, manager of Liverpool FC in 2016</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In the UAE, there are a number of mixed use, master communities that have a stadium as their focal point or as a prominent feature such as Sports City and Motor City in Dubai, Yas Island in Abu Dhabi and Hazza Bin Zayed Stadium in Al Ain (home of Al Ain F.C).</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Developers of such cornerstone plots in such developments will often be granted certain concessions in terms of master community fees in light of the fact that use of such facilities is more intermittent than standard commercial use and that they serve as a key attractor to investors, retailers and third party purchasers of residential property within the master community. Any such concessions should be expressly disclosed to third party purchasers by the master developer prior to the parties entering into a sale and purchase agreement.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In addition, although you would think that any such third party purchasers of residential property or commercial tenants would be well aware of potential infringements upon their use and enjoyment of their properties within such a stadium focussed master community, it would also be prudent of master developers to cover off the risk of any nuisance related claims. This may include express wording contained in the relevant master community declaration (which typically purchasers are bound by through the signing of a declaration of adherence upon purchase) or lease whereby a purchaser/tenant acknowledges and waives any claims relating to such matters as traffic congestion, noise and light pollution.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Another issue for retail tenants in stadium facilities are conflicts that may arise with the landlord/stadium owner’s sponsors – particularly in relation to special, one off events taking place at the stadium. It is therefore not unusual to find provisions in such leases whereby the landlord reserves rights to impose signage and branding blackouts or restrictions on the sale of goods or services during certain times when a conflict arises with sponsors. This can be a tricky issue and needs to be carefully managed and negotiated up front in the lease. Often with leases where tenants that have a particular connection to the type of sport practised at the stadium, the lease itself may be just a part of a wider commercial deal with the stadium and this may assist with negotiations.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Stadiums should also have good standard forms of venue hire agreements and short term kiosk type agreements in place. One issue to be considered is the potential effect of landlord and tenant laws in the UAE on such agreements. Unlike in the UK for example, where the case of Street v Mountford [1985] established that the legal distinction between a lease and an occupational licence is whether or not the tenant enjoys \"exclusive possession\" of the premises, there is no such distinction under UAE law. A short term occupational licence, even if it is described as such on its face and contains express wording that the parties do not intend to create a lease or a relationship of landlord or tenant, is therefore likely to be considered a lease if the question is brought before judicial authorities. This is significant as this will mean that the so called \"licence\" will be subject to landlord and tenant legislation which, in onshore Dubai for example, is generally very tenant friendly in terms of the rights of the landlord to terminate, renewal and security of tenure for tenants. Nevertheless, on a case by case basis depending on the circumstances, certain structuring of the relevant agreement can potentially help to mitigate the risk of it being caught by local landlord and tenant laws.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">...... and there goes the full time whistle.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">For further information please contact Ian Arnott (i.arnott@tamimi.com)</p>'),
(250457, 24429, 'MetaLink', 'content'),
(250458, 24429, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7945&amp;action=edit'),
(250459, 24429, 'ReportText', '<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong><img class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-8021\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/12323.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"4272\" height=\"1747\" />A brief history of stadiums</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The origins of stadiums lie in Ancient Greece in the 8th Century BC where a \"stadion’ (or \"stadium\" in its translated Latin form) was a unit of measurement approximately 200 metres in length. The name of stadion referred to both the elongated U-shaped track of the same length and the sprint race that was run along its distance. The tracks were usually surrounded by rudimentary stands that were sometimes built into hillsides or surrounded by artificial embankments of stone steps in order for spectators to view the race.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Romans later advanced the development of stadiums with the \"circus\", which had a similar, open-ended horseshoe shape to the stadion, but which was used for horse and chariot racing. However, the familiar modern day design was really started with the amphitheatre, which could accommodate much larger crowds, was often multi-tiered and wrapped around the often gruesome gladiatorial, venatio (animal hunts) and naumachia (staged naval battles to the death involving condemned prisoners) events put on for mass entertainment in a circle of blood thirsty noise.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">With the fall of the Roman Empire, \"sports\" and their associated facilities also fell into a steep decline during the Middle Ages with the world more pre-occupied with other matters – with jousting being a notable anomaly.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">It was not until the late 19th Century, with large scale urbanisation and the huge growth in organised sports such as football, rugby and cricket in the UK and baseball in the United States, that the modern era of the stadium began and which drew upon its ancient roots. Although the sportsmen on the field of play now managed to escape with their lives, football stadiums in the UK, at least, retained much of the \"red in tooth and claw\" atmosphere of their Roman ancestors right up to as recently as the end of the 1980s.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">My own first experience of attending a stadium was as a child with my father in 1987 standing in the Gallowgate End at St James’ Park watching Newcastle United inflict a very rare 2-1 victory over Manchester United. The memories of that day remain very vivid – the pitch, the ear-splitting volume of the chants, the soggy meat pies, watching Gazza do his stuff as a young 19 year-old, Gordon Strachan’s long range equaliser on the stroke of half time (with the ball remaining ominously lodged in the top right stanchion of the goal in front of me for the whole of the half time interval) and Paul Goddard’s 90th minute winner which sent the place ballistic in a primeval frenzy – all of which was simultaneously pretty intoxicating and slightly terrifying for a 10 year old.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">As Nick Hornby describes of his first football match in his 1992 novel Fever Pitch, an autobiographical account of his lifelong obsession with Arsenal FC:</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">\"All I saw on the day was a bewildering chain of incomprehensible incidents ... I remember the overwhelming maleness of it all – cigar and pipe smoke, foul language ... I’d been to public entertainments before, of course ... but that was different. The audiences I had hithero been a part of had paid to have a good time and, though occasionally one might spot a fidgety child or yawning adult, I hadn’t ever noticed faces contorted by rage or despair or frustration. Entertainment as pain was an idea entirely new to me\".</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">However, change was afoot. The design of football stadiums and related health and safety legislation in the UK were subject to a massive overhaul following a series of tragedies such as Hillsborough, the Bradford City fire and the Heysel Stadium disaster in the 1980s. Such catastrophes highlighted fatal flaws in stadium design and crowd control at such time. As a result, standing areas were removed from stadiums, which became all-seaters, and an era of much safer, comfortable and more family friendly stadiums was ushered in. The new designs also led to the commercialisation of the stadium with the introduction of hospitality areas and services, acoustics and lighting fit for TV purposes, the hosting of alternative events such as music concerts, and additional commercial facilities such as food and beverage outlets, hotels and conference rooms – all of which increased the frequency and diversity of stadium use.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>A view from pitch side</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Talking of Manchester United, I spoke with Dan Schofield, Head of Venue Operations at Old Trafford and self-confessed stadium geek on the current state of play. Dan provided me with the following insights:</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em>\"Stadium development is such a hot topic at the moment in the football industry with clubs jostling and jockeying for position in bringing the newest and best developments in the quest for commercial gain, footballing excellence and fan experience. The big challenge for us all is to find the right balance of each of those elements and different clubs have taken differing approaches. Some, such as Liverpool, FC Barcelona and Sheffield United are looking at modernising existing stadiums whilst others, including Tottenham Hotspur, Everton and Chelsea are spending huge amounts on developing completely new stadiums. To justify these huge outlays in capital expenditure clubs are looking to \"sweat the asset\" and stage as many different events and activities as they can in the stadium. If managed well the non-matchday business can be as lucrative as the matchday business.</em></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em>If you take a deep-dive in to the new White Hart Lane development, for example, you will see that Spurs have incorporated a skywalk, abseil and a huge Museum experience - all to bolster the non-matchday revenue generating potential of the facility. That is in addition to an average of 27 homes games (across all competitions) and a number of NFL games and concerts which they have contracted to take place. This diversification is always a balancing act between bringing in commercially viable events whilst not impacting on the footballing performance on the pitch. It’s been fascinating to follow the development at Spurs and in particular the retractable pitch they are implementing which will enable them to host NFL games and concerts on an artificial surface whilst the football surface is retracted out of the stadium on a series of mechanical trays, rails and hoists.</em></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em>I’m very fortunate that my role heading up the venue operations at Manchester United allows me to visit stadiums all over the world and I make a point of trying to learn something from every venue we visit. I’m particularly looking forward to a trip to Michigan at the end of July where we are playing a pre-season tour game at the 107,000 capacity \"Big House\" stadium. Every stadium you visit is different and having joked about it for years I’ve certainly got enough Stadium based anecdotes to write a book called \"Around the World in 80 Stadiums\" which one day I may well do….. I recently added a new stadium I want to visit to my bucket-list with the Ekaterinburg Arena in Russia in its World Cup guise with its 147 foot high temporary scaffold stands literally outside the stadium with part of the perimeter cut out allowing fans to see the game. You look at photos, scratch your head and question how it’s possible and I’d love to visit and have a proper stomp all over it in person.</em></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em>I’m blessed with a fantastic facility in the 75,000 capacity Old Trafford and it’s a fantastic time to be involved in the stadium industry with a number of exciting developments happening all over the world and new ones being announced on an almost weekly basis. I’d recommend for anyone interested in the subject to sign-up to a couple of industry newsletters which help keep you abreast of developments and changes in the global stadium industry, I’d particularly recommend www.stadia-magazine.com and www.sportindustry.biz \"</em></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong><img class=\"alignright wp-image-8007 \" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_421751620-1024x682.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"668\" height=\"445\" />E-gaming stadiums</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">As for the future, stadiums will continue to evolve - becoming safer and more technologically sophisticated, diverse in their uses and sustainable; often built with iconic designs (see Qatar 2022) that provide a focal point for cities that are instantly recognisable internationally. They can also help to rejuvenate the economy and attract business in previously run down areas of a city in which they are anchored.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">One example of such evolution in the digital age is with the new phenomena of e-sports stadiums, where professional gamers compete with each other in front of a live audience. Such stadiums are already operational in the United States, China and South Korea and have a huge potential in terms of audience numbers and revenue.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">With a plethora of international standard stadiums already built and construction of the new Dubai Arena well underway, Dubai, ever at the cutting edge of building design and digital technology and soon to be host of EXPO 2020, has also announced the Dubai X-Stadium, a new e-gaming stadium being developed through a joint initiative between Dubai Media Office and TECOM Group.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The features and design of such e-gaming stadiums diverge from traditional stadiums, most notably in that all the action is on huge high definition screens rather than the audience focus being on the competitors, who may be squirreled away in separate booths during play. Use of holographic displays and augmented and virtual reality are also likely to play a significant part in the audience’s experience. Fans are also likely to have a much less sedentary, static relationship with the games – with the freedom to circulate within the stadium and experience other zones and outlets catering to the modern tastes of a new generation - soggy meat pies are likely to be thin on the ground.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Some UAE real estate legal considerations</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em>\"We don’t want people to leave the stadium until the game finishes\"</em></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Jurgen Klopp, manager of Liverpool FC in 2016</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In the UAE, there are a number of mixed use, master communities that have a stadium as their focal point or as a prominent feature such as Sports City and Motor City in Dubai, Yas Island in Abu Dhabi and Hazza Bin Zayed Stadium in Al Ain (home of Al Ain F.C).</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Developers of such cornerstone plots in such developments will often be granted certain concessions in terms of master community fees in light of the fact that use of such facilities is more intermittent than standard commercial use and that they serve as a key attractor to investors, retailers and third party purchasers of residential property within the master community. Any such concessions should be expressly disclosed to third party purchasers by the master developer prior to the parties entering into a sale and purchase agreement.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In addition, although you would think that any such third party purchasers of residential property or commercial tenants would be well aware of potential infringements upon their use and enjoyment of their properties within such a stadium focussed master community, it would also be prudent of master developers to cover off the risk of any nuisance related claims. This may include express wording contained in the relevant master community declaration (which typically purchasers are bound by through the signing of a declaration of adherence upon purchase) or lease whereby a purchaser/tenant acknowledges and waives any claims relating to such matters as traffic congestion, noise and light pollution.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Another issue for retail tenants in stadium facilities are conflicts that may arise with the landlord/stadium owner’s sponsors – particularly in relation to special, one off events taking place at the stadium. It is therefore not unusual to find provisions in such leases whereby the landlord reserves rights to impose signage and branding blackouts or restrictions on the sale of goods or services during certain times when a conflict arises with sponsors. This can be a tricky issue and needs to be carefully managed and negotiated up front in the lease. Often with leases where tenants that have a particular connection to the type of sport practised at the stadium, the lease itself may be just a part of a wider commercial deal with the stadium and this may assist with negotiations.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Stadiums should also have good standard forms of venue hire agreements and short term kiosk type agreements in place. One issue to be considered is the potential effect of landlord and tenant laws in the UAE on such agreements. Unlike in the UK for example, where the case of Street v Mountford [1985] established that the legal distinction between a lease and an occupational licence is whether or not the tenant enjoys \"exclusive possession\" of the premises, there is no such distinction under UAE law. A short term occupational licence, even if it is described as such on its face and contains express wording that the parties do not intend to create a lease or a relationship of landlord or tenant, is therefore likely to be considered a lease if the question is brought before judicial authorities. This is significant as this will mean that the so called \"licence\" will be subject to landlord and tenant legislation which, in onshore Dubai for example, is generally very tenant friendly in terms of the rights of the landlord to terminate, renewal and security of tenure for tenants. Nevertheless, on a case by case basis depending on the circumstances, certain structuring of the relevant agreement can potentially help to mitigate the risk of it being caught by local landlord and tenant laws.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">...... and there goes the full time whistle.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">For further information please contact Ian Arnott (i.arnott@tamimi.com)</p>|<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong><img class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-8021\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/12323.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"4272\" height=\"1747\" />A brief history of stadiums</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The origins of stadiums lie in Ancient Greece in the 8th Century BC where a \"stadion’ (or \"stadium\" in its translated Latin form) was a unit of measurement approximately 200 metres in length. The name of stadion referred to both the elongated U-shaped track of the same length and the sprint race that was run along its distance. The tracks were usually surrounded by rudimentary stands that were sometimes built into hillsides or surrounded by artificial embankments of stone steps in order for spectators to view the race.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Romans later advanced the development of stadiums with the \"circus\", which had a similar, open-ended horseshoe shape to the stadion, but which was used for horse and chariot racing. However, the familiar modern day design was really started with the amphitheatre, which could accommodate much larger crowds, was often multi-tiered and wrapped around the often gruesome gladiatorial, venatio (animal hunts) and naumachia (staged naval battles to the death involving condemned prisoners) events put on for mass entertainment in a circle of blood thirsty noise.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">With the fall of the Roman Empire, \"sports\" and their associated facilities also fell into a steep decline during the Middle Ages with the world more pre-occupied with other matters – with jousting being a notable anomaly.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">It was not until the late 19th Century, with large scale urbanisation and the huge growth in organised sports such as football, rugby and cricket in the UK and baseball in the United States, that the modern era of the stadium began and which drew upon its ancient roots. Although the sportsmen on the field of play now managed to escape with their lives, football stadiums in the UK, at least, retained much of the \"red in tooth and claw\" atmosphere of their Roman ancestors right up to as recently as the end of the 1980s.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">My own first experience of attending a stadium was as a child with my father in 1987 standing in the Gallowgate End at St James’ Park watching Newcastle United inflict a very rare 2-1 victory over Manchester United. The memories of that day remain very vivid – the pitch, the ear-splitting volume of the chants, the soggy meat pies, watching Gazza do his stuff as a young 19 year-old, Gordon Strachan’s long range equaliser on the stroke of half time (with the ball remaining ominously lodged in the top right stanchion of the goal in front of me for the whole of the half time interval) and Paul Goddard’s 90th minute winner which sent the place ballistic in a primeval frenzy – all of which was simultaneously pretty intoxicating and slightly terrifying for a 10 year old.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">As Nick Hornby describes of his first football match in his 1992 novel Fever Pitch, an autobiographical account of his lifelong obsession with Arsenal FC:</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">\"All I saw on the day was a bewildering chain of incomprehensible incidents ... I remember the overwhelming maleness of it all – cigar and pipe smoke, foul language ... I’d been to public entertainments before, of course ... but that was different. The audiences I had hithero been a part of had paid to have a good time and, though occasionally one might spot a fidgety child or yawning adult, I hadn’t ever noticed faces contorted by rage or despair or frustration. Entertainment as pain was an idea entirely new to me\".</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">However, change was afoot. The design of football stadiums and related health and safety legislation in the UK were subject to a massive overhaul following a series of tragedies such as Hillsborough, the Bradford City fire and the Heysel Stadium disaster in the 1980s. Such catastrophes highlighted fatal flaws in stadium design and crowd control at such time. As a result, standing areas were removed from stadiums, which became all-seaters, and an era of much safer, comfortable and more family friendly stadiums was ushered in. The new designs also led to the commercialisation of the stadium with the introduction of hospitality areas and services, acoustics and lighting fit for TV purposes, the hosting of alternative events such as music concerts, and additional commercial facilities such as food and beverage outlets, hotels and conference rooms – all of which increased the frequency and diversity of stadium use.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>A view from pitch side</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Talking of Manchester United, I spoke with Dan Schofield, Head of Venue Operations at Old Trafford and self-confessed stadium geek on the current state of play. Dan provided me with the following insights:</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em>\"Stadium development is such a hot topic at the moment in the football industry with clubs jostling and jockeying for position in bringing the newest and best developments in the quest for commercial gain, footballing excellence and fan experience. The big challenge for us all is to find the right balance of each of those elements and different clubs have taken differing approaches. Some, such as Liverpool, FC Barcelona and Sheffield United are looking at modernising existing stadiums whilst others, including Tottenham Hotspur, Everton and Chelsea are spending huge amounts on developing completely new stadiums. To justify these huge outlays in capital expenditure clubs are looking to \"sweat the asset\" and stage as many different events and activities as they can in the stadium. If managed well the non-matchday business can be as lucrative as the matchday business.</em></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em>If you take a deep-dive in to the new White Hart Lane development, for example, you will see that Spurs have incorporated a skywalk, abseil and a huge Museum experience - all to bolster the non-matchday revenue generating potential of the facility. That is in addition to an average of 27 homes games (across all competitions) and a number of NFL games and concerts which they have contracted to take place. This diversification is always a balancing act between bringing in commercially viable events whilst not impacting on the footballing performance on the pitch. It’s been fascinating to follow the development at Spurs and in particular the retractable pitch they are implementing which will enable them to host NFL games and concerts on an artificial surface whilst the football surface is retracted out of the stadium on a series of mechanical trays, rails and hoists.</em></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em>I’m very fortunate that my role heading up the venue operations at Manchester United allows me to visit stadiums all over the world and I make a point of trying to learn something from every venue we visit. I’m particularly looking forward to a trip to Michigan at the end of July where we are playing a pre-season tour game at the 107,000 capacity \"Big House\" stadium. Every stadium you visit is different and having joked about it for years I’ve certainly got enough Stadium based anecdotes to write a book called \"Around the World in 80 Stadiums\" which one day I may well do….. I recently added a new stadium I want to visit to my bucket-list with the Ekaterinburg Arena in Russia in its World Cup guise with its 147 foot high temporary scaffold stands literally outside the stadium with part of the perimeter cut out allowing fans to see the game. You look at photos, scratch your head and question how it’s possible and I’d love to visit and have a proper stomp all over it in person.</em></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em>I’m blessed with a fantastic facility in the 75,000 capacity Old Trafford and it’s a fantastic time to be involved in the stadium industry with a number of exciting developments happening all over the world and new ones being announced on an almost weekly basis. I’d recommend for anyone interested in the subject to sign-up to a couple of industry newsletters which help keep you abreast of developments and changes in the global stadium industry, I’d particularly recommend www.stadia-magazine.com and www.sportindustry.biz \"</em></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong><img class=\"alignright wp-image-8007 \" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_421751620-1024x682.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"470\" height=\"313\" />E-gaming stadiums</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">As for the future, stadiums will continue to evolve - becoming safer and more technologically sophisticated, diverse in their uses and sustainable; often built with iconic designs (see Qatar 2022) that provide a focal point for cities that are instantly recognisable internationally. They can also help to rejuvenate the economy and attract business in previously run down areas of a city in which they are anchored.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">One example of such evolution in the digital age is with the new phenomena of e-sports stadiums, where professional gamers compete with each other in front of a live audience. Such stadiums are already operational in the United States, China and South Korea and have a huge potential in terms of audience numbers and revenue.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">With a plethora of international standard stadiums already built and construction of the new Dubai Arena well underway, Dubai, ever at the cutting edge of building design and digital technology and soon to be host of EXPO 2020, has also announced the Dubai X-Stadium, a new e-gaming stadium being developed through a joint initiative between Dubai Media Office and TECOM Group.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The features and design of such e-gaming stadiums diverge from traditional stadiums, most notably in that all the action is on huge high definition screens rather than the audience focus being on the competitors, who may be squirreled away in separate booths during play. Use of holographic displays and augmented and virtual reality are also likely to play a significant part in the audience’s experience. Fans are also likely to have a much less sedentary, static relationship with the games – with the freedom to circulate within the stadium and experience other zones and outlets catering to the modern tastes of a new generation - soggy meat pies are likely to be thin on the ground.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Some UAE real estate legal considerations</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em>\"We don’t want people to leave the stadium until the game finishes\"</em></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Jurgen Klopp, manager of Liverpool FC in 2016</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In the UAE, there are a number of mixed use, master communities that have a stadium as their focal point or as a prominent feature such as Sports City and Motor City in Dubai, Yas Island in Abu Dhabi and Hazza Bin Zayed Stadium in Al Ain (home of Al Ain F.C).</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Developers of such cornerstone plots in such developments will often be granted certain concessions in terms of master community fees in light of the fact that use of such facilities is more intermittent than standard commercial use and that they serve as a key attractor to investors, retailers and third party purchasers of residential property within the master community. Any such concessions should be expressly disclosed to third party purchasers by the master developer prior to the parties entering into a sale and purchase agreement.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In addition, although you would think that any such third party purchasers of residential property or commercial tenants would be well aware of potential infringements upon their use and enjoyment of their properties within such a stadium focussed master community, it would also be prudent of master developers to cover off the risk of any nuisance related claims. This may include express wording contained in the relevant master community declaration (which typically purchasers are bound by through the signing of a declaration of adherence upon purchase) or lease whereby a purchaser/tenant acknowledges and waives any claims relating to such matters as traffic congestion, noise and light pollution.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Another issue for retail tenants in stadium facilities are conflicts that may arise with the landlord/stadium owner’s sponsors – particularly in relation to special, one off events taking place at the stadium. It is therefore not unusual to find provisions in such leases whereby the landlord reserves rights to impose signage and branding blackouts or restrictions on the sale of goods or services during certain times when a conflict arises with sponsors. This can be a tricky issue and needs to be carefully managed and negotiated up front in the lease. Often with leases where tenants that have a particular connection to the type of sport practised at the stadium, the lease itself may be just a part of a wider commercial deal with the stadium and this may assist with negotiations.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Stadiums should also have good standard forms of venue hire agreements and short term kiosk type agreements in place. One issue to be considered is the potential effect of landlord and tenant laws in the UAE on such agreements. Unlike in the UK for example, where the case of Street v Mountford [1985] established that the legal distinction between a lease and an occupational licence is whether or not the tenant enjoys \"exclusive possession\" of the premises, there is no such distinction under UAE law. A short term occupational licence, even if it is described as such on its face and contains express wording that the parties do not intend to create a lease or a relationship of landlord or tenant, is therefore likely to be considered a lease if the question is brought before judicial authorities. This is significant as this will mean that the so called \"licence\" will be subject to landlord and tenant legislation which, in onshore Dubai for example, is generally very tenant friendly in terms of the rights of the landlord to terminate, renewal and security of tenure for tenants. Nevertheless, on a case by case basis depending on the circumstances, certain structuring of the relevant agreement can potentially help to mitigate the risk of it being caught by local landlord and tenant laws.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">...... and there goes the full time whistle.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">For further information please contact Ian Arnott (i.arnott@tamimi.com)</p>'),
(250460, 24429, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250461, 24429, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250462, 24429, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250463, 24429, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250464, 24430, 'PostID', '7945'),
(250465, 24430, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(250466, 24430, 'PostTitle', 'From Stadion to E-Gaming in the UAE: A look at Stadium'),
(250467, 24430, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(250468, 24430, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 17:54:29'),
(250469, 24430, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7945'),
(250470, 24430, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7945&amp;action=edit'),
(250471, 24430, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250472, 24430, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250473, 24430, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250474, 24430, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250475, 24431, 'PostID', '7945'),
(250476, 24431, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(250477, 24431, 'PostTitle', 'From Stadion to E-Gaming in the UAE: A look at Stadium'),
(250478, 24431, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(250479, 24431, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 17:54:54'),
(250480, 24431, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7945'),
(250481, 24431, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7945&amp;action=edit'),
(250482, 24431, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250483, 24431, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250484, 24431, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250485, 24431, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250486, 24432, 'PostID', '7950'),
(250487, 24432, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(250488, 24432, 'PostTitle', 'Qatar 2022 World Cup: Laws, Changes and Legacy Benefits'),
(250489, 24432, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(250490, 24432, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 16:00:30'),
(250491, 24432, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7950'),
(250492, 24432, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7950&amp;action=edit'),
(250493, 24432, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250494, 24432, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250495, 24432, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250496, 24432, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250497, 24433, 'AttachmentID', '7977'),
(250498, 24433, 'FileName', 'shutterstock_282688541.jpg'),
(250499, 24433, 'FilePath', '/home/tamimnew/public_html/wp-content/uploads/2018/07'),
(250500, 24433, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250501, 24433, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250502, 24433, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250503, 24433, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250504, 24434, 'AttachmentID', '8022'),
(250505, 24434, 'FileName', 'RTHTF.jpg'),
(250506, 24434, 'FilePath', '/home/tamimnew/public_html/wp-content/uploads/2018/07'),
(250507, 24434, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250508, 24434, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250509, 24434, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250510, 24434, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250511, 24435, 'AttachmentID', '8023'),
(250512, 24435, 'FileName', 'shutterstock_775162108.jpg'),
(250513, 24435, 'FilePath', '/home/tamimnew/public_html/wp-content/uploads/2018/07'),
(250514, 24435, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250515, 24435, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250516, 24435, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250517, 24435, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250518, 24436, 'PostID', '7949'),
(250519, 24436, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(250520, 24436, 'PostTitle', 'Kuwait: still in the Olympic wilderness'),
(250521, 24436, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(250522, 24436, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 17:58:01'),
(250523, 24436, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7949'),
(250524, 24436, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7949&amp;action=edit'),
(250525, 24436, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18');
INSERT INTO `tm_wsal_metadata` (`id`, `occurrence_id`, `name`, `value`) VALUES
(250526, 24436, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250527, 24436, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250528, 24436, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250529, 24437, 'PostID', '7949'),
(250530, 24437, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(250531, 24437, 'PostTitle', 'Kuwait: still in the Olympic wilderness'),
(250532, 24437, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(250533, 24437, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 15:53:48'),
(250534, 24437, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7949'),
(250535, 24437, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7949&amp;action=edit'),
(250536, 24437, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250537, 24437, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250538, 24437, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250539, 24437, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250540, 24438, 'PostID', '7949'),
(250541, 24438, 'PostTitle', 'Kuwait: still in the Olympic wilderness'),
(250542, 24438, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(250543, 24438, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(250544, 24438, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 17:58:04'),
(250545, 24438, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7949'),
(250546, 24438, 'MetaID', '223668'),
(250547, 24438, 'MetaKey', 'content'),
(250548, 24438, 'MetaValueNew', '<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><img class=\"alignright size-large wp-image-8023\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_775162108-389x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"389\" height=\"1024\" />The suspension of an athlete or nation from participating in the Olympic Games is commonly considered to be the ultimate sporting sanction. Whilst the suspension of Russia from PyeongChang 2018 (and its reinstatement immediately afterwards) grabbed headlines, Kuwait remains subject to a ban imposed by the International Olympic Committee (\"IOC\") in 2015.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Kuwait’s National Olympic Committee (\"NOC\") is no stranger to Olympic exile, having been suspended by the IOC in 1986. More recently, Kuwait was warned by the IOC in 2007 that its sports legislation permitted governmental interference in the internal functioning of its NOC and other sporting federations, in violation of the Olympic Charter. When Kuwait did not address this issue by the IOC’s deadline of 31 December 2009, its NOC was suspended. This ban was lifted shortly before London 2012.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Further sports legislation was enacted in early 2015, however, that conferred upon the Kuwaiti Sports Ministry the power to assume control of national sporting bodies, as well the ability to control financial matters. Consequently, Kuwait’s NOC was disbanded by the Kuwaiti Sport Ministry, purportedly due to financial irregularities, as were nine other national federations. Interim committees were established to take over their administration, headed by figures widely reported to be loyal to the Kuwaiti Sports Ministry. The IOC took the view that Kuwait had failed to ameliorate the position by the IOC’s deadline of 27 October 2015; and, its NOC was suspended again. This came shortly after FIFA had imposed its own suspension on Kuwait’s football association (\"KFA\"), having failed to meet FIFA’s 15 October 2015 deadline for corrective action. Sixteen further international sports federations subsequently followed suit.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Subsequent Developments</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In response to its censure by the international sporting community, Kuwait went on the offensive. In June 2016, the Kuwait government appealed the IOC suspension in the Swiss Civil Courts and claimed $1 billion compensation for losses flowing from the alleged unjust imposition of a suspension in the absence of an appropriate investigation. The appeal and compensation claim were dismissed in August 2016 and Kuwait was ordered to pay $11,500 towards the IOC’s legal costs. Also in June 2016, the Court of Arbitration for Sport (\"CAS\") rejected an appeal brought by a number of Kuwaiti football clubs (including the Kuwaiti Premier League champions, Kuwait Sporting Club) against the FIFA suspension.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In addition to legal proceedings, Kuwait has made frequent unsuccessful appeals to the IOC (and FIFA) for its suspension to be lifted. Numerous meetings have also taken place between Kuwaiti officials and the IOC, most notably that mediated by the United Nations in January 2016, at which the parties appeared to have to have reached an agreement in principle that Kuwait reportedly reneged upon at a later date.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">On 12 December 2016, Kuwait’s newly-elected parliament voted by a majority of over two thirds to amend the relevant sports legislation to facilitate re-admission to international sport. This vote unfortunately came too late for Kuwait to take part in the AFC Asian Cup Qualification final round, given that the deadline imposed by the Asian Football Conference (\"AFC\") for the KFA to be readmitted to FIFA membership was 18 December 2016.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In early 2017 the IOC are reported to have sent a letter to the Kuwaiti Sports Ministry setting three conditions for Kuwait’s re-acceptance into the Olympic Movement:</p>\r\n\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">all relevant sport legislation must be amended in order to comply with the Olympic Charter;</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">all board member changes imposed upon Kuwait’s NOC and other sporting bodes must be revoked; and</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">all ongoing domestic and international cases against the IOC and other international sporting bodes must be dropped.</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">On 4 December 2017, Kuwait finally bowed to mounting domestic and international pressure by enacting new sports legislation purporting to replace all previous such laws and thus prevent governmental interference with Kuwaiti sporting bodies.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">FIFA lifted its ban on 6 December 2017. However, despite subsequent meetings taking place between Kuwaiti officials and the IOC, the Olympic ban remains in place.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>The wider context of governmental interference</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Sporting bodies are hard-wired to protect their autonomy to govern and regulate their sport, as enshrined in the Olympic Charter. A distinct body of law, lex sportiva, has developed over time to underpin the doctrine that sporting bodies are best placed to understand the unique circumstances of sport and manage them in a way that maximises wider societal benefits. The Olympic Charter promotes collaboration between sporting bodies and government, but prohibits interference. This begs the question as to where the line is between benign and undue governmental influence. Reasonable conditions attached to the receipt of public funds by sporting bodies for grassroots investment is an obvious example of the former, whereas a government retaining unfettered power to disband national sporting federations is an obvious example of the latter. However, there are a myriad of circumstances falling in between.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Kuwait is not alone in finding itself on the wrong side of the IOC due to governmental interference in sport:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In July 2007, Panama was suspended by the IOC for governmental interference in the running of its NOC. The ban was lifted in April 2008 in time for the nation to compete at Beijing 2008. It was threatened with a further suspension in January 2011 when the Panamanian President demanded the resignation of NOC committee members, but this was averted when the issue was resolved to the IOC’s satisfaction.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In January 2011, Ghana’s NOC was suspended by the IOC for failing to amend its sports law to prevent the Ghanaian government from making presidential appointments to its NOC and numerous national sporting federations. The ban was lifted in October 2011 when a new sports law was enacted to prevent political interference, allowing the nation to compete at London 2012.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In June 2011, the IOC warned the Indian Sports Ministry that compelling national sporting federations to adopt mandatory eligibility requirements for officials constituted undue governmental interference. When the Indian government ignored this warning and the Olympic Association separately elected officials accused of corruption, the Indian NOC was suspended by the IOC for non-compliance with the Olympic Charter in December 2012. Somewhat uniquely, the IOC lifted this ban lifted four days into Sochi 2014 when new officials were elected, causing the Indian flag to be belatedly raised in the Olympic Village.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In 2015, Sri Lanka was warned by the IOC that it faced suspension if it did not revise proposed sports legislation that barred high-ranking officials from standing for re-election by the end of that year. This governmental interference was cited as a major reason for Sri Lanka being stripped of its hosting rights of the 2017 Asian Youth Games.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In August 2016, Kenya’s Sports Ministry disbanded its NOC and transferred its duties to Sports Kenya, in response to alleged mismanagement of Team Kenya at Rio 2016 by senior NOC officials. In March 2017, the IOC cut funding and threated suspension of the newly-formed NOC when it refused to accept IOC-requested governance reforms.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Recent reports suggest that Saudi Arabia is coming under increased scrutiny from the IOC and FIFA in connection with a growing trend of appointments for government-backed appointees to the Kingdom’s national sports federations. A suspension from international sport would impact the Kingdom’s successful national and club football teams and may also affect its progressive economic reforms, of which sport - and in particular the privatisation of its top-tier football clubs - is a central component, owing to sport’s increasingly valuable geo-political status in the GCC region.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The IOC is, therefore, not afraid to adopt a robust approach if it considers that the Olympic Charter is being undermined by undue governmental interference. One particular area it has sought to control is the fall-out when relations between national governments and NOCs breakdown. In this regard the IOC has a number of weapons at its disposal, including proactive engagement with the parties, interim funding cuts, the threat of a suspension, and ultimately the imposition of a suspension. The political unpopularity of presiding over a nation suspended from the Olympics more often than not prompts governments to take the necessary remedial action.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Commentary</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The fact that the IOC has not yet followed FIFA’s lead in lifting its ban on Kuwait is an intriguing epilogue to this rather messy affair. The reasons for this are not clear, however it may be because Kuwait has not yet complied with the pre-conditions for re-acceptance (outlined above) to the IOC’s satisfaction. It may also be symptomatic of the deterioration in the relationship between Kuwait and the IOC. A string of previous broken promises and the instigation of a $1 billion lawsuit may have eroded the IOC’s trust in Kuwait delivering meaningful and lasting change this time around.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">What is certain is that the impact on Kuwaiti sport has been marked. Kuwaiti athletes were unable to represent their country at the 2010 Summer Youth Olympics, Rio 2016, and PyeongChang 2018; having to compete instead as neutral athletes under the Olympic flag. Indeed, Kuwait was denied its first ever Olympic gold medal when Kuwaiti shooter Fehaid Al-Deehani claimed the dubious honour at Rio 2016 of becoming the first athlete to win a gold medal as an Independent Olympic Athlete. Similarly, Kuwaiti football teams and clubs have been barred from international competitions (including the World Cup 2018 qualifiers and the AFC Asian Cup 2019) and the national team’s FIFA ranking has plummeted to 160 (having been as high as 24 in 1998). To add insult to injury, all IOC and FIFA financial development assistance has been stopped during the periods of suspension, which has severely affected the finances of Kuwaiti sport. Even more tragic is the impact on Kuwait’s grassroots participants and youth, who have cruelly been denied sporting heroes to aspire to and sporting goals to aim for, as well as their training programmes and facilities being starved of cash from the IOC and FIFA. Many talk of Kuwait’s ‘lost generation’ of talent and feel that lasting damage has been done.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">It is difficult not to draw comparisons with Russia’s 85 day IOC suspension for systemic manipulation of anti-doping rules which the IOC President Thomas Bach described as \"an unprecedented attack on the integrity of the Olympic games and sport\". There is little doubting that a Russian team appeared at PyeongChang 2018 in all but name (and arguably in name, being ‘Olympic Athletes from Russia’, as compared to Kuwait’s ‘Independent Olympic Athletes’), with its 168 athletes (only 64 less than at Sochi 2014) being cheered on by fans wearing Russian kit, waving Russian flags and singing the Russian anthem. Kuwait’s continuing IOC suspension, which in contrast to the Russian suspension does not implicate any individual athletes, does seem to disproportionately punish Kuwaiti athletes for what has been termed a power struggle between Kuwait’s ruling elite.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Now that certain roadblocks to reinstatement have been removed (as outlined above), it seems likely that the IOC ban will be lifted; however it remains to be seen when this will be and what further steps Kuwait will need to take to achieve it.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em><img class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-8022\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/RTHTF.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"5786\" height=\"1837\" />NB: Please note a version of this article was first published on lawinsport.com on 15 June 2018 (https://www.lawinsport.com/topics/articles/item/governmental-interference-in-global-sport-why-kuwait-is-still-in-the-olympic-wilderness).</em></p>\r\n<em>Andrew (a.moroney@tamimi.com) is an Associate in Al Tamimi &amp; Company’s dedicated Sports &amp; Events Management team, working exclusively for clients in the sports and events sector on commercial, dispute resolution and regulatory matters. For further information please contact Steve Bainbridge (s.bainbridge@tamimi.com)</em>'),
(250549, 24438, 'MetaValueOld', '<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The suspension of an athlete or nation from participating in the Olympic Games is commonly considered to be the ultimate sporting sanction. Whilst the suspension of Russia from PyeongChang 2018 (and its reinstatement immediately afterwards) grabbed headlines, Kuwait remains subject to a ban imposed by the International Olympic Committee (\"IOC\") in 2015.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Kuwait’s National Olympic Committee (\"NOC\") is no stranger to Olympic exile, having been suspended by the IOC in 1986. More recently, Kuwait was warned by the IOC in 2007 that its sports legislation permitted governmental interference in the internal functioning of its NOC and other sporting federations, in violation of the Olympic Charter. When Kuwait did not address this issue by the IOC’s deadline of 31 December 2009, its NOC was suspended. This ban was lifted shortly before London 2012.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Further sports legislation was enacted in early 2015, however, that conferred upon the Kuwaiti Sports Ministry the power to assume control of national sporting bodies, as well the ability to control financial matters. Consequently, Kuwait’s NOC was disbanded by the Kuwaiti Sport Ministry, purportedly due to financial irregularities, as were nine other national federations. Interim committees were established to take over their administration, headed by figures widely reported to be loyal to the Kuwaiti Sports Ministry. The IOC took the view that Kuwait had failed to ameliorate the position by the IOC’s deadline of 27 October 2015; and, its NOC was suspended again. This came shortly after FIFA had imposed its own suspension on Kuwait’s football association (\"KFA\"), having failed to meet FIFA’s 15 October 2015 deadline for corrective action. Sixteen further international sports federations subsequently followed suit.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Subsequent Developments</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In response to its censure by the international sporting community, Kuwait went on the offensive. In June 2016, the Kuwait government appealed the IOC suspension in the Swiss Civil Courts and claimed $1 billion compensation for losses flowing from the alleged unjust imposition of a suspension in the absence of an appropriate investigation. The appeal and compensation claim were dismissed in August 2016 and Kuwait was ordered to pay $11,500 towards the IOC’s legal costs. Also in June 2016, the Court of Arbitration for Sport (\"CAS\") rejected an appeal brought by a number of Kuwaiti football clubs (including the Kuwaiti Premier League champions, Kuwait Sporting Club) against the FIFA suspension.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In addition to legal proceedings, Kuwait has made frequent unsuccessful appeals to the IOC (and FIFA) for its suspension to be lifted. Numerous meetings have also taken place between Kuwaiti officials and the IOC, most notably that mediated by the United Nations in January 2016, at which the parties appeared to have to have reached an agreement in principle that Kuwait reportedly reneged upon at a later date.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">On 12 December 2016, Kuwait’s newly-elected parliament voted by a majority of over two thirds to amend the relevant sports legislation to facilitate re-admission to international sport. This vote unfortunately came too late for Kuwait to take part in the AFC Asian Cup Qualification final round, given that the deadline imposed by the Asian Football Conference (\"AFC\") for the KFA to be readmitted to FIFA membership was 18 December 2016.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In early 2017 the IOC are reported to have sent a letter to the Kuwaiti Sports Ministry setting three conditions for Kuwait’s re-acceptance into the Olympic Movement:</p>\r\n\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">all relevant sport legislation must be amended in order to comply with the Olympic Charter;</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">all board member changes imposed upon Kuwait’s NOC and other sporting bodes must be revoked; and</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">all ongoing domestic and international cases against the IOC and other international sporting bodes must be dropped.</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">On 4 December 2017, Kuwait finally bowed to mounting domestic and international pressure by enacting new sports legislation purporting to replace all previous such laws and thus prevent governmental interference with Kuwaiti sporting bodies.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">FIFA lifted its ban on 6 December 2017. However, despite subsequent meetings taking place between Kuwaiti officials and the IOC, the Olympic ban remains in place.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>The wider context of governmental interference</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Sporting bodies are hard-wired to protect their autonomy to govern and regulate their sport, as enshrined in the Olympic Charter. A distinct body of law, lex sportiva, has developed over time to underpin the doctrine that sporting bodies are best placed to understand the unique circumstances of sport and manage them in a way that maximises wider societal benefits. The Olympic Charter promotes collaboration between sporting bodies and government, but prohibits interference. This begs the question as to where the line is between benign and undue governmental influence. Reasonable conditions attached to the receipt of public funds by sporting bodies for grassroots investment is an obvious example of the former, whereas a government retaining unfettered power to disband national sporting federations is an obvious example of the latter. However, there are a myriad of circumstances falling in between.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Kuwait is not alone in finding itself on the wrong side of the IOC due to governmental interference in sport:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In July 2007, Panama was suspended by the IOC for governmental interference in the running of its NOC. The ban was lifted in April 2008 in time for the nation to compete at Beijing 2008. It was threatened with a further suspension in January 2011 when the Panamanian President demanded the resignation of NOC committee members, but this was averted when the issue was resolved to the IOC’s satisfaction.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In January 2011, Ghana’s NOC was suspended by the IOC for failing to amend its sports law to prevent the Ghanaian government from making presidential appointments to its NOC and numerous national sporting federations. The ban was lifted in October 2011 when a new sports law was enacted to prevent political interference, allowing the nation to compete at London 2012.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In June 2011, the IOC warned the Indian Sports Ministry that compelling national sporting federations to adopt mandatory eligibility requirements for officials constituted undue governmental interference. When the Indian government ignored this warning and the Olympic Association separately elected officials accused of corruption, the Indian NOC was suspended by the IOC for non-compliance with the Olympic Charter in December 2012. Somewhat uniquely, the IOC lifted this ban lifted four days into Sochi 2014 when new officials were elected, causing the Indian flag to be belatedly raised in the Olympic Village.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In 2015, Sri Lanka was warned by the IOC that it faced suspension if it did not revise proposed sports legislation that barred high-ranking officials from standing for re-election by the end of that year. This governmental interference was cited as a major reason for Sri Lanka being stripped of its hosting rights of the 2017 Asian Youth Games.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In August 2016, Kenya’s Sports Ministry disbanded its NOC and transferred its duties to Sports Kenya, in response to alleged mismanagement of Team Kenya at Rio 2016 by senior NOC officials. In March 2017, the IOC cut funding and threated suspension of the newly-formed NOC when it refused to accept IOC-requested governance reforms.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Recent reports suggest that Saudi Arabia is coming under increased scrutiny from the IOC and FIFA in connection with a growing trend of appointments for government-backed appointees to the Kingdom’s national sports federations. A suspension from international sport would impact the Kingdom’s successful national and club football teams and may also affect its progressive economic reforms, of which sport - and in particular the privatisation of its top-tier football clubs - is a central component, owing to sport’s increasingly valuable geo-political status in the GCC region.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The IOC is, therefore, not afraid to adopt a robust approach if it considers that the Olympic Charter is being undermined by undue governmental interference. One particular area it has sought to control is the fall-out when relations between national governments and NOCs breakdown. In this regard the IOC has a number of weapons at its disposal, including proactive engagement with the parties, interim funding cuts, the threat of a suspension, and ultimately the imposition of a suspension. The political unpopularity of presiding over a nation suspended from the Olympics more often than not prompts governments to take the necessary remedial action.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Commentary</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The fact that the IOC has not yet followed FIFA’s lead in lifting its ban on Kuwait is an intriguing epilogue to this rather messy affair. The reasons for this are not clear, however it may be because Kuwait has not yet complied with the pre-conditions for re-acceptance (outlined above) to the IOC’s satisfaction. It may also be symptomatic of the deterioration in the relationship between Kuwait and the IOC. A string of previous broken promises and the instigation of a $1 billion lawsuit may have eroded the IOC’s trust in Kuwait delivering meaningful and lasting change this time around.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">What is certain is that the impact on Kuwaiti sport has been marked. Kuwaiti athletes were unable to represent their country at the 2010 Summer Youth Olympics, Rio 2016, and PyeongChang 2018; having to compete instead as neutral athletes under the Olympic flag. Indeed, Kuwait was denied its first ever Olympic gold medal when Kuwaiti shooter Fehaid Al-Deehani claimed the dubious honour at Rio 2016 of becoming the first athlete to win a gold medal as an Independent Olympic Athlete. Similarly, Kuwaiti football teams and clubs have been barred from international competitions (including the World Cup 2018 qualifiers and the AFC Asian Cup 2019) and the national team’s FIFA ranking has plummeted to 160 (having been as high as 24 in 1998). To add insult to injury, all IOC and FIFA financial development assistance has been stopped during the periods of suspension, which has severely affected the finances of Kuwaiti sport. Even more tragic is the impact on Kuwait’s grassroots participants and youth, who have cruelly been denied sporting heroes to aspire to and sporting goals to aim for, as well as their training programmes and facilities being starved of cash from the IOC and FIFA. Many talk of Kuwait’s ‘lost generation’ of talent and feel that lasting damage has been done.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">It is difficult not to draw comparisons with Russia’s 85 day IOC suspension for systemic manipulation of anti-doping rules which the IOC President Thomas Bach described as \"an unprecedented attack on the integrity of the Olympic games and sport\". There is little doubting that a Russian team appeared at PyeongChang 2018 in all but name (and arguably in name, being ‘Olympic Athletes from Russia’, as compared to Kuwait’s ‘Independent Olympic Athletes’), with its 168 athletes (only 64 less than at Sochi 2014) being cheered on by fans wearing Russian kit, waving Russian flags and singing the Russian anthem. Kuwait’s continuing IOC suspension, which in contrast to the Russian suspension does not implicate any individual athletes, does seem to disproportionately punish Kuwaiti athletes for what has been termed a power struggle between Kuwait’s ruling elite.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Now that certain roadblocks to reinstatement have been removed (as outlined above), it seems likely that the IOC ban will be lifted; however it remains to be seen when this will be and what further steps Kuwait will need to take to achieve it.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em>NB: Please note a version of this article was first published on lawinsport.com on 15 June 2018 (https://www.lawinsport.com/topics/articles/item/governmental-interference-in-global-sport-why-kuwait-is-still-in-the-olympic-wilderness).</em></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<em>Andrew (a.moroney@tamimi.com) is an Associate in Al Tamimi &amp; Company’s dedicated Sports &amp; Events Management team, working exclusively for clients in the sports and events sector on commercial, dispute resolution and regulatory matters. For further information please contact Steve Bainbridge (s.bainbridge@tamimi.com)</em>'),
(250550, 24438, 'MetaLink', 'content'),
(250551, 24438, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7949&amp;action=edit');
INSERT INTO `tm_wsal_metadata` (`id`, `occurrence_id`, `name`, `value`) VALUES
(250552, 24438, 'ReportText', '<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The suspension of an athlete or nation from participating in the Olympic Games is commonly considered to be the ultimate sporting sanction. Whilst the suspension of Russia from PyeongChang 2018 (and its reinstatement immediately afterwards) grabbed headlines, Kuwait remains subject to a ban imposed by the International Olympic Committee (\"IOC\") in 2015.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Kuwait’s National Olympic Committee (\"NOC\") is no stranger to Olympic exile, having been suspended by the IOC in 1986. More recently, Kuwait was warned by the IOC in 2007 that its sports legislation permitted governmental interference in the internal functioning of its NOC and other sporting federations, in violation of the Olympic Charter. When Kuwait did not address this issue by the IOC’s deadline of 31 December 2009, its NOC was suspended. This ban was lifted shortly before London 2012.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Further sports legislation was enacted in early 2015, however, that conferred upon the Kuwaiti Sports Ministry the power to assume control of national sporting bodies, as well the ability to control financial matters. Consequently, Kuwait’s NOC was disbanded by the Kuwaiti Sport Ministry, purportedly due to financial irregularities, as were nine other national federations. Interim committees were established to take over their administration, headed by figures widely reported to be loyal to the Kuwaiti Sports Ministry. The IOC took the view that Kuwait had failed to ameliorate the position by the IOC’s deadline of 27 October 2015; and, its NOC was suspended again. This came shortly after FIFA had imposed its own suspension on Kuwait’s football association (\"KFA\"), having failed to meet FIFA’s 15 October 2015 deadline for corrective action. Sixteen further international sports federations subsequently followed suit.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Subsequent Developments</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In response to its censure by the international sporting community, Kuwait went on the offensive. In June 2016, the Kuwait government appealed the IOC suspension in the Swiss Civil Courts and claimed $1 billion compensation for losses flowing from the alleged unjust imposition of a suspension in the absence of an appropriate investigation. The appeal and compensation claim were dismissed in August 2016 and Kuwait was ordered to pay $11,500 towards the IOC’s legal costs. Also in June 2016, the Court of Arbitration for Sport (\"CAS\") rejected an appeal brought by a number of Kuwaiti football clubs (including the Kuwaiti Premier League champions, Kuwait Sporting Club) against the FIFA suspension.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In addition to legal proceedings, Kuwait has made frequent unsuccessful appeals to the IOC (and FIFA) for its suspension to be lifted. Numerous meetings have also taken place between Kuwaiti officials and the IOC, most notably that mediated by the United Nations in January 2016, at which the parties appeared to have to have reached an agreement in principle that Kuwait reportedly reneged upon at a later date.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">On 12 December 2016, Kuwait’s newly-elected parliament voted by a majority of over two thirds to amend the relevant sports legislation to facilitate re-admission to international sport. This vote unfortunately came too late for Kuwait to take part in the AFC Asian Cup Qualification final round, given that the deadline imposed by the Asian Football Conference (\"AFC\") for the KFA to be readmitted to FIFA membership was 18 December 2016.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In early 2017 the IOC are reported to have sent a letter to the Kuwaiti Sports Ministry setting three conditions for Kuwait’s re-acceptance into the Olympic Movement:</p>\r\n\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">all relevant sport legislation must be amended in order to comply with the Olympic Charter;</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">all board member changes imposed upon Kuwait’s NOC and other sporting bodes must be revoked; and</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">all ongoing domestic and international cases against the IOC and other international sporting bodes must be dropped.</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">On 4 December 2017, Kuwait finally bowed to mounting domestic and international pressure by enacting new sports legislation purporting to replace all previous such laws and thus prevent governmental interference with Kuwaiti sporting bodies.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">FIFA lifted its ban on 6 December 2017. However, despite subsequent meetings taking place between Kuwaiti officials and the IOC, the Olympic ban remains in place.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>The wider context of governmental interference</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Sporting bodies are hard-wired to protect their autonomy to govern and regulate their sport, as enshrined in the Olympic Charter. A distinct body of law, lex sportiva, has developed over time to underpin the doctrine that sporting bodies are best placed to understand the unique circumstances of sport and manage them in a way that maximises wider societal benefits. The Olympic Charter promotes collaboration between sporting bodies and government, but prohibits interference. This begs the question as to where the line is between benign and undue governmental influence. Reasonable conditions attached to the receipt of public funds by sporting bodies for grassroots investment is an obvious example of the former, whereas a government retaining unfettered power to disband national sporting federations is an obvious example of the latter. However, there are a myriad of circumstances falling in between.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Kuwait is not alone in finding itself on the wrong side of the IOC due to governmental interference in sport:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In July 2007, Panama was suspended by the IOC for governmental interference in the running of its NOC. The ban was lifted in April 2008 in time for the nation to compete at Beijing 2008. It was threatened with a further suspension in January 2011 when the Panamanian President demanded the resignation of NOC committee members, but this was averted when the issue was resolved to the IOC’s satisfaction.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In January 2011, Ghana’s NOC was suspended by the IOC for failing to amend its sports law to prevent the Ghanaian government from making presidential appointments to its NOC and numerous national sporting federations. The ban was lifted in October 2011 when a new sports law was enacted to prevent political interference, allowing the nation to compete at London 2012.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In June 2011, the IOC warned the Indian Sports Ministry that compelling national sporting federations to adopt mandatory eligibility requirements for officials constituted undue governmental interference. When the Indian government ignored this warning and the Olympic Association separately elected officials accused of corruption, the Indian NOC was suspended by the IOC for non-compliance with the Olympic Charter in December 2012. Somewhat uniquely, the IOC lifted this ban lifted four days into Sochi 2014 when new officials were elected, causing the Indian flag to be belatedly raised in the Olympic Village.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In 2015, Sri Lanka was warned by the IOC that it faced suspension if it did not revise proposed sports legislation that barred high-ranking officials from standing for re-election by the end of that year. This governmental interference was cited as a major reason for Sri Lanka being stripped of its hosting rights of the 2017 Asian Youth Games.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In August 2016, Kenya’s Sports Ministry disbanded its NOC and transferred its duties to Sports Kenya, in response to alleged mismanagement of Team Kenya at Rio 2016 by senior NOC officials. In March 2017, the IOC cut funding and threated suspension of the newly-formed NOC when it refused to accept IOC-requested governance reforms.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Recent reports suggest that Saudi Arabia is coming under increased scrutiny from the IOC and FIFA in connection with a growing trend of appointments for government-backed appointees to the Kingdom’s national sports federations. A suspension from international sport would impact the Kingdom’s successful national and club football teams and may also affect its progressive economic reforms, of which sport - and in particular the privatisation of its top-tier football clubs - is a central component, owing to sport’s increasingly valuable geo-political status in the GCC region.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The IOC is, therefore, not afraid to adopt a robust approach if it considers that the Olympic Charter is being undermined by undue governmental interference. One particular area it has sought to control is the fall-out when relations between national governments and NOCs breakdown. In this regard the IOC has a number of weapons at its disposal, including proactive engagement with the parties, interim funding cuts, the threat of a suspension, and ultimately the imposition of a suspension. The political unpopularity of presiding over a nation suspended from the Olympics more often than not prompts governments to take the necessary remedial action.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Commentary</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The fact that the IOC has not yet followed FIFA’s lead in lifting its ban on Kuwait is an intriguing epilogue to this rather messy affair. The reasons for this are not clear, however it may be because Kuwait has not yet complied with the pre-conditions for re-acceptance (outlined above) to the IOC’s satisfaction. It may also be symptomatic of the deterioration in the relationship between Kuwait and the IOC. A string of previous broken promises and the instigation of a $1 billion lawsuit may have eroded the IOC’s trust in Kuwait delivering meaningful and lasting change this time around.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">What is certain is that the impact on Kuwaiti sport has been marked. Kuwaiti athletes were unable to represent their country at the 2010 Summer Youth Olympics, Rio 2016, and PyeongChang 2018; having to compete instead as neutral athletes under the Olympic flag. Indeed, Kuwait was denied its first ever Olympic gold medal when Kuwaiti shooter Fehaid Al-Deehani claimed the dubious honour at Rio 2016 of becoming the first athlete to win a gold medal as an Independent Olympic Athlete. Similarly, Kuwaiti football teams and clubs have been barred from international competitions (including the World Cup 2018 qualifiers and the AFC Asian Cup 2019) and the national team’s FIFA ranking has plummeted to 160 (having been as high as 24 in 1998). To add insult to injury, all IOC and FIFA financial development assistance has been stopped during the periods of suspension, which has severely affected the finances of Kuwaiti sport. Even more tragic is the impact on Kuwait’s grassroots participants and youth, who have cruelly been denied sporting heroes to aspire to and sporting goals to aim for, as well as their training programmes and facilities being starved of cash from the IOC and FIFA. Many talk of Kuwait’s ‘lost generation’ of talent and feel that lasting damage has been done.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">It is difficult not to draw comparisons with Russia’s 85 day IOC suspension for systemic manipulation of anti-doping rules which the IOC President Thomas Bach described as \"an unprecedented attack on the integrity of the Olympic games and sport\". There is little doubting that a Russian team appeared at PyeongChang 2018 in all but name (and arguably in name, being ‘Olympic Athletes from Russia’, as compared to Kuwait’s ‘Independent Olympic Athletes’), with its 168 athletes (only 64 less than at Sochi 2014) being cheered on by fans wearing Russian kit, waving Russian flags and singing the Russian anthem. Kuwait’s continuing IOC suspension, which in contrast to the Russian suspension does not implicate any individual athletes, does seem to disproportionately punish Kuwaiti athletes for what has been termed a power struggle between Kuwait’s ruling elite.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Now that certain roadblocks to reinstatement have been removed (as outlined above), it seems likely that the IOC ban will be lifted; however it remains to be seen when this will be and what further steps Kuwait will need to take to achieve it.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em>NB: Please note a version of this article was first published on lawinsport.com on 15 June 2018 (https://www.lawinsport.com/topics/articles/item/governmental-interference-in-global-sport-why-kuwait-is-still-in-the-olympic-wilderness).</em></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<em>Andrew (a.moroney@tamimi.com) is an Associate in Al Tamimi &amp; Company’s dedicated Sports &amp; Events Management team, working exclusively for clients in the sports and events sector on commercial, dispute resolution and regulatory matters. For further information please contact Steve Bainbridge (s.bainbridge@tamimi.com)</em>|<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><img class=\"alignright size-large wp-image-8023\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_775162108-389x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"389\" height=\"1024\" />The suspension of an athlete or nation from participating in the Olympic Games is commonly considered to be the ultimate sporting sanction. Whilst the suspension of Russia from PyeongChang 2018 (and its reinstatement immediately afterwards) grabbed headlines, Kuwait remains subject to a ban imposed by the International Olympic Committee (\"IOC\") in 2015.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Kuwait’s National Olympic Committee (\"NOC\") is no stranger to Olympic exile, having been suspended by the IOC in 1986. More recently, Kuwait was warned by the IOC in 2007 that its sports legislation permitted governmental interference in the internal functioning of its NOC and other sporting federations, in violation of the Olympic Charter. When Kuwait did not address this issue by the IOC’s deadline of 31 December 2009, its NOC was suspended. This ban was lifted shortly before London 2012.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Further sports legislation was enacted in early 2015, however, that conferred upon the Kuwaiti Sports Ministry the power to assume control of national sporting bodies, as well the ability to control financial matters. Consequently, Kuwait’s NOC was disbanded by the Kuwaiti Sport Ministry, purportedly due to financial irregularities, as were nine other national federations. Interim committees were established to take over their administration, headed by figures widely reported to be loyal to the Kuwaiti Sports Ministry. The IOC took the view that Kuwait had failed to ameliorate the position by the IOC’s deadline of 27 October 2015; and, its NOC was suspended again. This came shortly after FIFA had imposed its own suspension on Kuwait’s football association (\"KFA\"), having failed to meet FIFA’s 15 October 2015 deadline for corrective action. Sixteen further international sports federations subsequently followed suit.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Subsequent Developments</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In response to its censure by the international sporting community, Kuwait went on the offensive. In June 2016, the Kuwait government appealed the IOC suspension in the Swiss Civil Courts and claimed $1 billion compensation for losses flowing from the alleged unjust imposition of a suspension in the absence of an appropriate investigation. The appeal and compensation claim were dismissed in August 2016 and Kuwait was ordered to pay $11,500 towards the IOC’s legal costs. Also in June 2016, the Court of Arbitration for Sport (\"CAS\") rejected an appeal brought by a number of Kuwaiti football clubs (including the Kuwaiti Premier League champions, Kuwait Sporting Club) against the FIFA suspension.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In addition to legal proceedings, Kuwait has made frequent unsuccessful appeals to the IOC (and FIFA) for its suspension to be lifted. Numerous meetings have also taken place between Kuwaiti officials and the IOC, most notably that mediated by the United Nations in January 2016, at which the parties appeared to have to have reached an agreement in principle that Kuwait reportedly reneged upon at a later date.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">On 12 December 2016, Kuwait’s newly-elected parliament voted by a majority of over two thirds to amend the relevant sports legislation to facilitate re-admission to international sport. This vote unfortunately came too late for Kuwait to take part in the AFC Asian Cup Qualification final round, given that the deadline imposed by the Asian Football Conference (\"AFC\") for the KFA to be readmitted to FIFA membership was 18 December 2016.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In early 2017 the IOC are reported to have sent a letter to the Kuwaiti Sports Ministry setting three conditions for Kuwait’s re-acceptance into the Olympic Movement:</p>\r\n\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">all relevant sport legislation must be amended in order to comply with the Olympic Charter;</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">all board member changes imposed upon Kuwait’s NOC and other sporting bodes must be revoked; and</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">all ongoing domestic and international cases against the IOC and other international sporting bodes must be dropped.</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">On 4 December 2017, Kuwait finally bowed to mounting domestic and international pressure by enacting new sports legislation purporting to replace all previous such laws and thus prevent governmental interference with Kuwaiti sporting bodies.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">FIFA lifted its ban on 6 December 2017. However, despite subsequent meetings taking place between Kuwaiti officials and the IOC, the Olympic ban remains in place.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>The wider context of governmental interference</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Sporting bodies are hard-wired to protect their autonomy to govern and regulate their sport, as enshrined in the Olympic Charter. A distinct body of law, lex sportiva, has developed over time to underpin the doctrine that sporting bodies are best placed to understand the unique circumstances of sport and manage them in a way that maximises wider societal benefits. The Olympic Charter promotes collaboration between sporting bodies and government, but prohibits interference. This begs the question as to where the line is between benign and undue governmental influence. Reasonable conditions attached to the receipt of public funds by sporting bodies for grassroots investment is an obvious example of the former, whereas a government retaining unfettered power to disband national sporting federations is an obvious example of the latter. However, there are a myriad of circumstances falling in between.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Kuwait is not alone in finding itself on the wrong side of the IOC due to governmental interference in sport:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In July 2007, Panama was suspended by the IOC for governmental interference in the running of its NOC. The ban was lifted in April 2008 in time for the nation to compete at Beijing 2008. It was threatened with a further suspension in January 2011 when the Panamanian President demanded the resignation of NOC committee members, but this was averted when the issue was resolved to the IOC’s satisfaction.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In January 2011, Ghana’s NOC was suspended by the IOC for failing to amend its sports law to prevent the Ghanaian government from making presidential appointments to its NOC and numerous national sporting federations. The ban was lifted in October 2011 when a new sports law was enacted to prevent political interference, allowing the nation to compete at London 2012.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In June 2011, the IOC warned the Indian Sports Ministry that compelling national sporting federations to adopt mandatory eligibility requirements for officials constituted undue governmental interference. When the Indian government ignored this warning and the Olympic Association separately elected officials accused of corruption, the Indian NOC was suspended by the IOC for non-compliance with the Olympic Charter in December 2012. Somewhat uniquely, the IOC lifted this ban lifted four days into Sochi 2014 when new officials were elected, causing the Indian flag to be belatedly raised in the Olympic Village.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In 2015, Sri Lanka was warned by the IOC that it faced suspension if it did not revise proposed sports legislation that barred high-ranking officials from standing for re-election by the end of that year. This governmental interference was cited as a major reason for Sri Lanka being stripped of its hosting rights of the 2017 Asian Youth Games.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In August 2016, Kenya’s Sports Ministry disbanded its NOC and transferred its duties to Sports Kenya, in response to alleged mismanagement of Team Kenya at Rio 2016 by senior NOC officials. In March 2017, the IOC cut funding and threated suspension of the newly-formed NOC when it refused to accept IOC-requested governance reforms.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Recent reports suggest that Saudi Arabia is coming under increased scrutiny from the IOC and FIFA in connection with a growing trend of appointments for government-backed appointees to the Kingdom’s national sports federations. A suspension from international sport would impact the Kingdom’s successful national and club football teams and may also affect its progressive economic reforms, of which sport - and in particular the privatisation of its top-tier football clubs - is a central component, owing to sport’s increasingly valuable geo-political status in the GCC region.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The IOC is, therefore, not afraid to adopt a robust approach if it considers that the Olympic Charter is being undermined by undue governmental interference. One particular area it has sought to control is the fall-out when relations between national governments and NOCs breakdown. In this regard the IOC has a number of weapons at its disposal, including proactive engagement with the parties, interim funding cuts, the threat of a suspension, and ultimately the imposition of a suspension. The political unpopularity of presiding over a nation suspended from the Olympics more often than not prompts governments to take the necessary remedial action.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Commentary</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The fact that the IOC has not yet followed FIFA’s lead in lifting its ban on Kuwait is an intriguing epilogue to this rather messy affair. The reasons for this are not clear, however it may be because Kuwait has not yet complied with the pre-conditions for re-acceptance (outlined above) to the IOC’s satisfaction. It may also be symptomatic of the deterioration in the relationship between Kuwait and the IOC. A string of previous broken promises and the instigation of a $1 billion lawsuit may have eroded the IOC’s trust in Kuwait delivering meaningful and lasting change this time around.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">What is certain is that the impact on Kuwaiti sport has been marked. Kuwaiti athletes were unable to represent their country at the 2010 Summer Youth Olympics, Rio 2016, and PyeongChang 2018; having to compete instead as neutral athletes under the Olympic flag. Indeed, Kuwait was denied its first ever Olympic gold medal when Kuwaiti shooter Fehaid Al-Deehani claimed the dubious honour at Rio 2016 of becoming the first athlete to win a gold medal as an Independent Olympic Athlete. Similarly, Kuwaiti football teams and clubs have been barred from international competitions (including the World Cup 2018 qualifiers and the AFC Asian Cup 2019) and the national team’s FIFA ranking has plummeted to 160 (having been as high as 24 in 1998). To add insult to injury, all IOC and FIFA financial development assistance has been stopped during the periods of suspension, which has severely affected the finances of Kuwaiti sport. Even more tragic is the impact on Kuwait’s grassroots participants and youth, who have cruelly been denied sporting heroes to aspire to and sporting goals to aim for, as well as their training programmes and facilities being starved of cash from the IOC and FIFA. Many talk of Kuwait’s ‘lost generation’ of talent and feel that lasting damage has been done.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">It is difficult not to draw comparisons with Russia’s 85 day IOC suspension for systemic manipulation of anti-doping rules which the IOC President Thomas Bach described as \"an unprecedented attack on the integrity of the Olympic games and sport\". There is little doubting that a Russian team appeared at PyeongChang 2018 in all but name (and arguably in name, being ‘Olympic Athletes from Russia’, as compared to Kuwait’s ‘Independent Olympic Athletes’), with its 168 athletes (only 64 less than at Sochi 2014) being cheered on by fans wearing Russian kit, waving Russian flags and singing the Russian anthem. Kuwait’s continuing IOC suspension, which in contrast to the Russian suspension does not implicate any individual athletes, does seem to disproportionately punish Kuwaiti athletes for what has been termed a power struggle between Kuwait’s ruling elite.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Now that certain roadblocks to reinstatement have been removed (as outlined above), it seems likely that the IOC ban will be lifted; however it remains to be seen when this will be and what further steps Kuwait will need to take to achieve it.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em><img class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-8022\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/RTHTF.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"5786\" height=\"1837\" />NB: Please note a version of this article was first published on lawinsport.com on 15 June 2018 (https://www.lawinsport.com/topics/articles/item/governmental-interference-in-global-sport-why-kuwait-is-still-in-the-olympic-wilderness).</em></p>\r\n<em>Andrew (a.moroney@tamimi.com) is an Associate in Al Tamimi &amp; Company’s dedicated Sports &amp; Events Management team, working exclusively for clients in the sports and events sector on commercial, dispute resolution and regulatory matters. For further information please contact Steve Bainbridge (s.bainbridge@tamimi.com)</em>'),
(250553, 24438, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250554, 24438, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250555, 24438, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250556, 24438, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250557, 24439, 'PostID', '7949'),
(250558, 24439, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(250559, 24439, 'PostTitle', 'Kuwait: still in the Olympic wilderness'),
(250560, 24439, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(250561, 24439, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 17:58:04'),
(250562, 24439, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7949'),
(250563, 24439, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7949&amp;action=edit'),
(250564, 24439, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250565, 24439, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250566, 24439, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250567, 24439, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250568, 24440, 'PostID', '7949'),
(250569, 24440, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(250570, 24440, 'PostTitle', 'Kuwait: still in the Olympic wilderness'),
(250571, 24440, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(250572, 24440, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 17:58:09'),
(250573, 24440, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7949'),
(250574, 24440, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7949&amp;action=edit'),
(250575, 24440, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250576, 24440, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250577, 24440, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250578, 24440, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250579, 24441, 'AttachmentID', '8024'),
(250580, 24441, 'FileName', 'shutterstock_657601672.jpg'),
(250581, 24441, 'FilePath', '/home/tamimnew/public_html/wp-content/uploads/2018/07'),
(250582, 24441, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250583, 24441, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250584, 24441, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250585, 24441, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250586, 24442, 'AttachmentID', '8025'),
(250587, 24442, 'FileName', 'shutterstock_1051299398.jpg'),
(250588, 24442, 'FilePath', '/home/tamimnew/public_html/wp-content/uploads/2018/07'),
(250589, 24442, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250590, 24442, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250591, 24442, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250592, 24442, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250593, 24443, 'AttachmentID', '8026'),
(250594, 24443, 'FileName', 'shutterstock_1115518292.jpg'),
(250595, 24443, 'FilePath', '/home/tamimnew/public_html/wp-content/uploads/2018/07'),
(250596, 24443, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250597, 24443, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250598, 24443, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250599, 24443, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250600, 24444, 'AttachmentID', '8027'),
(250601, 24444, 'FileName', 'shutterstock_1016569270.jpg'),
(250602, 24444, 'FilePath', '/home/tamimnew/public_html/wp-content/uploads/2018/07'),
(250603, 24444, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250604, 24444, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250605, 24444, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250606, 24444, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250607, 24445, 'PostID', '7950'),
(250608, 24445, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(250609, 24445, 'PostTitle', 'Qatar 2022 World Cup: Laws, Changes and Legacy Benefits'),
(250610, 24445, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(250611, 24445, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 18:02:29'),
(250612, 24445, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7950'),
(250613, 24445, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7950&amp;action=edit'),
(250614, 24445, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250615, 24445, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250616, 24445, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250617, 24445, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250618, 24446, 'PostID', '7950'),
(250619, 24446, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(250620, 24446, 'PostTitle', 'Qatar 2022 World Cup: Laws, Changes and Legacy Benefits'),
(250621, 24446, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(250622, 24446, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 16:00:30'),
(250623, 24446, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7950'),
(250624, 24446, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7950&amp;action=edit'),
(250625, 24446, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250626, 24446, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250627, 24446, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250628, 24446, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250629, 24447, 'PostID', '7950'),
(250630, 24447, 'PostTitle', 'Qatar 2022 World Cup: Laws, Changes and Legacy Benefits'),
(250631, 24447, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(250632, 24447, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(250633, 24447, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 18:02:38'),
(250634, 24447, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7950'),
(250635, 24447, 'MetaID', '223720'),
(250636, 24447, 'MetaKey', 'content'),
(250637, 24447, 'MetaValueNew', '<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><img class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-8024\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_657601672.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"7000\" height=\"3000\" />The 2022 FIFA World Cup™ is shaping up to be a momentous event. It will be the first to be held in the Middle East and the first to be hosted by an Arab country. It is well-known that the FIFA obligations imposed on a host country in relation to the tournament involve substantial changes to its laws in order to accommodate FIFA’s commercial, licensing and tax requirements, among other issues.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">This is not to say FIFA can simply impose its will and insist on complete changes to Qatar’s legal system. Qatar is a relatively conservative Arab country with traditional and established legal concepts and customs. While by necessity, and by virtue of similar situations at previous World Cups, changes will need to be made to certain local laws to meet FIFA requirements, such changes will need to be through agreements between the host country and FIFA.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Getting this balance right will result in mutual benefits for Qatar and FIFA to create a successful tournament as well developing an ongoing legacy for the host country in conjunction with the Qatar National Vision 2030. Some of these changes in law are still to be agreed while others may have already set in motion positive developments, as further shown below.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Legal challenges</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">FIFA has strict requirements in respect of all aspects relating to a World Cup, from stadium construction, accommodation and transport to publicity and marketing matters related to the event. Changes to local laws are generally needed in order to allow for, among other things, FIFA to obtain all required Qatar government guarantees in respect of the World Cup, FIFA-designated goods and merchandise to be imported into Qatar free of customs duties, FIFA’s intellectual property (‘IP’) and authorised sponsors and licensees to be protected against unlawful third party actions such as sale of counterfeit goods and ambush marketing (see more below). FIFA also requires that it is exempted from taxation or otherwise favourably treated in respect of World Cup-related income.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">While there will be changes made to comply with such FIFA requirements it will generally still be necessary for persons doing business in Qatar to comply with existing Qatar laws, for example in respect of IP protection, events, customs and consumer protection, to the extent there is no conflict between the two.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Specific changes to laws and/or the enactment of enabling laws in respect of government guarantees, customs requirements and taxation have not yet been implemented. It is expected these will be agreed between Qatar and FIFA within an appropriate time period prior to the 2022 tournament, although the basis and extent of these new laws is not yet clear. It seems, however, that in respect of licensing and merchandising matters, such as in respect of ambush marketing and fake/counterfeit merchandise, the legal approach and position will be similar to that taken at previous World Cups, .</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Sponsorship and Merchandising</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Ambush marketing is essentially the unauthorised association by an entity of its products and/or services in respect of an event where it has no sponsorship or licensing rights. The entity is often a competitor of a duly authorised event sponsor/licensee. The aim, via clever marketing and the pushing of legal boundaries, is to create the perception (and obtain the related commercial value) of the ambushing entity being associated with the event in question, to the detriment and loss of the authorised event sponsor or licensee who has paid a substantial amount for such privilege.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Fake/counterfeit merchandising involves the sale to the public of event-themed and event-linked goods where the sellers are not authorised to do so and/or where the actual goods being sold have been not produced under authorised licence.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">As with previous World Cup tournaments, the intention of the Qatar authorities and FIFA is not to take a heavy-handed approach but at the same time ensure that action is taken quickly and decisively against any infringing persons. Special investigative units and courts specifically to deal with cases of ambush marketing and counterfeit merchandise will be created. This will involve enabling legislation being introduced to allow authorised officials to monitor and stop infringements by conducting local investigations and court hearings and issuing immediate fines to perpetrators. The plan is not to provide for any jail sentences but in all cases the infringing goods would be confiscated.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">These additional legal provisions will be supplementary to existing Qatari copyright and trademark laws which protect IP and related licensing rights in accordance with international standards. FIFA has also published an exhaustive and extremely strict code of what it considers to be unacceptable marketing practices surrounding its World Cup tournament.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Customs and Consumer Protection</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Irrespective of specific agreements reached with FIFA, any goods coming into Qatar in connection with the World Cup will need to comply with the existing Customs Law, whereby the General Authority of Customs have the right not to permit any goods to clear customs and enter Qatar unless such goods have been approved by the relevant authority.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Incoming goods will also need to comply with the existing Consumer Protection Law. This gives consumers in Qatar the right, amongst others, to return defective products, to the repair or replacement of any defective products and the right to receive accurate information about the products. The Consumer Protection Law prohibits the sale or marketing of defective or expired goods, with goods considered defective if they do not comply with specific standards, are unfit for purpose or have expired.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Electronic Commerce Law also addresses certain consumer rights by stating that its provisions are applicable to the provisions of the Consumer Protection Law. This ensures that both physical and online sales and marketing transactions are covered in relation to counterfeit goods.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Tourism and Events Management</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The provisions of the Tourism Licensing Law, which govern business activities in the tourism sector within Qatar, are applicable to the hotel and other industries within the tourism sector. They will impact related World Cup activities and ventures. The law regulates ‘tourism establishments’, defined as places operating mainly to accommodate tourists, such as entertainment establishments and specialised clubs, and other places allocated to provide services for tourists, such as tourism offices, offices offering tourist transport, tourist guide offices and time-sharing places, and any other establishment deemed to be a tourist establishment in accordance with a decision of the Minister of Economy and Commerce or the proposal of the President of the Qatar Tourism Authority. It also covers ‘tourism activities’: any activity of the transport of tourists including the transport of tourists on trips onshore or offshore, the activities of tour guides, time-sharing and any other activity deemed to be a tourist activity in accordance with a decision of the Minister of Economy and Commerce or the proposal of the President of the Qatar Tourism Authority.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Under the Tourism Licensing Law, a licence is required to establish or manage a hotel or tourist establishment or to practise any tourist activity. Applications for such a licence is made to the Qatar Tourism Authority and all hotel and/or tour operators wishing to conduct such activities in relation to the 2022 World Cup will need to be aware of such requirement.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Gambling</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">As with all major sporting events, the World Cup will generate substantial gambling activities. Gambling is prohibited in Qatar in all forms, whether land-based or online, as well as the advertising of gambling activities. Accordingly it is unlikely that any gambling will be tolerated and any offenders would face prosecution. The risk of enforcement against an online gambling operator outside of Qatar is lower but the offending website could be blocked by the authorities pursuant to provisions under the Cybercrime Law, which also provide for the confiscation of all devices, software or equipment used in the commission of the offence and the confiscation of any funds obtained from such offence.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Worker’s Rights and Laws</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Due to the extensive construction and infrastructure projects associated with the 2022 World Cup in terms of stadiums, accommodation and transport, a lot of attention has been focused on the rights and welfare of the many workers who will be engaged on these projects. Certain rights and protections are granted to workers in Qatar under the Labour Law and these have been further supplemented pursuant to the adoption in 2013 of specific workers’ charters by the Supreme Committee for Delivery and Legacy (the ‘SC 2022’) and Qatar Foundation for Science, Education and Community Development (the ‘Qatar Foundation’).</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Labour Law provides workers with certain rights and protections in respect of the provision of necessary equipment, the nature of work to be performed, remuneration, working hours and holidays, annual and sick leave, other forms of leave, occupational health and safety, compensation for accidents and death, end-of-service gratuity and repatriation obligation upon termination. Non-Qatari workers are not permitted to form worker committees, unions or similar collective organisations.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SC 2022’s Workers’ Welfare Standards charter, which covers all workers engaged in the World Cup stadium construction and infrastructure projects overseen by the SC 2022, says additional protections are provided to such workers requiring all its contractors and subcontractors for stadium-related projects to comply with such charter. These protections include, without limitation, ethical recruitment and fair treatment, employment offer minimum requirements, responsibility for relocation costs to Qatar, no retention of worker passports or other personal documents, dignified and ethical employment conditions, the provision of medical insurance, accommodation and food standards, reporting requirements for employers, the creation of workers’ welfare forums, transportation and site requirements and access to information in an appropriate language.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Qatar Foundation Mandatory Standards of Migrant Workers’ Welfare document provides similar additional rights and protections for workers involved in all Qatar Foundation projects, which includes one of the World Cup 2022 stadiums and related facilities. The Qatar Foundation charter sets out certain minimum standards with regards to the recruitment, living and working conditions of workers engaged in construction and other projects at the Qatar Foundation. These standards are applicable to, and compliance is required from, all contractors and subcontractors of Qatar Foundation. The required standards include, without limitation, preparation of a welfare adherence plan and related audit, workers being informed as to all entitlements, a safe and healthy work environment, a clean, safe and healthy living environment, equal and humane treatment, equal pay for equal work, regulated working hours, medical insurance and skills training.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Accessibility Requirements</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Accessibility to stadiums for disabled persons and/or persons in wheelchairs is a mandatory requirement of FIFA for all stadiums constructed for a World Cup tournament. In this respect, the SC 2022 is ensuring that all World Cup 2022 venues will be accessible to persons with disabilities so as to make the event inclusive for all. Pursuant to this requirement, accessibility is incorporated into all areas of stadium and venue design such as seating, entry and exit points, parking and toilet facilities. The SC 2022 has advised that the amount of seating for disabled persons (including for disabled media representatives) will be based on the size of each stadium and will include places for people with autism as well.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">From a local perspective there is no substantial legal provision in respect of accessibility requirements for persons with disabilities. In terms of the Qatari Law in respect of People with Special Needs, there is a general requirement to provide people with special needs with, inter alia, the means for assisted transport and equipment, accommodation for safe and secure movement as well as special facilities in public places. The Ministry of Municipality and Environment covers some of these aspects in terms of its requirements for building works, along with various other ministries and local authorities in relation to building matters, but these requirements do not extend as far as those of FIFA in terms of accessibility. However, the overall scope of the World Cup 2022 requirements would seem to imply accessibility requirements for disabled persons will inevitably need to be extended to other World Cup-related areas such as hotels and accommodation, airport and transport facilities and fan zones in order to be compatible with those at the stadium venues.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Summary</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">FIFA has strict benchmarks to meet when it comes to the stadiums, facilities, logistics and publicity for World Cup events while Qatar has strict legislation that cannot be easily or quickly changed. The attaining of a mutually beneficial solution will take time but can be achieved after undertaking detailed research and analysis to understand the laws that may need to be enacted or changed to host the tournament.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">There are plenty of precedents for this. South Africa for instance enacted a law to enable speedy trials in special courts in respect of crimes by fans, Brazil enacted legislation to accommodate FIFA requirements and Russia, the 2018 hosts, have also made changes to their laws in connection with the World Cup.</p>\r\n<img class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-8026\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_1115518292.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"5043\" height=\"2073\" />\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The process of analysis is well under way in Qatar and changes to laws and standards in connection with World Cup 2022 have been and continue to be considered. The prospects seem to be in place for finding a solution that satisfies external and internal stakeholders, ensures a successful tournament for FIFA and the host nation as well leaving a meaningful legacy of progressive standards and legal considerations.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em>NB: A version of this article was first published during the week of 18 June 2018 on Lawinsport.com.</em></p>\r\n<em>Al Tamimi &amp; Company’s TMT team regularly advises on the full spectrum of technology, media and telecommunications matters and Roberto routinely provides key support to our Sports Law and Events Management practice. For further information please contact Steve Bainbridge (s.bainbridge@tamimi.com) or Roberto Lusardi (r.lusardi@tamimi.com).</em>');
INSERT INTO `tm_wsal_metadata` (`id`, `occurrence_id`, `name`, `value`) VALUES
(250638, 24447, 'MetaValueOld', '<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The 2022 FIFA World Cup™ is shaping up to be a momentous event. It will be the first to be held in the Middle East and the first to be hosted by an Arab country. It is well-known that the FIFA obligations imposed on a host country in relation to the tournament involve substantial changes to its laws in order to accommodate FIFA’s commercial, licensing and tax requirements, among other issues.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">This is not to say FIFA can simply impose its will and insist on complete changes to Qatar’s legal system. Qatar is a relatively conservative Arab country with traditional and established legal concepts and customs. While by necessity, and by virtue of similar situations at previous World Cups, changes will need to be made to certain local laws to meet FIFA requirements, such changes will need to be through agreements between the host country and FIFA.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Getting this balance right will result in mutual benefits for Qatar and FIFA to create a successful tournament as well developing an ongoing legacy for the host country in conjunction with the Qatar National Vision 2030. Some of these changes in law are still to be agreed while others may have already set in motion positive developments, as further shown below.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Legal challenges</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">FIFA has strict requirements in respect of all aspects relating to a World Cup, from stadium construction, accommodation and transport to publicity and marketing matters related to the event. Changes to local laws are generally needed in order to allow for, among other things, FIFA to obtain all required Qatar government guarantees in respect of the World Cup, FIFA-designated goods and merchandise to be imported into Qatar free of customs duties, FIFA’s intellectual property (‘IP’) and authorised sponsors and licensees to be protected against unlawful third party actions such as sale of counterfeit goods and ambush marketing (see more below). FIFA also requires that it is exempted from taxation or otherwise favourably treated in respect of World Cup-related income.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">While there will be changes made to comply with such FIFA requirements it will generally still be necessary for persons doing business in Qatar to comply with existing Qatar laws, for example in respect of IP protection, events, customs and consumer protection, to the extent there is no conflict between the two.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Specific changes to laws and/or the enactment of enabling laws in respect of government guarantees, customs requirements and taxation have not yet been implemented. It is expected these will be agreed between Qatar and FIFA within an appropriate time period prior to the 2022 tournament, although the basis and extent of these new laws is not yet clear. It seems, however, that in respect of licensing and merchandising matters, such as in respect of ambush marketing and fake/counterfeit merchandise, the legal approach and position will be similar to that taken at previous World Cups, .</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Sponsorship and Merchandising</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Ambush marketing is essentially the unauthorised association by an entity of its products and/or services in respect of an event where it has no sponsorship or licensing rights. The entity is often a competitor of a duly authorised event sponsor/licensee. The aim, via clever marketing and the pushing of legal boundaries, is to create the perception (and obtain the related commercial value) of the ambushing entity being associated with the event in question, to the detriment and loss of the authorised event sponsor or licensee who has paid a substantial amount for such privilege.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Fake/counterfeit merchandising involves the sale to the public of event-themed and event-linked goods where the sellers are not authorised to do so and/or where the actual goods being sold have been not produced under authorised licence.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">As with previous World Cup tournaments, the intention of the Qatar authorities and FIFA is not to take a heavy-handed approach but at the same time ensure that action is taken quickly and decisively against any infringing persons. Special investigative units and courts specifically to deal with cases of ambush marketing and counterfeit merchandise will be created. This will involve enabling legislation being introduced to allow authorised officials to monitor and stop infringements by conducting local investigations and court hearings and issuing immediate fines to perpetrators. The plan is not to provide for any jail sentences but in all cases the infringing goods would be confiscated.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">These additional legal provisions will be supplementary to existing Qatari copyright and trademark laws which protect IP and related licensing rights in accordance with international standards. FIFA has also published an exhaustive and extremely strict code of what it considers to be unacceptable marketing practices surrounding its World Cup tournament.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Customs and Consumer Protection</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Irrespective of specific agreements reached with FIFA, any goods coming into Qatar in connection with the World Cup will need to comply with the existing Customs Law, whereby the General Authority of Customs have the right not to permit any goods to clear customs and enter Qatar unless such goods have been approved by the relevant authority.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Incoming goods will also need to comply with the existing Consumer Protection Law. This gives consumers in Qatar the right, amongst others, to return defective products, to the repair or replacement of any defective products and the right to receive accurate information about the products. The Consumer Protection Law prohibits the sale or marketing of defective or expired goods, with goods considered defective if they do not comply with specific standards, are unfit for purpose or have expired.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Electronic Commerce Law also addresses certain consumer rights by stating that its provisions are applicable to the provisions of the Consumer Protection Law. This ensures that both physical and online sales and marketing transactions are covered in relation to counterfeit goods.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Tourism and Events Management</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The provisions of the Tourism Licensing Law, which govern business activities in the tourism sector within Qatar, are applicable to the hotel and other industries within the tourism sector. They will impact related World Cup activities and ventures. The law regulates ‘tourism establishments’, defined as places operating mainly to accommodate tourists, such as entertainment establishments and specialised clubs, and other places allocated to provide services for tourists, such as tourism offices, offices offering tourist transport, tourist guide offices and time-sharing places, and any other establishment deemed to be a tourist establishment in accordance with a decision of the Minister of Economy and Commerce or the proposal of the President of the Qatar Tourism Authority. It also covers ‘tourism activities’: any activity of the transport of tourists including the transport of tourists on trips onshore or offshore, the activities of tour guides, time-sharing and any other activity deemed to be a tourist activity in accordance with a decision of the Minister of Economy and Commerce or the proposal of the President of the Qatar Tourism Authority.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Under the Tourism Licensing Law, a licence is required to establish or manage a hotel or tourist establishment or to practise any tourist activity. Applications for such a licence is made to the Qatar Tourism Authority and all hotel and/or tour operators wishing to conduct such activities in relation to the 2022 World Cup will need to be aware of such requirement.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Gambling</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">As with all major sporting events, the World Cup will generate substantial gambling activities. Gambling is prohibited in Qatar in all forms, whether land-based or online, as well as the advertising of gambling activities. Accordingly it is unlikely that any gambling will be tolerated and any offenders would face prosecution. The risk of enforcement against an online gambling operator outside of Qatar is lower but the offending website could be blocked by the authorities pursuant to provisions under the Cybercrime Law, which also provide for the confiscation of all devices, software or equipment used in the commission of the offence and the confiscation of any funds obtained from such offence.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Worker’s Rights and Laws</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Due to the extensive construction and infrastructure projects associated with the 2022 World Cup in terms of stadiums, accommodation and transport, a lot of attention has been focused on the rights and welfare of the many workers who will be engaged on these projects. Certain rights and protections are granted to workers in Qatar under the Labour Law and these have been further supplemented pursuant to the adoption in 2013 of specific workers’ charters by the Supreme Committee for Delivery and Legacy (the ‘SC 2022’) and Qatar Foundation for Science, Education and Community Development (the ‘Qatar Foundation’).</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Labour Law provides workers with certain rights and protections in respect of the provision of necessary equipment, the nature of work to be performed, remuneration, working hours and holidays, annual and sick leave, other forms of leave, occupational health and safety, compensation for accidents and death, end-of-service gratuity and repatriation obligation upon termination. Non-Qatari workers are not permitted to form worker committees, unions or similar collective organisations.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SC 2022’s Workers’ Welfare Standards charter, which covers all workers engaged in the World Cup stadium construction and infrastructure projects overseen by the SC 2022, says additional protections are provided to such workers requiring all its contractors and subcontractors for stadium-related projects to comply with such charter. These protections include, without limitation, ethical recruitment and fair treatment, employment offer minimum requirements, responsibility for relocation costs to Qatar, no retention of worker passports or other personal documents, dignified and ethical employment conditions, the provision of medical insurance, accommodation and food standards, reporting requirements for employers, the creation of workers’ welfare forums, transportation and site requirements and access to information in an appropriate language.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Qatar Foundation Mandatory Standards of Migrant Workers’ Welfare document provides similar additional rights and protections for workers involved in all Qatar Foundation projects, which includes one of the World Cup 2022 stadiums and related facilities. The Qatar Foundation charter sets out certain minimum standards with regards to the recruitment, living and working conditions of workers engaged in construction and other projects at the Qatar Foundation. These standards are applicable to, and compliance is required from, all contractors and subcontractors of Qatar Foundation. The required standards include, without limitation, preparation of a welfare adherence plan and related audit, workers being informed as to all entitlements, a safe and healthy work environment, a clean, safe and healthy living environment, equal and humane treatment, equal pay for equal work, regulated working hours, medical insurance and skills training.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Accessibility Requirements</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Accessibility to stadiums for disabled persons and/or persons in wheelchairs is a mandatory requirement of FIFA for all stadiums constructed for a World Cup tournament. In this respect, the SC 2022 is ensuring that all World Cup 2022 venues will be accessible to persons with disabilities so as to make the event inclusive for all. Pursuant to this requirement, accessibility is incorporated into all areas of stadium and venue design such as seating, entry and exit points, parking and toilet facilities. The SC 2022 has advised that the amount of seating for disabled persons (including for disabled media representatives) will be based on the size of each stadium and will include places for people with autism as well.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">From a local perspective there is no substantial legal provision in respect of accessibility requirements for persons with disabilities. In terms of the Qatari Law in respect of People with Special Needs, there is a general requirement to provide people with special needs with, inter alia, the means for assisted transport and equipment, accommodation for safe and secure movement as well as special facilities in public places. The Ministry of Municipality and Environment covers some of these aspects in terms of its requirements for building works, along with various other ministries and local authorities in relation to building matters, but these requirements do not extend as far as those of FIFA in terms of accessibility. However, the overall scope of the World Cup 2022 requirements would seem to imply accessibility requirements for disabled persons will inevitably need to be extended to other World Cup-related areas such as hotels and accommodation, airport and transport facilities and fan zones in order to be compatible with those at the stadium venues.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Summary</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">FIFA has strict benchmarks to meet when it comes to the stadiums, facilities, logistics and publicity for World Cup events while Qatar has strict legislation that cannot be easily or quickly changed. The attaining of a mutually beneficial solution will take time but can be achieved after undertaking detailed research and analysis to understand the laws that may need to be enacted or changed to host the tournament.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">There are plenty of precedents for this. South Africa for instance enacted a law to enable speedy trials in special courts in respect of crimes by fans, Brazil enacted legislation to accommodate FIFA requirements and Russia, the 2018 hosts, have also made changes to their laws in connection with the World Cup.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The process of analysis is well under way in Qatar and changes to laws and standards in connection with World Cup 2022 have been and continue to be considered. The prospects seem to be in place for finding a solution that satisfies external and internal stakeholders, ensures a successful tournament for FIFA and the host nation as well leaving a meaningful legacy of progressive standards and legal considerations.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em>NB: A version of this article was first published during the week of 18 June 2018 on Lawinsport.com.</em></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<em>Al Tamimi &amp; Company’s TMT team regularly advises on the full spectrum of technology, media and telecommunications matters and Roberto routinely provides key support to our Sports Law and Events Management practice. For further information please contact Steve Bainbridge (s.bainbridge@tamimi.com) or Roberto Lusardi (r.lusardi@tamimi.com).</em>'),
(250639, 24447, 'MetaLink', 'content'),
(250640, 24447, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7950&amp;action=edit'),
(250641, 24447, 'ReportText', '<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The 2022 FIFA World Cup™ is shaping up to be a momentous event. It will be the first to be held in the Middle East and the first to be hosted by an Arab country. It is well-known that the FIFA obligations imposed on a host country in relation to the tournament involve substantial changes to its laws in order to accommodate FIFA’s commercial, licensing and tax requirements, among other issues.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">This is not to say FIFA can simply impose its will and insist on complete changes to Qatar’s legal system. Qatar is a relatively conservative Arab country with traditional and established legal concepts and customs. While by necessity, and by virtue of similar situations at previous World Cups, changes will need to be made to certain local laws to meet FIFA requirements, such changes will need to be through agreements between the host country and FIFA.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Getting this balance right will result in mutual benefits for Qatar and FIFA to create a successful tournament as well developing an ongoing legacy for the host country in conjunction with the Qatar National Vision 2030. Some of these changes in law are still to be agreed while others may have already set in motion positive developments, as further shown below.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Legal challenges</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">FIFA has strict requirements in respect of all aspects relating to a World Cup, from stadium construction, accommodation and transport to publicity and marketing matters related to the event. Changes to local laws are generally needed in order to allow for, among other things, FIFA to obtain all required Qatar government guarantees in respect of the World Cup, FIFA-designated goods and merchandise to be imported into Qatar free of customs duties, FIFA’s intellectual property (‘IP’) and authorised sponsors and licensees to be protected against unlawful third party actions such as sale of counterfeit goods and ambush marketing (see more below). FIFA also requires that it is exempted from taxation or otherwise favourably treated in respect of World Cup-related income.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">While there will be changes made to comply with such FIFA requirements it will generally still be necessary for persons doing business in Qatar to comply with existing Qatar laws, for example in respect of IP protection, events, customs and consumer protection, to the extent there is no conflict between the two.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Specific changes to laws and/or the enactment of enabling laws in respect of government guarantees, customs requirements and taxation have not yet been implemented. It is expected these will be agreed between Qatar and FIFA within an appropriate time period prior to the 2022 tournament, although the basis and extent of these new laws is not yet clear. It seems, however, that in respect of licensing and merchandising matters, such as in respect of ambush marketing and fake/counterfeit merchandise, the legal approach and position will be similar to that taken at previous World Cups, .</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Sponsorship and Merchandising</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Ambush marketing is essentially the unauthorised association by an entity of its products and/or services in respect of an event where it has no sponsorship or licensing rights. The entity is often a competitor of a duly authorised event sponsor/licensee. The aim, via clever marketing and the pushing of legal boundaries, is to create the perception (and obtain the related commercial value) of the ambushing entity being associated with the event in question, to the detriment and loss of the authorised event sponsor or licensee who has paid a substantial amount for such privilege.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Fake/counterfeit merchandising involves the sale to the public of event-themed and event-linked goods where the sellers are not authorised to do so and/or where the actual goods being sold have been not produced under authorised licence.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">As with previous World Cup tournaments, the intention of the Qatar authorities and FIFA is not to take a heavy-handed approach but at the same time ensure that action is taken quickly and decisively against any infringing persons. Special investigative units and courts specifically to deal with cases of ambush marketing and counterfeit merchandise will be created. This will involve enabling legislation being introduced to allow authorised officials to monitor and stop infringements by conducting local investigations and court hearings and issuing immediate fines to perpetrators. The plan is not to provide for any jail sentences but in all cases the infringing goods would be confiscated.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">These additional legal provisions will be supplementary to existing Qatari copyright and trademark laws which protect IP and related licensing rights in accordance with international standards. FIFA has also published an exhaustive and extremely strict code of what it considers to be unacceptable marketing practices surrounding its World Cup tournament.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Customs and Consumer Protection</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Irrespective of specific agreements reached with FIFA, any goods coming into Qatar in connection with the World Cup will need to comply with the existing Customs Law, whereby the General Authority of Customs have the right not to permit any goods to clear customs and enter Qatar unless such goods have been approved by the relevant authority.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Incoming goods will also need to comply with the existing Consumer Protection Law. This gives consumers in Qatar the right, amongst others, to return defective products, to the repair or replacement of any defective products and the right to receive accurate information about the products. The Consumer Protection Law prohibits the sale or marketing of defective or expired goods, with goods considered defective if they do not comply with specific standards, are unfit for purpose or have expired.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Electronic Commerce Law also addresses certain consumer rights by stating that its provisions are applicable to the provisions of the Consumer Protection Law. This ensures that both physical and online sales and marketing transactions are covered in relation to counterfeit goods.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Tourism and Events Management</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The provisions of the Tourism Licensing Law, which govern business activities in the tourism sector within Qatar, are applicable to the hotel and other industries within the tourism sector. They will impact related World Cup activities and ventures. The law regulates ‘tourism establishments’, defined as places operating mainly to accommodate tourists, such as entertainment establishments and specialised clubs, and other places allocated to provide services for tourists, such as tourism offices, offices offering tourist transport, tourist guide offices and time-sharing places, and any other establishment deemed to be a tourist establishment in accordance with a decision of the Minister of Economy and Commerce or the proposal of the President of the Qatar Tourism Authority. It also covers ‘tourism activities’: any activity of the transport of tourists including the transport of tourists on trips onshore or offshore, the activities of tour guides, time-sharing and any other activity deemed to be a tourist activity in accordance with a decision of the Minister of Economy and Commerce or the proposal of the President of the Qatar Tourism Authority.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Under the Tourism Licensing Law, a licence is required to establish or manage a hotel or tourist establishment or to practise any tourist activity. Applications for such a licence is made to the Qatar Tourism Authority and all hotel and/or tour operators wishing to conduct such activities in relation to the 2022 World Cup will need to be aware of such requirement.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Gambling</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">As with all major sporting events, the World Cup will generate substantial gambling activities. Gambling is prohibited in Qatar in all forms, whether land-based or online, as well as the advertising of gambling activities. Accordingly it is unlikely that any gambling will be tolerated and any offenders would face prosecution. The risk of enforcement against an online gambling operator outside of Qatar is lower but the offending website could be blocked by the authorities pursuant to provisions under the Cybercrime Law, which also provide for the confiscation of all devices, software or equipment used in the commission of the offence and the confiscation of any funds obtained from such offence.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Worker’s Rights and Laws</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Due to the extensive construction and infrastructure projects associated with the 2022 World Cup in terms of stadiums, accommodation and transport, a lot of attention has been focused on the rights and welfare of the many workers who will be engaged on these projects. Certain rights and protections are granted to workers in Qatar under the Labour Law and these have been further supplemented pursuant to the adoption in 2013 of specific workers’ charters by the Supreme Committee for Delivery and Legacy (the ‘SC 2022’) and Qatar Foundation for Science, Education and Community Development (the ‘Qatar Foundation’).</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Labour Law provides workers with certain rights and protections in respect of the provision of necessary equipment, the nature of work to be performed, remuneration, working hours and holidays, annual and sick leave, other forms of leave, occupational health and safety, compensation for accidents and death, end-of-service gratuity and repatriation obligation upon termination. Non-Qatari workers are not permitted to form worker committees, unions or similar collective organisations.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SC 2022’s Workers’ Welfare Standards charter, which covers all workers engaged in the World Cup stadium construction and infrastructure projects overseen by the SC 2022, says additional protections are provided to such workers requiring all its contractors and subcontractors for stadium-related projects to comply with such charter. These protections include, without limitation, ethical recruitment and fair treatment, employment offer minimum requirements, responsibility for relocation costs to Qatar, no retention of worker passports or other personal documents, dignified and ethical employment conditions, the provision of medical insurance, accommodation and food standards, reporting requirements for employers, the creation of workers’ welfare forums, transportation and site requirements and access to information in an appropriate language.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Qatar Foundation Mandatory Standards of Migrant Workers’ Welfare document provides similar additional rights and protections for workers involved in all Qatar Foundation projects, which includes one of the World Cup 2022 stadiums and related facilities. The Qatar Foundation charter sets out certain minimum standards with regards to the recruitment, living and working conditions of workers engaged in construction and other projects at the Qatar Foundation. These standards are applicable to, and compliance is required from, all contractors and subcontractors of Qatar Foundation. The required standards include, without limitation, preparation of a welfare adherence plan and related audit, workers being informed as to all entitlements, a safe and healthy work environment, a clean, safe and healthy living environment, equal and humane treatment, equal pay for equal work, regulated working hours, medical insurance and skills training.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Accessibility Requirements</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Accessibility to stadiums for disabled persons and/or persons in wheelchairs is a mandatory requirement of FIFA for all stadiums constructed for a World Cup tournament. In this respect, the SC 2022 is ensuring that all World Cup 2022 venues will be accessible to persons with disabilities so as to make the event inclusive for all. Pursuant to this requirement, accessibility is incorporated into all areas of stadium and venue design such as seating, entry and exit points, parking and toilet facilities. The SC 2022 has advised that the amount of seating for disabled persons (including for disabled media representatives) will be based on the size of each stadium and will include places for people with autism as well.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">From a local perspective there is no substantial legal provision in respect of accessibility requirements for persons with disabilities. In terms of the Qatari Law in respect of People with Special Needs, there is a general requirement to provide people with special needs with, inter alia, the means for assisted transport and equipment, accommodation for safe and secure movement as well as special facilities in public places. The Ministry of Municipality and Environment covers some of these aspects in terms of its requirements for building works, along with various other ministries and local authorities in relation to building matters, but these requirements do not extend as far as those of FIFA in terms of accessibility. However, the overall scope of the World Cup 2022 requirements would seem to imply accessibility requirements for disabled persons will inevitably need to be extended to other World Cup-related areas such as hotels and accommodation, airport and transport facilities and fan zones in order to be compatible with those at the stadium venues.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Summary</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">FIFA has strict benchmarks to meet when it comes to the stadiums, facilities, logistics and publicity for World Cup events while Qatar has strict legislation that cannot be easily or quickly changed. The attaining of a mutually beneficial solution will take time but can be achieved after undertaking detailed research and analysis to understand the laws that may need to be enacted or changed to host the tournament.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">There are plenty of precedents for this. South Africa for instance enacted a law to enable speedy trials in special courts in respect of crimes by fans, Brazil enacted legislation to accommodate FIFA requirements and Russia, the 2018 hosts, have also made changes to their laws in connection with the World Cup.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The process of analysis is well under way in Qatar and changes to laws and standards in connection with World Cup 2022 have been and continue to be considered. The prospects seem to be in place for finding a solution that satisfies external and internal stakeholders, ensures a successful tournament for FIFA and the host nation as well leaving a meaningful legacy of progressive standards and legal considerations.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em>NB: A version of this article was first published during the week of 18 June 2018 on Lawinsport.com.</em></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<em>Al Tamimi &amp; Company’s TMT team regularly advises on the full spectrum of technology, media and telecommunications matters and Roberto routinely provides key support to our Sports Law and Events Management practice. For further information please contact Steve Bainbridge (s.bainbridge@tamimi.com) or Roberto Lusardi (r.lusardi@tamimi.com).</em>|<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><img class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-8024\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_657601672.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"7000\" height=\"3000\" />The 2022 FIFA World Cup™ is shaping up to be a momentous event. It will be the first to be held in the Middle East and the first to be hosted by an Arab country. It is well-known that the FIFA obligations imposed on a host country in relation to the tournament involve substantial changes to its laws in order to accommodate FIFA’s commercial, licensing and tax requirements, among other issues.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">This is not to say FIFA can simply impose its will and insist on complete changes to Qatar’s legal system. Qatar is a relatively conservative Arab country with traditional and established legal concepts and customs. While by necessity, and by virtue of similar situations at previous World Cups, changes will need to be made to certain local laws to meet FIFA requirements, such changes will need to be through agreements between the host country and FIFA.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Getting this balance right will result in mutual benefits for Qatar and FIFA to create a successful tournament as well developing an ongoing legacy for the host country in conjunction with the Qatar National Vision 2030. Some of these changes in law are still to be agreed while others may have already set in motion positive developments, as further shown below.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Legal challenges</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">FIFA has strict requirements in respect of all aspects relating to a World Cup, from stadium construction, accommodation and transport to publicity and marketing matters related to the event. Changes to local laws are generally needed in order to allow for, among other things, FIFA to obtain all required Qatar government guarantees in respect of the World Cup, FIFA-designated goods and merchandise to be imported into Qatar free of customs duties, FIFA’s intellectual property (‘IP’) and authorised sponsors and licensees to be protected against unlawful third party actions such as sale of counterfeit goods and ambush marketing (see more below). FIFA also requires that it is exempted from taxation or otherwise favourably treated in respect of World Cup-related income.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">While there will be changes made to comply with such FIFA requirements it will generally still be necessary for persons doing business in Qatar to comply with existing Qatar laws, for example in respect of IP protection, events, customs and consumer protection, to the extent there is no conflict between the two.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Specific changes to laws and/or the enactment of enabling laws in respect of government guarantees, customs requirements and taxation have not yet been implemented. It is expected these will be agreed between Qatar and FIFA within an appropriate time period prior to the 2022 tournament, although the basis and extent of these new laws is not yet clear. It seems, however, that in respect of licensing and merchandising matters, such as in respect of ambush marketing and fake/counterfeit merchandise, the legal approach and position will be similar to that taken at previous World Cups, .</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Sponsorship and Merchandising</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Ambush marketing is essentially the unauthorised association by an entity of its products and/or services in respect of an event where it has no sponsorship or licensing rights. The entity is often a competitor of a duly authorised event sponsor/licensee. The aim, via clever marketing and the pushing of legal boundaries, is to create the perception (and obtain the related commercial value) of the ambushing entity being associated with the event in question, to the detriment and loss of the authorised event sponsor or licensee who has paid a substantial amount for such privilege.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Fake/counterfeit merchandising involves the sale to the public of event-themed and event-linked goods where the sellers are not authorised to do so and/or where the actual goods being sold have been not produced under authorised licence.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">As with previous World Cup tournaments, the intention of the Qatar authorities and FIFA is not to take a heavy-handed approach but at the same time ensure that action is taken quickly and decisively against any infringing persons. Special investigative units and courts specifically to deal with cases of ambush marketing and counterfeit merchandise will be created. This will involve enabling legislation being introduced to allow authorised officials to monitor and stop infringements by conducting local investigations and court hearings and issuing immediate fines to perpetrators. The plan is not to provide for any jail sentences but in all cases the infringing goods would be confiscated.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">These additional legal provisions will be supplementary to existing Qatari copyright and trademark laws which protect IP and related licensing rights in accordance with international standards. FIFA has also published an exhaustive and extremely strict code of what it considers to be unacceptable marketing practices surrounding its World Cup tournament.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Customs and Consumer Protection</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Irrespective of specific agreements reached with FIFA, any goods coming into Qatar in connection with the World Cup will need to comply with the existing Customs Law, whereby the General Authority of Customs have the right not to permit any goods to clear customs and enter Qatar unless such goods have been approved by the relevant authority.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Incoming goods will also need to comply with the existing Consumer Protection Law. This gives consumers in Qatar the right, amongst others, to return defective products, to the repair or replacement of any defective products and the right to receive accurate information about the products. The Consumer Protection Law prohibits the sale or marketing of defective or expired goods, with goods considered defective if they do not comply with specific standards, are unfit for purpose or have expired.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Electronic Commerce Law also addresses certain consumer rights by stating that its provisions are applicable to the provisions of the Consumer Protection Law. This ensures that both physical and online sales and marketing transactions are covered in relation to counterfeit goods.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Tourism and Events Management</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The provisions of the Tourism Licensing Law, which govern business activities in the tourism sector within Qatar, are applicable to the hotel and other industries within the tourism sector. They will impact related World Cup activities and ventures. The law regulates ‘tourism establishments’, defined as places operating mainly to accommodate tourists, such as entertainment establishments and specialised clubs, and other places allocated to provide services for tourists, such as tourism offices, offices offering tourist transport, tourist guide offices and time-sharing places, and any other establishment deemed to be a tourist establishment in accordance with a decision of the Minister of Economy and Commerce or the proposal of the President of the Qatar Tourism Authority. It also covers ‘tourism activities’: any activity of the transport of tourists including the transport of tourists on trips onshore or offshore, the activities of tour guides, time-sharing and any other activity deemed to be a tourist activity in accordance with a decision of the Minister of Economy and Commerce or the proposal of the President of the Qatar Tourism Authority.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Under the Tourism Licensing Law, a licence is required to establish or manage a hotel or tourist establishment or to practise any tourist activity. Applications for such a licence is made to the Qatar Tourism Authority and all hotel and/or tour operators wishing to conduct such activities in relation to the 2022 World Cup will need to be aware of such requirement.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Gambling</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">As with all major sporting events, the World Cup will generate substantial gambling activities. Gambling is prohibited in Qatar in all forms, whether land-based or online, as well as the advertising of gambling activities. Accordingly it is unlikely that any gambling will be tolerated and any offenders would face prosecution. The risk of enforcement against an online gambling operator outside of Qatar is lower but the offending website could be blocked by the authorities pursuant to provisions under the Cybercrime Law, which also provide for the confiscation of all devices, software or equipment used in the commission of the offence and the confiscation of any funds obtained from such offence.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Worker’s Rights and Laws</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Due to the extensive construction and infrastructure projects associated with the 2022 World Cup in terms of stadiums, accommodation and transport, a lot of attention has been focused on the rights and welfare of the many workers who will be engaged on these projects. Certain rights and protections are granted to workers in Qatar under the Labour Law and these have been further supplemented pursuant to the adoption in 2013 of specific workers’ charters by the Supreme Committee for Delivery and Legacy (the ‘SC 2022’) and Qatar Foundation for Science, Education and Community Development (the ‘Qatar Foundation’).</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Labour Law provides workers with certain rights and protections in respect of the provision of necessary equipment, the nature of work to be performed, remuneration, working hours and holidays, annual and sick leave, other forms of leave, occupational health and safety, compensation for accidents and death, end-of-service gratuity and repatriation obligation upon termination. Non-Qatari workers are not permitted to form worker committees, unions or similar collective organisations.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SC 2022’s Workers’ Welfare Standards charter, which covers all workers engaged in the World Cup stadium construction and infrastructure projects overseen by the SC 2022, says additional protections are provided to such workers requiring all its contractors and subcontractors for stadium-related projects to comply with such charter. These protections include, without limitation, ethical recruitment and fair treatment, employment offer minimum requirements, responsibility for relocation costs to Qatar, no retention of worker passports or other personal documents, dignified and ethical employment conditions, the provision of medical insurance, accommodation and food standards, reporting requirements for employers, the creation of workers’ welfare forums, transportation and site requirements and access to information in an appropriate language.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Qatar Foundation Mandatory Standards of Migrant Workers’ Welfare document provides similar additional rights and protections for workers involved in all Qatar Foundation projects, which includes one of the World Cup 2022 stadiums and related facilities. The Qatar Foundation charter sets out certain minimum standards with regards to the recruitment, living and working conditions of workers engaged in construction and other projects at the Qatar Foundation. These standards are applicable to, and compliance is required from, all contractors and subcontractors of Qatar Foundation. The required standards include, without limitation, preparation of a welfare adherence plan and related audit, workers being informed as to all entitlements, a safe and healthy work environment, a clean, safe and healthy living environment, equal and humane treatment, equal pay for equal work, regulated working hours, medical insurance and skills training.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Accessibility Requirements</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Accessibility to stadiums for disabled persons and/or persons in wheelchairs is a mandatory requirement of FIFA for all stadiums constructed for a World Cup tournament. In this respect, the SC 2022 is ensuring that all World Cup 2022 venues will be accessible to persons with disabilities so as to make the event inclusive for all. Pursuant to this requirement, accessibility is incorporated into all areas of stadium and venue design such as seating, entry and exit points, parking and toilet facilities. The SC 2022 has advised that the amount of seating for disabled persons (including for disabled media representatives) will be based on the size of each stadium and will include places for people with autism as well.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">From a local perspective there is no substantial legal provision in respect of accessibility requirements for persons with disabilities. In terms of the Qatari Law in respect of People with Special Needs, there is a general requirement to provide people with special needs with, inter alia, the means for assisted transport and equipment, accommodation for safe and secure movement as well as special facilities in public places. The Ministry of Municipality and Environment covers some of these aspects in terms of its requirements for building works, along with various other ministries and local authorities in relation to building matters, but these requirements do not extend as far as those of FIFA in terms of accessibility. However, the overall scope of the World Cup 2022 requirements would seem to imply accessibility requirements for disabled persons will inevitably need to be extended to other World Cup-related areas such as hotels and accommodation, airport and transport facilities and fan zones in order to be compatible with those at the stadium venues.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Summary</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">FIFA has strict benchmarks to meet when it comes to the stadiums, facilities, logistics and publicity for World Cup events while Qatar has strict legislation that cannot be easily or quickly changed. The attaining of a mutually beneficial solution will take time but can be achieved after undertaking detailed research and analysis to understand the laws that may need to be enacted or changed to host the tournament.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">There are plenty of precedents for this. South Africa for instance enacted a law to enable speedy trials in special courts in respect of crimes by fans, Brazil enacted legislation to accommodate FIFA requirements and Russia, the 2018 hosts, have also made changes to their laws in connection with the World Cup.</p>\r\n<img class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-8026\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_1115518292.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"5043\" height=\"2073\" />\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The process of analysis is well under way in Qatar and changes to laws and standards in connection with World Cup 2022 have been and continue to be considered. The prospects seem to be in place for finding a solution that satisfies external and internal stakeholders, ensures a successful tournament for FIFA and the host nation as well leaving a meaningful legacy of progressive standards and legal considerations.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em>NB: A version of this article was first published during the week of 18 June 2018 on Lawinsport.com.</em></p>\r\n<em>Al Tamimi &amp; Company’s TMT team regularly advises on the full spectrum of technology, media and telecommunications matters and Roberto routinely provides key support to our Sports Law and Events Management practice. For further information please contact Steve Bainbridge (s.bainbridge@tamimi.com) or Roberto Lusardi (r.lusardi@tamimi.com).</em>'),
(250642, 24447, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250643, 24447, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250644, 24447, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250645, 24447, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250646, 24448, 'PostID', '7950'),
(250647, 24448, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(250648, 24448, 'PostTitle', 'Qatar 2022 World Cup: Laws, Changes and Legacy Benefits');
INSERT INTO `tm_wsal_metadata` (`id`, `occurrence_id`, `name`, `value`) VALUES
(250649, 24448, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(250650, 24448, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 18:02:38'),
(250651, 24448, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7950'),
(250652, 24448, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7950&amp;action=edit'),
(250653, 24448, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250654, 24448, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250655, 24448, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250656, 24448, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250657, 24449, 'PostID', '7950'),
(250658, 24449, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(250659, 24449, 'PostTitle', 'Qatar 2022 World Cup: Laws, Changes and Legacy Benefits'),
(250660, 24449, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(250661, 24449, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 18:02:43'),
(250662, 24449, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7950'),
(250663, 24449, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7950&amp;action=edit'),
(250664, 24449, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250665, 24449, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250666, 24449, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250667, 24449, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250668, 24450, 'AttachmentID', '8028'),
(250669, 24450, 'FileName', 'shutterstock_791480302.jpg'),
(250670, 24450, 'FilePath', '/home/tamimnew/public_html/wp-content/uploads/2018/07'),
(250671, 24450, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250672, 24450, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250673, 24450, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250674, 24450, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250675, 24451, 'ClientIP', '127.0.0.1'),
(250676, 24451, 'Username', 'Plugin'),
(250677, 24451, 'PromoMessage', 'See who is logged in, create user productivity reports, get notified instantly via email of important changes, add search and much more. <strong><a href=\"https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/admin.php?page=wsal-auditlog-pricing\">Upgrade to Premium</a></strong> | <strong><a href=\"https://www.wpsecurityauditlog.com/premium-features/?utm_source=alert&utm_medium=page&utm_content=alert+more+info&utm_campaign=upgrade+premium\" target=\"_blank\">More Information</a></strong>'),
(250678, 24451, 'PromoName', 'Upgrade to Premium'),
(250679, 24452, 'AttachmentID', '8026'),
(250680, 24452, 'FileName', 'shutterstock_1115518292.jpg'),
(250681, 24452, 'FilePath', '/home/tamimnew/public_html/wp-content/uploads/2018/07'),
(250682, 24452, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250683, 24452, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250684, 24452, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250685, 24452, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250686, 24453, 'AttachmentID', '8024'),
(250687, 24453, 'FileName', 'shutterstock_657601672.jpg'),
(250688, 24453, 'FilePath', '/home/tamimnew/public_html/wp-content/uploads/2018/07'),
(250689, 24453, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250690, 24453, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250691, 24453, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250692, 24453, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250693, 24454, 'AttachmentID', '8029'),
(250694, 24454, 'FileName', '8678.jpg'),
(250695, 24454, 'FilePath', '/home/tamimnew/public_html/wp-content/uploads/2018/07'),
(250696, 24454, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250697, 24454, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250698, 24454, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250699, 24454, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250700, 24455, 'AttachmentID', '8030'),
(250701, 24455, 'FileName', 'KJBNKJN.jpg'),
(250702, 24455, 'FilePath', '/home/tamimnew/public_html/wp-content/uploads/2018/07'),
(250703, 24455, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250704, 24455, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250705, 24455, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250706, 24455, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250707, 24456, 'PostID', '7950'),
(250708, 24456, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(250709, 24456, 'PostTitle', 'Qatar 2022 World Cup: Laws, Changes and Legacy Benefits'),
(250710, 24456, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(250711, 24456, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 18:02:38'),
(250712, 24456, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7950'),
(250713, 24456, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7950&amp;action=edit'),
(250714, 24456, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250715, 24456, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250716, 24456, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250717, 24456, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250718, 24457, 'PostID', '7950'),
(250719, 24457, 'PostTitle', 'Qatar 2022 World Cup: Laws, Changes and Legacy Benefits'),
(250720, 24457, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(250721, 24457, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(250722, 24457, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 18:04:56'),
(250723, 24457, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7950'),
(250724, 24457, 'MetaID', '223720'),
(250725, 24457, 'MetaKey', 'content'),
(250726, 24457, 'MetaValueNew', '<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><img class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-8029\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/8678.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"7000\" height=\"2173\" />The 2022 FIFA World Cup™ is shaping up to be a momentous event. It will be the first to be held in the Middle East and the first to be hosted by an Arab country. It is well-known that the FIFA obligations imposed on a host country in relation to the tournament involve substantial changes to its laws in order to accommodate FIFA’s commercial, licensing and tax requirements, among other issues.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">This is not to say FIFA can simply impose its will and insist on complete changes to Qatar’s legal system. Qatar is a relatively conservative Arab country with traditional and established legal concepts and customs. While by necessity, and by virtue of similar situations at previous World Cups, changes will need to be made to certain local laws to meet FIFA requirements, such changes will need to be through agreements between the host country and FIFA.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Getting this balance right will result in mutual benefits for Qatar and FIFA to create a successful tournament as well developing an ongoing legacy for the host country in conjunction with the Qatar National Vision 2030. Some of these changes in law are still to be agreed while others may have already set in motion positive developments, as further shown below.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Legal challenges</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">FIFA has strict requirements in respect of all aspects relating to a World Cup, from stadium construction, accommodation and transport to publicity and marketing matters related to the event. Changes to local laws are generally needed in order to allow for, among other things, FIFA to obtain all required Qatar government guarantees in respect of the World Cup, FIFA-designated goods and merchandise to be imported into Qatar free of customs duties, FIFA’s intellectual property (‘IP’) and authorised sponsors and licensees to be protected against unlawful third party actions such as sale of counterfeit goods and ambush marketing (see more below). FIFA also requires that it is exempted from taxation or otherwise favourably treated in respect of World Cup-related income.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">While there will be changes made to comply with such FIFA requirements it will generally still be necessary for persons doing business in Qatar to comply with existing Qatar laws, for example in respect of IP protection, events, customs and consumer protection, to the extent there is no conflict between the two.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Specific changes to laws and/or the enactment of enabling laws in respect of government guarantees, customs requirements and taxation have not yet been implemented. It is expected these will be agreed between Qatar and FIFA within an appropriate time period prior to the 2022 tournament, although the basis and extent of these new laws is not yet clear. It seems, however, that in respect of licensing and merchandising matters, such as in respect of ambush marketing and fake/counterfeit merchandise, the legal approach and position will be similar to that taken at previous World Cups, .</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Sponsorship and Merchandising</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Ambush marketing is essentially the unauthorised association by an entity of its products and/or services in respect of an event where it has no sponsorship or licensing rights. The entity is often a competitor of a duly authorised event sponsor/licensee. The aim, via clever marketing and the pushing of legal boundaries, is to create the perception (and obtain the related commercial value) of the ambushing entity being associated with the event in question, to the detriment and loss of the authorised event sponsor or licensee who has paid a substantial amount for such privilege.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Fake/counterfeit merchandising involves the sale to the public of event-themed and event-linked goods where the sellers are not authorised to do so and/or where the actual goods being sold have been not produced under authorised licence.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">As with previous World Cup tournaments, the intention of the Qatar authorities and FIFA is not to take a heavy-handed approach but at the same time ensure that action is taken quickly and decisively against any infringing persons. Special investigative units and courts specifically to deal with cases of ambush marketing and counterfeit merchandise will be created. This will involve enabling legislation being introduced to allow authorised officials to monitor and stop infringements by conducting local investigations and court hearings and issuing immediate fines to perpetrators. The plan is not to provide for any jail sentences but in all cases the infringing goods would be confiscated.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">These additional legal provisions will be supplementary to existing Qatari copyright and trademark laws which protect IP and related licensing rights in accordance with international standards. FIFA has also published an exhaustive and extremely strict code of what it considers to be unacceptable marketing practices surrounding its World Cup tournament.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Customs and Consumer Protection</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Irrespective of specific agreements reached with FIFA, any goods coming into Qatar in connection with the World Cup will need to comply with the existing Customs Law, whereby the General Authority of Customs have the right not to permit any goods to clear customs and enter Qatar unless such goods have been approved by the relevant authority.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Incoming goods will also need to comply with the existing Consumer Protection Law. This gives consumers in Qatar the right, amongst others, to return defective products, to the repair or replacement of any defective products and the right to receive accurate information about the products. The Consumer Protection Law prohibits the sale or marketing of defective or expired goods, with goods considered defective if they do not comply with specific standards, are unfit for purpose or have expired.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Electronic Commerce Law also addresses certain consumer rights by stating that its provisions are applicable to the provisions of the Consumer Protection Law. This ensures that both physical and online sales and marketing transactions are covered in relation to counterfeit goods.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Tourism and Events Management</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The provisions of the Tourism Licensing Law, which govern business activities in the tourism sector within Qatar, are applicable to the hotel and other industries within the tourism sector. They will impact related World Cup activities and ventures. The law regulates ‘tourism establishments’, defined as places operating mainly to accommodate tourists, such as entertainment establishments and specialised clubs, and other places allocated to provide services for tourists, such as tourism offices, offices offering tourist transport, tourist guide offices and time-sharing places, and any other establishment deemed to be a tourist establishment in accordance with a decision of the Minister of Economy and Commerce or the proposal of the President of the Qatar Tourism Authority. It also covers ‘tourism activities’: any activity of the transport of tourists including the transport of tourists on trips onshore or offshore, the activities of tour guides, time-sharing and any other activity deemed to be a tourist activity in accordance with a decision of the Minister of Economy and Commerce or the proposal of the President of the Qatar Tourism Authority.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Under the Tourism Licensing Law, a licence is required to establish or manage a hotel or tourist establishment or to practise any tourist activity. Applications for such a licence is made to the Qatar Tourism Authority and all hotel and/or tour operators wishing to conduct such activities in relation to the 2022 World Cup will need to be aware of such requirement.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Gambling</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">As with all major sporting events, the World Cup will generate substantial gambling activities. Gambling is prohibited in Qatar in all forms, whether land-based or online, as well as the advertising of gambling activities. Accordingly it is unlikely that any gambling will be tolerated and any offenders would face prosecution. The risk of enforcement against an online gambling operator outside of Qatar is lower but the offending website could be blocked by the authorities pursuant to provisions under the Cybercrime Law, which also provide for the confiscation of all devices, software or equipment used in the commission of the offence and the confiscation of any funds obtained from such offence.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Worker’s Rights and Laws</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Due to the extensive construction and infrastructure projects associated with the 2022 World Cup in terms of stadiums, accommodation and transport, a lot of attention has been focused on the rights and welfare of the many workers who will be engaged on these projects. Certain rights and protections are granted to workers in Qatar under the Labour Law and these have been further supplemented pursuant to the adoption in 2013 of specific workers’ charters by the Supreme Committee for Delivery and Legacy (the ‘SC 2022’) and Qatar Foundation for Science, Education and Community Development (the ‘Qatar Foundation’).</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Labour Law provides workers with certain rights and protections in respect of the provision of necessary equipment, the nature of work to be performed, remuneration, working hours and holidays, annual and sick leave, other forms of leave, occupational health and safety, compensation for accidents and death, end-of-service gratuity and repatriation obligation upon termination. Non-Qatari workers are not permitted to form worker committees, unions or similar collective organisations.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SC 2022’s Workers’ Welfare Standards charter, which covers all workers engaged in the World Cup stadium construction and infrastructure projects overseen by the SC 2022, says additional protections are provided to such workers requiring all its contractors and subcontractors for stadium-related projects to comply with such charter. These protections include, without limitation, ethical recruitment and fair treatment, employment offer minimum requirements, responsibility for relocation costs to Qatar, no retention of worker passports or other personal documents, dignified and ethical employment conditions, the provision of medical insurance, accommodation and food standards, reporting requirements for employers, the creation of workers’ welfare forums, transportation and site requirements and access to information in an appropriate language.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Qatar Foundation Mandatory Standards of Migrant Workers’ Welfare document provides similar additional rights and protections for workers involved in all Qatar Foundation projects, which includes one of the World Cup 2022 stadiums and related facilities. The Qatar Foundation charter sets out certain minimum standards with regards to the recruitment, living and working conditions of workers engaged in construction and other projects at the Qatar Foundation. These standards are applicable to, and compliance is required from, all contractors and subcontractors of Qatar Foundation. The required standards include, without limitation, preparation of a welfare adherence plan and related audit, workers being informed as to all entitlements, a safe and healthy work environment, a clean, safe and healthy living environment, equal and humane treatment, equal pay for equal work, regulated working hours, medical insurance and skills training.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Accessibility Requirements</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Accessibility to stadiums for disabled persons and/or persons in wheelchairs is a mandatory requirement of FIFA for all stadiums constructed for a World Cup tournament. In this respect, the SC 2022 is ensuring that all World Cup 2022 venues will be accessible to persons with disabilities so as to make the event inclusive for all. Pursuant to this requirement, accessibility is incorporated into all areas of stadium and venue design such as seating, entry and exit points, parking and toilet facilities. The SC 2022 has advised that the amount of seating for disabled persons (including for disabled media representatives) will be based on the size of each stadium and will include places for people with autism as well.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">From a local perspective there is no substantial legal provision in respect of accessibility requirements for persons with disabilities. In terms of the Qatari Law in respect of People with Special Needs, there is a general requirement to provide people with special needs with, inter alia, the means for assisted transport and equipment, accommodation for safe and secure movement as well as special facilities in public places. The Ministry of Municipality and Environment covers some of these aspects in terms of its requirements for building works, along with various other ministries and local authorities in relation to building matters, but these requirements do not extend as far as those of FIFA in terms of accessibility. However, the overall scope of the World Cup 2022 requirements would seem to imply accessibility requirements for disabled persons will inevitably need to be extended to other World Cup-related areas such as hotels and accommodation, airport and transport facilities and fan zones in order to be compatible with those at the stadium venues.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Summary</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">FIFA has strict benchmarks to meet when it comes to the stadiums, facilities, logistics and publicity for World Cup events while Qatar has strict legislation that cannot be easily or quickly changed. The attaining of a mutually beneficial solution will take time but can be achieved after undertaking detailed research and analysis to understand the laws that may need to be enacted or changed to host the tournament.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">There are plenty of precedents for this. South Africa for instance enacted a law to enable speedy trials in special courts in respect of crimes by fans, Brazil enacted legislation to accommodate FIFA requirements and Russia, the 2018 hosts, have also made changes to their laws in connection with the World Cup.</p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The process of analysis is well under way in Qatar and changes to laws and standards in connection with World Cup 2022 have been and continue to be considered. The prospects seem to be in place for finding a solution that satisfies external and internal stakeholders, ensures a successful tournament for FIFA and the host nation as well leaving a meaningful legacy of progressive standards and legal considerations.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em><img class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-8030\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/KJBNKJN.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"5043\" height=\"1477\" />NB: A version of this article was first published during the week of 18 June 2018 on Lawinsport.com.</em></p>\r\n<em>Al Tamimi &amp; Company’s TMT team regularly advises on the full spectrum of technology, media and telecommunications matters and Roberto routinely provides key support to our Sports Law and Events Management practice. For further information please contact Steve Bainbridge (s.bainbridge@tamimi.com) or Roberto Lusardi (r.lusardi@tamimi.com).</em>'),
(250727, 24457, 'MetaValueOld', '<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><img class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-8024\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_657601672.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"7000\" height=\"3000\" />The 2022 FIFA World Cup™ is shaping up to be a momentous event. It will be the first to be held in the Middle East and the first to be hosted by an Arab country. It is well-known that the FIFA obligations imposed on a host country in relation to the tournament involve substantial changes to its laws in order to accommodate FIFA’s commercial, licensing and tax requirements, among other issues.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">This is not to say FIFA can simply impose its will and insist on complete changes to Qatar’s legal system. Qatar is a relatively conservative Arab country with traditional and established legal concepts and customs. While by necessity, and by virtue of similar situations at previous World Cups, changes will need to be made to certain local laws to meet FIFA requirements, such changes will need to be through agreements between the host country and FIFA.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Getting this balance right will result in mutual benefits for Qatar and FIFA to create a successful tournament as well developing an ongoing legacy for the host country in conjunction with the Qatar National Vision 2030. Some of these changes in law are still to be agreed while others may have already set in motion positive developments, as further shown below.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Legal challenges</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">FIFA has strict requirements in respect of all aspects relating to a World Cup, from stadium construction, accommodation and transport to publicity and marketing matters related to the event. Changes to local laws are generally needed in order to allow for, among other things, FIFA to obtain all required Qatar government guarantees in respect of the World Cup, FIFA-designated goods and merchandise to be imported into Qatar free of customs duties, FIFA’s intellectual property (‘IP’) and authorised sponsors and licensees to be protected against unlawful third party actions such as sale of counterfeit goods and ambush marketing (see more below). FIFA also requires that it is exempted from taxation or otherwise favourably treated in respect of World Cup-related income.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">While there will be changes made to comply with such FIFA requirements it will generally still be necessary for persons doing business in Qatar to comply with existing Qatar laws, for example in respect of IP protection, events, customs and consumer protection, to the extent there is no conflict between the two.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Specific changes to laws and/or the enactment of enabling laws in respect of government guarantees, customs requirements and taxation have not yet been implemented. It is expected these will be agreed between Qatar and FIFA within an appropriate time period prior to the 2022 tournament, although the basis and extent of these new laws is not yet clear. It seems, however, that in respect of licensing and merchandising matters, such as in respect of ambush marketing and fake/counterfeit merchandise, the legal approach and position will be similar to that taken at previous World Cups, .</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Sponsorship and Merchandising</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Ambush marketing is essentially the unauthorised association by an entity of its products and/or services in respect of an event where it has no sponsorship or licensing rights. The entity is often a competitor of a duly authorised event sponsor/licensee. The aim, via clever marketing and the pushing of legal boundaries, is to create the perception (and obtain the related commercial value) of the ambushing entity being associated with the event in question, to the detriment and loss of the authorised event sponsor or licensee who has paid a substantial amount for such privilege.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Fake/counterfeit merchandising involves the sale to the public of event-themed and event-linked goods where the sellers are not authorised to do so and/or where the actual goods being sold have been not produced under authorised licence.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">As with previous World Cup tournaments, the intention of the Qatar authorities and FIFA is not to take a heavy-handed approach but at the same time ensure that action is taken quickly and decisively against any infringing persons. Special investigative units and courts specifically to deal with cases of ambush marketing and counterfeit merchandise will be created. This will involve enabling legislation being introduced to allow authorised officials to monitor and stop infringements by conducting local investigations and court hearings and issuing immediate fines to perpetrators. The plan is not to provide for any jail sentences but in all cases the infringing goods would be confiscated.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">These additional legal provisions will be supplementary to existing Qatari copyright and trademark laws which protect IP and related licensing rights in accordance with international standards. FIFA has also published an exhaustive and extremely strict code of what it considers to be unacceptable marketing practices surrounding its World Cup tournament.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Customs and Consumer Protection</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Irrespective of specific agreements reached with FIFA, any goods coming into Qatar in connection with the World Cup will need to comply with the existing Customs Law, whereby the General Authority of Customs have the right not to permit any goods to clear customs and enter Qatar unless such goods have been approved by the relevant authority.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Incoming goods will also need to comply with the existing Consumer Protection Law. This gives consumers in Qatar the right, amongst others, to return defective products, to the repair or replacement of any defective products and the right to receive accurate information about the products. The Consumer Protection Law prohibits the sale or marketing of defective or expired goods, with goods considered defective if they do not comply with specific standards, are unfit for purpose or have expired.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Electronic Commerce Law also addresses certain consumer rights by stating that its provisions are applicable to the provisions of the Consumer Protection Law. This ensures that both physical and online sales and marketing transactions are covered in relation to counterfeit goods.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Tourism and Events Management</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The provisions of the Tourism Licensing Law, which govern business activities in the tourism sector within Qatar, are applicable to the hotel and other industries within the tourism sector. They will impact related World Cup activities and ventures. The law regulates ‘tourism establishments’, defined as places operating mainly to accommodate tourists, such as entertainment establishments and specialised clubs, and other places allocated to provide services for tourists, such as tourism offices, offices offering tourist transport, tourist guide offices and time-sharing places, and any other establishment deemed to be a tourist establishment in accordance with a decision of the Minister of Economy and Commerce or the proposal of the President of the Qatar Tourism Authority. It also covers ‘tourism activities’: any activity of the transport of tourists including the transport of tourists on trips onshore or offshore, the activities of tour guides, time-sharing and any other activity deemed to be a tourist activity in accordance with a decision of the Minister of Economy and Commerce or the proposal of the President of the Qatar Tourism Authority.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Under the Tourism Licensing Law, a licence is required to establish or manage a hotel or tourist establishment or to practise any tourist activity. Applications for such a licence is made to the Qatar Tourism Authority and all hotel and/or tour operators wishing to conduct such activities in relation to the 2022 World Cup will need to be aware of such requirement.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Gambling</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">As with all major sporting events, the World Cup will generate substantial gambling activities. Gambling is prohibited in Qatar in all forms, whether land-based or online, as well as the advertising of gambling activities. Accordingly it is unlikely that any gambling will be tolerated and any offenders would face prosecution. The risk of enforcement against an online gambling operator outside of Qatar is lower but the offending website could be blocked by the authorities pursuant to provisions under the Cybercrime Law, which also provide for the confiscation of all devices, software or equipment used in the commission of the offence and the confiscation of any funds obtained from such offence.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Worker’s Rights and Laws</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Due to the extensive construction and infrastructure projects associated with the 2022 World Cup in terms of stadiums, accommodation and transport, a lot of attention has been focused on the rights and welfare of the many workers who will be engaged on these projects. Certain rights and protections are granted to workers in Qatar under the Labour Law and these have been further supplemented pursuant to the adoption in 2013 of specific workers’ charters by the Supreme Committee for Delivery and Legacy (the ‘SC 2022’) and Qatar Foundation for Science, Education and Community Development (the ‘Qatar Foundation’).</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Labour Law provides workers with certain rights and protections in respect of the provision of necessary equipment, the nature of work to be performed, remuneration, working hours and holidays, annual and sick leave, other forms of leave, occupational health and safety, compensation for accidents and death, end-of-service gratuity and repatriation obligation upon termination. Non-Qatari workers are not permitted to form worker committees, unions or similar collective organisations.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SC 2022’s Workers’ Welfare Standards charter, which covers all workers engaged in the World Cup stadium construction and infrastructure projects overseen by the SC 2022, says additional protections are provided to such workers requiring all its contractors and subcontractors for stadium-related projects to comply with such charter. These protections include, without limitation, ethical recruitment and fair treatment, employment offer minimum requirements, responsibility for relocation costs to Qatar, no retention of worker passports or other personal documents, dignified and ethical employment conditions, the provision of medical insurance, accommodation and food standards, reporting requirements for employers, the creation of workers’ welfare forums, transportation and site requirements and access to information in an appropriate language.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Qatar Foundation Mandatory Standards of Migrant Workers’ Welfare document provides similar additional rights and protections for workers involved in all Qatar Foundation projects, which includes one of the World Cup 2022 stadiums and related facilities. The Qatar Foundation charter sets out certain minimum standards with regards to the recruitment, living and working conditions of workers engaged in construction and other projects at the Qatar Foundation. These standards are applicable to, and compliance is required from, all contractors and subcontractors of Qatar Foundation. The required standards include, without limitation, preparation of a welfare adherence plan and related audit, workers being informed as to all entitlements, a safe and healthy work environment, a clean, safe and healthy living environment, equal and humane treatment, equal pay for equal work, regulated working hours, medical insurance and skills training.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Accessibility Requirements</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Accessibility to stadiums for disabled persons and/or persons in wheelchairs is a mandatory requirement of FIFA for all stadiums constructed for a World Cup tournament. In this respect, the SC 2022 is ensuring that all World Cup 2022 venues will be accessible to persons with disabilities so as to make the event inclusive for all. Pursuant to this requirement, accessibility is incorporated into all areas of stadium and venue design such as seating, entry and exit points, parking and toilet facilities. The SC 2022 has advised that the amount of seating for disabled persons (including for disabled media representatives) will be based on the size of each stadium and will include places for people with autism as well.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">From a local perspective there is no substantial legal provision in respect of accessibility requirements for persons with disabilities. In terms of the Qatari Law in respect of People with Special Needs, there is a general requirement to provide people with special needs with, inter alia, the means for assisted transport and equipment, accommodation for safe and secure movement as well as special facilities in public places. The Ministry of Municipality and Environment covers some of these aspects in terms of its requirements for building works, along with various other ministries and local authorities in relation to building matters, but these requirements do not extend as far as those of FIFA in terms of accessibility. However, the overall scope of the World Cup 2022 requirements would seem to imply accessibility requirements for disabled persons will inevitably need to be extended to other World Cup-related areas such as hotels and accommodation, airport and transport facilities and fan zones in order to be compatible with those at the stadium venues.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Summary</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">FIFA has strict benchmarks to meet when it comes to the stadiums, facilities, logistics and publicity for World Cup events while Qatar has strict legislation that cannot be easily or quickly changed. The attaining of a mutually beneficial solution will take time but can be achieved after undertaking detailed research and analysis to understand the laws that may need to be enacted or changed to host the tournament.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">There are plenty of precedents for this. South Africa for instance enacted a law to enable speedy trials in special courts in respect of crimes by fans, Brazil enacted legislation to accommodate FIFA requirements and Russia, the 2018 hosts, have also made changes to their laws in connection with the World Cup.</p>\r\n<img class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-8026\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_1115518292.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"5043\" height=\"2073\" />\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The process of analysis is well under way in Qatar and changes to laws and standards in connection with World Cup 2022 have been and continue to be considered. The prospects seem to be in place for finding a solution that satisfies external and internal stakeholders, ensures a successful tournament for FIFA and the host nation as well leaving a meaningful legacy of progressive standards and legal considerations.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em>NB: A version of this article was first published during the week of 18 June 2018 on Lawinsport.com.</em></p>\r\n<em>Al Tamimi &amp; Company’s TMT team regularly advises on the full spectrum of technology, media and telecommunications matters and Roberto routinely provides key support to our Sports Law and Events Management practice. For further information please contact Steve Bainbridge (s.bainbridge@tamimi.com) or Roberto Lusardi (r.lusardi@tamimi.com).</em>'),
(250728, 24457, 'MetaLink', 'content'),
(250729, 24457, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7950&amp;action=edit');
INSERT INTO `tm_wsal_metadata` (`id`, `occurrence_id`, `name`, `value`) VALUES
(250730, 24457, 'ReportText', '<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><img class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-8024\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_657601672.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"7000\" height=\"3000\" />The 2022 FIFA World Cup™ is shaping up to be a momentous event. It will be the first to be held in the Middle East and the first to be hosted by an Arab country. It is well-known that the FIFA obligations imposed on a host country in relation to the tournament involve substantial changes to its laws in order to accommodate FIFA’s commercial, licensing and tax requirements, among other issues.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">This is not to say FIFA can simply impose its will and insist on complete changes to Qatar’s legal system. Qatar is a relatively conservative Arab country with traditional and established legal concepts and customs. While by necessity, and by virtue of similar situations at previous World Cups, changes will need to be made to certain local laws to meet FIFA requirements, such changes will need to be through agreements between the host country and FIFA.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Getting this balance right will result in mutual benefits for Qatar and FIFA to create a successful tournament as well developing an ongoing legacy for the host country in conjunction with the Qatar National Vision 2030. Some of these changes in law are still to be agreed while others may have already set in motion positive developments, as further shown below.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Legal challenges</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">FIFA has strict requirements in respect of all aspects relating to a World Cup, from stadium construction, accommodation and transport to publicity and marketing matters related to the event. Changes to local laws are generally needed in order to allow for, among other things, FIFA to obtain all required Qatar government guarantees in respect of the World Cup, FIFA-designated goods and merchandise to be imported into Qatar free of customs duties, FIFA’s intellectual property (‘IP’) and authorised sponsors and licensees to be protected against unlawful third party actions such as sale of counterfeit goods and ambush marketing (see more below). FIFA also requires that it is exempted from taxation or otherwise favourably treated in respect of World Cup-related income.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">While there will be changes made to comply with such FIFA requirements it will generally still be necessary for persons doing business in Qatar to comply with existing Qatar laws, for example in respect of IP protection, events, customs and consumer protection, to the extent there is no conflict between the two.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Specific changes to laws and/or the enactment of enabling laws in respect of government guarantees, customs requirements and taxation have not yet been implemented. It is expected these will be agreed between Qatar and FIFA within an appropriate time period prior to the 2022 tournament, although the basis and extent of these new laws is not yet clear. It seems, however, that in respect of licensing and merchandising matters, such as in respect of ambush marketing and fake/counterfeit merchandise, the legal approach and position will be similar to that taken at previous World Cups, .</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Sponsorship and Merchandising</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Ambush marketing is essentially the unauthorised association by an entity of its products and/or services in respect of an event where it has no sponsorship or licensing rights. The entity is often a competitor of a duly authorised event sponsor/licensee. The aim, via clever marketing and the pushing of legal boundaries, is to create the perception (and obtain the related commercial value) of the ambushing entity being associated with the event in question, to the detriment and loss of the authorised event sponsor or licensee who has paid a substantial amount for such privilege.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Fake/counterfeit merchandising involves the sale to the public of event-themed and event-linked goods where the sellers are not authorised to do so and/or where the actual goods being sold have been not produced under authorised licence.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">As with previous World Cup tournaments, the intention of the Qatar authorities and FIFA is not to take a heavy-handed approach but at the same time ensure that action is taken quickly and decisively against any infringing persons. Special investigative units and courts specifically to deal with cases of ambush marketing and counterfeit merchandise will be created. This will involve enabling legislation being introduced to allow authorised officials to monitor and stop infringements by conducting local investigations and court hearings and issuing immediate fines to perpetrators. The plan is not to provide for any jail sentences but in all cases the infringing goods would be confiscated.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">These additional legal provisions will be supplementary to existing Qatari copyright and trademark laws which protect IP and related licensing rights in accordance with international standards. FIFA has also published an exhaustive and extremely strict code of what it considers to be unacceptable marketing practices surrounding its World Cup tournament.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Customs and Consumer Protection</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Irrespective of specific agreements reached with FIFA, any goods coming into Qatar in connection with the World Cup will need to comply with the existing Customs Law, whereby the General Authority of Customs have the right not to permit any goods to clear customs and enter Qatar unless such goods have been approved by the relevant authority.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Incoming goods will also need to comply with the existing Consumer Protection Law. This gives consumers in Qatar the right, amongst others, to return defective products, to the repair or replacement of any defective products and the right to receive accurate information about the products. The Consumer Protection Law prohibits the sale or marketing of defective or expired goods, with goods considered defective if they do not comply with specific standards, are unfit for purpose or have expired.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Electronic Commerce Law also addresses certain consumer rights by stating that its provisions are applicable to the provisions of the Consumer Protection Law. This ensures that both physical and online sales and marketing transactions are covered in relation to counterfeit goods.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Tourism and Events Management</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The provisions of the Tourism Licensing Law, which govern business activities in the tourism sector within Qatar, are applicable to the hotel and other industries within the tourism sector. They will impact related World Cup activities and ventures. The law regulates ‘tourism establishments’, defined as places operating mainly to accommodate tourists, such as entertainment establishments and specialised clubs, and other places allocated to provide services for tourists, such as tourism offices, offices offering tourist transport, tourist guide offices and time-sharing places, and any other establishment deemed to be a tourist establishment in accordance with a decision of the Minister of Economy and Commerce or the proposal of the President of the Qatar Tourism Authority. It also covers ‘tourism activities’: any activity of the transport of tourists including the transport of tourists on trips onshore or offshore, the activities of tour guides, time-sharing and any other activity deemed to be a tourist activity in accordance with a decision of the Minister of Economy and Commerce or the proposal of the President of the Qatar Tourism Authority.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Under the Tourism Licensing Law, a licence is required to establish or manage a hotel or tourist establishment or to practise any tourist activity. Applications for such a licence is made to the Qatar Tourism Authority and all hotel and/or tour operators wishing to conduct such activities in relation to the 2022 World Cup will need to be aware of such requirement.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Gambling</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">As with all major sporting events, the World Cup will generate substantial gambling activities. Gambling is prohibited in Qatar in all forms, whether land-based or online, as well as the advertising of gambling activities. Accordingly it is unlikely that any gambling will be tolerated and any offenders would face prosecution. The risk of enforcement against an online gambling operator outside of Qatar is lower but the offending website could be blocked by the authorities pursuant to provisions under the Cybercrime Law, which also provide for the confiscation of all devices, software or equipment used in the commission of the offence and the confiscation of any funds obtained from such offence.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Worker’s Rights and Laws</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Due to the extensive construction and infrastructure projects associated with the 2022 World Cup in terms of stadiums, accommodation and transport, a lot of attention has been focused on the rights and welfare of the many workers who will be engaged on these projects. Certain rights and protections are granted to workers in Qatar under the Labour Law and these have been further supplemented pursuant to the adoption in 2013 of specific workers’ charters by the Supreme Committee for Delivery and Legacy (the ‘SC 2022’) and Qatar Foundation for Science, Education and Community Development (the ‘Qatar Foundation’).</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Labour Law provides workers with certain rights and protections in respect of the provision of necessary equipment, the nature of work to be performed, remuneration, working hours and holidays, annual and sick leave, other forms of leave, occupational health and safety, compensation for accidents and death, end-of-service gratuity and repatriation obligation upon termination. Non-Qatari workers are not permitted to form worker committees, unions or similar collective organisations.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SC 2022’s Workers’ Welfare Standards charter, which covers all workers engaged in the World Cup stadium construction and infrastructure projects overseen by the SC 2022, says additional protections are provided to such workers requiring all its contractors and subcontractors for stadium-related projects to comply with such charter. These protections include, without limitation, ethical recruitment and fair treatment, employment offer minimum requirements, responsibility for relocation costs to Qatar, no retention of worker passports or other personal documents, dignified and ethical employment conditions, the provision of medical insurance, accommodation and food standards, reporting requirements for employers, the creation of workers’ welfare forums, transportation and site requirements and access to information in an appropriate language.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Qatar Foundation Mandatory Standards of Migrant Workers’ Welfare document provides similar additional rights and protections for workers involved in all Qatar Foundation projects, which includes one of the World Cup 2022 stadiums and related facilities. The Qatar Foundation charter sets out certain minimum standards with regards to the recruitment, living and working conditions of workers engaged in construction and other projects at the Qatar Foundation. These standards are applicable to, and compliance is required from, all contractors and subcontractors of Qatar Foundation. The required standards include, without limitation, preparation of a welfare adherence plan and related audit, workers being informed as to all entitlements, a safe and healthy work environment, a clean, safe and healthy living environment, equal and humane treatment, equal pay for equal work, regulated working hours, medical insurance and skills training.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Accessibility Requirements</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Accessibility to stadiums for disabled persons and/or persons in wheelchairs is a mandatory requirement of FIFA for all stadiums constructed for a World Cup tournament. In this respect, the SC 2022 is ensuring that all World Cup 2022 venues will be accessible to persons with disabilities so as to make the event inclusive for all. Pursuant to this requirement, accessibility is incorporated into all areas of stadium and venue design such as seating, entry and exit points, parking and toilet facilities. The SC 2022 has advised that the amount of seating for disabled persons (including for disabled media representatives) will be based on the size of each stadium and will include places for people with autism as well.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">From a local perspective there is no substantial legal provision in respect of accessibility requirements for persons with disabilities. In terms of the Qatari Law in respect of People with Special Needs, there is a general requirement to provide people with special needs with, inter alia, the means for assisted transport and equipment, accommodation for safe and secure movement as well as special facilities in public places. The Ministry of Municipality and Environment covers some of these aspects in terms of its requirements for building works, along with various other ministries and local authorities in relation to building matters, but these requirements do not extend as far as those of FIFA in terms of accessibility. However, the overall scope of the World Cup 2022 requirements would seem to imply accessibility requirements for disabled persons will inevitably need to be extended to other World Cup-related areas such as hotels and accommodation, airport and transport facilities and fan zones in order to be compatible with those at the stadium venues.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Summary</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">FIFA has strict benchmarks to meet when it comes to the stadiums, facilities, logistics and publicity for World Cup events while Qatar has strict legislation that cannot be easily or quickly changed. The attaining of a mutually beneficial solution will take time but can be achieved after undertaking detailed research and analysis to understand the laws that may need to be enacted or changed to host the tournament.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">There are plenty of precedents for this. South Africa for instance enacted a law to enable speedy trials in special courts in respect of crimes by fans, Brazil enacted legislation to accommodate FIFA requirements and Russia, the 2018 hosts, have also made changes to their laws in connection with the World Cup.</p>\r\n<img class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-8026\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_1115518292.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"5043\" height=\"2073\" />\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The process of analysis is well under way in Qatar and changes to laws and standards in connection with World Cup 2022 have been and continue to be considered. The prospects seem to be in place for finding a solution that satisfies external and internal stakeholders, ensures a successful tournament for FIFA and the host nation as well leaving a meaningful legacy of progressive standards and legal considerations.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em>NB: A version of this article was first published during the week of 18 June 2018 on Lawinsport.com.</em></p>\r\n<em>Al Tamimi &amp; Company’s TMT team regularly advises on the full spectrum of technology, media and telecommunications matters and Roberto routinely provides key support to our Sports Law and Events Management practice. For further information please contact Steve Bainbridge (s.bainbridge@tamimi.com) or Roberto Lusardi (r.lusardi@tamimi.com).</em>|<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><img class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-8029\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/8678.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"7000\" height=\"2173\" />The 2022 FIFA World Cup™ is shaping up to be a momentous event. It will be the first to be held in the Middle East and the first to be hosted by an Arab country. It is well-known that the FIFA obligations imposed on a host country in relation to the tournament involve substantial changes to its laws in order to accommodate FIFA’s commercial, licensing and tax requirements, among other issues.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">This is not to say FIFA can simply impose its will and insist on complete changes to Qatar’s legal system. Qatar is a relatively conservative Arab country with traditional and established legal concepts and customs. While by necessity, and by virtue of similar situations at previous World Cups, changes will need to be made to certain local laws to meet FIFA requirements, such changes will need to be through agreements between the host country and FIFA.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Getting this balance right will result in mutual benefits for Qatar and FIFA to create a successful tournament as well developing an ongoing legacy for the host country in conjunction with the Qatar National Vision 2030. Some of these changes in law are still to be agreed while others may have already set in motion positive developments, as further shown below.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Legal challenges</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">FIFA has strict requirements in respect of all aspects relating to a World Cup, from stadium construction, accommodation and transport to publicity and marketing matters related to the event. Changes to local laws are generally needed in order to allow for, among other things, FIFA to obtain all required Qatar government guarantees in respect of the World Cup, FIFA-designated goods and merchandise to be imported into Qatar free of customs duties, FIFA’s intellectual property (‘IP’) and authorised sponsors and licensees to be protected against unlawful third party actions such as sale of counterfeit goods and ambush marketing (see more below). FIFA also requires that it is exempted from taxation or otherwise favourably treated in respect of World Cup-related income.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">While there will be changes made to comply with such FIFA requirements it will generally still be necessary for persons doing business in Qatar to comply with existing Qatar laws, for example in respect of IP protection, events, customs and consumer protection, to the extent there is no conflict between the two.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Specific changes to laws and/or the enactment of enabling laws in respect of government guarantees, customs requirements and taxation have not yet been implemented. It is expected these will be agreed between Qatar and FIFA within an appropriate time period prior to the 2022 tournament, although the basis and extent of these new laws is not yet clear. It seems, however, that in respect of licensing and merchandising matters, such as in respect of ambush marketing and fake/counterfeit merchandise, the legal approach and position will be similar to that taken at previous World Cups, .</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Sponsorship and Merchandising</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Ambush marketing is essentially the unauthorised association by an entity of its products and/or services in respect of an event where it has no sponsorship or licensing rights. The entity is often a competitor of a duly authorised event sponsor/licensee. The aim, via clever marketing and the pushing of legal boundaries, is to create the perception (and obtain the related commercial value) of the ambushing entity being associated with the event in question, to the detriment and loss of the authorised event sponsor or licensee who has paid a substantial amount for such privilege.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Fake/counterfeit merchandising involves the sale to the public of event-themed and event-linked goods where the sellers are not authorised to do so and/or where the actual goods being sold have been not produced under authorised licence.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">As with previous World Cup tournaments, the intention of the Qatar authorities and FIFA is not to take a heavy-handed approach but at the same time ensure that action is taken quickly and decisively against any infringing persons. Special investigative units and courts specifically to deal with cases of ambush marketing and counterfeit merchandise will be created. This will involve enabling legislation being introduced to allow authorised officials to monitor and stop infringements by conducting local investigations and court hearings and issuing immediate fines to perpetrators. The plan is not to provide for any jail sentences but in all cases the infringing goods would be confiscated.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">These additional legal provisions will be supplementary to existing Qatari copyright and trademark laws which protect IP and related licensing rights in accordance with international standards. FIFA has also published an exhaustive and extremely strict code of what it considers to be unacceptable marketing practices surrounding its World Cup tournament.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Customs and Consumer Protection</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Irrespective of specific agreements reached with FIFA, any goods coming into Qatar in connection with the World Cup will need to comply with the existing Customs Law, whereby the General Authority of Customs have the right not to permit any goods to clear customs and enter Qatar unless such goods have been approved by the relevant authority.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Incoming goods will also need to comply with the existing Consumer Protection Law. This gives consumers in Qatar the right, amongst others, to return defective products, to the repair or replacement of any defective products and the right to receive accurate information about the products. The Consumer Protection Law prohibits the sale or marketing of defective or expired goods, with goods considered defective if they do not comply with specific standards, are unfit for purpose or have expired.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Electronic Commerce Law also addresses certain consumer rights by stating that its provisions are applicable to the provisions of the Consumer Protection Law. This ensures that both physical and online sales and marketing transactions are covered in relation to counterfeit goods.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Tourism and Events Management</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The provisions of the Tourism Licensing Law, which govern business activities in the tourism sector within Qatar, are applicable to the hotel and other industries within the tourism sector. They will impact related World Cup activities and ventures. The law regulates ‘tourism establishments’, defined as places operating mainly to accommodate tourists, such as entertainment establishments and specialised clubs, and other places allocated to provide services for tourists, such as tourism offices, offices offering tourist transport, tourist guide offices and time-sharing places, and any other establishment deemed to be a tourist establishment in accordance with a decision of the Minister of Economy and Commerce or the proposal of the President of the Qatar Tourism Authority. It also covers ‘tourism activities’: any activity of the transport of tourists including the transport of tourists on trips onshore or offshore, the activities of tour guides, time-sharing and any other activity deemed to be a tourist activity in accordance with a decision of the Minister of Economy and Commerce or the proposal of the President of the Qatar Tourism Authority.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Under the Tourism Licensing Law, a licence is required to establish or manage a hotel or tourist establishment or to practise any tourist activity. Applications for such a licence is made to the Qatar Tourism Authority and all hotel and/or tour operators wishing to conduct such activities in relation to the 2022 World Cup will need to be aware of such requirement.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Gambling</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">As with all major sporting events, the World Cup will generate substantial gambling activities. Gambling is prohibited in Qatar in all forms, whether land-based or online, as well as the advertising of gambling activities. Accordingly it is unlikely that any gambling will be tolerated and any offenders would face prosecution. The risk of enforcement against an online gambling operator outside of Qatar is lower but the offending website could be blocked by the authorities pursuant to provisions under the Cybercrime Law, which also provide for the confiscation of all devices, software or equipment used in the commission of the offence and the confiscation of any funds obtained from such offence.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Worker’s Rights and Laws</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Due to the extensive construction and infrastructure projects associated with the 2022 World Cup in terms of stadiums, accommodation and transport, a lot of attention has been focused on the rights and welfare of the many workers who will be engaged on these projects. Certain rights and protections are granted to workers in Qatar under the Labour Law and these have been further supplemented pursuant to the adoption in 2013 of specific workers’ charters by the Supreme Committee for Delivery and Legacy (the ‘SC 2022’) and Qatar Foundation for Science, Education and Community Development (the ‘Qatar Foundation’).</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Labour Law provides workers with certain rights and protections in respect of the provision of necessary equipment, the nature of work to be performed, remuneration, working hours and holidays, annual and sick leave, other forms of leave, occupational health and safety, compensation for accidents and death, end-of-service gratuity and repatriation obligation upon termination. Non-Qatari workers are not permitted to form worker committees, unions or similar collective organisations.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SC 2022’s Workers’ Welfare Standards charter, which covers all workers engaged in the World Cup stadium construction and infrastructure projects overseen by the SC 2022, says additional protections are provided to such workers requiring all its contractors and subcontractors for stadium-related projects to comply with such charter. These protections include, without limitation, ethical recruitment and fair treatment, employment offer minimum requirements, responsibility for relocation costs to Qatar, no retention of worker passports or other personal documents, dignified and ethical employment conditions, the provision of medical insurance, accommodation and food standards, reporting requirements for employers, the creation of workers’ welfare forums, transportation and site requirements and access to information in an appropriate language.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Qatar Foundation Mandatory Standards of Migrant Workers’ Welfare document provides similar additional rights and protections for workers involved in all Qatar Foundation projects, which includes one of the World Cup 2022 stadiums and related facilities. The Qatar Foundation charter sets out certain minimum standards with regards to the recruitment, living and working conditions of workers engaged in construction and other projects at the Qatar Foundation. These standards are applicable to, and compliance is required from, all contractors and subcontractors of Qatar Foundation. The required standards include, without limitation, preparation of a welfare adherence plan and related audit, workers being informed as to all entitlements, a safe and healthy work environment, a clean, safe and healthy living environment, equal and humane treatment, equal pay for equal work, regulated working hours, medical insurance and skills training.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Accessibility Requirements</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Accessibility to stadiums for disabled persons and/or persons in wheelchairs is a mandatory requirement of FIFA for all stadiums constructed for a World Cup tournament. In this respect, the SC 2022 is ensuring that all World Cup 2022 venues will be accessible to persons with disabilities so as to make the event inclusive for all. Pursuant to this requirement, accessibility is incorporated into all areas of stadium and venue design such as seating, entry and exit points, parking and toilet facilities. The SC 2022 has advised that the amount of seating for disabled persons (including for disabled media representatives) will be based on the size of each stadium and will include places for people with autism as well.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">From a local perspective there is no substantial legal provision in respect of accessibility requirements for persons with disabilities. In terms of the Qatari Law in respect of People with Special Needs, there is a general requirement to provide people with special needs with, inter alia, the means for assisted transport and equipment, accommodation for safe and secure movement as well as special facilities in public places. The Ministry of Municipality and Environment covers some of these aspects in terms of its requirements for building works, along with various other ministries and local authorities in relation to building matters, but these requirements do not extend as far as those of FIFA in terms of accessibility. However, the overall scope of the World Cup 2022 requirements would seem to imply accessibility requirements for disabled persons will inevitably need to be extended to other World Cup-related areas such as hotels and accommodation, airport and transport facilities and fan zones in order to be compatible with those at the stadium venues.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Summary</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">FIFA has strict benchmarks to meet when it comes to the stadiums, facilities, logistics and publicity for World Cup events while Qatar has strict legislation that cannot be easily or quickly changed. The attaining of a mutually beneficial solution will take time but can be achieved after undertaking detailed research and analysis to understand the laws that may need to be enacted or changed to host the tournament.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">There are plenty of precedents for this. South Africa for instance enacted a law to enable speedy trials in special courts in respect of crimes by fans, Brazil enacted legislation to accommodate FIFA requirements and Russia, the 2018 hosts, have also made changes to their laws in connection with the World Cup.</p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The process of analysis is well under way in Qatar and changes to laws and standards in connection with World Cup 2022 have been and continue to be considered. The prospects seem to be in place for finding a solution that satisfies external and internal stakeholders, ensures a successful tournament for FIFA and the host nation as well leaving a meaningful legacy of progressive standards and legal considerations.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em><img class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-8030\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/KJBNKJN.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"5043\" height=\"1477\" />NB: A version of this article was first published during the week of 18 June 2018 on Lawinsport.com.</em></p>\r\n<em>Al Tamimi &amp; Company’s TMT team regularly advises on the full spectrum of technology, media and telecommunications matters and Roberto routinely provides key support to our Sports Law and Events Management practice. For further information please contact Steve Bainbridge (s.bainbridge@tamimi.com) or Roberto Lusardi (r.lusardi@tamimi.com).</em>'),
(250731, 24457, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250732, 24457, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250733, 24457, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250734, 24457, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250735, 24458, 'PostID', '7950'),
(250736, 24458, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(250737, 24458, 'PostTitle', 'Qatar 2022 World Cup: Laws, Changes and Legacy Benefits'),
(250738, 24458, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(250739, 24458, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 18:04:56'),
(250740, 24458, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7950'),
(250741, 24458, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7950&amp;action=edit'),
(250742, 24458, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250743, 24458, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250744, 24458, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250745, 24458, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250746, 24459, 'PostID', '7951'),
(250747, 24459, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(250748, 24459, 'PostTitle', 'The Privatisation of Saudi Arabia’s Football Clubs: An Update'),
(250749, 24459, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(250750, 24459, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 18:05:24'),
(250751, 24459, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7951'),
(250752, 24459, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7951&amp;action=edit'),
(250753, 24459, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250754, 24459, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250755, 24459, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250756, 24459, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250757, 24460, 'PostID', '7951'),
(250758, 24460, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(250759, 24460, 'PostTitle', 'The Privatisation of Saudi Arabia’s Football Clubs: An Update'),
(250760, 24460, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(250761, 24460, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 16:03:17'),
(250762, 24460, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7951'),
(250763, 24460, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7951&amp;action=edit'),
(250764, 24460, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250765, 24460, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250766, 24460, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250767, 24460, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250768, 24461, 'PostID', '7951'),
(250769, 24461, 'PostTitle', 'The Privatisation of Saudi Arabia’s Football Clubs: An Update'),
(250770, 24461, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(250771, 24461, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(250772, 24461, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 18:05:26'),
(250773, 24461, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7951'),
(250774, 24461, 'MetaID', '223772'),
(250775, 24461, 'MetaKey', 'content'),
(250776, 24461, 'MetaValueNew', '<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><img class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-8028\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_791480302.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"6400\" height=\"2008\" />Progress towards privatising the top 14 professional football clubs in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (\"KSA\") continues apace in light of a string of recent developments.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Background</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Presently KSA sporting clubs, including clubs competing in the Saudi Professional League (\"SPL\"), are government-owned. This status quo stems from an historic objective to centralise the growth and development of socially-desirable sporting initiatives across KSA sports, including those which may not enjoy the commercial appeal and sustainability of football.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The push towards privatisation of SPL clubs started in earnest in April 2016 with the unveiling of the Saudi Vision 2030 plan (\"Vision 2030\"), which aims to diversify KSA’s economy and reduce its dependence on oil revenues. Vision 2030 crystallised the government’s long-standing position, advanced most recently by His Royal Highness Prince Mohammad bin Salman that the privatisation of certain state-owned assets can and should play a significant role in economic and social development. The plan expressly promotes social goals including increasing physical and sporting activities, as well as the creation of new public-private partnerships (\"PPPs\") to establish dedicated sporting facilities and programmes, a general reduction in costs and increased efficiency.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The unveiling of Vision 2030 prompted a number of developments. In May 2016, the General Presidency of Youth Welfare was rebranded as the General Authority for Sports (\"GAS\") and given greater responsibilities for developing sports clubs and facilities. This was followed in June 2016 by the launch of the National Transformation Program 2020, a framework for the implementation of Vision 2030. Shortly thereafter in July 2016, the GAS and the Ministry of Commence and Investment launched a campaign to increase awareness amongst KSA football clubs and other interested parties regarding, inter alia, the need to register trademarks and otherwise protect their IP.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In November 2016, the Council of Ministers approved the Council for Economic Development Affairs’ (\"CEDA\") recommendations to:</p>\r\n\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">privatise SPL clubs as new corporate entities;</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">give the GAS responsibility for granting licences to such entities;</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">create a Sports Development Fund to finance new stadiums and facilities for clubs; and</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">create a supervisory committee (headed by the Chairman of the GAS and with representatives of the SPL and Saudi Arabian Football Federation (\"SAFF\")) to oversee the transfer of operational and financial control from government hands to the private sector.</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Specific goals for the privatisation process were also set, including elevating the quality and status of the SPL and positioning it to diversify revenues and make a greater contribution to the national economy. All of these steps indicate that a serious review of factors relevant to the privatisation process has been undertaken, underlining the KSA government’s commitment to the project.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Recent Developments</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">A number of recent developments impact, either directly or indirectly, upon the plans to privatise SPL clubs and the potential of a privatised KSA football industry:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In February 2017, Jadwa Investment, one of KSA’s largest privately-owned investment banks, was appointed to advise on the privatisation of up to five SPL clubs, following a competitive tender exercise;</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In January 2018, the KSA government lifted the ban on women attending football games and in doing so opened up a large and hitherto un-tapped commercial market for the SPL;</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In February 2018, SAFF announced a new 10 year broadcasting deal with Saudi Telecommunications Company (\"STC\", which is 70% owned by the KSA Public Investment Fund) from season 2018/19 worth $1.76 billion. This deal is reportedly an increase of 61% from the previous deal with MBC and ensures that all SPL games are free-to-air across the MENA region; and</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In April 2018, CEDA approved a ‘Privatisation Program’ for the creation of, inter alia, the legal and regulatory basis for the privatisation process. The Privatisation Program document confirms that the privatisation of SPL clubs is a core component of the initial tranche of projects due to be finalised by 2020.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">These recent developments demonstrate a number of important points. Firstly, that the KSA government remains committed to keeping up the momentum towards the privatisation of SPL clubs. Secondly, that the privatisation of SPL clubs has become a bellwether project to showcase KSA’s progressive economic and social reforms, with the expectation that the SPL will become a powerful marketing tool for KSA to attract international brands and investors. And thirdly, that the KSA government is committed to grow and develop the KSA football industry in general.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>The Structural Potential of KSA Football</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Football is the preeminent sport in Saudi Arabia. The national team is one of the most successful in Asia, winning the AFC Asian Cup three times (and reaching the final on three further occasions) since 1984, as well as qualifying for the FIFA World Cup on five occasions, including Russia 2018. Domestically, Al-Hilal FC and Al-Nassr FC are considered to be the amongst the leading football clubs in Asia, having won numerous Asian Club Championship, AFC Champions League and Arab Club Championship titles.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">KSA football clubs tend to rely on a combination of traditional revenue streams (broadcast, commercial and match-day) and contributions from wealthy groups and individuals affiliated, formally or informally, with clubs. The hope is that privatisation will significantly increase traditional revenue streams without impacting investment from wealthy groups and individuals. As touched upon further below, this may require some delicate handling to ensure that the best aspects of modern corporate governance and management structures do not alienate existing financial backers.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Football is the largest spectator sport in KSA and the SPL boasts an impressive average stadium capacity of 33,273 (falling just short of the English Premier League’s 37,644). Given that the average SPL attendance in the 2017/18 season was only 5,726, there is spare capacity into which the SPL fan base can grow. As alluded to above, fan engagement with SPL and attendances are expected to receive a significant boost from the progressive societal reforms taking place in KSA generally.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Fan engagement is also expected to receive a boost due to the new broadcast deal with STC, which ensures that all SPL games will be free-to-air across the MENA region. International broadcast penetration of the SPL has also hitherto been limited, with only about 5% of MBC Pro Sports (the outgoing SPL broadcast rights-holder) subscriptions coming from outside Saudi Arabia. The new rights deal should ensure that SPL viewership increases many-fold.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In addition, KSA has one of the most digitally engaged populations in the world. Mobile phone penetration is extremely high (estimated at 180 subscriptions per 100 residents), it has the highest per capita rate of YouTube use of any country in the world (according to a 2015 BBC study) and its residents use social media for an average of five hours per day (according to a 2016 YouGov study). Potential football fans are therefore increasingly accessible and SPL clubs are increasingly looking to engage with their already very large digital fan-bases.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Potential Challenges</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">After positive reports in early 2017, specific details about the procedural steps for transforming clubs into corporate entities and subsequently formalising the process of private investment, including timelines, applicable regulations and execution documentation have still not been confirmed as of the date of this article’s publication. For example, it is not yet known whether a specific corporate entity will be required to hold the assets, or what form and scope a designated long-term regulator may take and what its part in the privatisation process will be. Anecdotal reports suggest that for the purposes of investment, every club will have two components: assets and real estate; and that a given privatisation need not necessarily include an obligation to purchase the club’s real estate. This would provide some welcome flexibility to investors in considering various business plans and strategies to optimise growth and development in years to come.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Comment</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Subject to effective implementation and the absence of significant market distortion factors, the privatisation of sports clubs can be beneficial in terms of providing both access to capital for short-term investment in stadia, training facilities and playing squads, and also in establishing the necessary business framework to nurture talent and encourage the best practices in club management. Indeed the prospect of attracting owners who are incentivised to bring the best and brightest management teams to drive commercial success could bode well in terms of growing match-day revenues with stadium development and an increased ability to compete for domestic and foreign players.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Given the issues outlined above, the 2020 target date for all SPL clubs to be privatised does seem ambitious, as some commentators have noted; however the KSA government is clearly committed to the project. Indeed, it has become a central pillar in the delivery plan for Vision 2030 and the political capital staked on the project being a success should help drive it forward.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">As touched upon in this article, a number of unknowns remain. For example, the size of the Sports Development Fund earmarked for assisting with this process and the precise details of planned allocations are not officially available at present but the establishment of the fund does suggest an understanding and appreciation that there will be certain costs involved in helping even the top clubs achieve immediate sustainability.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Further afield, the privatisation of SPL clubs has prompted reports that Saudi investors are considering investment into British clubs in order to link them with newly privatised SPL clubs. Ironically, and subject to particular investment dynamics, this could mean that the sovereign wealth fund created by the wider KSA privatisation program may indirectly lead to Saudi investment in European clubs, which we are already starting to see (e.g., Sheffield United), in much the same way that middle-eastern investors have acquired Premier League and Ligue 1 clubs.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">It is likely that the SPL would benefit significantly from such tie-ups, as they would bring to the table a wealth of on-field and off-field technical expertise, as well as opportunities to share playing talent and synchronise commercial objectives. In addition to the ancillary benefits of such direct foreign investment, Saudi interests have also been linked with proposals to reconceive the Club World Cup. With greater influence in top leagues and competitions abroad and a roadmap to stabilize and grow the domestic league, the future for the KSA football industry has never looked brighter.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em><img class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-8025\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_1051299398.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"5999\" height=\"2678\" />NB: This article was first published on 15 June 2018 on lawinsport.com</em></p>\r\n<em>Steve leads Al Tamimi &amp; Company’s Sports and Events Management practice. For further information, please contact Steve Bainbridge (s.bainbridge@tamimi.com).</em>');
INSERT INTO `tm_wsal_metadata` (`id`, `occurrence_id`, `name`, `value`) VALUES
(250777, 24461, 'MetaValueOld', '<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Progress towards privatising the top 14 professional football clubs in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (\"KSA\") continues apace in light of a string of recent developments.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Background</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Presently KSA sporting clubs, including clubs competing in the Saudi Professional League (\"SPL\"), are government-owned. This status quo stems from an historic objective to centralise the growth and development of socially-desirable sporting initiatives across KSA sports, including those which may not enjoy the commercial appeal and sustainability of football.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The push towards privatisation of SPL clubs started in earnest in April 2016 with the unveiling of the Saudi Vision 2030 plan (\"Vision 2030\"), which aims to diversify KSA’s economy and reduce its dependence on oil revenues. Vision 2030 crystallised the government’s long-standing position, advanced most recently by His Royal Highness Prince Mohammad bin Salman that the privatisation of certain state-owned assets can and should play a significant role in economic and social development. The plan expressly promotes social goals including increasing physical and sporting activities, as well as the creation of new public-private partnerships (\"PPPs\") to establish dedicated sporting facilities and programmes, a general reduction in costs and increased efficiency.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The unveiling of Vision 2030 prompted a number of developments. In May 2016, the General Presidency of Youth Welfare was rebranded as the General Authority for Sports (\"GAS\") and given greater responsibilities for developing sports clubs and facilities. This was followed in June 2016 by the launch of the National Transformation Program 2020, a framework for the implementation of Vision 2030. Shortly thereafter in July 2016, the GAS and the Ministry of Commence and Investment launched a campaign to increase awareness amongst KSA football clubs and other interested parties regarding, inter alia, the need to register trademarks and otherwise protect their IP.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In November 2016, the Council of Ministers approved the Council for Economic Development Affairs’ (\"CEDA\") recommendations to:</p>\r\n\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">privatise SPL clubs as new corporate entities;</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">give the GAS responsibility for granting licences to such entities;</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">create a Sports Development Fund to finance new stadiums and facilities for clubs; and</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">create a supervisory committee (headed by the Chairman of the GAS and with representatives of the SPL and Saudi Arabian Football Federation (\"SAFF\")) to oversee the transfer of operational and financial control from government hands to the private sector.</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Specific goals for the privatisation process were also set, including elevating the quality and status of the SPL and positioning it to diversify revenues and make a greater contribution to the national economy. All of these steps indicate that a serious review of factors relevant to the privatisation process has been undertaken, underlining the KSA government’s commitment to the project.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Recent Developments</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">A number of recent developments impact, either directly or indirectly, upon the plans to privatise SPL clubs and the potential of a privatised KSA football industry:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In February 2017, Jadwa Investment, one of KSA’s largest privately-owned investment banks, was appointed to advise on the privatisation of up to five SPL clubs, following a competitive tender exercise;</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In January 2018, the KSA government lifted the ban on women attending football games and in doing so opened up a large and hitherto un-tapped commercial market for the SPL;</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In February 2018, SAFF announced a new 10 year broadcasting deal with Saudi Telecommunications Company (\"STC\", which is 70% owned by the KSA Public Investment Fund) from season 2018/19 worth $1.76 billion. This deal is reportedly an increase of 61% from the previous deal with MBC and ensures that all SPL games are free-to-air across the MENA region; and</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In April 2018, CEDA approved a ‘Privatisation Program’ for the creation of, inter alia, the legal and regulatory basis for the privatisation process. The Privatisation Program document confirms that the privatisation of SPL clubs is a core component of the initial tranche of projects due to be finalised by 2020.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">These recent developments demonstrate a number of important points. Firstly, that the KSA government remains committed to keeping up the momentum towards the privatisation of SPL clubs. Secondly, that the privatisation of SPL clubs has become a bellwether project to showcase KSA’s progressive economic and social reforms, with the expectation that the SPL will become a powerful marketing tool for KSA to attract international brands and investors. And thirdly, that the KSA government is committed to grow and develop the KSA football industry in general.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>The Structural Potential of KSA Football</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Football is the preeminent sport in Saudi Arabia. The national team is one of the most successful in Asia, winning the AFC Asian Cup three times (and reaching the final on three further occasions) since 1984, as well as qualifying for the FIFA World Cup on five occasions, including Russia 2018. Domestically, Al-Hilal FC and Al-Nassr FC are considered to be the amongst the leading football clubs in Asia, having won numerous Asian Club Championship, AFC Champions League and Arab Club Championship titles.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">KSA football clubs tend to rely on a combination of traditional revenue streams (broadcast, commercial and match-day) and contributions from wealthy groups and individuals affiliated, formally or informally, with clubs. The hope is that privatisation will significantly increase traditional revenue streams without impacting investment from wealthy groups and individuals. As touched upon further below, this may require some delicate handling to ensure that the best aspects of modern corporate governance and management structures do not alienate existing financial backers.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Football is the largest spectator sport in KSA and the SPL boasts an impressive average stadium capacity of 33,273 (falling just short of the English Premier League’s 37,644). Given that the average SPL attendance in the 2017/18 season was only 5,726, there is spare capacity into which the SPL fan base can grow. As alluded to above, fan engagement with SPL and attendances are expected to receive a significant boost from the progressive societal reforms taking place in KSA generally.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Fan engagement is also expected to receive a boost due to the new broadcast deal with STC, which ensures that all SPL games will be free-to-air across the MENA region. International broadcast penetration of the SPL has also hitherto been limited, with only about 5% of MBC Pro Sports (the outgoing SPL broadcast rights-holder) subscriptions coming from outside Saudi Arabia. The new rights deal should ensure that SPL viewership increases many-fold.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In addition, KSA has one of the most digitally engaged populations in the world. Mobile phone penetration is extremely high (estimated at 180 subscriptions per 100 residents), it has the highest per capita rate of YouTube use of any country in the world (according to a 2015 BBC study) and its residents use social media for an average of five hours per day (according to a 2016 YouGov study). Potential football fans are therefore increasingly accessible and SPL clubs are increasingly looking to engage with their already very large digital fan-bases.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Potential Challenges</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">After positive reports in early 2017, specific details about the procedural steps for transforming clubs into corporate entities and subsequently formalising the process of private investment, including timelines, applicable regulations and execution documentation have still not been confirmed as of the date of this article’s publication. For example, it is not yet known whether a specific corporate entity will be required to hold the assets, or what form and scope a designated long-term regulator may take and what its part in the privatisation process will be. Anecdotal reports suggest that for the purposes of investment, every club will have two components: assets and real estate; and that a given privatisation need not necessarily include an obligation to purchase the club’s real estate. This would provide some welcome flexibility to investors in considering various business plans and strategies to optimise growth and development in years to come.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Comment</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Subject to effective implementation and the absence of significant market distortion factors, the privatisation of sports clubs can be beneficial in terms of providing both access to capital for short-term investment in stadia, training facilities and playing squads, and also in establishing the necessary business framework to nurture talent and encourage the best practices in club management. Indeed the prospect of attracting owners who are incentivised to bring the best and brightest management teams to drive commercial success could bode well in terms of growing match-day revenues with stadium development and an increased ability to compete for domestic and foreign players.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Given the issues outlined above, the 2020 target date for all SPL clubs to be privatised does seem ambitious, as some commentators have noted; however the KSA government is clearly committed to the project. Indeed, it has become a central pillar in the delivery plan for Vision 2030 and the political capital staked on the project being a success should help drive it forward.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">As touched upon in this article, a number of unknowns remain. For example, the size of the Sports Development Fund earmarked for assisting with this process and the precise details of planned allocations are not officially available at present but the establishment of the fund does suggest an understanding and appreciation that there will be certain costs involved in helping even the top clubs achieve immediate sustainability.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Further afield, the privatisation of SPL clubs has prompted reports that Saudi investors are considering investment into British clubs in order to link them with newly privatised SPL clubs. Ironically, and subject to particular investment dynamics, this could mean that the sovereign wealth fund created by the wider KSA privatisation program may indirectly lead to Saudi investment in European clubs, which we are already starting to see (e.g., Sheffield United), in much the same way that middle-eastern investors have acquired Premier League and Ligue 1 clubs.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">It is likely that the SPL would benefit significantly from such tie-ups, as they would bring to the table a wealth of on-field and off-field technical expertise, as well as opportunities to share playing talent and synchronise commercial objectives. In addition to the ancillary benefits of such direct foreign investment, Saudi interests have also been linked with proposals to reconceive the Club World Cup. With greater influence in top leagues and competitions abroad and a roadmap to stabilize and grow the domestic league, the future for the KSA football industry has never looked brighter.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em>NB: This article was first published on 15 June 2018 on lawinsport.com</em></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<em>Steve leads Al Tamimi &amp; Company’s Sports and Events Management practice. For further information, please contact Steve Bainbridge (s.bainbridge@tamimi.com).</em>'),
(250778, 24461, 'MetaLink', 'content'),
(250779, 24461, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7951&amp;action=edit'),
(250780, 24461, 'ReportText', '<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Progress towards privatising the top 14 professional football clubs in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (\"KSA\") continues apace in light of a string of recent developments.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Background</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Presently KSA sporting clubs, including clubs competing in the Saudi Professional League (\"SPL\"), are government-owned. This status quo stems from an historic objective to centralise the growth and development of socially-desirable sporting initiatives across KSA sports, including those which may not enjoy the commercial appeal and sustainability of football.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The push towards privatisation of SPL clubs started in earnest in April 2016 with the unveiling of the Saudi Vision 2030 plan (\"Vision 2030\"), which aims to diversify KSA’s economy and reduce its dependence on oil revenues. Vision 2030 crystallised the government’s long-standing position, advanced most recently by His Royal Highness Prince Mohammad bin Salman that the privatisation of certain state-owned assets can and should play a significant role in economic and social development. The plan expressly promotes social goals including increasing physical and sporting activities, as well as the creation of new public-private partnerships (\"PPPs\") to establish dedicated sporting facilities and programmes, a general reduction in costs and increased efficiency.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The unveiling of Vision 2030 prompted a number of developments. In May 2016, the General Presidency of Youth Welfare was rebranded as the General Authority for Sports (\"GAS\") and given greater responsibilities for developing sports clubs and facilities. This was followed in June 2016 by the launch of the National Transformation Program 2020, a framework for the implementation of Vision 2030. Shortly thereafter in July 2016, the GAS and the Ministry of Commence and Investment launched a campaign to increase awareness amongst KSA football clubs and other interested parties regarding, inter alia, the need to register trademarks and otherwise protect their IP.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In November 2016, the Council of Ministers approved the Council for Economic Development Affairs’ (\"CEDA\") recommendations to:</p>\r\n\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">privatise SPL clubs as new corporate entities;</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">give the GAS responsibility for granting licences to such entities;</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">create a Sports Development Fund to finance new stadiums and facilities for clubs; and</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">create a supervisory committee (headed by the Chairman of the GAS and with representatives of the SPL and Saudi Arabian Football Federation (\"SAFF\")) to oversee the transfer of operational and financial control from government hands to the private sector.</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Specific goals for the privatisation process were also set, including elevating the quality and status of the SPL and positioning it to diversify revenues and make a greater contribution to the national economy. All of these steps indicate that a serious review of factors relevant to the privatisation process has been undertaken, underlining the KSA government’s commitment to the project.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Recent Developments</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">A number of recent developments impact, either directly or indirectly, upon the plans to privatise SPL clubs and the potential of a privatised KSA football industry:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In February 2017, Jadwa Investment, one of KSA’s largest privately-owned investment banks, was appointed to advise on the privatisation of up to five SPL clubs, following a competitive tender exercise;</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In January 2018, the KSA government lifted the ban on women attending football games and in doing so opened up a large and hitherto un-tapped commercial market for the SPL;</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In February 2018, SAFF announced a new 10 year broadcasting deal with Saudi Telecommunications Company (\"STC\", which is 70% owned by the KSA Public Investment Fund) from season 2018/19 worth $1.76 billion. This deal is reportedly an increase of 61% from the previous deal with MBC and ensures that all SPL games are free-to-air across the MENA region; and</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In April 2018, CEDA approved a ‘Privatisation Program’ for the creation of, inter alia, the legal and regulatory basis for the privatisation process. The Privatisation Program document confirms that the privatisation of SPL clubs is a core component of the initial tranche of projects due to be finalised by 2020.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">These recent developments demonstrate a number of important points. Firstly, that the KSA government remains committed to keeping up the momentum towards the privatisation of SPL clubs. Secondly, that the privatisation of SPL clubs has become a bellwether project to showcase KSA’s progressive economic and social reforms, with the expectation that the SPL will become a powerful marketing tool for KSA to attract international brands and investors. And thirdly, that the KSA government is committed to grow and develop the KSA football industry in general.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>The Structural Potential of KSA Football</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Football is the preeminent sport in Saudi Arabia. The national team is one of the most successful in Asia, winning the AFC Asian Cup three times (and reaching the final on three further occasions) since 1984, as well as qualifying for the FIFA World Cup on five occasions, including Russia 2018. Domestically, Al-Hilal FC and Al-Nassr FC are considered to be the amongst the leading football clubs in Asia, having won numerous Asian Club Championship, AFC Champions League and Arab Club Championship titles.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">KSA football clubs tend to rely on a combination of traditional revenue streams (broadcast, commercial and match-day) and contributions from wealthy groups and individuals affiliated, formally or informally, with clubs. The hope is that privatisation will significantly increase traditional revenue streams without impacting investment from wealthy groups and individuals. As touched upon further below, this may require some delicate handling to ensure that the best aspects of modern corporate governance and management structures do not alienate existing financial backers.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Football is the largest spectator sport in KSA and the SPL boasts an impressive average stadium capacity of 33,273 (falling just short of the English Premier League’s 37,644). Given that the average SPL attendance in the 2017/18 season was only 5,726, there is spare capacity into which the SPL fan base can grow. As alluded to above, fan engagement with SPL and attendances are expected to receive a significant boost from the progressive societal reforms taking place in KSA generally.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Fan engagement is also expected to receive a boost due to the new broadcast deal with STC, which ensures that all SPL games will be free-to-air across the MENA region. International broadcast penetration of the SPL has also hitherto been limited, with only about 5% of MBC Pro Sports (the outgoing SPL broadcast rights-holder) subscriptions coming from outside Saudi Arabia. The new rights deal should ensure that SPL viewership increases many-fold.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In addition, KSA has one of the most digitally engaged populations in the world. Mobile phone penetration is extremely high (estimated at 180 subscriptions per 100 residents), it has the highest per capita rate of YouTube use of any country in the world (according to a 2015 BBC study) and its residents use social media for an average of five hours per day (according to a 2016 YouGov study). Potential football fans are therefore increasingly accessible and SPL clubs are increasingly looking to engage with their already very large digital fan-bases.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Potential Challenges</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">After positive reports in early 2017, specific details about the procedural steps for transforming clubs into corporate entities and subsequently formalising the process of private investment, including timelines, applicable regulations and execution documentation have still not been confirmed as of the date of this article’s publication. For example, it is not yet known whether a specific corporate entity will be required to hold the assets, or what form and scope a designated long-term regulator may take and what its part in the privatisation process will be. Anecdotal reports suggest that for the purposes of investment, every club will have two components: assets and real estate; and that a given privatisation need not necessarily include an obligation to purchase the club’s real estate. This would provide some welcome flexibility to investors in considering various business plans and strategies to optimise growth and development in years to come.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Comment</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Subject to effective implementation and the absence of significant market distortion factors, the privatisation of sports clubs can be beneficial in terms of providing both access to capital for short-term investment in stadia, training facilities and playing squads, and also in establishing the necessary business framework to nurture talent and encourage the best practices in club management. Indeed the prospect of attracting owners who are incentivised to bring the best and brightest management teams to drive commercial success could bode well in terms of growing match-day revenues with stadium development and an increased ability to compete for domestic and foreign players.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Given the issues outlined above, the 2020 target date for all SPL clubs to be privatised does seem ambitious, as some commentators have noted; however the KSA government is clearly committed to the project. Indeed, it has become a central pillar in the delivery plan for Vision 2030 and the political capital staked on the project being a success should help drive it forward.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">As touched upon in this article, a number of unknowns remain. For example, the size of the Sports Development Fund earmarked for assisting with this process and the precise details of planned allocations are not officially available at present but the establishment of the fund does suggest an understanding and appreciation that there will be certain costs involved in helping even the top clubs achieve immediate sustainability.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Further afield, the privatisation of SPL clubs has prompted reports that Saudi investors are considering investment into British clubs in order to link them with newly privatised SPL clubs. Ironically, and subject to particular investment dynamics, this could mean that the sovereign wealth fund created by the wider KSA privatisation program may indirectly lead to Saudi investment in European clubs, which we are already starting to see (e.g., Sheffield United), in much the same way that middle-eastern investors have acquired Premier League and Ligue 1 clubs.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">It is likely that the SPL would benefit significantly from such tie-ups, as they would bring to the table a wealth of on-field and off-field technical expertise, as well as opportunities to share playing talent and synchronise commercial objectives. In addition to the ancillary benefits of such direct foreign investment, Saudi interests have also been linked with proposals to reconceive the Club World Cup. With greater influence in top leagues and competitions abroad and a roadmap to stabilize and grow the domestic league, the future for the KSA football industry has never looked brighter.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em>NB: This article was first published on 15 June 2018 on lawinsport.com</em></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<em>Steve leads Al Tamimi &amp; Company’s Sports and Events Management practice. For further information, please contact Steve Bainbridge (s.bainbridge@tamimi.com).</em>|<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><img class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-8028\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_791480302.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"6400\" height=\"2008\" />Progress towards privatising the top 14 professional football clubs in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (\"KSA\") continues apace in light of a string of recent developments.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Background</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Presently KSA sporting clubs, including clubs competing in the Saudi Professional League (\"SPL\"), are government-owned. This status quo stems from an historic objective to centralise the growth and development of socially-desirable sporting initiatives across KSA sports, including those which may not enjoy the commercial appeal and sustainability of football.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The push towards privatisation of SPL clubs started in earnest in April 2016 with the unveiling of the Saudi Vision 2030 plan (\"Vision 2030\"), which aims to diversify KSA’s economy and reduce its dependence on oil revenues. Vision 2030 crystallised the government’s long-standing position, advanced most recently by His Royal Highness Prince Mohammad bin Salman that the privatisation of certain state-owned assets can and should play a significant role in economic and social development. The plan expressly promotes social goals including increasing physical and sporting activities, as well as the creation of new public-private partnerships (\"PPPs\") to establish dedicated sporting facilities and programmes, a general reduction in costs and increased efficiency.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The unveiling of Vision 2030 prompted a number of developments. In May 2016, the General Presidency of Youth Welfare was rebranded as the General Authority for Sports (\"GAS\") and given greater responsibilities for developing sports clubs and facilities. This was followed in June 2016 by the launch of the National Transformation Program 2020, a framework for the implementation of Vision 2030. Shortly thereafter in July 2016, the GAS and the Ministry of Commence and Investment launched a campaign to increase awareness amongst KSA football clubs and other interested parties regarding, inter alia, the need to register trademarks and otherwise protect their IP.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In November 2016, the Council of Ministers approved the Council for Economic Development Affairs’ (\"CEDA\") recommendations to:</p>\r\n\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">privatise SPL clubs as new corporate entities;</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">give the GAS responsibility for granting licences to such entities;</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">create a Sports Development Fund to finance new stadiums and facilities for clubs; and</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">create a supervisory committee (headed by the Chairman of the GAS and with representatives of the SPL and Saudi Arabian Football Federation (\"SAFF\")) to oversee the transfer of operational and financial control from government hands to the private sector.</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Specific goals for the privatisation process were also set, including elevating the quality and status of the SPL and positioning it to diversify revenues and make a greater contribution to the national economy. All of these steps indicate that a serious review of factors relevant to the privatisation process has been undertaken, underlining the KSA government’s commitment to the project.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Recent Developments</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">A number of recent developments impact, either directly or indirectly, upon the plans to privatise SPL clubs and the potential of a privatised KSA football industry:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In February 2017, Jadwa Investment, one of KSA’s largest privately-owned investment banks, was appointed to advise on the privatisation of up to five SPL clubs, following a competitive tender exercise;</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In January 2018, the KSA government lifted the ban on women attending football games and in doing so opened up a large and hitherto un-tapped commercial market for the SPL;</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In February 2018, SAFF announced a new 10 year broadcasting deal with Saudi Telecommunications Company (\"STC\", which is 70% owned by the KSA Public Investment Fund) from season 2018/19 worth $1.76 billion. This deal is reportedly an increase of 61% from the previous deal with MBC and ensures that all SPL games are free-to-air across the MENA region; and</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">In April 2018, CEDA approved a ‘Privatisation Program’ for the creation of, inter alia, the legal and regulatory basis for the privatisation process. The Privatisation Program document confirms that the privatisation of SPL clubs is a core component of the initial tranche of projects due to be finalised by 2020.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">These recent developments demonstrate a number of important points. Firstly, that the KSA government remains committed to keeping up the momentum towards the privatisation of SPL clubs. Secondly, that the privatisation of SPL clubs has become a bellwether project to showcase KSA’s progressive economic and social reforms, with the expectation that the SPL will become a powerful marketing tool for KSA to attract international brands and investors. And thirdly, that the KSA government is committed to grow and develop the KSA football industry in general.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>The Structural Potential of KSA Football</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Football is the preeminent sport in Saudi Arabia. The national team is one of the most successful in Asia, winning the AFC Asian Cup three times (and reaching the final on three further occasions) since 1984, as well as qualifying for the FIFA World Cup on five occasions, including Russia 2018. Domestically, Al-Hilal FC and Al-Nassr FC are considered to be the amongst the leading football clubs in Asia, having won numerous Asian Club Championship, AFC Champions League and Arab Club Championship titles.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">KSA football clubs tend to rely on a combination of traditional revenue streams (broadcast, commercial and match-day) and contributions from wealthy groups and individuals affiliated, formally or informally, with clubs. The hope is that privatisation will significantly increase traditional revenue streams without impacting investment from wealthy groups and individuals. As touched upon further below, this may require some delicate handling to ensure that the best aspects of modern corporate governance and management structures do not alienate existing financial backers.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Football is the largest spectator sport in KSA and the SPL boasts an impressive average stadium capacity of 33,273 (falling just short of the English Premier League’s 37,644). Given that the average SPL attendance in the 2017/18 season was only 5,726, there is spare capacity into which the SPL fan base can grow. As alluded to above, fan engagement with SPL and attendances are expected to receive a significant boost from the progressive societal reforms taking place in KSA generally.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Fan engagement is also expected to receive a boost due to the new broadcast deal with STC, which ensures that all SPL games will be free-to-air across the MENA region. International broadcast penetration of the SPL has also hitherto been limited, with only about 5% of MBC Pro Sports (the outgoing SPL broadcast rights-holder) subscriptions coming from outside Saudi Arabia. The new rights deal should ensure that SPL viewership increases many-fold.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In addition, KSA has one of the most digitally engaged populations in the world. Mobile phone penetration is extremely high (estimated at 180 subscriptions per 100 residents), it has the highest per capita rate of YouTube use of any country in the world (according to a 2015 BBC study) and its residents use social media for an average of five hours per day (according to a 2016 YouGov study). Potential football fans are therefore increasingly accessible and SPL clubs are increasingly looking to engage with their already very large digital fan-bases.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Potential Challenges</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">After positive reports in early 2017, specific details about the procedural steps for transforming clubs into corporate entities and subsequently formalising the process of private investment, including timelines, applicable regulations and execution documentation have still not been confirmed as of the date of this article’s publication. For example, it is not yet known whether a specific corporate entity will be required to hold the assets, or what form and scope a designated long-term regulator may take and what its part in the privatisation process will be. Anecdotal reports suggest that for the purposes of investment, every club will have two components: assets and real estate; and that a given privatisation need not necessarily include an obligation to purchase the club’s real estate. This would provide some welcome flexibility to investors in considering various business plans and strategies to optimise growth and development in years to come.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Comment</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Subject to effective implementation and the absence of significant market distortion factors, the privatisation of sports clubs can be beneficial in terms of providing both access to capital for short-term investment in stadia, training facilities and playing squads, and also in establishing the necessary business framework to nurture talent and encourage the best practices in club management. Indeed the prospect of attracting owners who are incentivised to bring the best and brightest management teams to drive commercial success could bode well in terms of growing match-day revenues with stadium development and an increased ability to compete for domestic and foreign players.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Given the issues outlined above, the 2020 target date for all SPL clubs to be privatised does seem ambitious, as some commentators have noted; however the KSA government is clearly committed to the project. Indeed, it has become a central pillar in the delivery plan for Vision 2030 and the political capital staked on the project being a success should help drive it forward.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">As touched upon in this article, a number of unknowns remain. For example, the size of the Sports Development Fund earmarked for assisting with this process and the precise details of planned allocations are not officially available at present but the establishment of the fund does suggest an understanding and appreciation that there will be certain costs involved in helping even the top clubs achieve immediate sustainability.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Further afield, the privatisation of SPL clubs has prompted reports that Saudi investors are considering investment into British clubs in order to link them with newly privatised SPL clubs. Ironically, and subject to particular investment dynamics, this could mean that the sovereign wealth fund created by the wider KSA privatisation program may indirectly lead to Saudi investment in European clubs, which we are already starting to see (e.g., Sheffield United), in much the same way that middle-eastern investors have acquired Premier League and Ligue 1 clubs.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">It is likely that the SPL would benefit significantly from such tie-ups, as they would bring to the table a wealth of on-field and off-field technical expertise, as well as opportunities to share playing talent and synchronise commercial objectives. In addition to the ancillary benefits of such direct foreign investment, Saudi interests have also been linked with proposals to reconceive the Club World Cup. With greater influence in top leagues and competitions abroad and a roadmap to stabilize and grow the domestic league, the future for the KSA football industry has never looked brighter.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em><img class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-8025\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_1051299398.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"5999\" height=\"2678\" />NB: This article was first published on 15 June 2018 on lawinsport.com</em></p>\r\n<em>Steve leads Al Tamimi &amp; Company’s Sports and Events Management practice. For further information, please contact Steve Bainbridge (s.bainbridge@tamimi.com).</em>'),
(250781, 24461, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250782, 24461, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250783, 24461, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250784, 24461, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250785, 24462, 'PostID', '7950'),
(250786, 24462, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(250787, 24462, 'PostTitle', 'Qatar 2022 World Cup: Laws, Changes and Legacy Benefits'),
(250788, 24462, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(250789, 24462, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 18:05:27'),
(250790, 24462, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7950'),
(250791, 24462, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7950&amp;action=edit'),
(250792, 24462, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250793, 24462, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250794, 24462, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250795, 24462, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250796, 24463, 'PostID', '7951'),
(250797, 24463, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(250798, 24463, 'PostTitle', 'The Privatisation of Saudi Arabia’s Football Clubs: An Update'),
(250799, 24463, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(250800, 24463, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 18:05:26'),
(250801, 24463, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7951'),
(250802, 24463, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7951&amp;action=edit'),
(250803, 24463, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250804, 24463, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250805, 24463, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250806, 24463, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250807, 24464, 'PostID', '7951'),
(250808, 24464, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(250809, 24464, 'PostTitle', 'The Privatisation of Saudi Arabia’s Football Clubs: An Update'),
(250810, 24464, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(250811, 24464, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 18:05:37'),
(250812, 24464, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7951'),
(250813, 24464, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7951&amp;action=edit'),
(250814, 24464, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250815, 24464, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250816, 24464, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250817, 24464, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250818, 24465, 'PostID', '7952'),
(250819, 24465, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(250820, 24465, 'PostTitle', 'Introduction to the Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre (SSAC)'),
(250821, 24465, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(250822, 24465, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 18:08:56'),
(250823, 24465, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7952'),
(250824, 24465, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7952&amp;action=edit'),
(250825, 24465, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250826, 24465, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250827, 24465, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250828, 24465, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250829, 24466, 'PostID', '7952'),
(250830, 24466, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(250831, 24466, 'PostTitle', 'Introduction to the Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre (SSAC)'),
(250832, 24466, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(250833, 24466, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 16:06:35'),
(250834, 24466, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7952'),
(250835, 24466, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7952&amp;action=edit'),
(250836, 24466, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250837, 24466, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250838, 24466, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250839, 24466, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250840, 24467, 'PostID', '7952'),
(250841, 24467, 'PostTitle', 'Introduction to the Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre (SSAC)'),
(250842, 24467, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(250843, 24467, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(250844, 24467, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 18:08:59'),
(250845, 24467, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7952'),
(250846, 24467, 'MetaID', '223822'),
(250847, 24467, 'MetaKey', 'content');
INSERT INTO `tm_wsal_metadata` (`id`, `occurrence_id`, `name`, `value`) VALUES
(250848, 24467, 'MetaValueNew', '<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><img class=\"alignright wp-image-8027 size-large\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_1016569270-1024x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" />Football is hugely popular across the Middle East. Its popularity has led some to invest in football clubs. When one considers the wide range of agreements between clubs, players, coaches and sponsors, the potential for disputes is clear. Satisfactory resolution of such disputes is not always easily attainable, considering the specialist nature of sports law and general scarcity of specialist in the field. Bespoke judicial bodies and arbitration centres have recently been established in response.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In 2015, the Saudi Arabian Olympic Committee (SAOC) approved the establishment the Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre (SSAC). Specifically, the Generally Assembly of the SAOC approved its Board of Directors’ decision to authorize the SAOC President to take all necessary actions to establish the SSAC. The SSAC aims to contribute to the general development of the sports sector and the resolution of sport related disputes. As a result, sports law in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and the resolution of sports related disputes, has seen significant development. There is no doubt that SSAC has contributed to the preservation of the rights of parties, and the broader development of the sports sector in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">This article considers two significant regulatory regimes in the field of sports law in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia - the Statute of the Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre (SSAC Statute) and the Rules and Procedures of the Centre of Arbitration for Sport (Rules &amp; Procedures). Further, the author considers various divisions of sports arbitration with both the ordinary and the appeal arbitration procedures of the SSAC.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Established in 2016, the SSAC is located in Riyadh, the nation’s capital. The SSAC is the highest judicial body for sports-related disputes in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, specialising in the hearing of any sports-related dispute by arbitration or mediation.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The legal basis of the SSAC is the SSAC Statute, its procedural rules, and any resolution issued by the SSAC’s Board of Directors. Further, the SSAC was established in line with the Olympic Charter, the statutes of International Federations, the Code of the Court of Arbitration for Sports, and the Arbitration Law of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This has led to a strong, and familiar, legal basis for its effective operation.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC is composed of five members: one appointed by the SAOC, that individual is the President of the SSAC; one appointed by the Athletes’ Committee of the SAOC; one appointed by the Saudi Arabia Football Federation (SAFF); and two appointed by the General Assembly of the SAOC.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC does not deal with appeals arising from violations of laws of the game, criminal cases arising from sports disputes, or sports disputes that have not exhausted the internal roads via the competent judicial bodies. Final decisions may be appealed to the SSAC within 21 days of notification.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>SSAC Procedures</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC Statute and the Rules &amp; Procedures are a set of procedural rules that govern SSAC procedures. The SSAC provides for three types of procedure:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>Ordinary Arbitration - in which the parties have agreed to refer a sports dispute to the SSAC in accordance with an arbitration clause in a contract, or in cases where both parties agree to refer the dispute to arbitration after the dispute has arisen.</li>\r\n 	<li>Appeal Arbitration - in which a party has filed an appeal against a decision issued by a national association such as SAFF, or a judicial body related to sport, where the statutes or regulations provide an appeal before the SSAC.</li>\r\n 	<li>Mediation - in which each party has agreed to refer a dispute that has arisen, or a potential dispute that may arise, to an SSAC mediator.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>SSAC Jurisdiction</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC has jurisdiction to hear any dispute related to sport. Many types of disputes can be referred to the SSAC, including; disputes arising between the SAOC, associations, clubs, members of the boards, members of the general assembly, players, referees, coaches, intermediaries, registered media representatives, organizers of sports events, sponsoring companies, TV transmission channels, disputes relating to sports doping, contractual disputes (provided the arbitration clause refers the dispute to the SSAC), and any international sports dispute (such as may occur in connection with a foreign player or coach) in which the parties have agreed to resort to the SSAC. The SSAC accordingly enjoys wide jurisdiction to hear any dispute related to sports in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This stands to generally contribute to the development of sports law in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabian judiciary.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Arbitration Divisions</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">According to Article 24 of the SSAC Statute, the SSAC shall conduct the arbitration in sports-related disputes through the following arbitration divisions:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Ordinary Arbitration Division, which shall carry out its tasks in accordance with the following powers: to resolve sports-related disputes that may arise out of contracts containing an arbitration clause that refers any dispute to the SSAC, or out of any subsequent agreement allowing the referral of disputes to the SSAC and to resolve sports disputes that may arise between the parties to any sports matter (athletes, players, intermediaries, sponsors, administrative staff, technical staff, medical staff, sports clubs, sports federations and Olympic committees), provided that such disputes are not subject to appeal before the SSAC.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Appeals Arbitration Division, which shall carry out its tasks in accordance with the following powers: to decide on all appeals against final decisions issued by the sports bodies after exhausting all internal legal procedures, except for football decisions, to decide on objections filed against internal decisions issued by the sports bodies, which do not have protest proceedings provided for in their statutes or regulations.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Football Dispute Arbitration Division, which has the competence to decide on all appeals against the decisions issued by the SAFF and its committees after exhausting all its internal legal procedures, in accordance with the SAFF Rules and Regulations.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Special Dispute Division, that may be established by the SSAC to resolve all sports-related disputes referred by the General Sport Authority (GSA).</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Mediation Division, which has the competence to mediate between and assist the concerned parties to reach settlement agreements in contractual disputes.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">By comparison, the SSAC’s divisions exceed the number of divisions of the Foundation of Qatar Sports Arbitration (FQSA), another regional sports arbitration body. The FQSA is composed of three divisions, which are the ordinary arbitration division, the appeals arbitration division and the mediation division. The SSAC is composed of the five divisions described above plus newly created divisions, which are the Special Dispute Division and the Football Dispute Arbitration Division. It is to be inferred that the SSAC created a new division for the sport of football because it is the most popular sport in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and it is accordingly anticipated that most disputes will football related.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Applicable law and Arbitration Language</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In the ordinary, appeals or football arbitration divisions, the arbitration panel must follow all of the regulations and rules of the sports body whose decision is appealed against as a means of fulfilling the principles of justice, equity and the Olympic Charter. In the event that no relevant provision is stated in those regulations, then reference may be made to the statutes or regulations of the respective International Federations (IFs) according to each individual case, however, the parties may, in the ordinary arbitration, choose the law applicable to the dispute. From the above article it can be seen that the SSAC shall apply national laws and regulations, although the international regulations can also be applied in cases where there is no relevant provision to be found in the national laws and regulations. This situation helps the arbitrators to issue decisions in line with decisions at the international level.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Arabic language shall prevail as the language before the SSAC. However, English, or any other language, may be used before SSAC with a certified Arabic translation, upon the approval by the Arbitration Panel.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Arbitration Expenses and Fees</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Party requesting arbitration will be liable to pay the arbitration fees upon submitting the case to the SSAC. In case the Claimant requests an expedited procedure, then that party shall pay the applicable fees for an expedited procedure as prescribed. All fees are non-refundable. Furthermore, the party requesting arbitration shall pay the tribunal’s administrative expenses, while the losing party bears all such expenses unless an arbitral award states that the parties shall cover the expenses equally. One important rule is that the final arbitral award shall be delivered to the parties only after all the arbitrators’ costs and fees have been paid in full. Evidently, the SSAC has strong conditions in relation to fees and protects the rights of its arbitrators.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Notifications and Communications</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">All notifications, reports and communications shall be made through and by the SSAC General Secretariat. In addition, all correspondence must be made in PDF format and sent to an SSAC approved e-mail address which shall be the only legal way for the SSAC to send/receive correspondence. Moreover, notifications, correspondence and communications served to the parties to the arbitration or their representatives must be made through the e-mail address previously specified by them or any other address determined in writing at a later stage or through an online filing platform. In case the notifications and communications cannot be delivered by email then they can be delivered by mail or by facsimile. Notifications and correspondence served on the parties to the arbitration shall be considered legally received if they are sent to the addressees at their SSAC-approved e-mail addresses.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Legal Nature of SSAC Awards</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Arbitration awards issued by the SSAC are final and may not be appealed before any other tribunal, whether inside or outside the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, unless otherwise stated in the SSAC Statute. In sports disputes in which a foreigner is a party, awards may be appealed before the International Sports Federations (IFs) or the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), if the relevant statute of an IF states that an appeal shall be made before such judicial body. In case the contract states that the arbitration is within the jurisdiction of the SSAC, then the SSAC award shall be final and non-appealable before any other authority.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC represents a significant development in sports law, not only in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia but also in the Middle East. Litigants may be represented by any licensed lawyer. To date 24 specialist Saudi and Arab arbitrators have been appointed to the panel of the SSAC. Eight international arbitrators, from the list of the CAS, have been appointed to SSAC arbitral panels, demonstrating international confidence. Its wide jurisdiction, and the range of its specialized divisions, will ensure that sports disputes are resolved with high standards of efficiency and in accordance with the best international sports law dispute resolution standards.</p>\r\n<em>Bandar Alhamidani is a Partner and key member of the Al Tamimi &amp; Company’s Sports Law and Events Management team practice. Bandar has acted as an Arbitrator before CAS and SSAC. For further information, please contact Bandar Alhamidani (b.alhamidani@tamimi.com).</em>'),
(250849, 24467, 'MetaValueOld', '<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Football is hugely popular across the Middle East. Its popularity has led some to invest in football clubs. When one considers the wide range of agreements between clubs, players, coaches and sponsors, the potential for disputes is clear. Satisfactory resolution of such disputes is not always easily attainable, considering the specialist nature of sports law and general scarcity of specialist in the field. Bespoke judicial bodies and arbitration centres have recently been established in response.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In 2015, the Saudi Arabian Olympic Committee (SAOC) approved the establishment the Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre (SSAC). Specifically, the Generally Assembly of the SAOC approved its Board of Directors’ decision to authorize the SAOC President to take all necessary actions to establish the SSAC. The SSAC aims to contribute to the general development of the sports sector and the resolution of sport related disputes. As a result, sports law in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and the resolution of sports related disputes, has seen significant development. There is no doubt that SSAC has contributed to the preservation of the rights of parties, and the broader development of the sports sector in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">This article considers two significant regulatory regimes in the field of sports law in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia - the Statute of the Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre (SSAC Statute) and the Rules and Procedures of the Centre of Arbitration for Sport (Rules &amp; Procedures). Further, the author considers various divisions of sports arbitration with both the ordinary and the appeal arbitration procedures of the SSAC.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Established in 2016, the SSAC is located in Riyadh, the nation’s capital. The SSAC is the highest judicial body for sports-related disputes in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, specialising in the hearing of any sports-related dispute by arbitration or mediation.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The legal basis of the SSAC is the SSAC Statute, its procedural rules, and any resolution issued by the SSAC’s Board of Directors. Further, the SSAC was established in line with the Olympic Charter, the statutes of International Federations, the Code of the Court of Arbitration for Sports, and the Arbitration Law of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This has led to a strong, and familiar, legal basis for its effective operation.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC is composed of five members: one appointed by the SAOC, that individual is the President of the SSAC; one appointed by the Athletes’ Committee of the SAOC; one appointed by the Saudi Arabia Football Federation (SAFF); and two appointed by the General Assembly of the SAOC.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC does not deal with appeals arising from violations of laws of the game, criminal cases arising from sports disputes, or sports disputes that have not exhausted the internal roads via the competent judicial bodies. Final decisions may be appealed to the SSAC within 21 days of notification.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>SSAC Procedures</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC Statute and the Rules &amp; Procedures are a set of procedural rules that govern SSAC procedures. The SSAC provides for three types of procedure:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>Ordinary Arbitration - in which the parties have agreed to refer a sports dispute to the SSAC in accordance with an arbitration clause in a contract, or in cases where both parties agree to refer the dispute to arbitration after the dispute has arisen.</li>\r\n 	<li>Appeal Arbitration - in which a party has filed an appeal against a decision issued by a national association such as SAFF, or a judicial body related to sport, where the statutes or regulations provide an appeal before the SSAC.</li>\r\n 	<li>Mediation - in which each party has agreed to refer a dispute that has arisen, or a potential dispute that may arise, to an SSAC mediator.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>SSAC Jurisdiction</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC has jurisdiction to hear any dispute related to sport. Many types of disputes can be referred to the SSAC, including; disputes arising between the SAOC, associations, clubs, members of the boards, members of the general assembly, players, referees, coaches, intermediaries, registered media representatives, organizers of sports events, sponsoring companies, TV transmission channels, disputes relating to sports doping, contractual disputes (provided the arbitration clause refers the dispute to the SSAC), and any international sports dispute (such as may occur in connection with a foreign player or coach) in which the parties have agreed to resort to the SSAC. The SSAC accordingly enjoys wide jurisdiction to hear any dispute related to sports in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This stands to generally contribute to the development of sports law in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabian judiciary.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Arbitration Divisions</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">According to Article 24 of the SSAC Statute, the SSAC shall conduct the arbitration in sports-related disputes through the following arbitration divisions:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Ordinary Arbitration Division, which shall carry out its tasks in accordance with the following powers: to resolve sports-related disputes that may arise out of contracts containing an arbitration clause that refers any dispute to the SSAC, or out of any subsequent agreement allowing the referral of disputes to the SSAC and to resolve sports disputes that may arise between the parties to any sports matter (athletes, players, intermediaries, sponsors, administrative staff, technical staff, medical staff, sports clubs, sports federations and Olympic committees), provided that such disputes are not subject to appeal before the SSAC.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Appeals Arbitration Division, which shall carry out its tasks in accordance with the following powers: to decide on all appeals against final decisions issued by the sports bodies after exhausting all internal legal procedures, except for football decisions, to decide on objections filed against internal decisions issued by the sports bodies, which do not have protest proceedings provided for in their statutes or regulations.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Football Dispute Arbitration Division, which has the competence to decide on all appeals against the decisions issued by the SAFF and its committees after exhausting all its internal legal procedures, in accordance with the SAFF Rules and Regulations.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Special Dispute Division, that may be established by the SSAC to resolve all sports-related disputes referred by the General Sport Authority (GSA).</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Mediation Division, which has the competence to mediate between and assist the concerned parties to reach settlement agreements in contractual disputes.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">By comparison, the SSAC’s divisions exceed the number of divisions of the Foundation of Qatar Sports Arbitration (FQSA), another regional sports arbitration body. The FQSA is composed of three divisions, which are the ordinary arbitration division, the appeals arbitration division and the mediation division. The SSAC is composed of the five divisions described above plus newly created divisions, which are the Special Dispute Division and the Football Dispute Arbitration Division. It is to be inferred that the SSAC created a new division for the sport of football because it is the most popular sport in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and it is accordingly anticipated that most disputes will football related.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Applicable law and Arbitration Language</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In the ordinary, appeals or football arbitration divisions, the arbitration panel must follow all of the regulations and rules of the sports body whose decision is appealed against as a means of fulfilling the principles of justice, equity and the Olympic Charter. In the event that no relevant provision is stated in those regulations, then reference may be made to the statutes or regulations of the respective International Federations (IFs) according to each individual case, however, the parties may, in the ordinary arbitration, choose the law applicable to the dispute. From the above article it can be seen that the SSAC shall apply national laws and regulations, although the international regulations can also be applied in cases where there is no relevant provision to be found in the national laws and regulations. This situation helps the arbitrators to issue decisions in line with decisions at the international level.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Arabic language shall prevail as the language before the SSAC. However, English, or any other language, may be used before SSAC with a certified Arabic translation, upon the approval by the Arbitration Panel.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Arbitration Expenses and Fees</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Party requesting arbitration will be liable to pay the arbitration fees upon submitting the case to the SSAC. In case the Claimant requests an expedited procedure, then that party shall pay the applicable fees for an expedited procedure as prescribed. All fees are non-refundable. Furthermore, the party requesting arbitration shall pay the tribunal’s administrative expenses, while the losing party bears all such expenses unless an arbitral award states that the parties shall cover the expenses equally. One important rule is that the final arbitral award shall be delivered to the parties only after all the arbitrators’ costs and fees have been paid in full. Evidently, the SSAC has strong conditions in relation to fees and protects the rights of its arbitrators.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Notifications and Communications</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">All notifications, reports and communications shall be made through and by the SSAC General Secretariat. In addition, all correspondence must be made in PDF format and sent to an SSAC approved e-mail address which shall be the only legal way for the SSAC to send/receive correspondence. Moreover, notifications, correspondence and communications served to the parties to the arbitration or their representatives must be made through the e-mail address previously specified by them or any other address determined in writing at a later stage or through an online filing platform. In case the notifications and communications cannot be delivered by email then they can be delivered by mail or by facsimile. Notifications and correspondence served on the parties to the arbitration shall be considered legally received if they are sent to the addressees at their SSAC-approved e-mail addresses.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Legal Nature of SSAC Awards</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Arbitration awards issued by the SSAC are final and may not be appealed before any other tribunal, whether inside or outside the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, unless otherwise stated in the SSAC Statute. In sports disputes in which a foreigner is a party, awards may be appealed before the International Sports Federations (IFs) or the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), if the relevant statute of an IF states that an appeal shall be made before such judicial body. In case the contract states that the arbitration is within the jurisdiction of the SSAC, then the SSAC award shall be final and non-appealable before any other authority.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC represents a significant development in sports law, not only in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia but also in the Middle East. Litigants may be represented by any licensed lawyer. To date 24 specialist Saudi and Arab arbitrators have been appointed to the panel of the SSAC. Eight international arbitrators, from the list of the CAS, have been appointed to SSAC arbitral panels, demonstrating international confidence. Its wide jurisdiction, and the range of its specialized divisions, will ensure that sports disputes are resolved with high standards of efficiency and in accordance with the best international sports law dispute resolution standards.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<em>Bandar Alhamidani is a Partner and key member of the Al Tamimi &amp; Company’s Sports Law and Events Management team practice. Bandar has acted as an Arbitrator before CAS and SSAC. For further information, please contact Bandar Alhamidani (b.alhamidani@tamimi.com).</em>'),
(250850, 24467, 'MetaLink', 'content'),
(250851, 24467, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7952&amp;action=edit');
INSERT INTO `tm_wsal_metadata` (`id`, `occurrence_id`, `name`, `value`) VALUES
(250852, 24467, 'ReportText', '<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Football is hugely popular across the Middle East. Its popularity has led some to invest in football clubs. When one considers the wide range of agreements between clubs, players, coaches and sponsors, the potential for disputes is clear. Satisfactory resolution of such disputes is not always easily attainable, considering the specialist nature of sports law and general scarcity of specialist in the field. Bespoke judicial bodies and arbitration centres have recently been established in response.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In 2015, the Saudi Arabian Olympic Committee (SAOC) approved the establishment the Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre (SSAC). Specifically, the Generally Assembly of the SAOC approved its Board of Directors’ decision to authorize the SAOC President to take all necessary actions to establish the SSAC. The SSAC aims to contribute to the general development of the sports sector and the resolution of sport related disputes. As a result, sports law in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and the resolution of sports related disputes, has seen significant development. There is no doubt that SSAC has contributed to the preservation of the rights of parties, and the broader development of the sports sector in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">This article considers two significant regulatory regimes in the field of sports law in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia - the Statute of the Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre (SSAC Statute) and the Rules and Procedures of the Centre of Arbitration for Sport (Rules &amp; Procedures). Further, the author considers various divisions of sports arbitration with both the ordinary and the appeal arbitration procedures of the SSAC.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Established in 2016, the SSAC is located in Riyadh, the nation’s capital. The SSAC is the highest judicial body for sports-related disputes in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, specialising in the hearing of any sports-related dispute by arbitration or mediation.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The legal basis of the SSAC is the SSAC Statute, its procedural rules, and any resolution issued by the SSAC’s Board of Directors. Further, the SSAC was established in line with the Olympic Charter, the statutes of International Federations, the Code of the Court of Arbitration for Sports, and the Arbitration Law of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This has led to a strong, and familiar, legal basis for its effective operation.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC is composed of five members: one appointed by the SAOC, that individual is the President of the SSAC; one appointed by the Athletes’ Committee of the SAOC; one appointed by the Saudi Arabia Football Federation (SAFF); and two appointed by the General Assembly of the SAOC.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC does not deal with appeals arising from violations of laws of the game, criminal cases arising from sports disputes, or sports disputes that have not exhausted the internal roads via the competent judicial bodies. Final decisions may be appealed to the SSAC within 21 days of notification.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>SSAC Procedures</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC Statute and the Rules &amp; Procedures are a set of procedural rules that govern SSAC procedures. The SSAC provides for three types of procedure:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>Ordinary Arbitration - in which the parties have agreed to refer a sports dispute to the SSAC in accordance with an arbitration clause in a contract, or in cases where both parties agree to refer the dispute to arbitration after the dispute has arisen.</li>\r\n 	<li>Appeal Arbitration - in which a party has filed an appeal against a decision issued by a national association such as SAFF, or a judicial body related to sport, where the statutes or regulations provide an appeal before the SSAC.</li>\r\n 	<li>Mediation - in which each party has agreed to refer a dispute that has arisen, or a potential dispute that may arise, to an SSAC mediator.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>SSAC Jurisdiction</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC has jurisdiction to hear any dispute related to sport. Many types of disputes can be referred to the SSAC, including; disputes arising between the SAOC, associations, clubs, members of the boards, members of the general assembly, players, referees, coaches, intermediaries, registered media representatives, organizers of sports events, sponsoring companies, TV transmission channels, disputes relating to sports doping, contractual disputes (provided the arbitration clause refers the dispute to the SSAC), and any international sports dispute (such as may occur in connection with a foreign player or coach) in which the parties have agreed to resort to the SSAC. The SSAC accordingly enjoys wide jurisdiction to hear any dispute related to sports in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This stands to generally contribute to the development of sports law in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabian judiciary.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Arbitration Divisions</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">According to Article 24 of the SSAC Statute, the SSAC shall conduct the arbitration in sports-related disputes through the following arbitration divisions:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Ordinary Arbitration Division, which shall carry out its tasks in accordance with the following powers: to resolve sports-related disputes that may arise out of contracts containing an arbitration clause that refers any dispute to the SSAC, or out of any subsequent agreement allowing the referral of disputes to the SSAC and to resolve sports disputes that may arise between the parties to any sports matter (athletes, players, intermediaries, sponsors, administrative staff, technical staff, medical staff, sports clubs, sports federations and Olympic committees), provided that such disputes are not subject to appeal before the SSAC.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Appeals Arbitration Division, which shall carry out its tasks in accordance with the following powers: to decide on all appeals against final decisions issued by the sports bodies after exhausting all internal legal procedures, except for football decisions, to decide on objections filed against internal decisions issued by the sports bodies, which do not have protest proceedings provided for in their statutes or regulations.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Football Dispute Arbitration Division, which has the competence to decide on all appeals against the decisions issued by the SAFF and its committees after exhausting all its internal legal procedures, in accordance with the SAFF Rules and Regulations.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Special Dispute Division, that may be established by the SSAC to resolve all sports-related disputes referred by the General Sport Authority (GSA).</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Mediation Division, which has the competence to mediate between and assist the concerned parties to reach settlement agreements in contractual disputes.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">By comparison, the SSAC’s divisions exceed the number of divisions of the Foundation of Qatar Sports Arbitration (FQSA), another regional sports arbitration body. The FQSA is composed of three divisions, which are the ordinary arbitration division, the appeals arbitration division and the mediation division. The SSAC is composed of the five divisions described above plus newly created divisions, which are the Special Dispute Division and the Football Dispute Arbitration Division. It is to be inferred that the SSAC created a new division for the sport of football because it is the most popular sport in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and it is accordingly anticipated that most disputes will football related.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Applicable law and Arbitration Language</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In the ordinary, appeals or football arbitration divisions, the arbitration panel must follow all of the regulations and rules of the sports body whose decision is appealed against as a means of fulfilling the principles of justice, equity and the Olympic Charter. In the event that no relevant provision is stated in those regulations, then reference may be made to the statutes or regulations of the respective International Federations (IFs) according to each individual case, however, the parties may, in the ordinary arbitration, choose the law applicable to the dispute. From the above article it can be seen that the SSAC shall apply national laws and regulations, although the international regulations can also be applied in cases where there is no relevant provision to be found in the national laws and regulations. This situation helps the arbitrators to issue decisions in line with decisions at the international level.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Arabic language shall prevail as the language before the SSAC. However, English, or any other language, may be used before SSAC with a certified Arabic translation, upon the approval by the Arbitration Panel.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Arbitration Expenses and Fees</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Party requesting arbitration will be liable to pay the arbitration fees upon submitting the case to the SSAC. In case the Claimant requests an expedited procedure, then that party shall pay the applicable fees for an expedited procedure as prescribed. All fees are non-refundable. Furthermore, the party requesting arbitration shall pay the tribunal’s administrative expenses, while the losing party bears all such expenses unless an arbitral award states that the parties shall cover the expenses equally. One important rule is that the final arbitral award shall be delivered to the parties only after all the arbitrators’ costs and fees have been paid in full. Evidently, the SSAC has strong conditions in relation to fees and protects the rights of its arbitrators.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Notifications and Communications</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">All notifications, reports and communications shall be made through and by the SSAC General Secretariat. In addition, all correspondence must be made in PDF format and sent to an SSAC approved e-mail address which shall be the only legal way for the SSAC to send/receive correspondence. Moreover, notifications, correspondence and communications served to the parties to the arbitration or their representatives must be made through the e-mail address previously specified by them or any other address determined in writing at a later stage or through an online filing platform. In case the notifications and communications cannot be delivered by email then they can be delivered by mail or by facsimile. Notifications and correspondence served on the parties to the arbitration shall be considered legally received if they are sent to the addressees at their SSAC-approved e-mail addresses.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Legal Nature of SSAC Awards</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Arbitration awards issued by the SSAC are final and may not be appealed before any other tribunal, whether inside or outside the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, unless otherwise stated in the SSAC Statute. In sports disputes in which a foreigner is a party, awards may be appealed before the International Sports Federations (IFs) or the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), if the relevant statute of an IF states that an appeal shall be made before such judicial body. In case the contract states that the arbitration is within the jurisdiction of the SSAC, then the SSAC award shall be final and non-appealable before any other authority.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC represents a significant development in sports law, not only in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia but also in the Middle East. Litigants may be represented by any licensed lawyer. To date 24 specialist Saudi and Arab arbitrators have been appointed to the panel of the SSAC. Eight international arbitrators, from the list of the CAS, have been appointed to SSAC arbitral panels, demonstrating international confidence. Its wide jurisdiction, and the range of its specialized divisions, will ensure that sports disputes are resolved with high standards of efficiency and in accordance with the best international sports law dispute resolution standards.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<em>Bandar Alhamidani is a Partner and key member of the Al Tamimi &amp; Company’s Sports Law and Events Management team practice. Bandar has acted as an Arbitrator before CAS and SSAC. For further information, please contact Bandar Alhamidani (b.alhamidani@tamimi.com).</em>|<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><img class=\"alignright wp-image-8027 size-large\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_1016569270-1024x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" />Football is hugely popular across the Middle East. Its popularity has led some to invest in football clubs. When one considers the wide range of agreements between clubs, players, coaches and sponsors, the potential for disputes is clear. Satisfactory resolution of such disputes is not always easily attainable, considering the specialist nature of sports law and general scarcity of specialist in the field. Bespoke judicial bodies and arbitration centres have recently been established in response.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In 2015, the Saudi Arabian Olympic Committee (SAOC) approved the establishment the Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre (SSAC). Specifically, the Generally Assembly of the SAOC approved its Board of Directors’ decision to authorize the SAOC President to take all necessary actions to establish the SSAC. The SSAC aims to contribute to the general development of the sports sector and the resolution of sport related disputes. As a result, sports law in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and the resolution of sports related disputes, has seen significant development. There is no doubt that SSAC has contributed to the preservation of the rights of parties, and the broader development of the sports sector in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">This article considers two significant regulatory regimes in the field of sports law in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia - the Statute of the Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre (SSAC Statute) and the Rules and Procedures of the Centre of Arbitration for Sport (Rules &amp; Procedures). Further, the author considers various divisions of sports arbitration with both the ordinary and the appeal arbitration procedures of the SSAC.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Established in 2016, the SSAC is located in Riyadh, the nation’s capital. The SSAC is the highest judicial body for sports-related disputes in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, specialising in the hearing of any sports-related dispute by arbitration or mediation.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The legal basis of the SSAC is the SSAC Statute, its procedural rules, and any resolution issued by the SSAC’s Board of Directors. Further, the SSAC was established in line with the Olympic Charter, the statutes of International Federations, the Code of the Court of Arbitration for Sports, and the Arbitration Law of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This has led to a strong, and familiar, legal basis for its effective operation.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC is composed of five members: one appointed by the SAOC, that individual is the President of the SSAC; one appointed by the Athletes’ Committee of the SAOC; one appointed by the Saudi Arabia Football Federation (SAFF); and two appointed by the General Assembly of the SAOC.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC does not deal with appeals arising from violations of laws of the game, criminal cases arising from sports disputes, or sports disputes that have not exhausted the internal roads via the competent judicial bodies. Final decisions may be appealed to the SSAC within 21 days of notification.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>SSAC Procedures</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC Statute and the Rules &amp; Procedures are a set of procedural rules that govern SSAC procedures. The SSAC provides for three types of procedure:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>Ordinary Arbitration - in which the parties have agreed to refer a sports dispute to the SSAC in accordance with an arbitration clause in a contract, or in cases where both parties agree to refer the dispute to arbitration after the dispute has arisen.</li>\r\n 	<li>Appeal Arbitration - in which a party has filed an appeal against a decision issued by a national association such as SAFF, or a judicial body related to sport, where the statutes or regulations provide an appeal before the SSAC.</li>\r\n 	<li>Mediation - in which each party has agreed to refer a dispute that has arisen, or a potential dispute that may arise, to an SSAC mediator.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>SSAC Jurisdiction</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC has jurisdiction to hear any dispute related to sport. Many types of disputes can be referred to the SSAC, including; disputes arising between the SAOC, associations, clubs, members of the boards, members of the general assembly, players, referees, coaches, intermediaries, registered media representatives, organizers of sports events, sponsoring companies, TV transmission channels, disputes relating to sports doping, contractual disputes (provided the arbitration clause refers the dispute to the SSAC), and any international sports dispute (such as may occur in connection with a foreign player or coach) in which the parties have agreed to resort to the SSAC. The SSAC accordingly enjoys wide jurisdiction to hear any dispute related to sports in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This stands to generally contribute to the development of sports law in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabian judiciary.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Arbitration Divisions</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">According to Article 24 of the SSAC Statute, the SSAC shall conduct the arbitration in sports-related disputes through the following arbitration divisions:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Ordinary Arbitration Division, which shall carry out its tasks in accordance with the following powers: to resolve sports-related disputes that may arise out of contracts containing an arbitration clause that refers any dispute to the SSAC, or out of any subsequent agreement allowing the referral of disputes to the SSAC and to resolve sports disputes that may arise between the parties to any sports matter (athletes, players, intermediaries, sponsors, administrative staff, technical staff, medical staff, sports clubs, sports federations and Olympic committees), provided that such disputes are not subject to appeal before the SSAC.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Appeals Arbitration Division, which shall carry out its tasks in accordance with the following powers: to decide on all appeals against final decisions issued by the sports bodies after exhausting all internal legal procedures, except for football decisions, to decide on objections filed against internal decisions issued by the sports bodies, which do not have protest proceedings provided for in their statutes or regulations.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Football Dispute Arbitration Division, which has the competence to decide on all appeals against the decisions issued by the SAFF and its committees after exhausting all its internal legal procedures, in accordance with the SAFF Rules and Regulations.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Special Dispute Division, that may be established by the SSAC to resolve all sports-related disputes referred by the General Sport Authority (GSA).</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Mediation Division, which has the competence to mediate between and assist the concerned parties to reach settlement agreements in contractual disputes.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">By comparison, the SSAC’s divisions exceed the number of divisions of the Foundation of Qatar Sports Arbitration (FQSA), another regional sports arbitration body. The FQSA is composed of three divisions, which are the ordinary arbitration division, the appeals arbitration division and the mediation division. The SSAC is composed of the five divisions described above plus newly created divisions, which are the Special Dispute Division and the Football Dispute Arbitration Division. It is to be inferred that the SSAC created a new division for the sport of football because it is the most popular sport in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and it is accordingly anticipated that most disputes will football related.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Applicable law and Arbitration Language</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In the ordinary, appeals or football arbitration divisions, the arbitration panel must follow all of the regulations and rules of the sports body whose decision is appealed against as a means of fulfilling the principles of justice, equity and the Olympic Charter. In the event that no relevant provision is stated in those regulations, then reference may be made to the statutes or regulations of the respective International Federations (IFs) according to each individual case, however, the parties may, in the ordinary arbitration, choose the law applicable to the dispute. From the above article it can be seen that the SSAC shall apply national laws and regulations, although the international regulations can also be applied in cases where there is no relevant provision to be found in the national laws and regulations. This situation helps the arbitrators to issue decisions in line with decisions at the international level.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Arabic language shall prevail as the language before the SSAC. However, English, or any other language, may be used before SSAC with a certified Arabic translation, upon the approval by the Arbitration Panel.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Arbitration Expenses and Fees</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Party requesting arbitration will be liable to pay the arbitration fees upon submitting the case to the SSAC. In case the Claimant requests an expedited procedure, then that party shall pay the applicable fees for an expedited procedure as prescribed. All fees are non-refundable. Furthermore, the party requesting arbitration shall pay the tribunal’s administrative expenses, while the losing party bears all such expenses unless an arbitral award states that the parties shall cover the expenses equally. One important rule is that the final arbitral award shall be delivered to the parties only after all the arbitrators’ costs and fees have been paid in full. Evidently, the SSAC has strong conditions in relation to fees and protects the rights of its arbitrators.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Notifications and Communications</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">All notifications, reports and communications shall be made through and by the SSAC General Secretariat. In addition, all correspondence must be made in PDF format and sent to an SSAC approved e-mail address which shall be the only legal way for the SSAC to send/receive correspondence. Moreover, notifications, correspondence and communications served to the parties to the arbitration or their representatives must be made through the e-mail address previously specified by them or any other address determined in writing at a later stage or through an online filing platform. In case the notifications and communications cannot be delivered by email then they can be delivered by mail or by facsimile. Notifications and correspondence served on the parties to the arbitration shall be considered legally received if they are sent to the addressees at their SSAC-approved e-mail addresses.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Legal Nature of SSAC Awards</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Arbitration awards issued by the SSAC are final and may not be appealed before any other tribunal, whether inside or outside the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, unless otherwise stated in the SSAC Statute. In sports disputes in which a foreigner is a party, awards may be appealed before the International Sports Federations (IFs) or the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), if the relevant statute of an IF states that an appeal shall be made before such judicial body. In case the contract states that the arbitration is within the jurisdiction of the SSAC, then the SSAC award shall be final and non-appealable before any other authority.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC represents a significant development in sports law, not only in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia but also in the Middle East. Litigants may be represented by any licensed lawyer. To date 24 specialist Saudi and Arab arbitrators have been appointed to the panel of the SSAC. Eight international arbitrators, from the list of the CAS, have been appointed to SSAC arbitral panels, demonstrating international confidence. Its wide jurisdiction, and the range of its specialized divisions, will ensure that sports disputes are resolved with high standards of efficiency and in accordance with the best international sports law dispute resolution standards.</p>\r\n<em>Bandar Alhamidani is a Partner and key member of the Al Tamimi &amp; Company’s Sports Law and Events Management team practice. Bandar has acted as an Arbitrator before CAS and SSAC. For further information, please contact Bandar Alhamidani (b.alhamidani@tamimi.com).</em>'),
(250853, 24467, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250854, 24467, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250855, 24467, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250856, 24467, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250857, 24468, 'PostID', '7952'),
(250858, 24468, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(250859, 24468, 'PostTitle', 'Introduction to the Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre (SSAC)'),
(250860, 24468, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(250861, 24468, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 18:08:59'),
(250862, 24468, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7952'),
(250863, 24468, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7952&amp;action=edit'),
(250864, 24468, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250865, 24468, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250866, 24468, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250867, 24468, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250868, 24469, 'PostID', '7952'),
(250869, 24469, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(250870, 24469, 'PostTitle', 'Introduction to the Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre (SSAC)'),
(250871, 24469, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(250872, 24469, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 18:09:38'),
(250873, 24469, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7952'),
(250874, 24469, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7952&amp;action=edit'),
(250875, 24469, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250876, 24469, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250877, 24469, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250878, 24469, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250879, 24470, 'PostID', '7952'),
(250880, 24470, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(250881, 24470, 'PostTitle', 'Introduction to the Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre (SSAC)'),
(250882, 24470, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(250883, 24470, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 18:08:59'),
(250884, 24470, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7952'),
(250885, 24470, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7952&amp;action=edit'),
(250886, 24470, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250887, 24470, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250888, 24470, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250889, 24470, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250890, 24471, 'PostID', '7952'),
(250891, 24471, 'PostTitle', 'Introduction to the Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre (SSAC)'),
(250892, 24471, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(250893, 24471, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(250894, 24471, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 18:09:55'),
(250895, 24471, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7952'),
(250896, 24471, 'MetaID', '223822'),
(250897, 24471, 'MetaKey', 'content'),
(250898, 24471, 'MetaValueNew', '<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><img class=\"alignright wp-image-8027 \" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_1016569270-1024x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"442\" height=\"442\" />Football is hugely popular across the Middle East. Its popularity has led some to invest in football clubs. When one considers the wide range of agreements between clubs, players, coaches and sponsors, the potential for disputes is clear. Satisfactory resolution of such disputes is not always easily attainable, considering the specialist nature of sports law and general scarcity of specialist in the field. Bespoke judicial bodies and arbitration centres have recently been established in response.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In 2015, the Saudi Arabian Olympic Committee (SAOC) approved the establishment the Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre (SSAC). Specifically, the Generally Assembly of the SAOC approved its Board of Directors’ decision to authorize the SAOC President to take all necessary actions to establish the SSAC. The SSAC aims to contribute to the general development of the sports sector and the resolution of sport related disputes. As a result, sports law in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and the resolution of sports related disputes, has seen significant development. There is no doubt that SSAC has contributed to the preservation of the rights of parties, and the broader development of the sports sector in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">This article considers two significant regulatory regimes in the field of sports law in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia - the Statute of the Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre (SSAC Statute) and the Rules and Procedures of the Centre of Arbitration for Sport (Rules &amp; Procedures). Further, the author considers various divisions of sports arbitration with both the ordinary and the appeal arbitration procedures of the SSAC.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Established in 2016, the SSAC is located in Riyadh, the nation’s capital. The SSAC is the highest judicial body for sports-related disputes in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, specialising in the hearing of any sports-related dispute by arbitration or mediation.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The legal basis of the SSAC is the SSAC Statute, its procedural rules, and any resolution issued by the SSAC’s Board of Directors. Further, the SSAC was established in line with the Olympic Charter, the statutes of International Federations, the Code of the Court of Arbitration for Sports, and the Arbitration Law of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This has led to a strong, and familiar, legal basis for its effective operation.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC is composed of five members: one appointed by the SAOC, that individual is the President of the SSAC; one appointed by the Athletes’ Committee of the SAOC; one appointed by the Saudi Arabia Football Federation (SAFF); and two appointed by the General Assembly of the SAOC.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC does not deal with appeals arising from violations of laws of the game, criminal cases arising from sports disputes, or sports disputes that have not exhausted the internal roads via the competent judicial bodies. Final decisions may be appealed to the SSAC within 21 days of notification.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>SSAC Procedures</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC Statute and the Rules &amp; Procedures are a set of procedural rules that govern SSAC procedures. The SSAC provides for three types of procedure:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>Ordinary Arbitration - in which the parties have agreed to refer a sports dispute to the SSAC in accordance with an arbitration clause in a contract, or in cases where both parties agree to refer the dispute to arbitration after the dispute has arisen.</li>\r\n 	<li>Appeal Arbitration - in which a party has filed an appeal against a decision issued by a national association such as SAFF, or a judicial body related to sport, where the statutes or regulations provide an appeal before the SSAC.</li>\r\n 	<li>Mediation - in which each party has agreed to refer a dispute that has arisen, or a potential dispute that may arise, to an SSAC mediator.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>SSAC Jurisdiction</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC has jurisdiction to hear any dispute related to sport. Many types of disputes can be referred to the SSAC, including; disputes arising between the SAOC, associations, clubs, members of the boards, members of the general assembly, players, referees, coaches, intermediaries, registered media representatives, organizers of sports events, sponsoring companies, TV transmission channels, disputes relating to sports doping, contractual disputes (provided the arbitration clause refers the dispute to the SSAC), and any international sports dispute (such as may occur in connection with a foreign player or coach) in which the parties have agreed to resort to the SSAC. The SSAC accordingly enjoys wide jurisdiction to hear any dispute related to sports in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This stands to generally contribute to the development of sports law in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabian judiciary.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Arbitration Divisions</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">According to Article 24 of the SSAC Statute, the SSAC shall conduct the arbitration in sports-related disputes through the following arbitration divisions:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Ordinary Arbitration Division, which shall carry out its tasks in accordance with the following powers: to resolve sports-related disputes that may arise out of contracts containing an arbitration clause that refers any dispute to the SSAC, or out of any subsequent agreement allowing the referral of disputes to the SSAC and to resolve sports disputes that may arise between the parties to any sports matter (athletes, players, intermediaries, sponsors, administrative staff, technical staff, medical staff, sports clubs, sports federations and Olympic committees), provided that such disputes are not subject to appeal before the SSAC.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Appeals Arbitration Division, which shall carry out its tasks in accordance with the following powers: to decide on all appeals against final decisions issued by the sports bodies after exhausting all internal legal procedures, except for football decisions, to decide on objections filed against internal decisions issued by the sports bodies, which do not have protest proceedings provided for in their statutes or regulations.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Football Dispute Arbitration Division, which has the competence to decide on all appeals against the decisions issued by the SAFF and its committees after exhausting all its internal legal procedures, in accordance with the SAFF Rules and Regulations.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Special Dispute Division, that may be established by the SSAC to resolve all sports-related disputes referred by the General Sport Authority (GSA).</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Mediation Division, which has the competence to mediate between and assist the concerned parties to reach settlement agreements in contractual disputes.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">By comparison, the SSAC’s divisions exceed the number of divisions of the Foundation of Qatar Sports Arbitration (FQSA), another regional sports arbitration body. The FQSA is composed of three divisions, which are the ordinary arbitration division, the appeals arbitration division and the mediation division. The SSAC is composed of the five divisions described above plus newly created divisions, which are the Special Dispute Division and the Football Dispute Arbitration Division. It is to be inferred that the SSAC created a new division for the sport of football because it is the most popular sport in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and it is accordingly anticipated that most disputes will football related.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Applicable law and Arbitration Language</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In the ordinary, appeals or football arbitration divisions, the arbitration panel must follow all of the regulations and rules of the sports body whose decision is appealed against as a means of fulfilling the principles of justice, equity and the Olympic Charter. In the event that no relevant provision is stated in those regulations, then reference may be made to the statutes or regulations of the respective International Federations (IFs) according to each individual case, however, the parties may, in the ordinary arbitration, choose the law applicable to the dispute. From the above article it can be seen that the SSAC shall apply national laws and regulations, although the international regulations can also be applied in cases where there is no relevant provision to be found in the national laws and regulations. This situation helps the arbitrators to issue decisions in line with decisions at the international level.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Arabic language shall prevail as the language before the SSAC. However, English, or any other language, may be used before SSAC with a certified Arabic translation, upon the approval by the Arbitration Panel.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Arbitration Expenses and Fees</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Party requesting arbitration will be liable to pay the arbitration fees upon submitting the case to the SSAC. In case the Claimant requests an expedited procedure, then that party shall pay the applicable fees for an expedited procedure as prescribed. All fees are non-refundable. Furthermore, the party requesting arbitration shall pay the tribunal’s administrative expenses, while the losing party bears all such expenses unless an arbitral award states that the parties shall cover the expenses equally. One important rule is that the final arbitral award shall be delivered to the parties only after all the arbitrators’ costs and fees have been paid in full. Evidently, the SSAC has strong conditions in relation to fees and protects the rights of its arbitrators.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Notifications and Communications</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">All notifications, reports and communications shall be made through and by the SSAC General Secretariat. In addition, all correspondence must be made in PDF format and sent to an SSAC approved e-mail address which shall be the only legal way for the SSAC to send/receive correspondence. Moreover, notifications, correspondence and communications served to the parties to the arbitration or their representatives must be made through the e-mail address previously specified by them or any other address determined in writing at a later stage or through an online filing platform. In case the notifications and communications cannot be delivered by email then they can be delivered by mail or by facsimile. Notifications and correspondence served on the parties to the arbitration shall be considered legally received if they are sent to the addressees at their SSAC-approved e-mail addresses.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Legal Nature of SSAC Awards</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Arbitration awards issued by the SSAC are final and may not be appealed before any other tribunal, whether inside or outside the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, unless otherwise stated in the SSAC Statute. In sports disputes in which a foreigner is a party, awards may be appealed before the International Sports Federations (IFs) or the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), if the relevant statute of an IF states that an appeal shall be made before such judicial body. In case the contract states that the arbitration is within the jurisdiction of the SSAC, then the SSAC award shall be final and non-appealable before any other authority.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC represents a significant development in sports law, not only in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia but also in the Middle East. Litigants may be represented by any licensed lawyer. To date 24 specialist Saudi and Arab arbitrators have been appointed to the panel of the SSAC. Eight international arbitrators, from the list of the CAS, have been appointed to SSAC arbitral panels, demonstrating international confidence. Its wide jurisdiction, and the range of its specialized divisions, will ensure that sports disputes are resolved with high standards of efficiency and in accordance with the best international sports law dispute resolution standards.</p>\r\n<em>Bandar Alhamidani is a Partner and key member of the Al Tamimi &amp; Company’s Sports Law and Events Management team practice. Bandar has acted as an Arbitrator before CAS and SSAC. For further information, please contact Bandar Alhamidani (b.alhamidani@tamimi.com).</em>');
INSERT INTO `tm_wsal_metadata` (`id`, `occurrence_id`, `name`, `value`) VALUES
(250899, 24471, 'MetaValueOld', '<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><img class=\"alignright wp-image-8027 size-large\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_1016569270-1024x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" />Football is hugely popular across the Middle East. Its popularity has led some to invest in football clubs. When one considers the wide range of agreements between clubs, players, coaches and sponsors, the potential for disputes is clear. Satisfactory resolution of such disputes is not always easily attainable, considering the specialist nature of sports law and general scarcity of specialist in the field. Bespoke judicial bodies and arbitration centres have recently been established in response.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In 2015, the Saudi Arabian Olympic Committee (SAOC) approved the establishment the Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre (SSAC). Specifically, the Generally Assembly of the SAOC approved its Board of Directors’ decision to authorize the SAOC President to take all necessary actions to establish the SSAC. The SSAC aims to contribute to the general development of the sports sector and the resolution of sport related disputes. As a result, sports law in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and the resolution of sports related disputes, has seen significant development. There is no doubt that SSAC has contributed to the preservation of the rights of parties, and the broader development of the sports sector in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">This article considers two significant regulatory regimes in the field of sports law in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia - the Statute of the Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre (SSAC Statute) and the Rules and Procedures of the Centre of Arbitration for Sport (Rules &amp; Procedures). Further, the author considers various divisions of sports arbitration with both the ordinary and the appeal arbitration procedures of the SSAC.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Established in 2016, the SSAC is located in Riyadh, the nation’s capital. The SSAC is the highest judicial body for sports-related disputes in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, specialising in the hearing of any sports-related dispute by arbitration or mediation.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The legal basis of the SSAC is the SSAC Statute, its procedural rules, and any resolution issued by the SSAC’s Board of Directors. Further, the SSAC was established in line with the Olympic Charter, the statutes of International Federations, the Code of the Court of Arbitration for Sports, and the Arbitration Law of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This has led to a strong, and familiar, legal basis for its effective operation.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC is composed of five members: one appointed by the SAOC, that individual is the President of the SSAC; one appointed by the Athletes’ Committee of the SAOC; one appointed by the Saudi Arabia Football Federation (SAFF); and two appointed by the General Assembly of the SAOC.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC does not deal with appeals arising from violations of laws of the game, criminal cases arising from sports disputes, or sports disputes that have not exhausted the internal roads via the competent judicial bodies. Final decisions may be appealed to the SSAC within 21 days of notification.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>SSAC Procedures</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC Statute and the Rules &amp; Procedures are a set of procedural rules that govern SSAC procedures. The SSAC provides for three types of procedure:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>Ordinary Arbitration - in which the parties have agreed to refer a sports dispute to the SSAC in accordance with an arbitration clause in a contract, or in cases where both parties agree to refer the dispute to arbitration after the dispute has arisen.</li>\r\n 	<li>Appeal Arbitration - in which a party has filed an appeal against a decision issued by a national association such as SAFF, or a judicial body related to sport, where the statutes or regulations provide an appeal before the SSAC.</li>\r\n 	<li>Mediation - in which each party has agreed to refer a dispute that has arisen, or a potential dispute that may arise, to an SSAC mediator.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>SSAC Jurisdiction</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC has jurisdiction to hear any dispute related to sport. Many types of disputes can be referred to the SSAC, including; disputes arising between the SAOC, associations, clubs, members of the boards, members of the general assembly, players, referees, coaches, intermediaries, registered media representatives, organizers of sports events, sponsoring companies, TV transmission channels, disputes relating to sports doping, contractual disputes (provided the arbitration clause refers the dispute to the SSAC), and any international sports dispute (such as may occur in connection with a foreign player or coach) in which the parties have agreed to resort to the SSAC. The SSAC accordingly enjoys wide jurisdiction to hear any dispute related to sports in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This stands to generally contribute to the development of sports law in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabian judiciary.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Arbitration Divisions</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">According to Article 24 of the SSAC Statute, the SSAC shall conduct the arbitration in sports-related disputes through the following arbitration divisions:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Ordinary Arbitration Division, which shall carry out its tasks in accordance with the following powers: to resolve sports-related disputes that may arise out of contracts containing an arbitration clause that refers any dispute to the SSAC, or out of any subsequent agreement allowing the referral of disputes to the SSAC and to resolve sports disputes that may arise between the parties to any sports matter (athletes, players, intermediaries, sponsors, administrative staff, technical staff, medical staff, sports clubs, sports federations and Olympic committees), provided that such disputes are not subject to appeal before the SSAC.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Appeals Arbitration Division, which shall carry out its tasks in accordance with the following powers: to decide on all appeals against final decisions issued by the sports bodies after exhausting all internal legal procedures, except for football decisions, to decide on objections filed against internal decisions issued by the sports bodies, which do not have protest proceedings provided for in their statutes or regulations.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Football Dispute Arbitration Division, which has the competence to decide on all appeals against the decisions issued by the SAFF and its committees after exhausting all its internal legal procedures, in accordance with the SAFF Rules and Regulations.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Special Dispute Division, that may be established by the SSAC to resolve all sports-related disputes referred by the General Sport Authority (GSA).</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Mediation Division, which has the competence to mediate between and assist the concerned parties to reach settlement agreements in contractual disputes.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">By comparison, the SSAC’s divisions exceed the number of divisions of the Foundation of Qatar Sports Arbitration (FQSA), another regional sports arbitration body. The FQSA is composed of three divisions, which are the ordinary arbitration division, the appeals arbitration division and the mediation division. The SSAC is composed of the five divisions described above plus newly created divisions, which are the Special Dispute Division and the Football Dispute Arbitration Division. It is to be inferred that the SSAC created a new division for the sport of football because it is the most popular sport in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and it is accordingly anticipated that most disputes will football related.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Applicable law and Arbitration Language</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In the ordinary, appeals or football arbitration divisions, the arbitration panel must follow all of the regulations and rules of the sports body whose decision is appealed against as a means of fulfilling the principles of justice, equity and the Olympic Charter. In the event that no relevant provision is stated in those regulations, then reference may be made to the statutes or regulations of the respective International Federations (IFs) according to each individual case, however, the parties may, in the ordinary arbitration, choose the law applicable to the dispute. From the above article it can be seen that the SSAC shall apply national laws and regulations, although the international regulations can also be applied in cases where there is no relevant provision to be found in the national laws and regulations. This situation helps the arbitrators to issue decisions in line with decisions at the international level.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Arabic language shall prevail as the language before the SSAC. However, English, or any other language, may be used before SSAC with a certified Arabic translation, upon the approval by the Arbitration Panel.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Arbitration Expenses and Fees</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Party requesting arbitration will be liable to pay the arbitration fees upon submitting the case to the SSAC. In case the Claimant requests an expedited procedure, then that party shall pay the applicable fees for an expedited procedure as prescribed. All fees are non-refundable. Furthermore, the party requesting arbitration shall pay the tribunal’s administrative expenses, while the losing party bears all such expenses unless an arbitral award states that the parties shall cover the expenses equally. One important rule is that the final arbitral award shall be delivered to the parties only after all the arbitrators’ costs and fees have been paid in full. Evidently, the SSAC has strong conditions in relation to fees and protects the rights of its arbitrators.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Notifications and Communications</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">All notifications, reports and communications shall be made through and by the SSAC General Secretariat. In addition, all correspondence must be made in PDF format and sent to an SSAC approved e-mail address which shall be the only legal way for the SSAC to send/receive correspondence. Moreover, notifications, correspondence and communications served to the parties to the arbitration or their representatives must be made through the e-mail address previously specified by them or any other address determined in writing at a later stage or through an online filing platform. In case the notifications and communications cannot be delivered by email then they can be delivered by mail or by facsimile. Notifications and correspondence served on the parties to the arbitration shall be considered legally received if they are sent to the addressees at their SSAC-approved e-mail addresses.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Legal Nature of SSAC Awards</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Arbitration awards issued by the SSAC are final and may not be appealed before any other tribunal, whether inside or outside the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, unless otherwise stated in the SSAC Statute. In sports disputes in which a foreigner is a party, awards may be appealed before the International Sports Federations (IFs) or the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), if the relevant statute of an IF states that an appeal shall be made before such judicial body. In case the contract states that the arbitration is within the jurisdiction of the SSAC, then the SSAC award shall be final and non-appealable before any other authority.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC represents a significant development in sports law, not only in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia but also in the Middle East. Litigants may be represented by any licensed lawyer. To date 24 specialist Saudi and Arab arbitrators have been appointed to the panel of the SSAC. Eight international arbitrators, from the list of the CAS, have been appointed to SSAC arbitral panels, demonstrating international confidence. Its wide jurisdiction, and the range of its specialized divisions, will ensure that sports disputes are resolved with high standards of efficiency and in accordance with the best international sports law dispute resolution standards.</p>\r\n<em>Bandar Alhamidani is a Partner and key member of the Al Tamimi &amp; Company’s Sports Law and Events Management team practice. Bandar has acted as an Arbitrator before CAS and SSAC. For further information, please contact Bandar Alhamidani (b.alhamidani@tamimi.com).</em>'),
(250900, 24471, 'MetaLink', 'content'),
(250901, 24471, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7952&amp;action=edit'),
(250902, 24471, 'ReportText', '<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><img class=\"alignright wp-image-8027 size-large\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_1016569270-1024x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" />Football is hugely popular across the Middle East. Its popularity has led some to invest in football clubs. When one considers the wide range of agreements between clubs, players, coaches and sponsors, the potential for disputes is clear. Satisfactory resolution of such disputes is not always easily attainable, considering the specialist nature of sports law and general scarcity of specialist in the field. Bespoke judicial bodies and arbitration centres have recently been established in response.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In 2015, the Saudi Arabian Olympic Committee (SAOC) approved the establishment the Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre (SSAC). Specifically, the Generally Assembly of the SAOC approved its Board of Directors’ decision to authorize the SAOC President to take all necessary actions to establish the SSAC. The SSAC aims to contribute to the general development of the sports sector and the resolution of sport related disputes. As a result, sports law in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and the resolution of sports related disputes, has seen significant development. There is no doubt that SSAC has contributed to the preservation of the rights of parties, and the broader development of the sports sector in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">This article considers two significant regulatory regimes in the field of sports law in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia - the Statute of the Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre (SSAC Statute) and the Rules and Procedures of the Centre of Arbitration for Sport (Rules &amp; Procedures). Further, the author considers various divisions of sports arbitration with both the ordinary and the appeal arbitration procedures of the SSAC.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Established in 2016, the SSAC is located in Riyadh, the nation’s capital. The SSAC is the highest judicial body for sports-related disputes in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, specialising in the hearing of any sports-related dispute by arbitration or mediation.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The legal basis of the SSAC is the SSAC Statute, its procedural rules, and any resolution issued by the SSAC’s Board of Directors. Further, the SSAC was established in line with the Olympic Charter, the statutes of International Federations, the Code of the Court of Arbitration for Sports, and the Arbitration Law of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This has led to a strong, and familiar, legal basis for its effective operation.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC is composed of five members: one appointed by the SAOC, that individual is the President of the SSAC; one appointed by the Athletes’ Committee of the SAOC; one appointed by the Saudi Arabia Football Federation (SAFF); and two appointed by the General Assembly of the SAOC.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC does not deal with appeals arising from violations of laws of the game, criminal cases arising from sports disputes, or sports disputes that have not exhausted the internal roads via the competent judicial bodies. Final decisions may be appealed to the SSAC within 21 days of notification.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>SSAC Procedures</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC Statute and the Rules &amp; Procedures are a set of procedural rules that govern SSAC procedures. The SSAC provides for three types of procedure:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>Ordinary Arbitration - in which the parties have agreed to refer a sports dispute to the SSAC in accordance with an arbitration clause in a contract, or in cases where both parties agree to refer the dispute to arbitration after the dispute has arisen.</li>\r\n 	<li>Appeal Arbitration - in which a party has filed an appeal against a decision issued by a national association such as SAFF, or a judicial body related to sport, where the statutes or regulations provide an appeal before the SSAC.</li>\r\n 	<li>Mediation - in which each party has agreed to refer a dispute that has arisen, or a potential dispute that may arise, to an SSAC mediator.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>SSAC Jurisdiction</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC has jurisdiction to hear any dispute related to sport. Many types of disputes can be referred to the SSAC, including; disputes arising between the SAOC, associations, clubs, members of the boards, members of the general assembly, players, referees, coaches, intermediaries, registered media representatives, organizers of sports events, sponsoring companies, TV transmission channels, disputes relating to sports doping, contractual disputes (provided the arbitration clause refers the dispute to the SSAC), and any international sports dispute (such as may occur in connection with a foreign player or coach) in which the parties have agreed to resort to the SSAC. The SSAC accordingly enjoys wide jurisdiction to hear any dispute related to sports in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This stands to generally contribute to the development of sports law in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabian judiciary.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Arbitration Divisions</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">According to Article 24 of the SSAC Statute, the SSAC shall conduct the arbitration in sports-related disputes through the following arbitration divisions:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Ordinary Arbitration Division, which shall carry out its tasks in accordance with the following powers: to resolve sports-related disputes that may arise out of contracts containing an arbitration clause that refers any dispute to the SSAC, or out of any subsequent agreement allowing the referral of disputes to the SSAC and to resolve sports disputes that may arise between the parties to any sports matter (athletes, players, intermediaries, sponsors, administrative staff, technical staff, medical staff, sports clubs, sports federations and Olympic committees), provided that such disputes are not subject to appeal before the SSAC.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Appeals Arbitration Division, which shall carry out its tasks in accordance with the following powers: to decide on all appeals against final decisions issued by the sports bodies after exhausting all internal legal procedures, except for football decisions, to decide on objections filed against internal decisions issued by the sports bodies, which do not have protest proceedings provided for in their statutes or regulations.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Football Dispute Arbitration Division, which has the competence to decide on all appeals against the decisions issued by the SAFF and its committees after exhausting all its internal legal procedures, in accordance with the SAFF Rules and Regulations.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Special Dispute Division, that may be established by the SSAC to resolve all sports-related disputes referred by the General Sport Authority (GSA).</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Mediation Division, which has the competence to mediate between and assist the concerned parties to reach settlement agreements in contractual disputes.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">By comparison, the SSAC’s divisions exceed the number of divisions of the Foundation of Qatar Sports Arbitration (FQSA), another regional sports arbitration body. The FQSA is composed of three divisions, which are the ordinary arbitration division, the appeals arbitration division and the mediation division. The SSAC is composed of the five divisions described above plus newly created divisions, which are the Special Dispute Division and the Football Dispute Arbitration Division. It is to be inferred that the SSAC created a new division for the sport of football because it is the most popular sport in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and it is accordingly anticipated that most disputes will football related.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Applicable law and Arbitration Language</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In the ordinary, appeals or football arbitration divisions, the arbitration panel must follow all of the regulations and rules of the sports body whose decision is appealed against as a means of fulfilling the principles of justice, equity and the Olympic Charter. In the event that no relevant provision is stated in those regulations, then reference may be made to the statutes or regulations of the respective International Federations (IFs) according to each individual case, however, the parties may, in the ordinary arbitration, choose the law applicable to the dispute. From the above article it can be seen that the SSAC shall apply national laws and regulations, although the international regulations can also be applied in cases where there is no relevant provision to be found in the national laws and regulations. This situation helps the arbitrators to issue decisions in line with decisions at the international level.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Arabic language shall prevail as the language before the SSAC. However, English, or any other language, may be used before SSAC with a certified Arabic translation, upon the approval by the Arbitration Panel.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Arbitration Expenses and Fees</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Party requesting arbitration will be liable to pay the arbitration fees upon submitting the case to the SSAC. In case the Claimant requests an expedited procedure, then that party shall pay the applicable fees for an expedited procedure as prescribed. All fees are non-refundable. Furthermore, the party requesting arbitration shall pay the tribunal’s administrative expenses, while the losing party bears all such expenses unless an arbitral award states that the parties shall cover the expenses equally. One important rule is that the final arbitral award shall be delivered to the parties only after all the arbitrators’ costs and fees have been paid in full. Evidently, the SSAC has strong conditions in relation to fees and protects the rights of its arbitrators.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Notifications and Communications</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">All notifications, reports and communications shall be made through and by the SSAC General Secretariat. In addition, all correspondence must be made in PDF format and sent to an SSAC approved e-mail address which shall be the only legal way for the SSAC to send/receive correspondence. Moreover, notifications, correspondence and communications served to the parties to the arbitration or their representatives must be made through the e-mail address previously specified by them or any other address determined in writing at a later stage or through an online filing platform. In case the notifications and communications cannot be delivered by email then they can be delivered by mail or by facsimile. Notifications and correspondence served on the parties to the arbitration shall be considered legally received if they are sent to the addressees at their SSAC-approved e-mail addresses.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Legal Nature of SSAC Awards</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Arbitration awards issued by the SSAC are final and may not be appealed before any other tribunal, whether inside or outside the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, unless otherwise stated in the SSAC Statute. In sports disputes in which a foreigner is a party, awards may be appealed before the International Sports Federations (IFs) or the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), if the relevant statute of an IF states that an appeal shall be made before such judicial body. In case the contract states that the arbitration is within the jurisdiction of the SSAC, then the SSAC award shall be final and non-appealable before any other authority.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC represents a significant development in sports law, not only in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia but also in the Middle East. Litigants may be represented by any licensed lawyer. To date 24 specialist Saudi and Arab arbitrators have been appointed to the panel of the SSAC. Eight international arbitrators, from the list of the CAS, have been appointed to SSAC arbitral panels, demonstrating international confidence. Its wide jurisdiction, and the range of its specialized divisions, will ensure that sports disputes are resolved with high standards of efficiency and in accordance with the best international sports law dispute resolution standards.</p>\r\n<em>Bandar Alhamidani is a Partner and key member of the Al Tamimi &amp; Company’s Sports Law and Events Management team practice. Bandar has acted as an Arbitrator before CAS and SSAC. For further information, please contact Bandar Alhamidani (b.alhamidani@tamimi.com).</em>|<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><img class=\"alignright wp-image-8027 \" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_1016569270-1024x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"442\" height=\"442\" />Football is hugely popular across the Middle East. Its popularity has led some to invest in football clubs. When one considers the wide range of agreements between clubs, players, coaches and sponsors, the potential for disputes is clear. Satisfactory resolution of such disputes is not always easily attainable, considering the specialist nature of sports law and general scarcity of specialist in the field. Bespoke judicial bodies and arbitration centres have recently been established in response.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In 2015, the Saudi Arabian Olympic Committee (SAOC) approved the establishment the Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre (SSAC). Specifically, the Generally Assembly of the SAOC approved its Board of Directors’ decision to authorize the SAOC President to take all necessary actions to establish the SSAC. The SSAC aims to contribute to the general development of the sports sector and the resolution of sport related disputes. As a result, sports law in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and the resolution of sports related disputes, has seen significant development. There is no doubt that SSAC has contributed to the preservation of the rights of parties, and the broader development of the sports sector in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">This article considers two significant regulatory regimes in the field of sports law in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia - the Statute of the Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre (SSAC Statute) and the Rules and Procedures of the Centre of Arbitration for Sport (Rules &amp; Procedures). Further, the author considers various divisions of sports arbitration with both the ordinary and the appeal arbitration procedures of the SSAC.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Established in 2016, the SSAC is located in Riyadh, the nation’s capital. The SSAC is the highest judicial body for sports-related disputes in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, specialising in the hearing of any sports-related dispute by arbitration or mediation.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The legal basis of the SSAC is the SSAC Statute, its procedural rules, and any resolution issued by the SSAC’s Board of Directors. Further, the SSAC was established in line with the Olympic Charter, the statutes of International Federations, the Code of the Court of Arbitration for Sports, and the Arbitration Law of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This has led to a strong, and familiar, legal basis for its effective operation.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC is composed of five members: one appointed by the SAOC, that individual is the President of the SSAC; one appointed by the Athletes’ Committee of the SAOC; one appointed by the Saudi Arabia Football Federation (SAFF); and two appointed by the General Assembly of the SAOC.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC does not deal with appeals arising from violations of laws of the game, criminal cases arising from sports disputes, or sports disputes that have not exhausted the internal roads via the competent judicial bodies. Final decisions may be appealed to the SSAC within 21 days of notification.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>SSAC Procedures</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC Statute and the Rules &amp; Procedures are a set of procedural rules that govern SSAC procedures. The SSAC provides for three types of procedure:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>Ordinary Arbitration - in which the parties have agreed to refer a sports dispute to the SSAC in accordance with an arbitration clause in a contract, or in cases where both parties agree to refer the dispute to arbitration after the dispute has arisen.</li>\r\n 	<li>Appeal Arbitration - in which a party has filed an appeal against a decision issued by a national association such as SAFF, or a judicial body related to sport, where the statutes or regulations provide an appeal before the SSAC.</li>\r\n 	<li>Mediation - in which each party has agreed to refer a dispute that has arisen, or a potential dispute that may arise, to an SSAC mediator.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>SSAC Jurisdiction</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC has jurisdiction to hear any dispute related to sport. Many types of disputes can be referred to the SSAC, including; disputes arising between the SAOC, associations, clubs, members of the boards, members of the general assembly, players, referees, coaches, intermediaries, registered media representatives, organizers of sports events, sponsoring companies, TV transmission channels, disputes relating to sports doping, contractual disputes (provided the arbitration clause refers the dispute to the SSAC), and any international sports dispute (such as may occur in connection with a foreign player or coach) in which the parties have agreed to resort to the SSAC. The SSAC accordingly enjoys wide jurisdiction to hear any dispute related to sports in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This stands to generally contribute to the development of sports law in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabian judiciary.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Arbitration Divisions</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">According to Article 24 of the SSAC Statute, the SSAC shall conduct the arbitration in sports-related disputes through the following arbitration divisions:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Ordinary Arbitration Division, which shall carry out its tasks in accordance with the following powers: to resolve sports-related disputes that may arise out of contracts containing an arbitration clause that refers any dispute to the SSAC, or out of any subsequent agreement allowing the referral of disputes to the SSAC and to resolve sports disputes that may arise between the parties to any sports matter (athletes, players, intermediaries, sponsors, administrative staff, technical staff, medical staff, sports clubs, sports federations and Olympic committees), provided that such disputes are not subject to appeal before the SSAC.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Appeals Arbitration Division, which shall carry out its tasks in accordance with the following powers: to decide on all appeals against final decisions issued by the sports bodies after exhausting all internal legal procedures, except for football decisions, to decide on objections filed against internal decisions issued by the sports bodies, which do not have protest proceedings provided for in their statutes or regulations.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Football Dispute Arbitration Division, which has the competence to decide on all appeals against the decisions issued by the SAFF and its committees after exhausting all its internal legal procedures, in accordance with the SAFF Rules and Regulations.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Special Dispute Division, that may be established by the SSAC to resolve all sports-related disputes referred by the General Sport Authority (GSA).</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Mediation Division, which has the competence to mediate between and assist the concerned parties to reach settlement agreements in contractual disputes.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">By comparison, the SSAC’s divisions exceed the number of divisions of the Foundation of Qatar Sports Arbitration (FQSA), another regional sports arbitration body. The FQSA is composed of three divisions, which are the ordinary arbitration division, the appeals arbitration division and the mediation division. The SSAC is composed of the five divisions described above plus newly created divisions, which are the Special Dispute Division and the Football Dispute Arbitration Division. It is to be inferred that the SSAC created a new division for the sport of football because it is the most popular sport in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and it is accordingly anticipated that most disputes will football related.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Applicable law and Arbitration Language</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In the ordinary, appeals or football arbitration divisions, the arbitration panel must follow all of the regulations and rules of the sports body whose decision is appealed against as a means of fulfilling the principles of justice, equity and the Olympic Charter. In the event that no relevant provision is stated in those regulations, then reference may be made to the statutes or regulations of the respective International Federations (IFs) according to each individual case, however, the parties may, in the ordinary arbitration, choose the law applicable to the dispute. From the above article it can be seen that the SSAC shall apply national laws and regulations, although the international regulations can also be applied in cases where there is no relevant provision to be found in the national laws and regulations. This situation helps the arbitrators to issue decisions in line with decisions at the international level.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Arabic language shall prevail as the language before the SSAC. However, English, or any other language, may be used before SSAC with a certified Arabic translation, upon the approval by the Arbitration Panel.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Arbitration Expenses and Fees</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Party requesting arbitration will be liable to pay the arbitration fees upon submitting the case to the SSAC. In case the Claimant requests an expedited procedure, then that party shall pay the applicable fees for an expedited procedure as prescribed. All fees are non-refundable. Furthermore, the party requesting arbitration shall pay the tribunal’s administrative expenses, while the losing party bears all such expenses unless an arbitral award states that the parties shall cover the expenses equally. One important rule is that the final arbitral award shall be delivered to the parties only after all the arbitrators’ costs and fees have been paid in full. Evidently, the SSAC has strong conditions in relation to fees and protects the rights of its arbitrators.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Notifications and Communications</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">All notifications, reports and communications shall be made through and by the SSAC General Secretariat. In addition, all correspondence must be made in PDF format and sent to an SSAC approved e-mail address which shall be the only legal way for the SSAC to send/receive correspondence. Moreover, notifications, correspondence and communications served to the parties to the arbitration or their representatives must be made through the e-mail address previously specified by them or any other address determined in writing at a later stage or through an online filing platform. In case the notifications and communications cannot be delivered by email then they can be delivered by mail or by facsimile. Notifications and correspondence served on the parties to the arbitration shall be considered legally received if they are sent to the addressees at their SSAC-approved e-mail addresses.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Legal Nature of SSAC Awards</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Arbitration awards issued by the SSAC are final and may not be appealed before any other tribunal, whether inside or outside the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, unless otherwise stated in the SSAC Statute. In sports disputes in which a foreigner is a party, awards may be appealed before the International Sports Federations (IFs) or the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), if the relevant statute of an IF states that an appeal shall be made before such judicial body. In case the contract states that the arbitration is within the jurisdiction of the SSAC, then the SSAC award shall be final and non-appealable before any other authority.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The SSAC represents a significant development in sports law, not only in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia but also in the Middle East. Litigants may be represented by any licensed lawyer. To date 24 specialist Saudi and Arab arbitrators have been appointed to the panel of the SSAC. Eight international arbitrators, from the list of the CAS, have been appointed to SSAC arbitral panels, demonstrating international confidence. Its wide jurisdiction, and the range of its specialized divisions, will ensure that sports disputes are resolved with high standards of efficiency and in accordance with the best international sports law dispute resolution standards.</p>\r\n<em>Bandar Alhamidani is a Partner and key member of the Al Tamimi &amp; Company’s Sports Law and Events Management team practice. Bandar has acted as an Arbitrator before CAS and SSAC. For further information, please contact Bandar Alhamidani (b.alhamidani@tamimi.com).</em>'),
(250903, 24471, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250904, 24471, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250905, 24471, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250906, 24471, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250907, 24472, 'PostID', '7952'),
(250908, 24472, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(250909, 24472, 'PostTitle', 'Introduction to the Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre (SSAC)'),
(250910, 24472, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(250911, 24472, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 18:09:55'),
(250912, 24472, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7952'),
(250913, 24472, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7952&amp;action=edit'),
(250914, 24472, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250915, 24472, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250916, 24472, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250917, 24472, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250918, 24473, 'AttachmentID', '8031'),
(250919, 24473, 'FileName', 'shutterstock_224568580.jpg'),
(250920, 24473, 'FilePath', '/home/tamimnew/public_html/wp-content/uploads/2018/07'),
(250921, 24473, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250922, 24473, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250923, 24473, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250924, 24473, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250925, 24474, 'PostID', '7952'),
(250926, 24474, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(250927, 24474, 'PostTitle', 'Introduction to the Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre (SSAC)'),
(250928, 24474, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(250929, 24474, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 18:09:55'),
(250930, 24474, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7952'),
(250931, 24474, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7952&amp;action=edit'),
(250932, 24474, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(250933, 24474, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(250934, 24474, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(250935, 24474, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(250936, 24475, 'PostID', '7952'),
(250937, 24475, 'PostTitle', 'Introduction to the Saudi Sport Arbitration Centre (SSAC)'),
(250938, 24475, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(250939, 24475, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(250940, 24475, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 18:11:06'),
(250941, 24475, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7952'),
(250942, 24475, 'MetaID', '223822'),
(250943, 24475, 'MetaKey', 'content');
