INSERT INTO `tm_wsal_metadata` (`id`, `occurrence_id`, `name`, `value`) VALUES
(240040, 23483, 'CurrentUserID', '1'),
(240041, 23483, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(240042, 23483, 'SessionID', '81da103ad5564de63082ba6f60c7e438aaae5dad6757e0ae420ffc9daa0eeaf3'),
(240043, 23484, 'PostID', '4011'),
(240044, 23484, 'PostType', 'page'),
(240045, 23484, 'PostTitle', 'Search'),
(240046, 23484, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(240047, 23484, 'PostDate', '2017-10-16 10:21:41'),
(240048, 23484, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/search-result/'),
(240049, 23484, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=4011&amp;action=edit'),
(240050, 23484, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(240051, 23484, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_13_2) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(240052, 23484, 'CurrentUserID', '1'),
(240053, 23484, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(240054, 23484, 'SessionID', '81da103ad5564de63082ba6f60c7e438aaae5dad6757e0ae420ffc9daa0eeaf3'),
(240055, 23485, 'PostID', '7344'),
(240056, 23485, 'PostType', 'lawyer'),
(240057, 23485, 'PostTitle', 'Andrew Moroney'),
(240058, 23485, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(240059, 23485, 'PostDate', '2018-04-28 17:24:08'),
(240060, 23485, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/lawyer/andrew-moroney/'),
(240061, 23485, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7344&amp;action=edit'),
(240062, 23485, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(240063, 23485, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_13_2) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(240064, 23485, 'CurrentUserID', '1'),
(240065, 23485, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(240066, 23485, 'SessionID', '81da103ad5564de63082ba6f60c7e438aaae5dad6757e0ae420ffc9daa0eeaf3'),
(240067, 23486, 'PostID', '4011'),
(240068, 23486, 'PostType', 'page'),
(240069, 23486, 'PostTitle', 'Search'),
(240070, 23486, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(240071, 23486, 'PostDate', '2017-10-16 10:21:41'),
(240072, 23486, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/search-result/'),
(240073, 23486, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=4011&amp;action=edit'),
(240074, 23486, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(240075, 23486, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_13_2) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(240076, 23486, 'CurrentUserID', '1'),
(240077, 23486, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(240078, 23486, 'SessionID', '81da103ad5564de63082ba6f60c7e438aaae5dad6757e0ae420ffc9daa0eeaf3'),
(240079, 23487, 'PostID', '707'),
(240080, 23487, 'PostType', 'lawyer'),
(240081, 23487, 'PostTitle', 'Roberto Lusardi'),
(240082, 23487, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(240083, 23487, 'PostDate', '2017-09-27 12:12:58'),
(240084, 23487, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/lawyer/roberto-lusardi/'),
(240085, 23487, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=707&amp;action=edit'),
(240086, 23487, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(240087, 23487, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_13_2) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(245626, 24015, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 15:41:19'),
(245625, 24015, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(240520, 23548, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(240495, 23547, 'PostID', '650'),
(240526, 23549, 'PostType', 'page'),
(240524, 23548, 'SessionID', 'a1b4dccaf4b841d76e8aa32f20118fa956ab8e5f13acbda3bccc8e2089ab6dd5'),
(240525, 23549, 'PostID', '4074'),
(240522, 23548, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(240523, 23548, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(240226, 23513, 'ClientIP', '171.229.240.144'),
(240227, 23513, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_31_84) AppleWebKit/532.90.43 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/57.4.0105.5477 Safari/534.50 Edge/34.66562'),
(240225, 23513, 'Users', 'a:0:{}'),
(240222, 23512, 'ClientIP', '113.160.148.240'),
(240223, 23512, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:45.62.19) Gecko/20150081 Firefox/45.62.19'),
(240224, 23513, 'Attempts', '1'),
(240219, 23512, 'Attempts', '1'),
(240220, 23512, 'Username', 'admin'),
(240221, 23512, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(240215, 23511, 'EventCount', '2'),
(240216, 23511, 'PruneQuery', 'DELETE FROM tm_wsal_occurrences ORDER BY created_on ASC LIMIT 2'),
(240217, 23511, 'ClientIP', '185.140.248.63'),
(240218, 23511, 'UserAgent', 'WordPress/4.9.7; https://www.tamimi.com'),
(240519, 23548, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=650&amp;action=edit'),
(240496, 23547, 'PostTitle', 'Senior Partner\'s Office'),
(240497, 23547, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(240498, 23547, 'PostType', 'practice'),
(240499, 23547, 'PostDate', '2017-09-27 11:02:01'),
(240500, 23547, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/practice/senior-partners-office/'),
(240501, 23547, 'MetaID', '37574'),
(240502, 23547, 'MetaKey', 'related_pages'),
(240503, 23547, 'MetaValueNew', '6'),
(240504, 23547, 'MetaValueOld', '5'),
(240505, 23547, 'MetaLink', 'related_pages'),
(240506, 23547, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=650&amp;action=edit'),
(240507, 23547, 'ReportText', '5|6'),
(240508, 23547, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(240509, 23547, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(240510, 23547, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(240511, 23547, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(240512, 23547, 'SessionID', 'a1b4dccaf4b841d76e8aa32f20118fa956ab8e5f13acbda3bccc8e2089ab6dd5'),
(240513, 23548, 'PostID', '650'),
(240514, 23548, 'PostType', 'practice'),
(240515, 23548, 'PostTitle', 'Senior Partner&#039;s Office'),
(240516, 23548, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(240517, 23548, 'PostDate', '2017-09-27 11:02:01'),
(240518, 23548, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/practice/senior-partners-office/'),
(239963, 23476, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_13_2) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(245677, 24018, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(245678, 24019, 'PostID', '7945'),
(245679, 24019, 'PostTitle', 'From Stadion to E-Gaming in the UAE: A look at Stadium'),
(240399, 23539, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(240384, 23538, 'PostDate', '2017-10-05 13:36:13'),
(240637, 23561, 'PostID', '187'),
(240638, 23561, 'PostType', 'page'),
(240621, 23559, 'EventCount', '5'),
(240622, 23559, 'PruneQuery', 'DELETE FROM tm_wsal_occurrences ORDER BY created_on ASC LIMIT 5'),
(240623, 23559, 'ClientIP', '185.140.248.63'),
(240624, 23559, 'UserAgent', 'WordPress/4.9.7; https://www.tamimi.com'),
(240905, 23584, 'MetaLink', 'biography'),
(240906, 23584, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7306&amp;action=edit'),
(240904, 23584, 'MetaValueOld', 'Anna is experienced in many areas of corporate work including regional private equity and venture capital funding, local and cross-border mergers and acquisitions and joint ventures.\r\n\r\nAnna is experienced across all key work streams in the merger and acquisition legal process, including deal negotiation and transaction documents, due diligence and disclosure carve-outs, pre-closing restructuring and deal closings for both share and asset transactions.\r\n\r\nAnna transferred to Al Tamimi &amp; Co from Paris Smith LLP, a leading corporate firm in the South of England.'),
(240356, 23536, 'PostID', '5'),
(240355, 23535, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10_43_90) AppleWebKit/532.84.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/56.3.7279.2907 Safari/533.23 Edge/36.18286'),
(240354, 23535, 'ClientIP', '14.186.226.149'),
(240353, 23535, 'Users', 'a:0:{}'),
(240351, 23534, 'UserAgent', 'WordPress/4.9.7; https://www.tamimi.com'),
(240352, 23535, 'Attempts', '1'),
(240348, 23534, 'EventCount', '9'),
(240349, 23534, 'PruneQuery', 'DELETE FROM tm_wsal_occurrences ORDER BY created_on ASC LIMIT 9'),
(240350, 23534, 'ClientIP', '185.140.248.63'),
(240919, 23585, 'MetaID', '203955'),
(240920, 23585, 'MetaKey', 'recent_dealsexperience'),
(240921, 23585, 'MetaValueNew', '<ul>\r\n 	<li>Advised the acquirers on the cross border acquisition of two UAE based companies.</li>\r\n 	<li>Advised the sellers of a target company on the sale of the target to a private equity fund and simultaneous merger of the target with another media company.</li>\r\n 	<li>Advised high net worth individuals on the disposal of a majority stake in a scientific development company.</li>\r\n 	<li>Advised a healthcare company on the acquisition of three health-care provider entities.</li>\r\n 	<li>Advised on many cross border joint venture agreements.</li>\r\n</ul>'),
(240918, 23585, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/lawyer/anna-robinson/'),
(240915, 23585, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(240916, 23585, 'PostType', 'lawyer'),
(240917, 23585, 'PostDate', '2018-04-22 07:42:33'),
(240912, 23584, 'SessionID', 'a1b4dccaf4b841d76e8aa32f20118fa956ab8e5f13acbda3bccc8e2089ab6dd5'),
(240913, 23585, 'PostID', '7306'),
(240914, 23585, 'PostTitle', 'Anna Robinson'),
(240909, 23584, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(240910, 23584, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(240911, 23584, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(240908, 23584, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(240661, 23563, 'PostID', '848'),
(240662, 23563, 'PostType', 'lawyer'),
(240663, 23563, 'PostTitle', 'Dr. Hassan Arab'),
(240664, 23563, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(240665, 23563, 'PostDate', '2017-09-27 17:46:49'),
(240606, 23557, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(240605, 23557, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(240604, 23557, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(240600, 23557, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(240601, 23557, 'PostDate', '2017-09-11 07:06:17'),
(240602, 23557, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/partners/'),
(240603, 23557, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=187&amp;action=edit'),
(240599, 23557, 'PostTitle', 'Partners'),
(240596, 23556, 'SessionID', 'a1b4dccaf4b841d76e8aa32f20118fa956ab8e5f13acbda3bccc8e2089ab6dd5'),
(240597, 23557, 'PostID', '187'),
(240598, 23557, 'PostType', 'page'),
(240593, 23556, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(240594, 23556, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(240595, 23556, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(240590, 23556, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/partners/'),
(240591, 23556, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=187&amp;action=edit'),
(240592, 23556, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(240567, 23553, 'ClientIP', '185.140.248.63'),
(240568, 23553, 'UserAgent', 'WordPress/4.9.7; https://www.tamimi.com'),
(240565, 23553, 'TargetUserName', 'noura'),
(240566, 23553, 'TargetSessionID', '86c11e7805d5147029f16268fb4888994af654ad5807957c85ffc99cc85bc611'),
(240561, 23552, 'EventCount', '18'),
(240562, 23552, 'PruneQuery', 'DELETE FROM tm_wsal_occurrences ORDER BY created_on ASC LIMIT 18'),
(240563, 23552, 'ClientIP', '185.140.248.63'),
(240564, 23552, 'UserAgent', 'WordPress/4.9.7; https://www.tamimi.com'),
(240586, 23556, 'PostType', 'page'),
(240587, 23556, 'PostTitle', 'Partners'),
(240588, 23556, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(240589, 23556, 'PostDate', '2017-09-11 07:06:17'),
(240583, 23555, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(240584, 23555, 'SessionID', 'a1b4dccaf4b841d76e8aa32f20118fa956ab8e5f13acbda3bccc8e2089ab6dd5'),
(240585, 23556, 'PostID', '187'),
(240580, 23555, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(240581, 23555, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(240582, 23555, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(240577, 23555, 'PostDate', '2017-09-06 07:15:00'),
(240578, 23555, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/'),
(240579, 23555, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=5&amp;action=edit'),
(240573, 23555, 'PostID', '5'),
(240574, 23555, 'PostType', 'page'),
(240575, 23555, 'PostTitle', 'Home'),
(240576, 23555, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(240569, 23554, 'EventCount', '2'),
(240570, 23554, 'PruneQuery', 'DELETE FROM tm_wsal_occurrences ORDER BY created_on ASC LIMIT 2'),
(240571, 23554, 'ClientIP', '185.140.248.63'),
(240572, 23554, 'UserAgent', 'WordPress/4.9.7; https://www.tamimi.com'),
(240666, 23563, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/lawyer/hassan-arab/'),
(240667, 23563, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=848&amp;action=edit'),
(240668, 23563, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(240669, 23563, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(240670, 23563, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(240671, 23563, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(240672, 23563, 'SessionID', 'a1b4dccaf4b841d76e8aa32f20118fa956ab8e5f13acbda3bccc8e2089ab6dd5'),
(240673, 23564, 'PostID', '5'),
(240674, 23564, 'PostType', 'page'),
(240675, 23564, 'PostTitle', 'Home'),
(240676, 23564, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(240677, 23564, 'PostDate', '2017-09-06 07:15:00'),
(240678, 23564, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/'),
(240679, 23564, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=5&amp;action=edit'),
(240680, 23564, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(240681, 23564, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(240682, 23564, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(240683, 23564, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(240684, 23564, 'SessionID', 'a1b4dccaf4b841d76e8aa32f20118fa956ab8e5f13acbda3bccc8e2089ab6dd5'),
(240685, 23565, 'PostID', '252'),
(240686, 23565, 'PostType', 'page'),
(240687, 23565, 'PostTitle', 'Locations'),
(240688, 23565, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(240689, 23565, 'PostDate', '2017-09-18 08:56:53'),
(240690, 23565, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/locations/'),
(240691, 23565, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=252&amp;action=edit'),
(240692, 23565, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(240693, 23565, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(240694, 23565, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(240695, 23565, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(240696, 23565, 'SessionID', 'a1b4dccaf4b841d76e8aa32f20118fa956ab8e5f13acbda3bccc8e2089ab6dd5'),
(240697, 23566, 'PostID', '1558'),
(240698, 23566, 'PostType', 'jurisdictions'),
(240699, 23566, 'PostTitle', 'Saudi Arabia'),
(240700, 23566, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(240701, 23566, 'PostDate', '2017-10-08 08:08:10'),
(240702, 23566, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/jurisdictions/saudi-arabia/'),
(240703, 23566, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=1558&amp;action=edit'),
(240704, 23566, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(240705, 23566, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(240706, 23566, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(240707, 23566, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(240708, 23566, 'SessionID', 'a1b4dccaf4b841d76e8aa32f20118fa956ab8e5f13acbda3bccc8e2089ab6dd5'),
(240709, 23567, 'PostID', '6654'),
(240710, 23567, 'PostType', 'lawyer'),
(240711, 23567, 'PostTitle', 'Rakesh Bassi'),
(240712, 23567, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(240713, 23567, 'PostDate', '2017-11-12 12:20:44'),
(240714, 23567, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/lawyer/rakesh-bassi/'),
(240715, 23567, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=6654&amp;action=edit'),
(240716, 23567, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(240717, 23567, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(240718, 23567, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(240719, 23567, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(240720, 23567, 'SessionID', 'a1b4dccaf4b841d76e8aa32f20118fa956ab8e5f13acbda3bccc8e2089ab6dd5'),
(240721, 23568, 'PostID', '537'),
(240722, 23568, 'PostType', 'practice'),
(240723, 23568, 'PostTitle', 'Construction & Infrastructure'),
(240724, 23568, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(240725, 23568, 'PostDate', '2017-09-26 15:10:02'),
(240726, 23568, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/practice/construction-infrastructure/'),
(240727, 23568, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=537&amp;action=edit'),
(240728, 23568, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(240729, 23568, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(240730, 23568, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(240731, 23568, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(240732, 23568, 'SessionID', 'a1b4dccaf4b841d76e8aa32f20118fa956ab8e5f13acbda3bccc8e2089ab6dd5'),
(240733, 23569, 'PostID', '5'),
(240734, 23569, 'PostType', 'page'),
(240735, 23569, 'PostTitle', 'Home'),
(240736, 23569, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(240737, 23569, 'PostDate', '2017-09-06 07:15:00'),
(240738, 23569, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/'),
(240739, 23569, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=5&amp;action=edit'),
(240740, 23569, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(240741, 23569, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_13_2) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(240742, 23569, 'CurrentUserID', '1'),
(240743, 23569, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(240744, 23569, 'SessionID', '81da103ad5564de63082ba6f60c7e438aaae5dad6757e0ae420ffc9daa0eeaf3'),
(240745, 23570, 'PostID', '970'),
(240746, 23570, 'PostType', 'page'),
(240747, 23570, 'PostTitle', 'Video Gallery'),
(240748, 23570, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(240749, 23570, 'PostDate', '2017-09-28 12:21:25'),
(240750, 23570, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/video-galleries/'),
(240751, 23570, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=970&amp;action=edit'),
(240752, 23570, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(240753, 23570, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_13_2) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(240754, 23570, 'CurrentUserID', '1'),
(240755, 23570, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(240756, 23570, 'SessionID', '81da103ad5564de63082ba6f60c7e438aaae5dad6757e0ae420ffc9daa0eeaf3'),
(240757, 23571, 'PostID', '7729'),
(240758, 23571, 'PostType', 'video-gallery'),
(240759, 23571, 'PostTitle', 'UAE\'s New Visa Rule: What you need to know'),
(240760, 23571, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(240761, 23571, 'PostDate', '2018-07-15 09:55:36'),
(240762, 23571, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/video-gallery/uaes-new-visa-rule-what-you-need-to-know/'),
(240763, 23571, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7729&amp;action=edit'),
(240764, 23571, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(240765, 23571, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_13_2) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(240766, 23571, 'CurrentUserID', '1'),
(240767, 23571, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(240768, 23571, 'SessionID', '81da103ad5564de63082ba6f60c7e438aaae5dad6757e0ae420ffc9daa0eeaf3'),
(244104, 23891, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244105, 23891, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244106, 23891, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244107, 23891, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244108, 23892, 'PostID', '7927'),
(244109, 23892, 'PostType', 'news-room'),
(244110, 23892, 'PostTitle', 'New Data Protection Law in Bahrain criminalises non-compliance'),
(244111, 23892, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(244112, 23892, 'PostDate', '2018-07-30 18:00:47'),
(244113, 23892, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/news-room/new-data-protection-law-in-bahrain-criminalises-non-compliance/'),
(244114, 23892, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7927&amp;action=edit'),
(244115, 23892, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244116, 23892, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244117, 23892, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244118, 23892, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244119, 23893, 'PostID', '7927'),
(244120, 23893, 'PostType', 'news-room'),
(244121, 23893, 'PostTitle', 'New Data Protection Law in Bahrain criminalises non-compliance'),
(244122, 23893, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(244123, 23893, 'PostDate', '2018-07-30 18:00:47'),
(244124, 23893, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/news-room/new-data-protection-law-in-bahrain-criminalises-non-compliance/'),
(244125, 23893, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7927&amp;action=edit'),
(244126, 23893, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244127, 23893, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244128, 23893, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244129, 23893, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244130, 23894, 'PostID', '893'),
(244131, 23894, 'PostType', 'lawyer'),
(244132, 23894, 'PostTitle', 'Nick O’Connell'),
(244133, 23894, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(244134, 23894, 'PostDate', '2017-09-28 08:17:21'),
(244135, 23894, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/lawyer/nick-oconnell/'),
(244136, 23894, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=893&amp;action=edit'),
(244137, 23894, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244138, 23894, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244139, 23894, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244140, 23894, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244141, 23895, 'PostID', '7930'),
(244142, 23895, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244143, 23895, 'PostTitle', 'Enforcement and Challenges to Arbitral Awards under the New Arbitration Law in the UAE'),
(244144, 23895, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(244145, 23895, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:04:57'),
(244146, 23895, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/law-update-articles/enforcement-and-challenges-to-arbitral-awards-under-the-new-arbitration-law-in-the-uae/'),
(244147, 23895, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7930&amp;action=edit'),
(244148, 23895, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244149, 23895, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244150, 23895, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244151, 23895, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244152, 23896, 'PostID', '7930'),
(244153, 23896, 'PostTitle', 'Enforcement and Challenges to Arbitral Awards under the New Arbitration Law in the UAE'),
(244154, 23896, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(244155, 23896, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244156, 23896, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:04:57'),
(244157, 23896, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/law-update-articles/enforcement-and-challenges-to-arbitral-awards-under-the-new-arbitration-law-in-the-uae/'),
(244158, 23896, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticleMonth'),
(244159, 23896, 'MetaValue', '7928'),
(244160, 23896, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticleMonth'),
(244161, 23896, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7930&amp;action=edit'),
(244162, 23896, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244163, 23896, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244164, 23896, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244165, 23896, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244166, 23897, 'PostID', '7930'),
(244167, 23897, 'PostTitle', 'Enforcement and Challenges to Arbitral Awards under the New Arbitration Law in the UAE'),
(244168, 23897, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(244169, 23897, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244170, 23897, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:04:57'),
(244171, 23897, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/law-update-articles/enforcement-and-challenges-to-arbitral-awards-under-the-new-arbitration-law-in-the-uae/'),
(244172, 23897, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices_0_lawUpdateArticlePractice'),
(244173, 23897, 'MetaValue', '638'),
(244174, 23897, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices_0_lawUpdateArticlePractice'),
(244175, 23897, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7930&amp;action=edit'),
(244176, 23897, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244177, 23897, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244178, 23897, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244179, 23897, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244180, 23898, 'PostID', '7930'),
(244181, 23898, 'PostTitle', 'Enforcement and Challenges to Arbitral Awards under the New Arbitration Law in the UAE'),
(244182, 23898, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(244183, 23898, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244184, 23898, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:04:57'),
(244185, 23898, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/law-update-articles/enforcement-and-challenges-to-arbitral-awards-under-the-new-arbitration-law-in-the-uae/'),
(244186, 23898, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices'),
(244187, 23898, 'MetaValue', '1'),
(244188, 23898, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices'),
(244189, 23898, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7930&amp;action=edit'),
(244190, 23898, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244191, 23898, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244192, 23898, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244193, 23898, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244194, 23899, 'PostID', '7930'),
(244195, 23899, 'PostTitle', 'Enforcement and Challenges to Arbitral Awards under the New Arbitration Law in the UAE'),
(244196, 23899, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(244197, 23899, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244198, 23899, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:04:57'),
(244199, 23899, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/law-update-articles/enforcement-and-challenges-to-arbitral-awards-under-the-new-arbitration-law-in-the-uae/'),
(244200, 23899, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticleSectors'),
(244201, 23899, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticleSectors'),
(244202, 23899, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7930&amp;action=edit'),
(244203, 23899, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244204, 23899, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244205, 23899, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244206, 23899, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244207, 23900, 'PostID', '7930'),
(244208, 23900, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244209, 23900, 'PostTitle', 'Enforcement and Challenges to Arbitral Awards under the New Arbitration Law in the UAE'),
(244210, 23900, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(244211, 23900, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:04:57'),
(244212, 23900, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/law-update-articles/enforcement-and-challenges-to-arbitral-awards-under-the-new-arbitration-law-in-the-uae/'),
(244213, 23900, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7930&amp;action=edit'),
(244214, 23900, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244215, 23900, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244216, 23900, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244217, 23900, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244218, 23901, 'PostID', '7930'),
(244219, 23901, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244220, 23901, 'PostTitle', 'Enforcement and Challenges to Arbitral Awards under the New Arbitration Law in the UAE'),
(244221, 23901, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244222, 23901, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:04:57'),
(244223, 23901, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7930'),
(244224, 23901, 'OldStatus', 'publish'),
(244225, 23901, 'NewStatus', 'draft'),
(244226, 23901, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7930&amp;action=edit'),
(244227, 23901, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244228, 23901, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244229, 23901, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244230, 23901, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244231, 23902, 'PostID', '7930'),
(244232, 23902, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244233, 23902, 'PostTitle', 'Enforcement and Challenges to Arbitral Awards under the New Arbitration Law in the UAE'),
(244234, 23902, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244235, 23902, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:04:57'),
(244236, 23902, 'OldUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/law-update-articles/enforcement-and-challenges-to-arbitral-awards-under-the-new-arbitration-law-in-the-uae/'),
(244237, 23902, 'NewUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7930'),
(244238, 23902, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7930&amp;action=edit'),
(244239, 23902, 'ReportText', '\"http://www.tamimi.com/law-update-articles/enforcement-and-challenges-to-arbitral-awards-under-the-new-arbitration-law-in-the-uae/\"|\"http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7930\"'),
(244240, 23902, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244241, 23902, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244242, 23902, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244243, 23902, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244244, 23903, 'PostID', '7930'),
(244245, 23903, 'PostTitle', 'Enforcement and Challenges to Arbitral Awards under the New Arbitration Law in the UAE'),
(244246, 23903, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244247, 23903, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244248, 23903, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:04:57'),
(244249, 23903, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7930'),
(244250, 23903, 'MetaID', '222848'),
(244251, 23903, 'MetaKey', 'content'),
(244252, 23903, 'MetaValueNew', '<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">On 03 May 2018 the UAE enacted Federal Law No. 6 of 2018 (\"the New Law\"), as published in the Official Gazette No 630 of 15 May 2018. The New Law replaced certain arbitration provisions found in the UAE Civil Procedures Law No. 11 of 1992, particularly Articles 203-218 (\"the former arbitration provisions\"). The New Law took effect after a month its publication, accordingly applying from mid-June 2018.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The enactment of the New Law confirms the UAE’s commitment to bring its arbitration law in line with internationally accepted best practice. In this article we consider key provisions of the New Law, with particular focus on the enforcement of arbitration awards.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Key Aspects of the New Law</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 2 outlines the scope of application of the New Law. It states that it applies to (i) any arbitration conducted in the UAE, unless the parties agree to another law governing the arbitration proceedings; (ii) any international arbitrations conducted outside the UAE, where the parties agree to apply the New Law to govern such proceedings; and (iii) to any arbitration arising from a dispute in respect of a legal relationship governed by UAE law, save where excepted by special provision.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em>A significant feature of the New Law is Article 3, which defines ‘international arbitration’. An arbitration is international if ‘the parties have, at the time of conclusion of the arbitration agreement, their places of business in different States’.</em></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Moreover, an arbitration is deemed to be international, if the place of arbitration, or the place of performance of the contractual obligations, or the subject matter of the dispute is connected with more than one country, or if the parties have expressly agreed that the subject matter of the arbitration agreement relates to more than one country. This new feature did not exist in the former arbitration provisions and which were limited to domestic and foreign arbitrations only. They did not consider any aspects of international arbitration, even in cases where the domestic arbitration contained elements of international arbitration. The New Law does not, however, confer any additional advantages for international arbitration in terms of the enforcement of an award, as the procedure to ratify an international award is similar to that of domestic awards. The New Law does, however, provide the parties with freedom to choose the New Law to govern the arbitration proceedings, even if the arbitration proceedings are conducted outside the UAE.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Chapter II Article 4 of the New Law deals with the parties’ capacity to enter into an arbitration agreement. Similarly, Articles 5 to 8 of the New Law cover the form, autonomy and subject matter of arbitration agreements.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Unlike the former arbitration provisions, the New Law defines arbitration institutions and confers wide powers on these institutions if the parties to the arbitration agree to apply arbitration institutional rules. The New Law accordingly covers all types of arbitrations, regardless of it being ad-hoc, institutional or arbitration conducted through the Court.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 11 provides mechanisms where the parties fail to agree on the appointment of an arbitrator/tribunal. Under the former arbitration provisions (Article 204), in such circumstances, parties were required to file a Court application for direction - which was effectively similar to initiating full litigation proceedings. The New Law allows the parties simply to apply to the relevant authority, which is either the body authorized to administer the arbitration, or the Court.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Under the former arbitration provisions the grounds for challenging an arbitrator were similar to the grounds for the recusal or impleading of judges. The New Law, under Articles 14 and 15, changes this - providing specific grounds and procedures for challenging an arbitrator.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The New Law recognizes key principles and practices of international commercial arbitration including the principles of severability, Article 6(1), and competence-competence - Article 19(1).</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 21 deals with the jurisdiction of the tribunal to issue interim or conservatory measures concerning arbitration proceedings, at the request of a party or on its own motion.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In contrast to the former arbitration provisions, Article 28 differentiates the ‘place of arbitration’ i.e. the seat of arbitration with which an award is legally connected, and the ‘venue of arbitration’ - where the arbitration sessions or hearings are conducted. Moreover, Article 41(6) provides that an award shall be considered as issued at the place of arbitration, as determined under Article 28, even if the tribunal signed an award outside the place of arbitration. The tribunal may conduct arbitration hearings and deliberations through modern means of communication (according to Article 28(2)(b)). Likewise, Article 35 provides an arbitral tribunal with the discretion to hear any witnesses, including expert witnesses, through modern means of communication.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Enforcement of Awards under the New Law</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 52 provides that an award issued under the New Law shall have res judicata status and be enforceable as a court judgment. The same article also states that an award must be ratified prior to its enforcement.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Unlike the former arbitration provisions, Article 55(1) states that a party seeking to enforce an award must submit an application to the Chief Justice of the relevant Court, together with supporting documents. The term ‘Court’ is defined as the Federal Court of Appeal or local Courts of Appeal in the UAE. Under Article 55(1), the Chief Justice of the Court (or any judges empowered by the Chief Justice) should issue an order confirming ratification and enforcement of the award within sixty days from the date of the submission of the application, unless any of the grounds for setting aside of the award exists under Article 53(1).</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Challenging the Decision against Enforcement of Awards</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Under Article 57, a party may challenge a decision of the Court on the ratification of the award, by filing a grievance before the Court within thirty days. Article 57 reads as follows:</p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em>\"A grievance may be filed against the Court’s decision to grant or deny enforcement of an arbitral award before the competent Court of Appeal within thirty days from the date following notification\".</em></p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 57 does not confirm whether a decision of the ‘competent Court of Appeal’ is to be considered as final or if an aggrieved party could pursue an appeal before the Cassation Court. Considering the New Law does not provide for an appeal of the decision of the ‘competent Court of Appeal’ on the grievance presented under Article 57, it is our respectful view that the decision of the ‘competent Court of Appeal’ is likely to be deemed as final. Otherwise, this could lead to lengthy procedures and result in delays of enforcement of awards, which is against the core of objectives of the New Law.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Action to set aside Arbitration Awards</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 53 entitles a party to challenge the enforcement of an award by submitting an application before the Court under one or more grounds contained in Articles 53(1)(a) - (h). Further, Article 53(2) states that the Court shall set aside an award if the subject matter of the dispute is not capable of settlement, or if the award is in conflict with public order.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">An action to set aside an arbitration award must be submitted by a party within thirty days from the date of notification of such award, otherwise the action will be time barred under Article 54(2).</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Besides the option of filling an action to set aside an award under Article 53(1), a party seeking to challenge an award may also submit objections to ratifying the award before the Court during the process of ratification in accordance with Article 57. Accordingly, there are three options for a party to challenge the ratification and enforcement of an award:</p>\r\n\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">file a case seeking to set aside an award under Article 53(1) before the Court of Appeal and this decision is subject to appeal before the Court of Cassation under Article 54(1);</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">present a defence to the Court objecting to the ratification and enforcement of the award during the process of ratification initiated by the award creditor under Article 55(1); or</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">submit a grievance against the Court’s decision to grant or deny enforcement under Article 57.</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Mechanism to Recognise and Enforce Foreign Awards</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The New Law does not expressly provide for the procedures applicable to the recognition and enforcement of foreign awards in the UAE. This begs the question - what procedures are applicable to the recognition of foreign arbitral awards in the UAE? Should a party seeking recognition apply to the Court of First Instance (the position prior to the enactment of the New Law) or should the parties follow the new procedures for ratifying awards as laid down under the New Law?</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Considering that Article 3 of the New York Convention requires Contracting States not to impose substantially more onerous conditions on the recognition and enforcement of foreign awards than are imposed on the enforcement of domestic awards, it is our view that the provisions of the New Law will apply for the recognition and enforcement of foreign awards. Further, the UAE is committed to fulfilling its obligations under applicable international conventions and treaties. It is accordingly inferred that a party seeking recognition of a foreign award should be required to submit an application to the Chief Justice of the Court in accordance with Article 55(1), together with the documents detailed in Article 4 of the New York Convention.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Since the UAE is a signatory to the New York Convention, UAE Courts should take into consideration Article 5, which provides the grounds for refusing recognition of foreign awards, rather than the grounds contained in Article 53(1), as the provisions of the Convention, we suggest, supersede the New Law.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">A party seeking to challenge the recognition and enforcement of a foreign award could submit their defence, objecting to enforcement of the foreign award, to the Court during the ratification process initiated by the award creditor under Article 55(1). However, the option for filling an action to set aside an award under Article 53(1) will not be available for foreign awards, as the UAE Courts do not have jurisdiction, in our view, to set aside foreign awards.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>\r\nThe New Law is undoubtedly a great milestone in the progression of international commercial arbitration in the UAE. It has taken into account the particular features and requirements of international commercial arbitration in the UAE. Thus, the New Law should contribute to making the UAE an arbitration hub in the region. However, certain elements of its enforcement provisions may still require clarity.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;');
INSERT INTO `tm_wsal_metadata` (`id`, `occurrence_id`, `name`, `value`) VALUES
(244253, 23903, 'MetaValueOld', '<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">On 03 May 2018 the UAE enacted Federal Law No. 6 of 2018 (\"the New Law\"), as published in the Official Gazette No 630 of 15 May 2018. The New Law replaced certain arbitration provisions found in the UAE Civil Procedures Law No. 11 of 1992, particularly Articles 203-218 (\"the former arbitration provisions\"). The New Law took effect after a month its publication, accordingly applying from mid-June 2018.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The enactment of the New Law confirms the UAE’s commitment to bring its arbitration law in line with internationally accepted best practice. In this article we consider key provisions of the New Law, with particular focus on the enforcement of arbitration awards.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Key Aspects of the New Law</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 2 outlines the scope of application of the New Law. It states that it applies to (i) any arbitration conducted in the UAE, unless the parties agree to another law governing the arbitration proceedings; (ii) any international arbitrations conducted outside the UAE, where the parties agree to apply the New Law to govern such proceedings; and (iii) to any arbitration arising from a dispute in respect of a legal relationship governed by UAE law, save where excepted by special provision.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em>A significant feature of the New Law is Article 3, which defines ‘international arbitration’. An arbitration is international if ‘the parties have, at the time of conclusion of the arbitration agreement, their places of business in different States’.</em></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Moreover, an arbitration is deemed to be international, if the place of arbitration, or the place of performance of the contractual obligations, or the subject matter of the dispute is connected with more than one country, or if the parties have expressly agreed that the subject matter of the arbitration agreement relates to more than one country. This new feature did not exist in the former arbitration provisions and which were limited to domestic and foreign arbitrations only. They did not consider any aspects of international arbitration, even in cases where the domestic arbitration contained elements of international arbitration. The New Law does not, however, confer any additional advantages for international arbitration in terms of the enforcement of an award, as the procedure to ratify an international award is similar to that of domestic awards. The New Law does, however, provide the parties with freedom to choose the New Law to govern the arbitration proceedings, even if the arbitration proceedings are conducted outside the UAE.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Chapter II Article 4 of the New Law deals with the parties’ capacity to enter into an arbitration agreement. Similarly, Articles 5 to 8 of the New Law cover the form, autonomy and subject matter of arbitration agreements.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Unlike the former arbitration provisions, the New Law defines arbitration institutions and confers wide powers on these institutions if the parties to the arbitration agree to apply arbitration institutional rules. The New Law accordingly covers all types of arbitrations, regardless of it being ad-hoc, institutional or arbitration conducted through the Court.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 11 provides mechanisms where the parties fail to agree on the appointment of an arbitrator/tribunal. Under the former arbitration provisions (Article 204), in such circumstances, parties were required to file a Court application for direction - which was effectively similar to initiating full litigation proceedings. The New Law allows the parties simply to apply to the relevant authority, which is either the body authorized to administer the arbitration, or the Court.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Under the former arbitration provisions the grounds for challenging an arbitrator were similar to the grounds for the recusal or impleading of judges. The New Law, under Articles 14 and 15, changes this - providing specific grounds and procedures for challenging an arbitrator.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The New Law recognizes key principles and practices of international commercial arbitration including the principles of severability, Article 6(1), and competence-competence - Article 19(1).</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 21 deals with the jurisdiction of the tribunal to issue interim or conservatory measures concerning arbitration proceedings, at the request of a party or on its own motion.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In contrast to the former arbitration provisions, Article 28 differentiates the ‘place of arbitration’ i.e. the seat of arbitration with which an award is legally connected, and the ‘venue of arbitration’ - where the arbitration sessions or hearings are conducted. Moreover, Article 41(6) provides that an award shall be considered as issued at the place of arbitration, as determined under Article 28, even if the tribunal signed an award outside the place of arbitration. The tribunal may conduct arbitration hearings and deliberations through modern means of communication (according to Article 28(2)(b)). Likewise, Article 35 provides an arbitral tribunal with the discretion to hear any witnesses, including expert witnesses, through modern means of communication.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Enforcement of Awards under the New Law</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 52 provides that an award issued under the New Law shall have res judicata status and be enforceable as a court judgment. The same article also states that an award must be ratified prior to its enforcement.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Unlike the former arbitration provisions, Article 55(1) states that a party seeking to enforce an award must submit an application to the Chief Justice of the relevant Court, together with supporting documents. The term ‘Court’ is defined as the Federal Court of Appeal or local Courts of Appeal in the UAE. Under Article 55(1), the Chief Justice of the Court (or any judges empowered by the Chief Justice) should issue an order confirming ratification and enforcement of the award within sixty days from the date of the submission of the application, unless any of the grounds for setting aside of the award exists under Article 53(1).</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Challenging the Decision against Enforcement of Awards</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Under Article 57, a party may challenge a decision of the Court on the ratification of the award, by filing a grievance before the Court within thirty days. Article 57 reads as follows:</p>\r\n\r\n<dir>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em>\"A grievance may be filed against the Court’s decision to grant or deny enforcement of an arbitral award before the competent Court of Appeal within thirty days from the date following notification\".</em></p>\r\n\r\n</dir>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 57 does not confirm whether a decision of the ‘competent Court of Appeal’ is to be considered as final or if an aggrieved party could pursue an appeal before the Cassation Court. Considering the New Law does not provide for an appeal of the decision of the ‘competent Court of Appeal’ on the grievance presented under Article 57, it is our respectful view that the decision of the ‘competent Court of Appeal’ is likely to be deemed as final. Otherwise, this could lead to lengthy procedures and result in delays of enforcement of awards, which is against the core of objectives of the New Law.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Action to set aside Arbitration Awards</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 53 entitles a party to challenge the enforcement of an award by submitting an application before the Court under one or more grounds contained in Articles 53(1)(a) - (h). Further, Article 53(2) states that the Court shall set aside an award if the subject matter of the dispute is not capable of settlement, or if the award is in conflict with public order.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">An action to set aside an arbitration award must be submitted by a party within thirty days from the date of notification of such award, otherwise the action will be time barred under Article 54(2).</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Besides the option of filling an action to set aside an award under Article 53(1), a party seeking to challenge an award may also submit objections to ratifying the award before the Court during the process of ratification in accordance with Article 57. Accordingly, there are three options for a party to challenge the ratification and enforcement of an award:</p>\r\n\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">file a case seeking to set aside an award under Article 53(1) before the Court of Appeal and this decision is subject to appeal before the Court of Cassation under Article 54(1);</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">present a defence to the Court objecting to the ratification and enforcement of the award during the process of ratification initiated by the award creditor under Article 55(1); or</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">submit a grievance against the Court’s decision to grant or deny enforcement under Article 57.</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Mechanism to Recognise and Enforce Foreign Awards</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The New Law does not expressly provide for the procedures applicable to the recognition and enforcement of foreign awards in the UAE. This begs the question - what procedures are applicable to the recognition of foreign arbitral awards in the UAE? Should a party seeking recognition apply to the Court of First Instance (the position prior to the enactment of the New Law) or should the parties follow the new procedures for ratifying awards as laid down under the New Law?</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Considering that Article 3 of the New York Convention requires Contracting States not to impose substantially more onerous conditions on the recognition and enforcement of foreign awards than are imposed on the enforcement of domestic awards, it is our view that the provisions of the New Law will apply for the recognition and enforcement of foreign awards. Further, the UAE is committed to fulfilling its obligations under applicable international conventions and treaties. It is accordingly inferred that a party seeking recognition of a foreign award should be required to submit an application to the Chief Justice of the Court in accordance with Article 55(1), together with the documents detailed in Article 4 of the New York Convention.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Since the UAE is a signatory to the New York Convention, UAE Courts should take into consideration Article 5, which provides the grounds for refusing recognition of foreign awards, rather than the grounds contained in Article 53(1), as the provisions of the Convention, we suggest, supersede the New Law.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">A party seeking to challenge the recognition and enforcement of a foreign award could submit their defence, objecting to enforcement of the foreign award, to the Court during the ratification process initiated by the award creditor under Article 55(1). However, the option for filling an action to set aside an award under Article 53(1) will not be available for foreign awards, as the UAE Courts do not have jurisdiction, in our view, to set aside foreign awards.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>\r\nThe New Law is undoubtedly a great milestone in the progression of international commercial arbitration in the UAE. It has taken into account the particular features and requirements of international commercial arbitration in the UAE. Thus, the New Law should contribute to making the UAE an arbitration hub in the region. However, certain elements of its enforcement provisions may still require clarity.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;'),
(244254, 23903, 'MetaLink', 'content'),
(244255, 23903, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7930&amp;action=edit'),
(244256, 23903, 'ReportText', '<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">On 03 May 2018 the UAE enacted Federal Law No. 6 of 2018 (\"the New Law\"), as published in the Official Gazette No 630 of 15 May 2018. The New Law replaced certain arbitration provisions found in the UAE Civil Procedures Law No. 11 of 1992, particularly Articles 203-218 (\"the former arbitration provisions\"). The New Law took effect after a month its publication, accordingly applying from mid-June 2018.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The enactment of the New Law confirms the UAE’s commitment to bring its arbitration law in line with internationally accepted best practice. In this article we consider key provisions of the New Law, with particular focus on the enforcement of arbitration awards.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Key Aspects of the New Law</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 2 outlines the scope of application of the New Law. It states that it applies to (i) any arbitration conducted in the UAE, unless the parties agree to another law governing the arbitration proceedings; (ii) any international arbitrations conducted outside the UAE, where the parties agree to apply the New Law to govern such proceedings; and (iii) to any arbitration arising from a dispute in respect of a legal relationship governed by UAE law, save where excepted by special provision.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em>A significant feature of the New Law is Article 3, which defines ‘international arbitration’. An arbitration is international if ‘the parties have, at the time of conclusion of the arbitration agreement, their places of business in different States’.</em></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Moreover, an arbitration is deemed to be international, if the place of arbitration, or the place of performance of the contractual obligations, or the subject matter of the dispute is connected with more than one country, or if the parties have expressly agreed that the subject matter of the arbitration agreement relates to more than one country. This new feature did not exist in the former arbitration provisions and which were limited to domestic and foreign arbitrations only. They did not consider any aspects of international arbitration, even in cases where the domestic arbitration contained elements of international arbitration. The New Law does not, however, confer any additional advantages for international arbitration in terms of the enforcement of an award, as the procedure to ratify an international award is similar to that of domestic awards. The New Law does, however, provide the parties with freedom to choose the New Law to govern the arbitration proceedings, even if the arbitration proceedings are conducted outside the UAE.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Chapter II Article 4 of the New Law deals with the parties’ capacity to enter into an arbitration agreement. Similarly, Articles 5 to 8 of the New Law cover the form, autonomy and subject matter of arbitration agreements.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Unlike the former arbitration provisions, the New Law defines arbitration institutions and confers wide powers on these institutions if the parties to the arbitration agree to apply arbitration institutional rules. The New Law accordingly covers all types of arbitrations, regardless of it being ad-hoc, institutional or arbitration conducted through the Court.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 11 provides mechanisms where the parties fail to agree on the appointment of an arbitrator/tribunal. Under the former arbitration provisions (Article 204), in such circumstances, parties were required to file a Court application for direction - which was effectively similar to initiating full litigation proceedings. The New Law allows the parties simply to apply to the relevant authority, which is either the body authorized to administer the arbitration, or the Court.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Under the former arbitration provisions the grounds for challenging an arbitrator were similar to the grounds for the recusal or impleading of judges. The New Law, under Articles 14 and 15, changes this - providing specific grounds and procedures for challenging an arbitrator.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The New Law recognizes key principles and practices of international commercial arbitration including the principles of severability, Article 6(1), and competence-competence - Article 19(1).</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 21 deals with the jurisdiction of the tribunal to issue interim or conservatory measures concerning arbitration proceedings, at the request of a party or on its own motion.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In contrast to the former arbitration provisions, Article 28 differentiates the ‘place of arbitration’ i.e. the seat of arbitration with which an award is legally connected, and the ‘venue of arbitration’ - where the arbitration sessions or hearings are conducted. Moreover, Article 41(6) provides that an award shall be considered as issued at the place of arbitration, as determined under Article 28, even if the tribunal signed an award outside the place of arbitration. The tribunal may conduct arbitration hearings and deliberations through modern means of communication (according to Article 28(2)(b)). Likewise, Article 35 provides an arbitral tribunal with the discretion to hear any witnesses, including expert witnesses, through modern means of communication.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Enforcement of Awards under the New Law</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 52 provides that an award issued under the New Law shall have res judicata status and be enforceable as a court judgment. The same article also states that an award must be ratified prior to its enforcement.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Unlike the former arbitration provisions, Article 55(1) states that a party seeking to enforce an award must submit an application to the Chief Justice of the relevant Court, together with supporting documents. The term ‘Court’ is defined as the Federal Court of Appeal or local Courts of Appeal in the UAE. Under Article 55(1), the Chief Justice of the Court (or any judges empowered by the Chief Justice) should issue an order confirming ratification and enforcement of the award within sixty days from the date of the submission of the application, unless any of the grounds for setting aside of the award exists under Article 53(1).</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Challenging the Decision against Enforcement of Awards</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Under Article 57, a party may challenge a decision of the Court on the ratification of the award, by filing a grievance before the Court within thirty days. Article 57 reads as follows:</p>\r\n\r\n<dir>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em>\"A grievance may be filed against the Court’s decision to grant or deny enforcement of an arbitral award before the competent Court of Appeal within thirty days from the date following notification\".</em></p>\r\n\r\n</dir>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 57 does not confirm whether a decision of the ‘competent Court of Appeal’ is to be considered as final or if an aggrieved party could pursue an appeal before the Cassation Court. Considering the New Law does not provide for an appeal of the decision of the ‘competent Court of Appeal’ on the grievance presented under Article 57, it is our respectful view that the decision of the ‘competent Court of Appeal’ is likely to be deemed as final. Otherwise, this could lead to lengthy procedures and result in delays of enforcement of awards, which is against the core of objectives of the New Law.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Action to set aside Arbitration Awards</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 53 entitles a party to challenge the enforcement of an award by submitting an application before the Court under one or more grounds contained in Articles 53(1)(a) - (h). Further, Article 53(2) states that the Court shall set aside an award if the subject matter of the dispute is not capable of settlement, or if the award is in conflict with public order.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">An action to set aside an arbitration award must be submitted by a party within thirty days from the date of notification of such award, otherwise the action will be time barred under Article 54(2).</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Besides the option of filling an action to set aside an award under Article 53(1), a party seeking to challenge an award may also submit objections to ratifying the award before the Court during the process of ratification in accordance with Article 57. Accordingly, there are three options for a party to challenge the ratification and enforcement of an award:</p>\r\n\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">file a case seeking to set aside an award under Article 53(1) before the Court of Appeal and this decision is subject to appeal before the Court of Cassation under Article 54(1);</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">present a defence to the Court objecting to the ratification and enforcement of the award during the process of ratification initiated by the award creditor under Article 55(1); or</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">submit a grievance against the Court’s decision to grant or deny enforcement under Article 57.</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Mechanism to Recognise and Enforce Foreign Awards</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The New Law does not expressly provide for the procedures applicable to the recognition and enforcement of foreign awards in the UAE. This begs the question - what procedures are applicable to the recognition of foreign arbitral awards in the UAE? Should a party seeking recognition apply to the Court of First Instance (the position prior to the enactment of the New Law) or should the parties follow the new procedures for ratifying awards as laid down under the New Law?</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Considering that Article 3 of the New York Convention requires Contracting States not to impose substantially more onerous conditions on the recognition and enforcement of foreign awards than are imposed on the enforcement of domestic awards, it is our view that the provisions of the New Law will apply for the recognition and enforcement of foreign awards. Further, the UAE is committed to fulfilling its obligations under applicable international conventions and treaties. It is accordingly inferred that a party seeking recognition of a foreign award should be required to submit an application to the Chief Justice of the Court in accordance with Article 55(1), together with the documents detailed in Article 4 of the New York Convention.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Since the UAE is a signatory to the New York Convention, UAE Courts should take into consideration Article 5, which provides the grounds for refusing recognition of foreign awards, rather than the grounds contained in Article 53(1), as the provisions of the Convention, we suggest, supersede the New Law.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">A party seeking to challenge the recognition and enforcement of a foreign award could submit their defence, objecting to enforcement of the foreign award, to the Court during the ratification process initiated by the award creditor under Article 55(1). However, the option for filling an action to set aside an award under Article 53(1) will not be available for foreign awards, as the UAE Courts do not have jurisdiction, in our view, to set aside foreign awards.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>\r\nThe New Law is undoubtedly a great milestone in the progression of international commercial arbitration in the UAE. It has taken into account the particular features and requirements of international commercial arbitration in the UAE. Thus, the New Law should contribute to making the UAE an arbitration hub in the region. However, certain elements of its enforcement provisions may still require clarity.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;|<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">On 03 May 2018 the UAE enacted Federal Law No. 6 of 2018 (\"the New Law\"), as published in the Official Gazette No 630 of 15 May 2018. The New Law replaced certain arbitration provisions found in the UAE Civil Procedures Law No. 11 of 1992, particularly Articles 203-218 (\"the former arbitration provisions\"). The New Law took effect after a month its publication, accordingly applying from mid-June 2018.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The enactment of the New Law confirms the UAE’s commitment to bring its arbitration law in line with internationally accepted best practice. In this article we consider key provisions of the New Law, with particular focus on the enforcement of arbitration awards.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Key Aspects of the New Law</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 2 outlines the scope of application of the New Law. It states that it applies to (i) any arbitration conducted in the UAE, unless the parties agree to another law governing the arbitration proceedings; (ii) any international arbitrations conducted outside the UAE, where the parties agree to apply the New Law to govern such proceedings; and (iii) to any arbitration arising from a dispute in respect of a legal relationship governed by UAE law, save where excepted by special provision.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em>A significant feature of the New Law is Article 3, which defines ‘international arbitration’. An arbitration is international if ‘the parties have, at the time of conclusion of the arbitration agreement, their places of business in different States’.</em></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Moreover, an arbitration is deemed to be international, if the place of arbitration, or the place of performance of the contractual obligations, or the subject matter of the dispute is connected with more than one country, or if the parties have expressly agreed that the subject matter of the arbitration agreement relates to more than one country. This new feature did not exist in the former arbitration provisions and which were limited to domestic and foreign arbitrations only. They did not consider any aspects of international arbitration, even in cases where the domestic arbitration contained elements of international arbitration. The New Law does not, however, confer any additional advantages for international arbitration in terms of the enforcement of an award, as the procedure to ratify an international award is similar to that of domestic awards. The New Law does, however, provide the parties with freedom to choose the New Law to govern the arbitration proceedings, even if the arbitration proceedings are conducted outside the UAE.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Chapter II Article 4 of the New Law deals with the parties’ capacity to enter into an arbitration agreement. Similarly, Articles 5 to 8 of the New Law cover the form, autonomy and subject matter of arbitration agreements.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Unlike the former arbitration provisions, the New Law defines arbitration institutions and confers wide powers on these institutions if the parties to the arbitration agree to apply arbitration institutional rules. The New Law accordingly covers all types of arbitrations, regardless of it being ad-hoc, institutional or arbitration conducted through the Court.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 11 provides mechanisms where the parties fail to agree on the appointment of an arbitrator/tribunal. Under the former arbitration provisions (Article 204), in such circumstances, parties were required to file a Court application for direction - which was effectively similar to initiating full litigation proceedings. The New Law allows the parties simply to apply to the relevant authority, which is either the body authorized to administer the arbitration, or the Court.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Under the former arbitration provisions the grounds for challenging an arbitrator were similar to the grounds for the recusal or impleading of judges. The New Law, under Articles 14 and 15, changes this - providing specific grounds and procedures for challenging an arbitrator.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The New Law recognizes key principles and practices of international commercial arbitration including the principles of severability, Article 6(1), and competence-competence - Article 19(1).</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 21 deals with the jurisdiction of the tribunal to issue interim or conservatory measures concerning arbitration proceedings, at the request of a party or on its own motion.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In contrast to the former arbitration provisions, Article 28 differentiates the ‘place of arbitration’ i.e. the seat of arbitration with which an award is legally connected, and the ‘venue of arbitration’ - where the arbitration sessions or hearings are conducted. Moreover, Article 41(6) provides that an award shall be considered as issued at the place of arbitration, as determined under Article 28, even if the tribunal signed an award outside the place of arbitration. The tribunal may conduct arbitration hearings and deliberations through modern means of communication (according to Article 28(2)(b)). Likewise, Article 35 provides an arbitral tribunal with the discretion to hear any witnesses, including expert witnesses, through modern means of communication.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Enforcement of Awards under the New Law</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 52 provides that an award issued under the New Law shall have res judicata status and be enforceable as a court judgment. The same article also states that an award must be ratified prior to its enforcement.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Unlike the former arbitration provisions, Article 55(1) states that a party seeking to enforce an award must submit an application to the Chief Justice of the relevant Court, together with supporting documents. The term ‘Court’ is defined as the Federal Court of Appeal or local Courts of Appeal in the UAE. Under Article 55(1), the Chief Justice of the Court (or any judges empowered by the Chief Justice) should issue an order confirming ratification and enforcement of the award within sixty days from the date of the submission of the application, unless any of the grounds for setting aside of the award exists under Article 53(1).</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Challenging the Decision against Enforcement of Awards</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Under Article 57, a party may challenge a decision of the Court on the ratification of the award, by filing a grievance before the Court within thirty days. Article 57 reads as follows:</p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><em>\"A grievance may be filed against the Court’s decision to grant or deny enforcement of an arbitral award before the competent Court of Appeal within thirty days from the date following notification\".</em></p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 57 does not confirm whether a decision of the ‘competent Court of Appeal’ is to be considered as final or if an aggrieved party could pursue an appeal before the Cassation Court. Considering the New Law does not provide for an appeal of the decision of the ‘competent Court of Appeal’ on the grievance presented under Article 57, it is our respectful view that the decision of the ‘competent Court of Appeal’ is likely to be deemed as final. Otherwise, this could lead to lengthy procedures and result in delays of enforcement of awards, which is against the core of objectives of the New Law.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Action to set aside Arbitration Awards</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 53 entitles a party to challenge the enforcement of an award by submitting an application before the Court under one or more grounds contained in Articles 53(1)(a) - (h). Further, Article 53(2) states that the Court shall set aside an award if the subject matter of the dispute is not capable of settlement, or if the award is in conflict with public order.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">An action to set aside an arbitration award must be submitted by a party within thirty days from the date of notification of such award, otherwise the action will be time barred under Article 54(2).</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Besides the option of filling an action to set aside an award under Article 53(1), a party seeking to challenge an award may also submit objections to ratifying the award before the Court during the process of ratification in accordance with Article 57. Accordingly, there are three options for a party to challenge the ratification and enforcement of an award:</p>\r\n\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">file a case seeking to set aside an award under Article 53(1) before the Court of Appeal and this decision is subject to appeal before the Court of Cassation under Article 54(1);</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">present a defence to the Court objecting to the ratification and enforcement of the award during the process of ratification initiated by the award creditor under Article 55(1); or</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">submit a grievance against the Court’s decision to grant or deny enforcement under Article 57.</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Mechanism to Recognise and Enforce Foreign Awards</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The New Law does not expressly provide for the procedures applicable to the recognition and enforcement of foreign awards in the UAE. This begs the question - what procedures are applicable to the recognition of foreign arbitral awards in the UAE? Should a party seeking recognition apply to the Court of First Instance (the position prior to the enactment of the New Law) or should the parties follow the new procedures for ratifying awards as laid down under the New Law?</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Considering that Article 3 of the New York Convention requires Contracting States not to impose substantially more onerous conditions on the recognition and enforcement of foreign awards than are imposed on the enforcement of domestic awards, it is our view that the provisions of the New Law will apply for the recognition and enforcement of foreign awards. Further, the UAE is committed to fulfilling its obligations under applicable international conventions and treaties. It is accordingly inferred that a party seeking recognition of a foreign award should be required to submit an application to the Chief Justice of the Court in accordance with Article 55(1), together with the documents detailed in Article 4 of the New York Convention.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Since the UAE is a signatory to the New York Convention, UAE Courts should take into consideration Article 5, which provides the grounds for refusing recognition of foreign awards, rather than the grounds contained in Article 53(1), as the provisions of the Convention, we suggest, supersede the New Law.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">A party seeking to challenge the recognition and enforcement of a foreign award could submit their defence, objecting to enforcement of the foreign award, to the Court during the ratification process initiated by the award creditor under Article 55(1). However, the option for filling an action to set aside an award under Article 53(1) will not be available for foreign awards, as the UAE Courts do not have jurisdiction, in our view, to set aside foreign awards.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>\r\nThe New Law is undoubtedly a great milestone in the progression of international commercial arbitration in the UAE. It has taken into account the particular features and requirements of international commercial arbitration in the UAE. Thus, the New Law should contribute to making the UAE an arbitration hub in the region. However, certain elements of its enforcement provisions may still require clarity.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;'),
(244257, 23903, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244258, 23903, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244259, 23903, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244260, 23903, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244261, 23904, 'PostID', '7930'),
(244262, 23904, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244263, 23904, 'PostTitle', 'Enforcement and Challenges to Arbitral Awards under the New Arbitration Law in the UAE'),
(244264, 23904, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244265, 23904, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:04:57'),
(244266, 23904, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7930'),
(244267, 23904, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7930&amp;action=edit'),
(244268, 23904, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244269, 23904, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244270, 23904, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244271, 23904, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244272, 23905, 'PostID', '4074'),
(244273, 23905, 'PostType', 'page'),
(244274, 23905, 'PostTitle', 'Lawyers'),
(244275, 23905, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(244276, 23905, 'PostDate', '2017-10-16 13:58:28'),
(244277, 23905, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/our-firm/find-a-lawyer/'),
(244278, 23905, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=4074&amp;action=edit'),
(244279, 23905, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244280, 23905, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244281, 23905, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244282, 23905, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244283, 23906, 'PostID', '501'),
(244284, 23906, 'PostType', 'lawyer'),
(244285, 23906, 'PostTitle', 'Ahmad Ghoneim'),
(244286, 23906, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(244287, 23906, 'PostDate', '2017-09-26 12:54:52'),
(244288, 23906, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/lawyer/ahmad-ghoneim/'),
(244289, 23906, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=501&amp;action=edit'),
(244290, 23906, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244291, 23906, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244292, 23906, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244293, 23906, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244294, 23907, 'PostID', '7932'),
(244295, 23907, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244296, 23907, 'PostTitle', 'Can a Main Contractor prevent an Employer from appointing a New Main Contractor?'),
(244297, 23907, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244298, 23907, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:09:36'),
(244299, 23907, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7932'),
(244300, 23907, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7932&amp;action=edit'),
(244301, 23907, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244302, 23907, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244303, 23907, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244304, 23907, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244305, 23908, 'PostID', '7932'),
(244306, 23908, 'PostTitle', 'Can a Main Contractor prevent an Employer from appointing a New Main Contractor?'),
(244307, 23908, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244308, 23908, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244309, 23908, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:09:36'),
(244310, 23908, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7932'),
(244311, 23908, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticleMonth'),
(244312, 23908, 'MetaValue', '7928'),
(244313, 23908, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticleMonth'),
(244314, 23908, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7932&amp;action=edit'),
(244315, 23908, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244316, 23908, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244317, 23908, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244318, 23908, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244319, 23909, 'PostID', '7932'),
(244320, 23909, 'PostTitle', 'Can a Main Contractor prevent an Employer from appointing a New Main Contractor?'),
(244321, 23909, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244322, 23909, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244323, 23909, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:09:36'),
(244324, 23909, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7932'),
(244325, 23909, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices_0_lawUpdateArticlePractice'),
(244326, 23909, 'MetaValue', '638'),
(244327, 23909, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices_0_lawUpdateArticlePractice'),
(244328, 23909, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7932&amp;action=edit'),
(244329, 23909, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244330, 23909, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244331, 23909, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244332, 23909, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244333, 23910, 'PostID', '7932'),
(244334, 23910, 'PostTitle', 'Can a Main Contractor prevent an Employer from appointing a New Main Contractor?'),
(244335, 23910, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244336, 23910, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244337, 23910, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:09:36'),
(244338, 23910, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7932'),
(244339, 23910, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices'),
(244340, 23910, 'MetaValue', '1'),
(244341, 23910, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices'),
(244342, 23910, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7932&amp;action=edit'),
(244343, 23910, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244344, 23910, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244345, 23910, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244346, 23910, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244347, 23911, 'PostID', '7932'),
(244348, 23911, 'PostTitle', 'Can a Main Contractor prevent an Employer from appointing a New Main Contractor?'),
(244349, 23911, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244350, 23911, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244351, 23911, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:09:36'),
(244352, 23911, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7932'),
(244353, 23911, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticleSectors'),
(244354, 23911, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticleSectors'),
(244355, 23911, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7932&amp;action=edit'),
(244356, 23911, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244357, 23911, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244358, 23911, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244359, 23911, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244360, 23912, 'PostID', '7932'),
(244361, 23912, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244362, 23912, 'PostTitle', 'Can a Main Contractor prevent an Employer from appointing a New Main Contractor?'),
(244363, 23912, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244364, 23912, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:09:36'),
(244365, 23912, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7932'),
(244366, 23912, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7932&amp;action=edit'),
(244367, 23912, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244368, 23912, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244369, 23912, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244370, 23912, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244371, 23913, 'PostID', '7933'),
(244372, 23913, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244373, 23913, 'PostTitle', 'Admissibility and Reliability of Electronic Evidence before Qatari courts'),
(244374, 23913, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244375, 23913, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:22:15'),
(244376, 23913, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7933'),
(244377, 23913, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7933&amp;action=edit'),
(244378, 23913, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244379, 23913, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244380, 23913, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244381, 23913, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244382, 23914, 'PostID', '7933'),
(244383, 23914, 'PostTitle', 'Admissibility and Reliability of Electronic Evidence before Qatari courts'),
(244384, 23914, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244385, 23914, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244386, 23914, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:22:15'),
(244387, 23914, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7933'),
(244388, 23914, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticleMonth'),
(244389, 23914, 'MetaValue', '7928'),
(244390, 23914, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticleMonth'),
(244391, 23914, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7933&amp;action=edit'),
(244392, 23914, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244393, 23914, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244394, 23914, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244395, 23914, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244396, 23915, 'PostID', '7933'),
(244397, 23915, 'PostTitle', 'Admissibility and Reliability of Electronic Evidence before Qatari courts'),
(244398, 23915, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244399, 23915, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244400, 23915, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:22:15'),
(244401, 23915, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7933'),
(244402, 23915, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices_0_lawUpdateArticlePractice'),
(244403, 23915, 'MetaValue', '638'),
(244404, 23915, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices_0_lawUpdateArticlePractice'),
(244405, 23915, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7933&amp;action=edit'),
(244406, 23915, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244407, 23915, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244408, 23915, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244409, 23915, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244410, 23916, 'PostID', '7933'),
(244411, 23916, 'PostTitle', 'Admissibility and Reliability of Electronic Evidence before Qatari courts'),
(244412, 23916, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244413, 23916, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244414, 23916, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:22:15'),
(244415, 23916, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7933'),
(244416, 23916, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices'),
(244417, 23916, 'MetaValue', '1'),
(244418, 23916, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices'),
(244419, 23916, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7933&amp;action=edit'),
(244420, 23916, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244421, 23916, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244422, 23916, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244423, 23916, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244424, 23917, 'PostID', '7933'),
(244425, 23917, 'PostTitle', 'Admissibility and Reliability of Electronic Evidence before Qatari courts'),
(244426, 23917, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244427, 23917, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244428, 23917, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:22:15'),
(244429, 23917, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7933'),
(244430, 23917, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticleSectors'),
(244431, 23917, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticleSectors'),
(244432, 23917, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7933&amp;action=edit'),
(244433, 23917, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244434, 23917, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244435, 23917, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244436, 23917, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244437, 23918, 'PostID', '7933'),
(244438, 23918, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244439, 23918, 'PostTitle', 'Admissibility and Reliability of Electronic Evidence before Qatari courts'),
(244440, 23918, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244441, 23918, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:22:15'),
(244442, 23918, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7933'),
(244443, 23918, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7933&amp;action=edit'),
(244444, 23918, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244445, 23918, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244446, 23918, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244447, 23918, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244448, 23919, 'PostID', '4074'),
(244449, 23919, 'PostType', 'page'),
(244450, 23919, 'PostTitle', 'Lawyers'),
(244451, 23919, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(244452, 23919, 'PostDate', '2017-10-16 13:58:28'),
(244453, 23919, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/our-firm/find-a-lawyer/');
INSERT INTO `tm_wsal_metadata` (`id`, `occurrence_id`, `name`, `value`) VALUES
(244454, 23919, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=4074&amp;action=edit'),
(244455, 23919, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244456, 23919, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244457, 23919, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244458, 23919, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244459, 23920, 'PostID', '957'),
(244460, 23920, 'PostType', 'lawyer'),
(244461, 23920, 'PostTitle', 'Essam Al Tamimi'),
(244462, 23920, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(244463, 23920, 'PostDate', '2017-09-28 10:10:41'),
(244464, 23920, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/lawyer/essam-al-tamimi/'),
(244465, 23920, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=957&amp;action=edit'),
(244466, 23920, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244467, 23920, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244468, 23920, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244469, 23920, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244470, 23921, 'PostID', '4074'),
(244471, 23921, 'PostType', 'page'),
(244472, 23921, 'PostTitle', 'Lawyers'),
(244473, 23921, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(244474, 23921, 'PostDate', '2017-10-16 13:58:28'),
(244475, 23921, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/our-firm/find-a-lawyer/'),
(244476, 23921, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=4074&amp;action=edit'),
(244477, 23921, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244478, 23921, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244479, 23921, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244480, 23921, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244481, 23922, 'PostID', '919'),
(244482, 23922, 'PostType', 'lawyer'),
(244483, 23922, 'PostTitle', 'Sara Koleilat-Aranjo'),
(244484, 23922, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(244485, 23922, 'PostDate', '2017-09-28 09:24:09'),
(244486, 23922, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/lawyer/sara-aranjo/'),
(244487, 23922, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=919&amp;action=edit'),
(244488, 23922, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244489, 23922, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244490, 23922, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244491, 23922, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244492, 23923, 'PostID', '7934'),
(244493, 23923, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244494, 23923, 'PostTitle', 'Commentary on the UAE’s New Arbitration Law'),
(244495, 23923, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244496, 23923, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:37:19'),
(244497, 23923, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7934'),
(244498, 23923, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7934&amp;action=edit'),
(244499, 23923, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244500, 23923, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244501, 23923, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244502, 23923, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244503, 23924, 'PostID', '7934'),
(244504, 23924, 'PostTitle', 'Commentary on the UAE’s New Arbitration Law'),
(244505, 23924, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244506, 23924, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244507, 23924, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:37:19'),
(244508, 23924, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7934'),
(244509, 23924, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticleMonth'),
(244510, 23924, 'MetaValue', '7928'),
(244511, 23924, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticleMonth'),
(244512, 23924, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7934&amp;action=edit'),
(244513, 23924, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244514, 23924, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244515, 23924, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244516, 23924, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244517, 23925, 'PostID', '7934'),
(244518, 23925, 'PostTitle', 'Commentary on the UAE’s New Arbitration Law'),
(244519, 23925, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244520, 23925, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244521, 23925, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:37:19'),
(244522, 23925, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7934'),
(244523, 23925, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices_0_lawUpdateArticlePractice'),
(244524, 23925, 'MetaValue', '650'),
(244525, 23925, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices_0_lawUpdateArticlePractice'),
(244526, 23925, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7934&amp;action=edit'),
(244527, 23925, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244528, 23925, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244529, 23925, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244530, 23925, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244531, 23926, 'PostID', '7934'),
(244532, 23926, 'PostTitle', 'Commentary on the UAE’s New Arbitration Law'),
(244533, 23926, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244534, 23926, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244535, 23926, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:37:19'),
(244536, 23926, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7934'),
(244537, 23926, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices_1_lawUpdateArticlePractice'),
(244538, 23926, 'MetaValue', '410'),
(244539, 23926, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices_1_lawUpdateArticlePractice'),
(244540, 23926, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7934&amp;action=edit'),
(244541, 23926, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244542, 23926, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244543, 23926, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244544, 23926, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244545, 23927, 'PostID', '7934'),
(244546, 23927, 'PostTitle', 'Commentary on the UAE’s New Arbitration Law'),
(244547, 23927, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244548, 23927, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244549, 23927, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:37:19'),
(244550, 23927, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7934'),
(244551, 23927, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices'),
(244552, 23927, 'MetaValue', '2'),
(244553, 23927, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices'),
(244554, 23927, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7934&amp;action=edit'),
(244555, 23927, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244556, 23927, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244557, 23927, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244558, 23927, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244559, 23928, 'PostID', '7934'),
(244560, 23928, 'PostTitle', 'Commentary on the UAE’s New Arbitration Law'),
(244561, 23928, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244562, 23928, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244563, 23928, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:37:19'),
(244564, 23928, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7934'),
(244565, 23928, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticleSectors'),
(244566, 23928, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticleSectors'),
(244567, 23928, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7934&amp;action=edit'),
(244568, 23928, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244569, 23928, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244570, 23928, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244571, 23928, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244572, 23929, 'PostID', '7934'),
(244573, 23929, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244574, 23929, 'PostTitle', 'Commentary on the UAE’s New Arbitration Law'),
(244575, 23929, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244576, 23929, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:37:19'),
(244577, 23929, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7934'),
(244578, 23929, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7934&amp;action=edit'),
(244579, 23929, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244580, 23929, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244581, 23929, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244582, 23929, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244583, 23930, 'PostID', '7935'),
(244584, 23930, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244585, 23930, 'PostTitle', 'Overhaul of the UAE Finance Companies Regulations'),
(244586, 23930, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244587, 23930, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:49:45'),
(244588, 23930, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7935'),
(244589, 23930, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7935&amp;action=edit'),
(244590, 23930, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244591, 23930, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244592, 23930, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244593, 23930, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244594, 23931, 'PostID', '7935'),
(244595, 23931, 'PostTitle', 'Overhaul of the UAE Finance Companies Regulations'),
(244596, 23931, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244597, 23931, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244598, 23931, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:49:45'),
(244599, 23931, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7935'),
(244600, 23931, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticleMonth'),
(244601, 23931, 'MetaValue', '7928'),
(244602, 23931, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticleMonth'),
(244603, 23931, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7935&amp;action=edit'),
(244604, 23931, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244605, 23931, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244606, 23931, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244607, 23931, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244608, 23932, 'PostID', '7935'),
(244609, 23932, 'PostTitle', 'Overhaul of the UAE Finance Companies Regulations'),
(244610, 23932, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244611, 23932, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244612, 23932, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:49:45'),
(244613, 23932, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7935'),
(244614, 23932, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices_0_lawUpdateArticlePractice'),
(244615, 23932, 'MetaValue', '411'),
(244616, 23932, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices_0_lawUpdateArticlePractice'),
(244617, 23932, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7935&amp;action=edit'),
(244618, 23932, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244619, 23932, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244620, 23932, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244621, 23932, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244622, 23933, 'PostID', '7935'),
(244623, 23933, 'PostTitle', 'Overhaul of the UAE Finance Companies Regulations'),
(244624, 23933, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244625, 23933, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244626, 23933, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:49:45'),
(244627, 23933, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7935'),
(244628, 23933, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices'),
(244629, 23933, 'MetaValue', '1'),
(244630, 23933, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices'),
(244631, 23933, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7935&amp;action=edit'),
(244632, 23933, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244633, 23933, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244634, 23933, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244635, 23933, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244636, 23934, 'PostID', '7935'),
(244637, 23934, 'PostTitle', 'Overhaul of the UAE Finance Companies Regulations'),
(244638, 23934, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244639, 23934, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244640, 23934, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:49:45'),
(244641, 23934, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7935'),
(244642, 23934, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticleSectors'),
(244643, 23934, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticleSectors'),
(244644, 23934, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7935&amp;action=edit'),
(244645, 23934, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244646, 23934, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244647, 23934, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244648, 23934, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244649, 23935, 'PostID', '7935'),
(244650, 23935, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244651, 23935, 'PostTitle', 'Overhaul of the UAE Finance Companies Regulations'),
(244652, 23935, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244653, 23935, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:49:48'),
(244654, 23935, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7935'),
(244655, 23935, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7935&amp;action=edit'),
(244656, 23935, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244657, 23935, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244658, 23935, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244659, 23935, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244660, 23936, 'PostID', '7935'),
(244661, 23936, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244662, 23936, 'PostTitle', 'Overhaul of the UAE Finance Companies Regulations'),
(244663, 23936, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244664, 23936, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:50:39'),
(244665, 23936, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7935'),
(244666, 23936, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7935&amp;action=edit'),
(244667, 23936, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244668, 23936, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244669, 23936, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244670, 23936, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244671, 23937, 'PostID', '7935'),
(244672, 23937, 'PostTitle', 'Overhaul of the UAE Finance Companies Regulations'),
(244673, 23937, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244674, 23937, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244675, 23937, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:50:39'),
(244676, 23937, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7935'),
(244677, 23937, 'MetaID', '223050'),
(244678, 23937, 'MetaKey', 'content'),
(244679, 23937, 'MetaValueNew', '<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Amongst the several new laws and regulations being introduced in the UAE, the UAE Central Bank (\"Central Bank\") has on10 May 2018 issued new Finance Company Regulations (\"Regulations\" or \"2018 Regulations\") which are to come into effect one month after its publication.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">These Regulations replace the previous finance company regulations issued in 1996 and finance companies regulations for companies conducting business as per Islamic sharia’a principles issued in 2004 (\"Previous Regulations\") and aim at providing a detailed regulatory framework for Finance Companies to operate and develop within the UAE and also covers in its ambit the framework for protecting the customers of such Finance Companies.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">These Regulations consolidate the regulations for both Islamic finance and conventional finance companies (\"Finance Company/ies\") and incorporate certain significant changes including changes to capital requirements and corporate governance, to also be followed by existing Finance Companies. We have set out below certain noteworthy features of these Regulations and a comparative table on the key changes from the Previous Regulations on subject.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>License Application</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Pursuant to these Regulations, conducting financing activities in the UAE without a central bank license is prohibited. An application for such license must include the proposed scope of activities, a feasibility study illustrating the financial activities and products to be launched, estimated financial projections, risk factors, corporate structure, start-up costs, branches and a recruitment plan.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Another important requisite is for the applicant to provide an unconditional guarantee from a UAE Bank, in favour of the Central Bank for an amount equivalent to the minimum required paid-up capital. The License will be granted for a period of three years and may be renewable for the same period unless otherwise required by the Central Bank.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Any changes to the ownership of the Finance Company of 5% or more will require prior approval from the Central Bank.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Cancelling or Revoking a License</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Central Bank has the discretion to approve or refuse the License application, but must notify applicants in writing with reasons in case there is a refusal. Licenses can also be amended, revoked or cancelled at the discretion of the Board. The Regulations set out instances when the license can be cancelled which include providing false/misleading information, risking interests of the potential customers, or if there is a bankruptcy order filed against the Finance Company.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">If a Finance Company wishes to cease operations it must apply to the Central Bank at least six months in advance providing the reasons for such a cessation or suspension.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Regulations also provide for penalties that will be imposed if such company does not follow the provisions of the Regulations including adhering to the anti-money laundering policies laid down by the Central Bank.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Permitted Activities</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 10.1 of the Regulation details out the types of activities that are permitted, which are:</p>\r\n\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Retail finance,</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">mortgage finance,</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">wholesale finance,</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">pre-paid cards, and</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">distribution of third party products.</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Central Bank can review and amend this list from time to time.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 10 further sets out the do’s and dont’s in relation to the business of the Finance Company, certain key features are:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">it can extend loans only to ‘Juridicial Persons’ (defined under Article 93 of the UAE Civil Transactions Law) and individuals in the UAE. However, it is prohibited from accepting deposits or loans from individuals.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">it may accept deposits only from Juridicial Persons, subject to certain conditions laid out under Article 10.4 and also borrow from UAE banks, and may even receive foreign funding provided that its risk has been adequately hedged. In doing so it must not exceed 25% of the sum of total amount of its debt capital.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">it must obtain a no objection letter from the Central Bank in order to provide any new product line from within activities specified in its license.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">it may only participate in the share capital of brokerage companies, money exchanges, UAE banks and other Finance Companies. Any such single participation cannot exceed 10% of its debt capital and the aggregate participation must not exceed 25% of the debt capital.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">It must obtain approval from the Central Bank in order to issue bonds or sukuks. Such bonds and sukuks shall only be denominated in UAE dirhams or US Dollars.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">it is prohibited from financing a borrower which is not an entity incorporated in the UAE or its free zones, or a UAE resident, or where the mortgaged assets are not in the UAE.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">it is prohibited from entering into the business of money exchange.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">it must not purchase immovable properties unless for its own use or specific approval for the same has been obtained from the Central Bank. This rule does not apply to Islamic Finance Companies (IFC). IFCs may own property including immovable property and goods as part of an underlying financing contract with a borrower.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Minimum Capital, Liquidity Requirements and Credit Exposure Restrictions</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The minimum paid-up capital for a Finance Company is 150 million UAE Dirhams. UAE national ownership of the Finance Company must comprise at least 60% of total paid-up capital. Finance Companies must also allocate at least 10% of annual net profits to establishing a statutory reserve until the reserve equals 50% of its paid-up capital.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">To withstand short-term liquidity stress, Finance Companies are required to hold an amount equivalent to 10% of their aggregate liabilities in liquid assets i.e. cash held in UAE bank, Certificates of deposit issued by the Central Bank held via a UAE bank, short term deposits with a UAE bank with maturity upto 30 days and UAE federal and local government bonds, which must not exceed 30% of the total liquid assets. For the purpose of calculating the 10% amount, a Finance Company may deduct from its aggregate liabilities, cash collateral, bank guarantees from UAE banks and sovereign guarantees.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The credit exposure is considered ‘large’ if the value of such exposure to one borrower or group of related entities is 7% or more. The Regulations set out maximum exposure limits for different borrower types.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Organisational Structure, Composition and Policies of the Finance Company</strong></p>\r\n\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Founding shareholders - Founding shareholders must satisfy \"Fit and Proper\" criteria as defined by the Central Bank and their appointment must be in line with the Commercial Companies Law<strong>.</strong></li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Board of Directors - The board of directors of a Finance Company must have no fewer than five members. Atleast 60% of the board members of an IFC must have knowledge of the banking business or Islamic finance and banking business as the case may be. The Regulations provide for detailed selection processes and guidances in relation to the board of directors</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Sharia’a Supervision Committee and other committees - An IFC must have a Sharia’a Supervision Committee, and its role must be laid out in the policies of the IFC. Finance Companies must also have a board committee and credit committee.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Senior Management – Finance Companies must comply with the ‘fit and proper‘ test set out by the Central Bank and must be professional who understands the business of finance and was experience of not less than 10 years in the field of finance. Person within the senior management cannot be a part of the board.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Corporate Governance - While the Regulations set out certain minimum requirements for corporate governance, Finance Companies are permitted to set out their own policies and framework for corporate governance (complying with the Regulations), however these must be approved by its board of directors and a copy of such policies must be provided to the Central Bank.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Internal Policies – the Regulations set out the requirements that need to be adhered to by Finance Companies and IFC with respect to its internal polices in relation to management, risk management, extension of credit, compliance, information technology, security, audit, remuneration, outsourcing, etc.</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Other provisions</strong></p>\r\n\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Consumer Protection: the Name of the finance company must not include the words \"bank\", \"investment company\" or and other term which may mislead its customer. It must provide its customers with sufficient information regarding its products, etc. in order for them to be able to make an informed decision. The Finance Company must follow the Central Bank guidelines in relation to ‘Consumer Protection’.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Credit Reports - Every Finance Company must adhere to the credit reporting requirements of the Al Etihad Credit Bureau and other credit agencies to provide to and obtain information of the Borrower.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Accounting Standards - A Finance Company must implement all applicable International Accounting Standards/International Financial Reporting Standards and provide the Central Bank with two copies of signed audited financial statements, including external auditor reports, before 31st March every year. The Central Bank may require the Finance Company to appoint another auditor if the size and nature of the business of the Finance Company so requires.</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Differences in the new Regulations from the Previous Regulations</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The 2018 Regulations are far more detailed in the nature of investments permitted, liquidity requirements, organisational structure to be followed, investor guidance; we have set out below certain differences in the provisions between the Previous Regulations and 2018 Regulations.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n\r\n<table style=\"height: 490px;\" width=\"1131\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\">&nbsp;</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\"><strong>Previous Regulations</strong></td>\r\n<td width=\"211\"><strong>2018 Regulations</strong></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\">License Validity</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">Valid for two years and renewable for a further year</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">Valid for three years and renewable for same period unless required by Central Bank</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\">Outward Investment</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">Prohibited to lend, deposit or invest in more than 7% in one institution or in one group</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">Participation in the share capital only of certain types of companies and each such participation must not exceed 10% of its aggregate capital</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\">Minimum Paid Up Capital</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">AED 35 million or 50 million for LLCs</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">AED 150 million irrespective of the form of company</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\">Application - Proof of Paid-up Capital</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">AED15 million deposit certificate with a bank operating in UAE + undertaking for the rest of the amount</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">AED 25 million deposit certificate with a UAE Bank + undertaking for the rest of the amount</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\">&nbsp;</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">N/a</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">Letter of unconditional guarantee from a UAE bank for the entire sum of the paid-up capital</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</tbody>\r\n</table>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Key Additions to the 2018 Regulations</strong></p>\r\n\r\n<table style=\"height: 281px;\" width=\"1131\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\"><strong>Prepaid Cards</strong></td>\r\n<td width=\"431\">Finance Companies can act as program managers for reliable prepaid cards</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\"><strong>Introduction of outsourcing activities</strong></td>\r\n<td width=\"431\">The Regulations permit outsourcing of its permitted activities and lays out the requirements for such processes. This is the first time that the Central Bank has included outsourcing as a part of certain regulations.</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\"><strong>Confidentiality of data</strong></td>\r\n<td width=\"431\">Another first being the Regulations lay emphasis on confidentiality of data available to it and safeguarding of such confidential data even while outsourcing.</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\"><strong>IT technology and Security</strong></td>\r\n<td width=\"431\">The Regulations details out technical facilities that must be available with finance companies in order to keep the records of its customers</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</tbody>\r\n</table>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">These Regulations apply to all Finance Companies. Accordingly companies licensed prior to the date of the issuance of these Regulations need to comply with the 2018 Regulations and are given a period not exceeding 3 years from the publication to conform. However, the Central Bank may amend the requirement of compliance within 3 years if it deems the finance company to be substantially in compliance with these Regulations. All existing Finance Companies will require to provide the Central Bank with a detailed adjustment plan to comply with the articles of these Regulations.</p>\r\nAl Tamimi &amp; Company’s Banking and Finance team regularly advises on the Finance Company Regulations. For further information please contact Mark Brown (m.brown@tamimi.com) or Maymoona Talib (m.talib@tamimi.com).'),
(244680, 23937, 'MetaValueOld', '<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Amongst the several new laws and regulations being introduced in the UAE, the UAE Central Bank (\"Central Bank\") has on10 May 2018 issued new Finance Company Regulations (\"Regulations\" or \"2018 Regulations\") which are to come into effect one month after its publication.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">These Regulations replace the previous finance company regulations issued in 1996 and finance companies regulations for companies conducting business as per Islamic sharia’a principles issued in 2004 (\"Previous Regulations\") and aim at providing a detailed regulatory framework for Finance Companies to operate and develop within the UAE and also covers in its ambit the framework for protecting the customers of such Finance Companies.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">These Regulations consolidate the regulations for both Islamic finance and conventional finance companies (\"Finance Company/ies\") and incorporate certain significant changes including changes to capital requirements and corporate governance, to also be followed by existing Finance Companies. We have set out below certain noteworthy features of these Regulations and a comparative table on the key changes from the Previous Regulations on subject.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>License Application</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Pursuant to these Regulations, conducting financing activities in the UAE without a central bank license is prohibited. An application for such license must include the proposed scope of activities, a feasibility study illustrating the financial activities and products to be launched, estimated financial projections, risk factors, corporate structure, start-up costs, branches and a recruitment plan.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Another important requisite is for the applicant to provide an unconditional guarantee from a UAE Bank, in favour of the Central Bank for an amount equivalent to the minimum required paid-up capital. The License will be granted for a period of three years and may be renewable for the same period unless otherwise required by the Central Bank.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Any changes to the ownership of the Finance Company of 5% or more will require prior approval from the Central Bank.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Cancelling or Revoking a License</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Central Bank has the discretion to approve or refuse the License application, but must notify applicants in writing with reasons in case there is a refusal. Licenses can also be amended, revoked or cancelled at the discretion of the Board. The Regulations set out instances when the license can be cancelled which include providing false/misleading information, risking interests of the potential customers, or if there is a bankruptcy order filed against the Finance Company.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">If a Finance Company wishes to cease operations it must apply to the Central Bank at least six months in advance providing the reasons for such a cessation or suspension.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Regulations also provide for penalties that will be imposed if such company does not follow the provisions of the Regulations including adhering to the anti-money laundering policies laid down by the Central Bank.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Permitted Activities</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 10.1 of the Regulation details out the types of activities that are permitted, which are:</p>\r\n\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Retail finance,</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">mortgage finance,</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">wholesale finance,</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">pre-paid cards, and</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">distribution of third party products.</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Central Bank can review and amend this list from time to time.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 10 further sets out the do’s and dont’s in relation to the business of the Finance Company, certain key features are:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">it can extend loans only to ‘Juridicial Persons’ (defined under Article 93 of the UAE Civil Transactions Law) and individuals in the UAE. However, it is prohibited from accepting deposits or loans from individuals.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">it may accept deposits only from Juridicial Persons, subject to certain conditions laid out under Article 10.4 and also borrow from UAE banks, and may even receive foreign funding provided that its risk has been adequately hedged. In doing so it must not exceed 25% of the sum of total amount of its debt capital.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">it must obtain a no objection letter from the Central Bank in order to provide any new product line from within activities specified in its license.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">it may only participate in the share capital of brokerage companies, money exchanges, UAE banks and other Finance Companies. Any such single participation cannot exceed 10% of its debt capital and the aggregate participation must not exceed 25% of the debt capital.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">It must obtain approval from the Central Bank in order to issue bonds or sukuks. Such bonds and sukuks shall only be denominated in UAE dirhams or US Dollars.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">it is prohibited from financing a borrower which is not an entity incorporated in the UAE or its free zones, or a UAE resident, or where the mortgaged assets are not in the UAE.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">it is prohibited from entering into the business of money exchange.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">it must not purchase immovable properties unless for its own use or specific approval for the same has been obtained from the Central Bank. This rule does not apply to Islamic Finance Companies (IFC). IFCs may own property including immovable property and goods as part of an underlying financing contract with a borrower.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Minimum Capital, Liquidity Requirements and Credit Exposure Restrictions</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The minimum paid-up capital for a Finance Company is 150 million UAE Dirhams. UAE national ownership of the Finance Company must comprise at least 60% of total paid-up capital. Finance Companies must also allocate at least 10% of annual net profits to establishing a statutory reserve until the reserve equals 50% of its paid-up capital.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">To withstand short-term liquidity stress, Finance Companies are required to hold an amount equivalent to 10% of their aggregate liabilities in liquid assets i.e. cash held in UAE bank, Certificates of deposit issued by the Central Bank held via a UAE bank, short term deposits with a UAE bank with maturity upto 30 days and UAE federal and local government bonds, which must not exceed 30% of the total liquid assets. For the purpose of calculating the 10% amount, a Finance Company may deduct from its aggregate liabilities, cash collateral, bank guarantees from UAE banks and sovereign guarantees.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The credit exposure is considered ‘large’ if the value of such exposure to one borrower or group of related entities is 7% or more. The Regulations set out maximum exposure limits for different borrower types.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Organisational Structure, Composition and Policies of the Finance Company</strong></p>\r\n\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Founding shareholders - Founding shareholders must satisfy \"Fit and Proper\" criteria as defined by the Central Bank and their appointment must be in line with the Commercial Companies Law<strong>.</strong></li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Board of Directors - The board of directors of a Finance Company must have no fewer than five members. Atleast 60% of the board members of an IFC must have knowledge of the banking business or Islamic finance and banking business as the case may be. The Regulations provide for detailed selection processes and guidances in relation to the board of directors</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Sharia’a Supervision Committee and other committees - An IFC must have a Sharia’a Supervision Committee, and its role must be laid out in the policies of the IFC. Finance Companies must also have a board committee and credit committee.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Senior Management – Finance Companies must comply with the ‘fit and proper‘ test set out by the Central Bank and must be professional who understands the business of finance and was experience of not less than 10 years in the field of finance. Person within the senior management cannot be a part of the board.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Corporate Governance - While the Regulations set out certain minimum requirements for corporate governance, Finance Companies are permitted to set out their own policies and framework for corporate governance (complying with the Regulations), however these must be approved by its board of directors and a copy of such policies must be provided to the Central Bank.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Internal Policies – the Regulations set out the requirements that need to be adhered to by Finance Companies and IFC with respect to its internal polices in relation to management, risk management, extension of credit, compliance, information technology, security, audit, remuneration, outsourcing, etc.</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Other provisions</strong></p>\r\n\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Consumer Protection: the Name of the finance company must not include the words \"bank\", \"investment company\" or and other term which may mislead its customer. It must provide its customers with sufficient information regarding its products, etc. in order for them to be able to make an informed decision. The Finance Company must follow the Central Bank guidelines in relation to ‘Consumer Protection’.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Credit Reports - Every Finance Company must adhere to the credit reporting requirements of the Al Etihad Credit Bureau and other credit agencies to provide to and obtain information of the Borrower.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Accounting Standards - A Finance Company must implement all applicable International Accounting Standards/International Financial Reporting Standards and provide the Central Bank with two copies of signed audited financial statements, including external auditor reports, before 31st March every year. The Central Bank may require the Finance Company to appoint another auditor if the size and nature of the business of the Finance Company so requires.</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Differences in the new Regulations from the Previous Regulations</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The 2018 Regulations are far more detailed in the nature of investments permitted, liquidity requirements, organisational structure to be followed, investor guidance; we have set out below certain differences in the provisions between the Previous Regulations and 2018 Regulations.</p>\r\n\r\n<table style=\"height: 490px;\" width=\"1131\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\">&nbsp;</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\"><strong>Previous Regulations</strong></td>\r\n<td width=\"211\"><strong>2018 Regulations</strong></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\">License Validity</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">Valid for two years and renewable for a further year</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">Valid for three years and renewable for same period unless required by Central Bank</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\">Outward Investment</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">Prohibited to lend, deposit or invest in more than 7% in one institution or in one group</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">Participation in the share capital only of certain types of companies and each such participation must not exceed 10% of its aggregate capital</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\">Minimum Paid Up Capital</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">AED 35 million or 50 million for LLCs</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">AED 150 million irrespective of the form of company</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\">Application - Proof of Paid-up Capital</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">AED15 million deposit certificate with a bank operating in UAE + undertaking for the rest of the amount</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">AED 25 million deposit certificate with a UAE Bank + undertaking for the rest of the amount</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\">&nbsp;</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">N/a</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">Letter of unconditional guarantee from a UAE bank for the entire sum of the paid-up capital</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</tbody>\r\n</table>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Key Additions to the 2018 Regulations</strong></p>\r\n\r\n<table style=\"height: 281px;\" width=\"1131\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\"><strong>Prepaid Cards</strong></td>\r\n<td width=\"431\">Finance Companies can act as program managers for reliable prepaid cards</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\"><strong>Introduction of outsourcing activities</strong></td>\r\n<td width=\"431\">The Regulations permit outsourcing of its permitted activities and lays out the requirements for such processes. This is the first time that the Central Bank has included outsourcing as a part of certain regulations.</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\"><strong>Confidentiality of data</strong></td>\r\n<td width=\"431\">Another first being the Regulations lay emphasis on confidentiality of data available to it and safeguarding of such confidential data even while outsourcing.</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\"><strong>IT technology and Security</strong></td>\r\n<td width=\"431\">The Regulations details out technical facilities that must be available with finance companies in order to keep the records of its customers</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</tbody>\r\n</table>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">These Regulations apply to all Finance Companies. Accordingly companies licensed prior to the date of the issuance of these Regulations need to comply with the 2018 Regulations and are given a period not exceeding 3 years from the publication to conform. However, the Central Bank may amend the requirement of compliance within 3 years if it deems the finance company to be substantially in compliance with these Regulations. All existing Finance Companies will require to provide the Central Bank with a detailed adjustment plan to comply with the articles of these Regulations.</p>\r\nAl Tamimi &amp; Company’s Banking and Finance team regularly advises on the Finance Company Regulations. For further information please contact Mark Brown (m.brown@tamimi.com) or Maymoona Talib (m.talib@tamimi.com).'),
(244681, 23937, 'MetaLink', 'content'),
(244682, 23937, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7935&amp;action=edit');
INSERT INTO `tm_wsal_metadata` (`id`, `occurrence_id`, `name`, `value`) VALUES
(244683, 23937, 'ReportText', '<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Amongst the several new laws and regulations being introduced in the UAE, the UAE Central Bank (\"Central Bank\") has on10 May 2018 issued new Finance Company Regulations (\"Regulations\" or \"2018 Regulations\") which are to come into effect one month after its publication.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">These Regulations replace the previous finance company regulations issued in 1996 and finance companies regulations for companies conducting business as per Islamic sharia’a principles issued in 2004 (\"Previous Regulations\") and aim at providing a detailed regulatory framework for Finance Companies to operate and develop within the UAE and also covers in its ambit the framework for protecting the customers of such Finance Companies.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">These Regulations consolidate the regulations for both Islamic finance and conventional finance companies (\"Finance Company/ies\") and incorporate certain significant changes including changes to capital requirements and corporate governance, to also be followed by existing Finance Companies. We have set out below certain noteworthy features of these Regulations and a comparative table on the key changes from the Previous Regulations on subject.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>License Application</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Pursuant to these Regulations, conducting financing activities in the UAE without a central bank license is prohibited. An application for such license must include the proposed scope of activities, a feasibility study illustrating the financial activities and products to be launched, estimated financial projections, risk factors, corporate structure, start-up costs, branches and a recruitment plan.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Another important requisite is for the applicant to provide an unconditional guarantee from a UAE Bank, in favour of the Central Bank for an amount equivalent to the minimum required paid-up capital. The License will be granted for a period of three years and may be renewable for the same period unless otherwise required by the Central Bank.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Any changes to the ownership of the Finance Company of 5% or more will require prior approval from the Central Bank.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Cancelling or Revoking a License</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Central Bank has the discretion to approve or refuse the License application, but must notify applicants in writing with reasons in case there is a refusal. Licenses can also be amended, revoked or cancelled at the discretion of the Board. The Regulations set out instances when the license can be cancelled which include providing false/misleading information, risking interests of the potential customers, or if there is a bankruptcy order filed against the Finance Company.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">If a Finance Company wishes to cease operations it must apply to the Central Bank at least six months in advance providing the reasons for such a cessation or suspension.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Regulations also provide for penalties that will be imposed if such company does not follow the provisions of the Regulations including adhering to the anti-money laundering policies laid down by the Central Bank.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Permitted Activities</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 10.1 of the Regulation details out the types of activities that are permitted, which are:</p>\r\n\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Retail finance,</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">mortgage finance,</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">wholesale finance,</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">pre-paid cards, and</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">distribution of third party products.</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Central Bank can review and amend this list from time to time.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 10 further sets out the do’s and dont’s in relation to the business of the Finance Company, certain key features are:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">it can extend loans only to ‘Juridicial Persons’ (defined under Article 93 of the UAE Civil Transactions Law) and individuals in the UAE. However, it is prohibited from accepting deposits or loans from individuals.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">it may accept deposits only from Juridicial Persons, subject to certain conditions laid out under Article 10.4 and also borrow from UAE banks, and may even receive foreign funding provided that its risk has been adequately hedged. In doing so it must not exceed 25% of the sum of total amount of its debt capital.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">it must obtain a no objection letter from the Central Bank in order to provide any new product line from within activities specified in its license.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">it may only participate in the share capital of brokerage companies, money exchanges, UAE banks and other Finance Companies. Any such single participation cannot exceed 10% of its debt capital and the aggregate participation must not exceed 25% of the debt capital.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">It must obtain approval from the Central Bank in order to issue bonds or sukuks. Such bonds and sukuks shall only be denominated in UAE dirhams or US Dollars.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">it is prohibited from financing a borrower which is not an entity incorporated in the UAE or its free zones, or a UAE resident, or where the mortgaged assets are not in the UAE.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">it is prohibited from entering into the business of money exchange.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">it must not purchase immovable properties unless for its own use or specific approval for the same has been obtained from the Central Bank. This rule does not apply to Islamic Finance Companies (IFC). IFCs may own property including immovable property and goods as part of an underlying financing contract with a borrower.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Minimum Capital, Liquidity Requirements and Credit Exposure Restrictions</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The minimum paid-up capital for a Finance Company is 150 million UAE Dirhams. UAE national ownership of the Finance Company must comprise at least 60% of total paid-up capital. Finance Companies must also allocate at least 10% of annual net profits to establishing a statutory reserve until the reserve equals 50% of its paid-up capital.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">To withstand short-term liquidity stress, Finance Companies are required to hold an amount equivalent to 10% of their aggregate liabilities in liquid assets i.e. cash held in UAE bank, Certificates of deposit issued by the Central Bank held via a UAE bank, short term deposits with a UAE bank with maturity upto 30 days and UAE federal and local government bonds, which must not exceed 30% of the total liquid assets. For the purpose of calculating the 10% amount, a Finance Company may deduct from its aggregate liabilities, cash collateral, bank guarantees from UAE banks and sovereign guarantees.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The credit exposure is considered ‘large’ if the value of such exposure to one borrower or group of related entities is 7% or more. The Regulations set out maximum exposure limits for different borrower types.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Organisational Structure, Composition and Policies of the Finance Company</strong></p>\r\n\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Founding shareholders - Founding shareholders must satisfy \"Fit and Proper\" criteria as defined by the Central Bank and their appointment must be in line with the Commercial Companies Law<strong>.</strong></li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Board of Directors - The board of directors of a Finance Company must have no fewer than five members. Atleast 60% of the board members of an IFC must have knowledge of the banking business or Islamic finance and banking business as the case may be. The Regulations provide for detailed selection processes and guidances in relation to the board of directors</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Sharia’a Supervision Committee and other committees - An IFC must have a Sharia’a Supervision Committee, and its role must be laid out in the policies of the IFC. Finance Companies must also have a board committee and credit committee.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Senior Management – Finance Companies must comply with the ‘fit and proper‘ test set out by the Central Bank and must be professional who understands the business of finance and was experience of not less than 10 years in the field of finance. Person within the senior management cannot be a part of the board.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Corporate Governance - While the Regulations set out certain minimum requirements for corporate governance, Finance Companies are permitted to set out their own policies and framework for corporate governance (complying with the Regulations), however these must be approved by its board of directors and a copy of such policies must be provided to the Central Bank.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Internal Policies – the Regulations set out the requirements that need to be adhered to by Finance Companies and IFC with respect to its internal polices in relation to management, risk management, extension of credit, compliance, information technology, security, audit, remuneration, outsourcing, etc.</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Other provisions</strong></p>\r\n\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Consumer Protection: the Name of the finance company must not include the words \"bank\", \"investment company\" or and other term which may mislead its customer. It must provide its customers with sufficient information regarding its products, etc. in order for them to be able to make an informed decision. The Finance Company must follow the Central Bank guidelines in relation to ‘Consumer Protection’.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Credit Reports - Every Finance Company must adhere to the credit reporting requirements of the Al Etihad Credit Bureau and other credit agencies to provide to and obtain information of the Borrower.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Accounting Standards - A Finance Company must implement all applicable International Accounting Standards/International Financial Reporting Standards and provide the Central Bank with two copies of signed audited financial statements, including external auditor reports, before 31st March every year. The Central Bank may require the Finance Company to appoint another auditor if the size and nature of the business of the Finance Company so requires.</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Differences in the new Regulations from the Previous Regulations</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The 2018 Regulations are far more detailed in the nature of investments permitted, liquidity requirements, organisational structure to be followed, investor guidance; we have set out below certain differences in the provisions between the Previous Regulations and 2018 Regulations.</p>\r\n\r\n<table style=\"height: 490px;\" width=\"1131\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\">&nbsp;</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\"><strong>Previous Regulations</strong></td>\r\n<td width=\"211\"><strong>2018 Regulations</strong></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\">License Validity</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">Valid for two years and renewable for a further year</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">Valid for three years and renewable for same period unless required by Central Bank</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\">Outward Investment</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">Prohibited to lend, deposit or invest in more than 7% in one institution or in one group</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">Participation in the share capital only of certain types of companies and each such participation must not exceed 10% of its aggregate capital</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\">Minimum Paid Up Capital</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">AED 35 million or 50 million for LLCs</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">AED 150 million irrespective of the form of company</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\">Application - Proof of Paid-up Capital</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">AED15 million deposit certificate with a bank operating in UAE + undertaking for the rest of the amount</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">AED 25 million deposit certificate with a UAE Bank + undertaking for the rest of the amount</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\">&nbsp;</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">N/a</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">Letter of unconditional guarantee from a UAE bank for the entire sum of the paid-up capital</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</tbody>\r\n</table>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Key Additions to the 2018 Regulations</strong></p>\r\n\r\n<table style=\"height: 281px;\" width=\"1131\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\"><strong>Prepaid Cards</strong></td>\r\n<td width=\"431\">Finance Companies can act as program managers for reliable prepaid cards</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\"><strong>Introduction of outsourcing activities</strong></td>\r\n<td width=\"431\">The Regulations permit outsourcing of its permitted activities and lays out the requirements for such processes. This is the first time that the Central Bank has included outsourcing as a part of certain regulations.</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\"><strong>Confidentiality of data</strong></td>\r\n<td width=\"431\">Another first being the Regulations lay emphasis on confidentiality of data available to it and safeguarding of such confidential data even while outsourcing.</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\"><strong>IT technology and Security</strong></td>\r\n<td width=\"431\">The Regulations details out technical facilities that must be available with finance companies in order to keep the records of its customers</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</tbody>\r\n</table>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">These Regulations apply to all Finance Companies. Accordingly companies licensed prior to the date of the issuance of these Regulations need to comply with the 2018 Regulations and are given a period not exceeding 3 years from the publication to conform. However, the Central Bank may amend the requirement of compliance within 3 years if it deems the finance company to be substantially in compliance with these Regulations. All existing Finance Companies will require to provide the Central Bank with a detailed adjustment plan to comply with the articles of these Regulations.</p>\r\nAl Tamimi &amp; Company’s Banking and Finance team regularly advises on the Finance Company Regulations. For further information please contact Mark Brown (m.brown@tamimi.com) or Maymoona Talib (m.talib@tamimi.com).|<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Amongst the several new laws and regulations being introduced in the UAE, the UAE Central Bank (\"Central Bank\") has on10 May 2018 issued new Finance Company Regulations (\"Regulations\" or \"2018 Regulations\") which are to come into effect one month after its publication.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">These Regulations replace the previous finance company regulations issued in 1996 and finance companies regulations for companies conducting business as per Islamic sharia’a principles issued in 2004 (\"Previous Regulations\") and aim at providing a detailed regulatory framework for Finance Companies to operate and develop within the UAE and also covers in its ambit the framework for protecting the customers of such Finance Companies.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">These Regulations consolidate the regulations for both Islamic finance and conventional finance companies (\"Finance Company/ies\") and incorporate certain significant changes including changes to capital requirements and corporate governance, to also be followed by existing Finance Companies. We have set out below certain noteworthy features of these Regulations and a comparative table on the key changes from the Previous Regulations on subject.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>License Application</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Pursuant to these Regulations, conducting financing activities in the UAE without a central bank license is prohibited. An application for such license must include the proposed scope of activities, a feasibility study illustrating the financial activities and products to be launched, estimated financial projections, risk factors, corporate structure, start-up costs, branches and a recruitment plan.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Another important requisite is for the applicant to provide an unconditional guarantee from a UAE Bank, in favour of the Central Bank for an amount equivalent to the minimum required paid-up capital. The License will be granted for a period of three years and may be renewable for the same period unless otherwise required by the Central Bank.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Any changes to the ownership of the Finance Company of 5% or more will require prior approval from the Central Bank.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Cancelling or Revoking a License</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Central Bank has the discretion to approve or refuse the License application, but must notify applicants in writing with reasons in case there is a refusal. Licenses can also be amended, revoked or cancelled at the discretion of the Board. The Regulations set out instances when the license can be cancelled which include providing false/misleading information, risking interests of the potential customers, or if there is a bankruptcy order filed against the Finance Company.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">If a Finance Company wishes to cease operations it must apply to the Central Bank at least six months in advance providing the reasons for such a cessation or suspension.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Regulations also provide for penalties that will be imposed if such company does not follow the provisions of the Regulations including adhering to the anti-money laundering policies laid down by the Central Bank.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Permitted Activities</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 10.1 of the Regulation details out the types of activities that are permitted, which are:</p>\r\n\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Retail finance,</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">mortgage finance,</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">wholesale finance,</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">pre-paid cards, and</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">distribution of third party products.</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Central Bank can review and amend this list from time to time.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 10 further sets out the do’s and dont’s in relation to the business of the Finance Company, certain key features are:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">it can extend loans only to ‘Juridicial Persons’ (defined under Article 93 of the UAE Civil Transactions Law) and individuals in the UAE. However, it is prohibited from accepting deposits or loans from individuals.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">it may accept deposits only from Juridicial Persons, subject to certain conditions laid out under Article 10.4 and also borrow from UAE banks, and may even receive foreign funding provided that its risk has been adequately hedged. In doing so it must not exceed 25% of the sum of total amount of its debt capital.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">it must obtain a no objection letter from the Central Bank in order to provide any new product line from within activities specified in its license.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">it may only participate in the share capital of brokerage companies, money exchanges, UAE banks and other Finance Companies. Any such single participation cannot exceed 10% of its debt capital and the aggregate participation must not exceed 25% of the debt capital.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">It must obtain approval from the Central Bank in order to issue bonds or sukuks. Such bonds and sukuks shall only be denominated in UAE dirhams or US Dollars.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">it is prohibited from financing a borrower which is not an entity incorporated in the UAE or its free zones, or a UAE resident, or where the mortgaged assets are not in the UAE.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">it is prohibited from entering into the business of money exchange.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">it must not purchase immovable properties unless for its own use or specific approval for the same has been obtained from the Central Bank. This rule does not apply to Islamic Finance Companies (IFC). IFCs may own property including immovable property and goods as part of an underlying financing contract with a borrower.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Minimum Capital, Liquidity Requirements and Credit Exposure Restrictions</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The minimum paid-up capital for a Finance Company is 150 million UAE Dirhams. UAE national ownership of the Finance Company must comprise at least 60% of total paid-up capital. Finance Companies must also allocate at least 10% of annual net profits to establishing a statutory reserve until the reserve equals 50% of its paid-up capital.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">To withstand short-term liquidity stress, Finance Companies are required to hold an amount equivalent to 10% of their aggregate liabilities in liquid assets i.e. cash held in UAE bank, Certificates of deposit issued by the Central Bank held via a UAE bank, short term deposits with a UAE bank with maturity upto 30 days and UAE federal and local government bonds, which must not exceed 30% of the total liquid assets. For the purpose of calculating the 10% amount, a Finance Company may deduct from its aggregate liabilities, cash collateral, bank guarantees from UAE banks and sovereign guarantees.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The credit exposure is considered ‘large’ if the value of such exposure to one borrower or group of related entities is 7% or more. The Regulations set out maximum exposure limits for different borrower types.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Organisational Structure, Composition and Policies of the Finance Company</strong></p>\r\n\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Founding shareholders - Founding shareholders must satisfy \"Fit and Proper\" criteria as defined by the Central Bank and their appointment must be in line with the Commercial Companies Law<strong>.</strong></li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Board of Directors - The board of directors of a Finance Company must have no fewer than five members. Atleast 60% of the board members of an IFC must have knowledge of the banking business or Islamic finance and banking business as the case may be. The Regulations provide for detailed selection processes and guidances in relation to the board of directors</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Sharia’a Supervision Committee and other committees - An IFC must have a Sharia’a Supervision Committee, and its role must be laid out in the policies of the IFC. Finance Companies must also have a board committee and credit committee.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Senior Management – Finance Companies must comply with the ‘fit and proper‘ test set out by the Central Bank and must be professional who understands the business of finance and was experience of not less than 10 years in the field of finance. Person within the senior management cannot be a part of the board.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Corporate Governance - While the Regulations set out certain minimum requirements for corporate governance, Finance Companies are permitted to set out their own policies and framework for corporate governance (complying with the Regulations), however these must be approved by its board of directors and a copy of such policies must be provided to the Central Bank.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Internal Policies – the Regulations set out the requirements that need to be adhered to by Finance Companies and IFC with respect to its internal polices in relation to management, risk management, extension of credit, compliance, information technology, security, audit, remuneration, outsourcing, etc.</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Other provisions</strong></p>\r\n\r\n<ol>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Consumer Protection: the Name of the finance company must not include the words \"bank\", \"investment company\" or and other term which may mislead its customer. It must provide its customers with sufficient information regarding its products, etc. in order for them to be able to make an informed decision. The Finance Company must follow the Central Bank guidelines in relation to ‘Consumer Protection’.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Credit Reports - Every Finance Company must adhere to the credit reporting requirements of the Al Etihad Credit Bureau and other credit agencies to provide to and obtain information of the Borrower.</li>\r\n 	<li dir=\"LTR\">Accounting Standards - A Finance Company must implement all applicable International Accounting Standards/International Financial Reporting Standards and provide the Central Bank with two copies of signed audited financial statements, including external auditor reports, before 31st March every year. The Central Bank may require the Finance Company to appoint another auditor if the size and nature of the business of the Finance Company so requires.</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Differences in the new Regulations from the Previous Regulations</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The 2018 Regulations are far more detailed in the nature of investments permitted, liquidity requirements, organisational structure to be followed, investor guidance; we have set out below certain differences in the provisions between the Previous Regulations and 2018 Regulations.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n\r\n<table style=\"height: 490px;\" width=\"1131\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\">&nbsp;</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\"><strong>Previous Regulations</strong></td>\r\n<td width=\"211\"><strong>2018 Regulations</strong></td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\">License Validity</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">Valid for two years and renewable for a further year</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">Valid for three years and renewable for same period unless required by Central Bank</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\">Outward Investment</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">Prohibited to lend, deposit or invest in more than 7% in one institution or in one group</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">Participation in the share capital only of certain types of companies and each such participation must not exceed 10% of its aggregate capital</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\">Minimum Paid Up Capital</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">AED 35 million or 50 million for LLCs</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">AED 150 million irrespective of the form of company</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\">Application - Proof of Paid-up Capital</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">AED15 million deposit certificate with a bank operating in UAE + undertaking for the rest of the amount</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">AED 25 million deposit certificate with a UAE Bank + undertaking for the rest of the amount</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\">&nbsp;</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">N/a</td>\r\n<td width=\"211\">Letter of unconditional guarantee from a UAE bank for the entire sum of the paid-up capital</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</tbody>\r\n</table>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Key Additions to the 2018 Regulations</strong></p>\r\n\r\n<table style=\"height: 281px;\" width=\"1131\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\"><strong>Prepaid Cards</strong></td>\r\n<td width=\"431\">Finance Companies can act as program managers for reliable prepaid cards</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\"><strong>Introduction of outsourcing activities</strong></td>\r\n<td width=\"431\">The Regulations permit outsourcing of its permitted activities and lays out the requirements for such processes. This is the first time that the Central Bank has included outsourcing as a part of certain regulations.</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\"><strong>Confidentiality of data</strong></td>\r\n<td width=\"431\">Another first being the Regulations lay emphasis on confidentiality of data available to it and safeguarding of such confidential data even while outsourcing.</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td width=\"211\"><strong>IT technology and Security</strong></td>\r\n<td width=\"431\">The Regulations details out technical facilities that must be available with finance companies in order to keep the records of its customers</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</tbody>\r\n</table>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">These Regulations apply to all Finance Companies. Accordingly companies licensed prior to the date of the issuance of these Regulations need to comply with the 2018 Regulations and are given a period not exceeding 3 years from the publication to conform. However, the Central Bank may amend the requirement of compliance within 3 years if it deems the finance company to be substantially in compliance with these Regulations. All existing Finance Companies will require to provide the Central Bank with a detailed adjustment plan to comply with the articles of these Regulations.</p>\r\nAl Tamimi &amp; Company’s Banking and Finance team regularly advises on the Finance Company Regulations. For further information please contact Mark Brown (m.brown@tamimi.com) or Maymoona Talib (m.talib@tamimi.com).'),
(244684, 23937, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244685, 23937, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244686, 23937, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244687, 23937, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244688, 23938, 'PostID', '7935'),
(244689, 23938, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244690, 23938, 'PostTitle', 'Overhaul of the UAE Finance Companies Regulations'),
(244691, 23938, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244692, 23938, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 10:50:39'),
(244693, 23938, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7935'),
(244694, 23938, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7935&amp;action=edit'),
(244695, 23938, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244696, 23938, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244697, 23938, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244698, 23938, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(248381, 24246, 'MetaLink', 'content'),
(248382, 24246, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7934&amp;action=edit');
INSERT INTO `tm_wsal_metadata` (`id`, `occurrence_id`, `name`, `value`) VALUES
(248383, 24246, 'ReportText', '<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><img class=\"alignleft wp-image-7990 size-full\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_555491044.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"3868\" height=\"1481\" /></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The long-awaited Federal arbitration law of the UAE – Federal Law No. 6 of 2018 on Arbitration (\"New Arbitration Law\" or the \"Law\") – was published in the Federal Official Gazette no. 630 of 15 May 2018 and came into effect last June. This standalone piece of legislation repeals the previous outdated and non-comprehensive UAE Chapter on Arbitration contained in articles 203 to 218 of the UAE Civil Procedures Law No. 11 of 1992 (\"CPC\").</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The New Arbitration Law was long overdue, as the sporadic articles of the CPC did not provide much needed detail and clarity on some of the major points arising out of, or in connection with, arbitral proceedings. Furthermore, the provisions did not conform to the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration as adopted by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law of 1985 and amended in 2006 (\"UNCITRAL Model Law\").</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The New Arbitration Law provides for a more secure framework for the conduct of arbitral proceedings in the UAE. The six sections of the New Arbitration Law contain 61 articles, most of which can be traced in the UNCITRAL Model Law, and are expected to significantly revamp the UAE chapter on arbitration.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In this article, we intend to provide an overview of the key highlights of the New Arbitration Law with a focus on its practical effects.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Scope of Application</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">We note the extensive scope of application of the New Arbitration Law, both in terms of substance and time. Firstly, pursuant to Article 2, the New Arbitration Law shall apply to (i) arbitrations seated in the UAE unless the parties agree on the application of a different arbitration law, provided that such a law does not contravene UAE public policy and morality; (ii) commercial arbitrations taking place outside of the UAE where the parties have agreed to submit the arbitration to the provisions of the New Arbitration Law; and (iii) arbitrations arising out of a legal dispute, whether contractual or non-contractual, governed by the laws of the UAE, unless an exception applies. Accordingly, the New Arbitration Law shall generally apply unless the parties have agreed to apply another arbitration law, provided that other law is not in conflict with the public policy and morality of the UAE.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Furthermore, we welcome the application of the New Arbitration Law to both domestic and international arbitral proceedings. Contrary to the CPC, which did not contain any reference to international arbitration, Article 3 of the New Arbitration Law introduced the character of international arbitration, which adopts an extraterritorial approach. As such, and under certain circumstances, an arbitration is deemed international even if it is conducted within the UAE.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">We also note the absence of an express exclusion regarding the application of the New Arbitration Law to arbitrations seated in either the Dubai International Financial Centre or the Abu Dhabi Global Market. However, pursuant to Article 3(2) of Federal Law No. 8 of 2004 Regarding the Financial Free Zones, we conclude that the New Arbitration Law will not govern arbitrations seated in these two free zones, which will continue to be governed by the relevant free zone’s arbitration laws and regulations.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In relation to the timing of the introduction of the New Arbitration Law, it came into effect \"one month from the day following its publication in the Official Gazette\". It is therefore our view that the New Arbitration Law came into effect on 15 June 2018. It is interesting to note that contrary to recently enacted arbitration laws in the region, the New Arbitration Law will apply retrospectively. Specifically, Article 59 provides that the New Arbitration Law will apply to all ongoing arbitral proceedings at the time of its coming into effect, including arbitrations arising out of existing arbitration agreements. Such a retrospective application is without any prejudice to all proceedings having taken place prior to the entry into force of the New Arbitration Law.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>The Competent Court</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">One of the major procedural highlights of the New Arbitration Law is the designation of the Competent Court, which has been defined as the \"Federal or local Court of Appeal agreed upon by the parties or in whose jurisdiction the arbitration is conducted.\" We hope that going forward, and in line with other major global arbitration hubs, that a dedicated circuit will hear arbitration matters, with specialised and arbitration-focused members of the judiciary to further support and safeguard the arbitral process.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>The Arbitration Agreement</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 7 confirms the writing requirement for the validity of arbitration agreements. Noteworthy additions to the New Arbitration Law include the expansive interpretation of the writing requirement. As such, an arbitration agreement can be concluded by an exchange of correspondence, including e-mails. Furthermore, the writing requirement is satisfied through the reference in a written contract to an arbitration agreement contained in another document, model contract or international agreement. In Article 5, the Law expressly provides for the notion of arbitration agreements incorporated by reference. Also, an oral agreement to arbitrate during court proceedings is deemed valid if it is recorded in a judgment or if the other party asserts the existence of an arbitration party and the other party does not raise any objection.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Despite the softening of the writing requirement, the New Arbitration Law reconfirms, through Article 4(1), the requirement for arbitration agreements to be signed by persons with authority to do so. Therefore, we draw the attention of parties wishing to enter into an arbitration agreement to the requisite capacity requirements provided for under the relevant laws of the UAE, which remain unaffected by the introduction of the New Arbitration Law. For a UAE incorporated limited liability company, it is recommended that the company’s constituting documents are reviewed prior to the execution of an arbitration agreement in order to verify that authority to enter into arbitration agreements, granted by default to the company’s manager, has not been explicitly withdrawn. Article 4(4) explicitly provides that the ex-post lack of capacity of a party entering into an arbitration agreement, which occurs for example as a result of the death of an individual or the expiry of the entity’s term (as prescribed in its constitutional documents) after it has entered into an arbitration agreement, shall not cause the termination of such an arbitration agreement. It is however interesting to note that the Law seemingly intended for such a provision to be non-mandatory as parties may still otherwise agree. Furthermore, Article 4(2) reiterates that there shall not be an agreement to arbitrate matters which are non-conciliatory.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In relation to the validity of arbitration agreements, Article 6, in line with the UNCITRAL Model Law, confirms the separability principle of arbitration agreements. When parties’ agreement to arbitrate is featured within the framework of their main contractual relationship, the New Arbitration Law affirms the independence of the arbitration agreement from the other terms of the main contract in which it is contained. Arbitration agreements are not affected by the nullity, rescission or termination of the main contract, save for grounds arising out of a defective capacity.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Finally, Article 8 provides that the court shall dismiss any action that falls within the scope of an arbitration agreement, provided that the existence of the arbitration agreement is brought to the court’s attention before making any substantive claims or defences on the merits, unless the court decides that the arbitration agreement is invalid or impossible to perform. The filing of such an action does not preclude the commencement or continuance of arbitral proceedings or the issuance of the arbitral award.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong><img class=\"alignleft wp-image-7992 size-full\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_756750676.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"4243\" height=\"1636\" />Set and Stringent Time Limits</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In an effort to promote efficiency and prevent unnecessary prejudicial delays, the legislative draftsman of the New Arbitration Law have aimed to fit the arbitral proceedings within a clear set of, often stringent, time limits.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">For example, in the event of alleged non-compliance with the arbitration agreement or the Law, Article 25 provides that if a party does not object within the time limit agreed upon, or within seven days of becoming aware of the alleged non-compliance, that party is deemed to have waived its right to rely on this non-compliance subsequently. It is questionable whether the default seven-day period is reasonable from a practical perspective. However, such a waiver to challenge constitutes an important pro-arbitration provision, which shall have the effect of estopping a party from attempting to halt the conduct of the proceedings if it does not assert any objection in a prompt manner. With that said, we note that a party’s right to challenge an award, based on a defective arbitration agreement, or lack thereof, would still be preserved pursuant to Article 53. It is yet to be tested how the courts will interpret and eventually apply Articles 25 and 53.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In relation to the appointment and challenge of arbitrators, the New Arbitration Law has set a reasonable 15-day period. Specifically, pursuant to Article 11(2-3), the parties have a 15-day time limit to agree to the appointment of an arbitrator, from the date of receipt of a request to do so. Under Article 15(1-2), a 15-day time limit has been set for a party to challenge an arbitrator after becoming aware of the arbitrator appointment or after becoming aware of any circumstances justifying the challenge. Such a challenge shall be in a written application addressed to the challenged arbitrator, with a copy of the same addressed to the other members of the tribunal, if any, as well as the other parties. In the event that the arbitrator does not withdraw or the other party does not agree to the removal of the arbitrator, the party making the challenge may present it to the concerned body within 15-days after the lapse of the initial 15-day period.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">We note the express acknowledgment of the compétence-compétence principle in Article 19(2) under which the arbitral tribunal has the jurisdiction to rule on its own jurisdiction. Notwithstanding, a party still has the right to challenge a tribunal’s preliminary decision of jurisdiction before the courts within 15 days of the preliminary decision being notified. The Court then has then 30 days to render its decision. While the request is pending, the arbitral proceedings may continue at the request of a party. We note that this possibility to petition the court on the basis of a procedural order and not an award, is uncustomary in the UAE and may lead, at least in the beginning, to uncertainty.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Arbitrator Requirements</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The New Arbitration Law brings clarity on the requisite requirements for arbitrators. Article 10(1) specifies that an arbitrator must not be a minor, or be judicially declared as incapacitated, or one without civil rights for the reasons of bankruptcy (unless discharged), or conviction for a crime (even if she or he has been rehabilitated).</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Furthermore, Article 10(2) provides that an arbitrator cannot be a member of the Board of Trustees or of the administrative body of the arbitral institution administering the arbitration in which that person is asked to sit. We highlight the expansive application of this provision to arbitrations administered by both domestic arbitration centres, such as the Dubai International Arbitration Centre and the DIFC-LCIA Arbitration Centre, as well as international arbitration centres, such as the International Chamber of Commerce’s International Court of Arbitration, the London Court of International Arbitration and the Singapore International Arbitration Centre. The triggering event prompting the application of Article 10(2) is therefore the UAE seat of such arbitral proceedings. It is regrettable that the Law did not draw a distinction between party-appointed arbitrators, on one hand, and centre-appointed arbitrators, on the other, as we would be of the view that party-appointed arbitrators, even if members of the Board of Trustees or administrative body of an arbitral institution, should not be affected by this provision. Given the retrospective application of the New Arbitration Law to ongoing arbitrations, we note that the entry into force of the Law will most likely cause certain concerned arbitrators to resign.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">We also note that the Ministry of Justice or the Chairman of the competent judicial authority are to compile a list of arbitrators to be appointed in the event of a failure to agree upon the appointment of an arbitrator. As the list has not yet been published, we remain hopeful that the selection process of the prospective arbitrators would follow the international best practices in terms of both procedural knowledge and industry-specific expertise.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Finally, pursuant to Article 58, the Ministry of Economy is to issue a charter on the professional conduct of arbitrators in consultation with the arbitration institutions in the UAE. While the issuance of such a charter is likely to instil confidence within the parties to arbitration in the UAE, we are of the view that the effect of such a charter will remain for guidance purposes only. It is notable that the Law does not address the issues relating to the liability of arbitrators. In our view, it would have been desirable that for the Law to have included a provision confirming the civil immunity of arbitrators.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Arbitral Proceedings</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Commencement</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">According to Article 27(1), arbitral proceedings are deemed to have commenced from the following day after which the arbitral tribunal has been constituted, unless the parties agree otherwise. With that said, in relation to the procedural requirement for a substantive claim to confirm and sustain precautionary attachments, Article 27(2) provides that the arbitral proceedings are deemed to have commenced on the date of the notification of the request for arbitration. Even though the relationship between arbitral and court proceedings relating to arbitration is yet to be tested under the New Arbitration Law, the advancement of the date of commencement of the arbitral proceedings for the purpose of precautionary attachments is a positive provision.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>The Language of the Arbitration</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Under the New Arbitration Law, the default language of the arbitral proceedings, absent an agreement between the parties, will be Arabic. We therefore draw the attention of foreign parties in particular to the need to agree on a different language for the arbitration should they wish to avoid arbitral proceedings in Arabic, either explicitly, through for example their arbitration agreement, or implicitly, by agreeing to the application of institutional rules.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Acknowledgment of Modern Means of Communication</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The emphasis on the use and role of technology in the New Arbitration Law can be attributed to the desire for more efficient proceedings. There are indeed several references to the use of \"modern means of communication\" in the Law. For example, written correspondence can now be deemed to have been delivered if sent, amongst other means, by email. Article 28(2) provides that arbitral hearings and deliberations can be conducted by modern means of communication and electronic technology. In addition, Article 33(3) provides that hearing may be held through modern means of communication without the physical presence of the parties at the hearing. Pursuant to Article 35, the arbitral tribunal may question witnesses, including expert witnesses, through modern means of communication without their physical presence at the hearing. The emphasis on the use of technology will undoubtedly modernise arbitral proceedings in the UAE and help instil global confidence in such proceedings.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Confidentiality</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Contrary to common belief, arbitral proceedings are not confidential by default. The New Arbitration Law addresses the issue of confidentiality by stating, under Article 33(1), that hearings shall be confidential unless parties have otherwise agreed. The confidentiality of arbitral awards is implicitly recognised pursuant to Article 44. However, the Law does not explicitly provide for the confidentiality of documents, pleadings, evidence or submissions produced by the parties and the tribunal during the proceedings. We recommend that parties address the confidentiality of their arbitral proceedings either through an explicit agreement, or implicitly, through an agreement to apply institutional rules providing for the hoped for confidentiality obligations.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong><img class=\"alignright wp-image-7991 \" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_315538304-145x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"236\" height=\"468\" />Conduct</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">It is clear that the New Arbitration Law attempts to instil discipline and efficiency in the conduct of the arbitral proceedings. As noted above, arbitral hearings can be held at any place, and the Law allows arbitral hearings and deliberations to be conducted by modern means of communication and electronic technology. Article 30(1-2) provides, absent an agreement between the parties, for a 14-day period from the date of the composition of the arbitral tribunal for the claimant to communicate the statement of claim in writing to the respondent and to the arbitrators. After receiving the statement of claim, the respondent has a further 14-day period to communicate its statement of defence. The practical difficulties associated with these relatively contracted time limits will most likely prompt parties to agree on different deadlines.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">It is worth noting that the New Arbitration Law attempts to put an end to disruptive guerrilla tactics through repetitive challenges of an arbitrator by providing under Article 15(3) that the challenge of an arbitrator does not suspend the arbitral proceedings.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Pursuant to Article 43 of the New Arbitration Law, the arbitral tribunal can decide to continue the arbitral proceedings (i) where there are issues that fall outside the scope of its jurisdiction; (ii) if a document submitted to it is challenged for forgery; or (iii) if criminal proceedings in respect of that document or for any other criminal act which has been instituted. This is a significant improvement as previously, according to the CPC, the tribunal was required to suspend its proceedings under such circumstances.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Law provides much needed clarity on the issue of the representation of the parties by non-UAE lawyers. Specifically, Article 33(5) provides that parties may seek the assistance of representatives for their representation in the arbitral proceedings and these representatives may or may not be lawyers. The non-restriction on the appearance of foreign counsel in UAE-seated arbitrations is welcome after the issuance of the 2017 Executive Regulations to the Federal Law No. 23 of 1991 on the Legal Professional, which was interpreted by some to restrict the appearance of non –UAE counsel in arbitral proceedings seated in the UAE.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Law also provides wide latitude to the parties and the arbitral tribunal to decide upon the conduct of the arbitral proceedings.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Interim and Conservatory Measures</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Interim and conservatory measures constitute crucial tools in arbitral proceedings. The CPC did not grant powers to the tribunal to order such measures, which were within the exclusive powers of the courts. In the event that parties agree to grant such powers to the tribunal, either explicitly or implicitly through the application of institutional rules, the enforcement of tribunal-ordered interim and conservatory measures was an impossible task in the UAE before the enactment of the New Arbitration Law.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">One of the much anticipated provisions of the New Arbitration Law is Article 21. Through this article, and unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the New Arbitration Law explicitly recognises the arbitral tribunal’s power to award interim or conservatory measures, either on the request of a party or of its own motion, including ordering a party to provide adequate security to cover the costs of such measures. Pursuant to Article 21(4), a party for whom an interim measure has been ordered in its favour may, with written permission from the tribunal, request the competent court to enforce the order of the tribunal within 15 days of receipt of the request.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Notwithstanding the arbitral tribunal’s newly attributed powers to order such interim and conservatory measures, the court also remains competent to grant interim and conservatory measures based on an application by the tribunal or one of the parties in relation to forthcoming or ongoing arbitral proceedings. As per Article 18(3), the arbitral proceedings shall continue notwithstanding any application for interim or conservatory measures relating to an ongoing arbitration and such an application to the court shall not constitute a waiver to the arbitration agreement.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">While the receptivity and approach of the courts in relation to these provisions are yet to be tested, we highly welcome these efforts to safeguard more efficient and equitable arbitral proceedings.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>The Award</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In relation to the issuance of the award, Article 42(1) provides that, unless agreed otherwise, an award must be issued within 6 months from the date of the first hearing of the arbitration. Contrary to the previous CPC regime, such a date can now be extended for an additional 6 months, unless the parties agree to a longer extension, either explicitly or implicitly through the application of institutional rules. Article 42(2) provides that absent such an agreement, further extension of time can only be made by the courts upon petition by the parties or the tribunal itself. It is important to bear in mind in this regard that the failure to meet this time limit is a ground for challenging an award pursuant to Article 53(1)(g) of the New Arbitration Law as discussed further below.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The time limits set forth in Article 42 lack any mechanism for arbitral institutions to grant an extension of time, though it may be argued that parties have agreed to such an extension by virtue of having agreed to the application of particular institutional rules. Under the previous regime, the CPC allowed the parties to agree to extensions of time whether expressly or by implication.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In our view, Article 41(6) is a very positive introduction, which provides that awards can be signed outside the seat of arbitration and can also be signed electronically. The issuance of the final award shall be deemed to mark the end of the arbitral proceedings. According to Article 44, parties are to be notified of the award within 15 days from the date of issue of the award.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Law explicitly recognises that an arbitral tribunal may interpret an award by issuing an explanatory award pursuant to Article 49. A party may request the tribunal to interpret any obscurity or ambiguity in its award within 30 days of receipt of the award, unless the parties have agreed to different procedures or time limits. The tribunal shall consider and issue its explanatory award within 30 days after the receipt of the request, which may extended by a further 15 days. Such an explanatory award is deemed to supplement the final arbitral award.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Enforcement of Arbitral Awards</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The New Arbitration Law clarifies the process for enforcing UAE arbitral awards with a fast-tracked and overhauled procedure. The New Arbitration Law provides that arbitral awards are binding on the parties, res judicata applies and that such awards shall be enforceable in the same manner as a judicial ruling provided ratification is obtained. If the enforcement of the award is sought in the UAE, a ratification of such an award by the court is required in order to proceed with the enforcement of such an award.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">A major development in the New Arbitration Law lies in the fact that enforcement proceedings shall now commence directly before the UAE federal or local Court of Appeal, not before the Court of First Instance as before. The form of the enforcement procedure has also been simplified. Instead of filing a case before the court, the award-creditor can seek the ratification and enforcement of an award through the filing of an application with the Chief Justice of the Court of Appeal. Pursuant to Article 55(2), the relevant authority will now have 60 days from the date of the application to order the ratification and enforcement of the award unless it finds grounds for annulment.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 57 provides for the possibility of filing a grievance against an order of the Court of Appeal ratifying an award and declaring it enforceable or order of the Court of Appeal denying enforcement. Such a grievance must be filed with the Court of Appeal within 30 days of the Court of Appeal’s notification of the order. We note that it would have been more appropriate for such a grievance to be filed before the Court of Cassation, as the higher appellate court, instead of the Court of Appeal.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In relation to foreign arbitral awards, we note that the Law lacks explicit provisions relating to the enforcement of such awards. It is our view that the CPC provisions, specifically Articles 235 to 238, remain applicable absent a convention or treaty entered into by the UAE dealing with the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. In the event of enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in the UAE sought on the basis of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 1958 (\"New York Convention\"), it is yet to be tested whether the new expedited enforcement provisions of the Law would apply to such enforcements given that Article III of the New York Convention provides that: \"(…) There shall not be imposed substantially more onerous conditions or higher fees or charges on the recognition or enforcement of arbitral awards to which this Convention applies than are imposed on the recognition or enforcement of domestic arbitral awards.\"</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Given the absence of any explicit provisions to the contrary within the Law, we are of the view that the new provisions of the Law should apply to enforcements of foreign arbitral awards under the New York Convention.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Award Challenge</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The grounds to challenge and set aside an award are limited and consistent with the spirit of Article 34 of the UNCITRAL Model Law. Article 53(1) of the New Arbitration Law provides for limited grounds for annulment, which include the lack of capacity of a party entering into the arbitration agreement, lack of authorisation to act on the matter or lack of notice. Unlike the UNCITRAL Model Law, the New Arbitration Law also provides that the issuance of a final award which does not apply the substantive law chosen by the parties or the arbitral tribunal’s failure to issue the award within the specified time-frame shall also constitute grounds for challenge. In addition, Article 53(2) provides that the court has the right to set aside the award on its own initiative, if the subject matter of the dispute is not arbitrable or if the award contravenes the public policy and morality of the UAE.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In an effort to preserve the arbitral proceedings, several articles purport to safeguard the sanctity of the arbitral proceedings.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">For example, pursuant to Article 50(1-2), a party may request the arbitral tribunal to correct any typographical or clerical errors in the award within 30 days of receipt of the award, unless the parties have agreed to different procedures or time limits. Such correction is to be made within 30 days after the tribunal issues the award or after receiving the request for correction by one of the parties, as the case may be. Such period may be extended by a further 15 days. The arbitral tribunal shall notify the parties after corrections are made within 15 days from the date of issue of correction. Also, Article 51(1-2) provides that a party may request the tribunal to issue an additional award if the party believes that the final award did not deal with some of the requests made. Such a request must be made within 30 days of receipt of the award. If such a request is justified, then the arbitral tribunal shall issue the additional award within 60 days after the receipt of the request and may extend by a further 30 days. In addition, pursuant to Article 54(6), the court may suspend the setting aside proceedings for a period of up to 60 days in order to give the arbitral tribunal an opportunity to take any action or make any amendment to the form of the award.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Whereas under the previous CPC regime, there was no specific deadline for the purpose of filing a set aside action, the New Arbitration Law, pursuant to Article 54(2) provides for a 30-day time limit from the date of receiving notice of the award for a party to commence annulment proceedings. This is a significant change to the previous regime, and we believe that this will contribute to the legal security of final awards. However, Article 54(1) provides that the decision to set aside is final and can only be appealed to the Court of Cassation. We note that there is no set time limit for the Court of Cassation to render its decision.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In line with the general spirit of the New Arbitration Law for more efficient proceedings, an action to set aside an arbitral award does not stay its enforcement. Nevertheless, the court may order a stay of enforcement if a party requests for a stay of enforcement. Such stay of enforcement is to be decided within 15 days after the date of the first scheduled hearing.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The UAE Federal Law No. 6 of 2018 on Arbitration undoubtedly constitutes a landmark development for arbitration in the UAE by providing a standalone arbitration law aligned with international best practices and standards. We consider that the overall preservation and respect of party autonomy and the focus on more streamlined and efficient proceedings will build the UAE’s reputation as a preferred seat for international arbitration in the region. We remain hopeful in the courts’ significant role in appropriately applying and preserving the spirit of the Law. The Executive Regulations, which are in the pipeline, will also undoubtedly clarify some of the issues raised in hope of a more rationalised and synchronised proceedings among the various players in UAE seated arbitrations.</p>\r\n<em>For further information, please contact <a href=\"https://www.tamimi.com/lawyer/essam-al-tamimi/\">Essam Al Tamimi</a> (e.tamimi@tamimi.com) or <a href=\"https://www.tamimi.com/lawyer/sara-aranjo/\">Sara Koleilat-Aranjo</a> (s.aranjo@tamimi.com).</em>|<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><img class=\"alignleft wp-image-7990 size-full\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_555491044.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"3868\" height=\"1481\" /></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The long-awaited Federal arbitration law of the UAE – Federal Law No. 6 of 2018 on Arbitration (\"New Arbitration Law\" or the \"Law\") – was published in the Federal Official Gazette no. 630 of 15 May 2018 and came into effect last June. This standalone piece of legislation repeals the previous outdated and non-comprehensive UAE Chapter on Arbitration contained in articles 203 to 218 of the UAE Civil Procedures Law No. 11 of 1992 (\"CPC\").</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The New Arbitration Law was long overdue, as the sporadic articles of the CPC did not provide much needed detail and clarity on some of the major points arising out of, or in connection with, arbitral proceedings. Furthermore, the provisions did not conform to the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration as adopted by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law of 1985 and amended in 2006 (\"UNCITRAL Model Law\").</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The New Arbitration Law provides for a more secure framework for the conduct of arbitral proceedings in the UAE. The six sections of the New Arbitration Law contain 61 articles, most of which can be traced in the UNCITRAL Model Law, and are expected to significantly revamp the UAE chapter on arbitration.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In this article, we intend to provide an overview of the key highlights of the New Arbitration Law with a focus on its practical effects.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Scope of Application</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">We note the extensive scope of application of the New Arbitration Law, both in terms of substance and time. Firstly, pursuant to Article 2, the New Arbitration Law shall apply to (i) arbitrations seated in the UAE unless the parties agree on the application of a different arbitration law, provided that such a law does not contravene UAE public policy and morality; (ii) commercial arbitrations taking place outside of the UAE where the parties have agreed to submit the arbitration to the provisions of the New Arbitration Law; and (iii) arbitrations arising out of a legal dispute, whether contractual or non-contractual, governed by the laws of the UAE, unless an exception applies. Accordingly, the New Arbitration Law shall generally apply unless the parties have agreed to apply another arbitration law, provided that other law is not in conflict with the public policy and morality of the UAE.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Furthermore, we welcome the application of the New Arbitration Law to both domestic and international arbitral proceedings. Contrary to the CPC, which did not contain any reference to international arbitration, Article 3 of the New Arbitration Law introduced the character of international arbitration, which adopts an extraterritorial approach. As such, and under certain circumstances, an arbitration is deemed international even if it is conducted within the UAE.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">We also note the absence of an express exclusion regarding the application of the New Arbitration Law to arbitrations seated in either the Dubai International Financial Centre or the Abu Dhabi Global Market. However, pursuant to Article 3(2) of Federal Law No. 8 of 2004 Regarding the Financial Free Zones, we conclude that the New Arbitration Law will not govern arbitrations seated in these two free zones, which will continue to be governed by the relevant free zone’s arbitration laws and regulations.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In relation to the timing of the introduction of the New Arbitration Law, it came into effect \"one month from the day following its publication in the Official Gazette\". It is therefore our view that the New Arbitration Law came into effect on 15 June 2018. It is interesting to note that contrary to recently enacted arbitration laws in the region, the New Arbitration Law will apply retrospectively. Specifically, Article 59 provides that the New Arbitration Law will apply to all ongoing arbitral proceedings at the time of its coming into effect, including arbitrations arising out of existing arbitration agreements. Such a retrospective application is without any prejudice to all proceedings having taken place prior to the entry into force of the New Arbitration Law.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>The Competent Court</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">One of the major procedural highlights of the New Arbitration Law is the designation of the Competent Court, which has been defined as the \"Federal or local Court of Appeal agreed upon by the parties or in whose jurisdiction the arbitration is conducted.\" We hope that going forward, and in line with other major global arbitration hubs, that a dedicated circuit will hear arbitration matters, with specialised and arbitration-focused members of the judiciary to further support and safeguard the arbitral process.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>The Arbitration Agreement</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 7 confirms the writing requirement for the validity of arbitration agreements. Noteworthy additions to the New Arbitration Law include the expansive interpretation of the writing requirement. As such, an arbitration agreement can be concluded by an exchange of correspondence, including e-mails. Furthermore, the writing requirement is satisfied through the reference in a written contract to an arbitration agreement contained in another document, model contract or international agreement. In Article 5, the Law expressly provides for the notion of arbitration agreements incorporated by reference. Also, an oral agreement to arbitrate during court proceedings is deemed valid if it is recorded in a judgment or if the other party asserts the existence of an arbitration party and the other party does not raise any objection.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Despite the softening of the writing requirement, the New Arbitration Law reconfirms, through Article 4(1), the requirement for arbitration agreements to be signed by persons with authority to do so. Therefore, we draw the attention of parties wishing to enter into an arbitration agreement to the requisite capacity requirements provided for under the relevant laws of the UAE, which remain unaffected by the introduction of the New Arbitration Law. For a UAE incorporated limited liability company, it is recommended that the company’s constituting documents are reviewed prior to the execution of an arbitration agreement in order to verify that authority to enter into arbitration agreements, granted by default to the company’s manager, has not been explicitly withdrawn. Article 4(4) explicitly provides that the ex-post lack of capacity of a party entering into an arbitration agreement, which occurs for example as a result of the death of an individual or the expiry of the entity’s term (as prescribed in its constitutional documents) after it has entered into an arbitration agreement, shall not cause the termination of such an arbitration agreement. It is however interesting to note that the Law seemingly intended for such a provision to be non-mandatory as parties may still otherwise agree. Furthermore, Article 4(2) reiterates that there shall not be an agreement to arbitrate matters which are non-conciliatory.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In relation to the validity of arbitration agreements, Article 6, in line with the UNCITRAL Model Law, confirms the separability principle of arbitration agreements. When parties’ agreement to arbitrate is featured within the framework of their main contractual relationship, the New Arbitration Law affirms the independence of the arbitration agreement from the other terms of the main contract in which it is contained. Arbitration agreements are not affected by the nullity, rescission or termination of the main contract, save for grounds arising out of a defective capacity.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Finally, Article 8 provides that the court shall dismiss any action that falls within the scope of an arbitration agreement, provided that the existence of the arbitration agreement is brought to the court’s attention before making any substantive claims or defences on the merits, unless the court decides that the arbitration agreement is invalid or impossible to perform. The filing of such an action does not preclude the commencement or continuance of arbitral proceedings or the issuance of the arbitral award.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong><img class=\"alignleft wp-image-7992 size-full\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_756750676.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"4243\" height=\"1636\" />Set and Stringent Time Limits</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In an effort to promote efficiency and prevent unnecessary prejudicial delays, the legislative draftsman of the New Arbitration Law have aimed to fit the arbitral proceedings within a clear set of, often stringent, time limits.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">For example, in the event of alleged non-compliance with the arbitration agreement or the Law, Article 25 provides that if a party does not object within the time limit agreed upon, or within seven days of becoming aware of the alleged non-compliance, that party is deemed to have waived its right to rely on this non-compliance subsequently. It is questionable whether the default seven-day period is reasonable from a practical perspective. However, such a waiver to challenge constitutes an important pro-arbitration provision, which shall have the effect of estopping a party from attempting to halt the conduct of the proceedings if it does not assert any objection in a prompt manner. With that said, we note that a party’s right to challenge an award, based on a defective arbitration agreement, or lack thereof, would still be preserved pursuant to Article 53. It is yet to be tested how the courts will interpret and eventually apply Articles 25 and 53.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In relation to the appointment and challenge of arbitrators, the New Arbitration Law has set a reasonable 15-day period. Specifically, pursuant to Article 11(2-3), the parties have a 15-day time limit to agree to the appointment of an arbitrator, from the date of receipt of a request to do so. Under Article 15(1-2), a 15-day time limit has been set for a party to challenge an arbitrator after becoming aware of the arbitrator appointment or after becoming aware of any circumstances justifying the challenge. Such a challenge shall be in a written application addressed to the challenged arbitrator, with a copy of the same addressed to the other members of the tribunal, if any, as well as the other parties. In the event that the arbitrator does not withdraw or the other party does not agree to the removal of the arbitrator, the party making the challenge may present it to the concerned body within 15-days after the lapse of the initial 15-day period.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">We note the express acknowledgment of the compétence-compétence principle in Article 19(2) under which the arbitral tribunal has the jurisdiction to rule on its own jurisdiction. Notwithstanding, a party still has the right to challenge a tribunal’s preliminary decision of jurisdiction before the courts within 15 days of the preliminary decision being notified. The Court then has then 30 days to render its decision. While the request is pending, the arbitral proceedings may continue at the request of a party. We note that this possibility to petition the court on the basis of a procedural order and not an award, is uncustomary in the UAE and may lead, at least in the beginning, to uncertainty.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Arbitrator Requirements</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The New Arbitration Law brings clarity on the requisite requirements for arbitrators. Article 10(1) specifies that an arbitrator must not be a minor, or be judicially declared as incapacitated, or one without civil rights for the reasons of bankruptcy (unless discharged), or conviction for a crime (even if she or he has been rehabilitated).</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Furthermore, Article 10(2) provides that an arbitrator cannot be a member of the Board of Trustees or of the administrative body of the arbitral institution administering the arbitration in which that person is asked to sit. We highlight the expansive application of this provision to arbitrations administered by both domestic arbitration centres, such as the Dubai International Arbitration Centre and the DIFC-LCIA Arbitration Centre, as well as international arbitration centres, such as the International Chamber of Commerce’s International Court of Arbitration, the London Court of International Arbitration and the Singapore International Arbitration Centre. The triggering event prompting the application of Article 10(2) is therefore the UAE seat of such arbitral proceedings. It is regrettable that the Law did not draw a distinction between party-appointed arbitrators, on one hand, and centre-appointed arbitrators, on the other, as we would be of the view that party-appointed arbitrators, even if members of the Board of Trustees or administrative body of an arbitral institution, should not be affected by this provision. Given the retrospective application of the New Arbitration Law to ongoing arbitrations, we note that the entry into force of the Law will most likely cause certain concerned arbitrators to resign.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">We also note that the Ministry of Justice or the Chairman of the competent judicial authority are to compile a list of arbitrators to be appointed in the event of a failure to agree upon the appointment of an arbitrator. As the list has not yet been published, we remain hopeful that the selection process of the prospective arbitrators would follow the international best practices in terms of both procedural knowledge and industry-specific expertise.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Finally, pursuant to Article 58, the Ministry of Economy is to issue a charter on the professional conduct of arbitrators in consultation with the arbitration institutions in the UAE. While the issuance of such a charter is likely to instil confidence within the parties to arbitration in the UAE, we are of the view that the effect of such a charter will remain for guidance purposes only. It is notable that the Law does not address the issues relating to the liability of arbitrators. In our view, it would have been desirable that for the Law to have included a provision confirming the civil immunity of arbitrators.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Arbitral Proceedings</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Commencement</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">According to Article 27(1), arbitral proceedings are deemed to have commenced from the following day after which the arbitral tribunal has been constituted, unless the parties agree otherwise. With that said, in relation to the procedural requirement for a substantive claim to confirm and sustain precautionary attachments, Article 27(2) provides that the arbitral proceedings are deemed to have commenced on the date of the notification of the request for arbitration. Even though the relationship between arbitral and court proceedings relating to arbitration is yet to be tested under the New Arbitration Law, the advancement of the date of commencement of the arbitral proceedings for the purpose of precautionary attachments is a positive provision.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>The Language of the Arbitration</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Under the New Arbitration Law, the default language of the arbitral proceedings, absent an agreement between the parties, will be Arabic. We therefore draw the attention of foreign parties in particular to the need to agree on a different language for the arbitration should they wish to avoid arbitral proceedings in Arabic, either explicitly, through for example their arbitration agreement, or implicitly, by agreeing to the application of institutional rules.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Acknowledgment of Modern Means of Communication</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The emphasis on the use and role of technology in the New Arbitration Law can be attributed to the desire for more efficient proceedings. There are indeed several references to the use of \"modern means of communication\" in the Law. For example, written correspondence can now be deemed to have been delivered if sent, amongst other means, by email. Article 28(2) provides that arbitral hearings and deliberations can be conducted by modern means of communication and electronic technology. In addition, Article 33(3) provides that hearing may be held through modern means of communication without the physical presence of the parties at the hearing. Pursuant to Article 35, the arbitral tribunal may question witnesses, including expert witnesses, through modern means of communication without their physical presence at the hearing. The emphasis on the use of technology will undoubtedly modernise arbitral proceedings in the UAE and help instil global confidence in such proceedings.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Confidentiality</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Contrary to common belief, arbitral proceedings are not confidential by default. The New Arbitration Law addresses the issue of confidentiality by stating, under Article 33(1), that hearings shall be confidential unless parties have otherwise agreed. The confidentiality of arbitral awards is implicitly recognised pursuant to Article 44. However, the Law does not explicitly provide for the confidentiality of documents, pleadings, evidence or submissions produced by the parties and the tribunal during the proceedings. We recommend that parties address the confidentiality of their arbitral proceedings either through an explicit agreement, or implicitly, through an agreement to apply institutional rules providing for the hoped for confidentiality obligations.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong><img class=\"alignright wp-image-7991 \" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_315538304-145x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"291\" height=\"602\" />Conduct</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">It is clear that the New Arbitration Law attempts to instil discipline and efficiency in the conduct of the arbitral proceedings. As noted above, arbitral hearings can be held at any place, and the Law allows arbitral hearings and deliberations to be conducted by modern means of communication and electronic technology. Article 30(1-2) provides, absent an agreement between the parties, for a 14-day period from the date of the composition of the arbitral tribunal for the claimant to communicate the statement of claim in writing to the respondent and to the arbitrators. After receiving the statement of claim, the respondent has a further 14-day period to communicate its statement of defence. The practical difficulties associated with these relatively contracted time limits will most likely prompt parties to agree on different deadlines.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">It is worth noting that the New Arbitration Law attempts to put an end to disruptive guerrilla tactics through repetitive challenges of an arbitrator by providing under Article 15(3) that the challenge of an arbitrator does not suspend the arbitral proceedings.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Pursuant to Article 43 of the New Arbitration Law, the arbitral tribunal can decide to continue the arbitral proceedings (i) where there are issues that fall outside the scope of its jurisdiction; (ii) if a document submitted to it is challenged for forgery; or (iii) if criminal proceedings in respect of that document or for any other criminal act which has been instituted. This is a significant improvement as previously, according to the CPC, the tribunal was required to suspend its proceedings under such circumstances.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Law provides much needed clarity on the issue of the representation of the parties by non-UAE lawyers. Specifically, Article 33(5) provides that parties may seek the assistance of representatives for their representation in the arbitral proceedings and these representatives may or may not be lawyers. The non-restriction on the appearance of foreign counsel in UAE-seated arbitrations is welcome after the issuance of the 2017 Executive Regulations to the Federal Law No. 23 of 1991 on the Legal Professional, which was interpreted by some to restrict the appearance of non –UAE counsel in arbitral proceedings seated in the UAE.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Law also provides wide latitude to the parties and the arbitral tribunal to decide upon the conduct of the arbitral proceedings.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Interim and Conservatory Measures</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Interim and conservatory measures constitute crucial tools in arbitral proceedings. The CPC did not grant powers to the tribunal to order such measures, which were within the exclusive powers of the courts. In the event that parties agree to grant such powers to the tribunal, either explicitly or implicitly through the application of institutional rules, the enforcement of tribunal-ordered interim and conservatory measures was an impossible task in the UAE before the enactment of the New Arbitration Law.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">One of the much anticipated provisions of the New Arbitration Law is Article 21. Through this article, and unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the New Arbitration Law explicitly recognises the arbitral tribunal’s power to award interim or conservatory measures, either on the request of a party or of its own motion, including ordering a party to provide adequate security to cover the costs of such measures. Pursuant to Article 21(4), a party for whom an interim measure has been ordered in its favour may, with written permission from the tribunal, request the competent court to enforce the order of the tribunal within 15 days of receipt of the request.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Notwithstanding the arbitral tribunal’s newly attributed powers to order such interim and conservatory measures, the court also remains competent to grant interim and conservatory measures based on an application by the tribunal or one of the parties in relation to forthcoming or ongoing arbitral proceedings. As per Article 18(3), the arbitral proceedings shall continue notwithstanding any application for interim or conservatory measures relating to an ongoing arbitration and such an application to the court shall not constitute a waiver to the arbitration agreement.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">While the receptivity and approach of the courts in relation to these provisions are yet to be tested, we highly welcome these efforts to safeguard more efficient and equitable arbitral proceedings.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>The Award</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In relation to the issuance of the award, Article 42(1) provides that, unless agreed otherwise, an award must be issued within 6 months from the date of the first hearing of the arbitration. Contrary to the previous CPC regime, such a date can now be extended for an additional 6 months, unless the parties agree to a longer extension, either explicitly or implicitly through the application of institutional rules. Article 42(2) provides that absent such an agreement, further extension of time can only be made by the courts upon petition by the parties or the tribunal itself. It is important to bear in mind in this regard that the failure to meet this time limit is a ground for challenging an award pursuant to Article 53(1)(g) of the New Arbitration Law as discussed further below.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The time limits set forth in Article 42 lack any mechanism for arbitral institutions to grant an extension of time, though it may be argued that parties have agreed to such an extension by virtue of having agreed to the application of particular institutional rules. Under the previous regime, the CPC allowed the parties to agree to extensions of time whether expressly or by implication.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In our view, Article 41(6) is a very positive introduction, which provides that awards can be signed outside the seat of arbitration and can also be signed electronically. The issuance of the final award shall be deemed to mark the end of the arbitral proceedings. According to Article 44, parties are to be notified of the award within 15 days from the date of issue of the award.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Law explicitly recognises that an arbitral tribunal may interpret an award by issuing an explanatory award pursuant to Article 49. A party may request the tribunal to interpret any obscurity or ambiguity in its award within 30 days of receipt of the award, unless the parties have agreed to different procedures or time limits. The tribunal shall consider and issue its explanatory award within 30 days after the receipt of the request, which may extended by a further 15 days. Such an explanatory award is deemed to supplement the final arbitral award.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Enforcement of Arbitral Awards</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The New Arbitration Law clarifies the process for enforcing UAE arbitral awards with a fast-tracked and overhauled procedure. The New Arbitration Law provides that arbitral awards are binding on the parties, res judicata applies and that such awards shall be enforceable in the same manner as a judicial ruling provided ratification is obtained. If the enforcement of the award is sought in the UAE, a ratification of such an award by the court is required in order to proceed with the enforcement of such an award.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">A major development in the New Arbitration Law lies in the fact that enforcement proceedings shall now commence directly before the UAE federal or local Court of Appeal, not before the Court of First Instance as before. The form of the enforcement procedure has also been simplified. Instead of filing a case before the court, the award-creditor can seek the ratification and enforcement of an award through the filing of an application with the Chief Justice of the Court of Appeal. Pursuant to Article 55(2), the relevant authority will now have 60 days from the date of the application to order the ratification and enforcement of the award unless it finds grounds for annulment.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 57 provides for the possibility of filing a grievance against an order of the Court of Appeal ratifying an award and declaring it enforceable or order of the Court of Appeal denying enforcement. Such a grievance must be filed with the Court of Appeal within 30 days of the Court of Appeal’s notification of the order. We note that it would have been more appropriate for such a grievance to be filed before the Court of Cassation, as the higher appellate court, instead of the Court of Appeal.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In relation to foreign arbitral awards, we note that the Law lacks explicit provisions relating to the enforcement of such awards. It is our view that the CPC provisions, specifically Articles 235 to 238, remain applicable absent a convention or treaty entered into by the UAE dealing with the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. In the event of enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in the UAE sought on the basis of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 1958 (\"New York Convention\"), it is yet to be tested whether the new expedited enforcement provisions of the Law would apply to such enforcements given that Article III of the New York Convention provides that: \"(…) There shall not be imposed substantially more onerous conditions or higher fees or charges on the recognition or enforcement of arbitral awards to which this Convention applies than are imposed on the recognition or enforcement of domestic arbitral awards.\"</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Given the absence of any explicit provisions to the contrary within the Law, we are of the view that the new provisions of the Law should apply to enforcements of foreign arbitral awards under the New York Convention.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Award Challenge</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The grounds to challenge and set aside an award are limited and consistent with the spirit of Article 34 of the UNCITRAL Model Law. Article 53(1) of the New Arbitration Law provides for limited grounds for annulment, which include the lack of capacity of a party entering into the arbitration agreement, lack of authorisation to act on the matter or lack of notice. Unlike the UNCITRAL Model Law, the New Arbitration Law also provides that the issuance of a final award which does not apply the substantive law chosen by the parties or the arbitral tribunal’s failure to issue the award within the specified time-frame shall also constitute grounds for challenge. In addition, Article 53(2) provides that the court has the right to set aside the award on its own initiative, if the subject matter of the dispute is not arbitrable or if the award contravenes the public policy and morality of the UAE.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In an effort to preserve the arbitral proceedings, several articles purport to safeguard the sanctity of the arbitral proceedings.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">For example, pursuant to Article 50(1-2), a party may request the arbitral tribunal to correct any typographical or clerical errors in the award within 30 days of receipt of the award, unless the parties have agreed to different procedures or time limits. Such correction is to be made within 30 days after the tribunal issues the award or after receiving the request for correction by one of the parties, as the case may be. Such period may be extended by a further 15 days. The arbitral tribunal shall notify the parties after corrections are made within 15 days from the date of issue of correction. Also, Article 51(1-2) provides that a party may request the tribunal to issue an additional award if the party believes that the final award did not deal with some of the requests made. Such a request must be made within 30 days of receipt of the award. If such a request is justified, then the arbitral tribunal shall issue the additional award within 60 days after the receipt of the request and may extend by a further 30 days. In addition, pursuant to Article 54(6), the court may suspend the setting aside proceedings for a period of up to 60 days in order to give the arbitral tribunal an opportunity to take any action or make any amendment to the form of the award.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Whereas under the previous CPC regime, there was no specific deadline for the purpose of filing a set aside action, the New Arbitration Law, pursuant to Article 54(2) provides for a 30-day time limit from the date of receiving notice of the award for a party to commence annulment proceedings. This is a significant change to the previous regime, and we believe that this will contribute to the legal security of final awards. However, Article 54(1) provides that the decision to set aside is final and can only be appealed to the Court of Cassation. We note that there is no set time limit for the Court of Cassation to render its decision.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In line with the general spirit of the New Arbitration Law for more efficient proceedings, an action to set aside an arbitral award does not stay its enforcement. Nevertheless, the court may order a stay of enforcement if a party requests for a stay of enforcement. Such stay of enforcement is to be decided within 15 days after the date of the first scheduled hearing.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The UAE Federal Law No. 6 of 2018 on Arbitration undoubtedly constitutes a landmark development for arbitration in the UAE by providing a standalone arbitration law aligned with international best practices and standards. We consider that the overall preservation and respect of party autonomy and the focus on more streamlined and efficient proceedings will build the UAE’s reputation as a preferred seat for international arbitration in the region. We remain hopeful in the courts’ significant role in appropriately applying and preserving the spirit of the Law. The Executive Regulations, which are in the pipeline, will also undoubtedly clarify some of the issues raised in hope of a more rationalised and synchronised proceedings among the various players in UAE seated arbitrations.</p>\r\n<em>For further information, please contact <a href=\"https://www.tamimi.com/lawyer/essam-al-tamimi/\">Essam Al Tamimi</a> (e.tamimi@tamimi.com) or <a href=\"https://www.tamimi.com/lawyer/sara-aranjo/\">Sara Koleilat-Aranjo</a> (s.aranjo@tamimi.com).</em>');
INSERT INTO `tm_wsal_metadata` (`id`, `occurrence_id`, `name`, `value`) VALUES
(248384, 24246, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(248385, 24246, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(248386, 24246, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(248387, 24246, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(248388, 24247, 'PostID', '7934'),
(248389, 24247, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(248390, 24247, 'PostTitle', 'Commentary on the UAE’s New Arbitration Law'),
(248391, 24247, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(248392, 24247, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 17:19:49'),
(248393, 24247, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7934'),
(248394, 24247, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7934&amp;action=edit'),
(248395, 24247, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(248396, 24247, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(248397, 24247, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(248398, 24247, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(248399, 24248, 'PostID', '7934'),
(248400, 24248, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(248401, 24248, 'PostTitle', 'Commentary on the UAE’s New Arbitration Law'),
(248402, 24248, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(248403, 24248, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 17:19:47'),
(248404, 24248, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7934'),
(248405, 24248, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7934&amp;action=edit'),
(248406, 24248, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(248407, 24248, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(248408, 24248, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(248409, 24248, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(248410, 24249, 'PostID', '7934'),
(248411, 24249, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(248412, 24249, 'PostTitle', 'Commentary on the UAE’s New Arbitration Law'),
(248413, 24249, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(248414, 24249, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 17:20:04'),
(248415, 24249, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7934'),
(248416, 24249, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7934&amp;action=edit'),
(248417, 24249, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(248418, 24249, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(248419, 24249, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(248420, 24249, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(248421, 24250, 'PostID', '7934'),
(248422, 24250, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(248423, 24250, 'PostTitle', 'Commentary on the UAE’s New Arbitration Law'),
(248424, 24250, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(248425, 24250, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 17:20:16'),
(248426, 24250, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7934'),
(248427, 24250, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7934&amp;action=edit'),
(248428, 24250, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(248429, 24250, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(248430, 24250, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(248431, 24250, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(248432, 24251, 'PostID', '7934'),
(248433, 24251, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(248434, 24251, 'PostTitle', 'Commentary on the UAE’s New Arbitration Law'),
(248435, 24251, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(248436, 24251, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 17:19:47'),
(248437, 24251, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7934'),
(248438, 24251, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7934&amp;action=edit'),
(248439, 24251, 'ClientIP', '86.98.5.18'),
(248440, 24251, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(248441, 24251, 'CurrentUserID', '8'),
(248442, 24251, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(248443, 24252, 'PostID', '7934'),
(248444, 24252, 'PostTitle', 'Commentary on the UAE’s New Arbitration Law'),
(248445, 24252, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(248446, 24252, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(248447, 24252, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 17:20:45'),
(248448, 24252, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7934'),
(248449, 24252, 'MetaID', '223002'),
(248450, 24252, 'MetaKey', 'content'),
(248451, 24252, 'MetaValueNew', '<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><img class=\"alignleft wp-image-7990 size-full\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_555491044.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"3868\" height=\"1481\" /></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The long-awaited Federal arbitration law of the UAE – Federal Law No. 6 of 2018 on Arbitration (\"New Arbitration Law\" or the \"Law\") – was published in the Federal Official Gazette no. 630 of 15 May 2018 and came into effect last June. This standalone piece of legislation repeals the previous outdated and non-comprehensive UAE Chapter on Arbitration contained in articles 203 to 218 of the UAE Civil Procedures Law No. 11 of 1992 (\"CPC\").</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The New Arbitration Law was long overdue, as the sporadic articles of the CPC did not provide much needed detail and clarity on some of the major points arising out of, or in connection with, arbitral proceedings. Furthermore, the provisions did not conform to the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration as adopted by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law of 1985 and amended in 2006 (\"UNCITRAL Model Law\").</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The New Arbitration Law provides for a more secure framework for the conduct of arbitral proceedings in the UAE. The six sections of the New Arbitration Law contain 61 articles, most of which can be traced in the UNCITRAL Model Law, and are expected to significantly revamp the UAE chapter on arbitration.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In this article, we intend to provide an overview of the key highlights of the New Arbitration Law with a focus on its practical effects.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Scope of Application</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">We note the extensive scope of application of the New Arbitration Law, both in terms of substance and time. Firstly, pursuant to Article 2, the New Arbitration Law shall apply to (i) arbitrations seated in the UAE unless the parties agree on the application of a different arbitration law, provided that such a law does not contravene UAE public policy and morality; (ii) commercial arbitrations taking place outside of the UAE where the parties have agreed to submit the arbitration to the provisions of the New Arbitration Law; and (iii) arbitrations arising out of a legal dispute, whether contractual or non-contractual, governed by the laws of the UAE, unless an exception applies. Accordingly, the New Arbitration Law shall generally apply unless the parties have agreed to apply another arbitration law, provided that other law is not in conflict with the public policy and morality of the UAE.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Furthermore, we welcome the application of the New Arbitration Law to both domestic and international arbitral proceedings. Contrary to the CPC, which did not contain any reference to international arbitration, Article 3 of the New Arbitration Law introduced the character of international arbitration, which adopts an extraterritorial approach. As such, and under certain circumstances, an arbitration is deemed international even if it is conducted within the UAE.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">We also note the absence of an express exclusion regarding the application of the New Arbitration Law to arbitrations seated in either the Dubai International Financial Centre or the Abu Dhabi Global Market. However, pursuant to Article 3(2) of Federal Law No. 8 of 2004 Regarding the Financial Free Zones, we conclude that the New Arbitration Law will not govern arbitrations seated in these two free zones, which will continue to be governed by the relevant free zone’s arbitration laws and regulations.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In relation to the timing of the introduction of the New Arbitration Law, it came into effect \"one month from the day following its publication in the Official Gazette\". It is therefore our view that the New Arbitration Law came into effect on 15 June 2018. It is interesting to note that contrary to recently enacted arbitration laws in the region, the New Arbitration Law will apply retrospectively. Specifically, Article 59 provides that the New Arbitration Law will apply to all ongoing arbitral proceedings at the time of its coming into effect, including arbitrations arising out of existing arbitration agreements. Such a retrospective application is without any prejudice to all proceedings having taken place prior to the entry into force of the New Arbitration Law.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>The Competent Court</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">One of the major procedural highlights of the New Arbitration Law is the designation of the Competent Court, which has been defined as the \"Federal or local Court of Appeal agreed upon by the parties or in whose jurisdiction the arbitration is conducted.\" We hope that going forward, and in line with other major global arbitration hubs, that a dedicated circuit will hear arbitration matters, with specialised and arbitration-focused members of the judiciary to further support and safeguard the arbitral process.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>The Arbitration Agreement</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 7 confirms the writing requirement for the validity of arbitration agreements. Noteworthy additions to the New Arbitration Law include the expansive interpretation of the writing requirement. As such, an arbitration agreement can be concluded by an exchange of correspondence, including e-mails. Furthermore, the writing requirement is satisfied through the reference in a written contract to an arbitration agreement contained in another document, model contract or international agreement. In Article 5, the Law expressly provides for the notion of arbitration agreements incorporated by reference. Also, an oral agreement to arbitrate during court proceedings is deemed valid if it is recorded in a judgment or if the other party asserts the existence of an arbitration party and the other party does not raise any objection.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Despite the softening of the writing requirement, the New Arbitration Law reconfirms, through Article 4(1), the requirement for arbitration agreements to be signed by persons with authority to do so. Therefore, we draw the attention of parties wishing to enter into an arbitration agreement to the requisite capacity requirements provided for under the relevant laws of the UAE, which remain unaffected by the introduction of the New Arbitration Law. For a UAE incorporated limited liability company, it is recommended that the company’s constituting documents are reviewed prior to the execution of an arbitration agreement in order to verify that authority to enter into arbitration agreements, granted by default to the company’s manager, has not been explicitly withdrawn. Article 4(4) explicitly provides that the ex-post lack of capacity of a party entering into an arbitration agreement, which occurs for example as a result of the death of an individual or the expiry of the entity’s term (as prescribed in its constitutional documents) after it has entered into an arbitration agreement, shall not cause the termination of such an arbitration agreement. It is however interesting to note that the Law seemingly intended for such a provision to be non-mandatory as parties may still otherwise agree. Furthermore, Article 4(2) reiterates that there shall not be an agreement to arbitrate matters which are non-conciliatory.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In relation to the validity of arbitration agreements, Article 6, in line with the UNCITRAL Model Law, confirms the separability principle of arbitration agreements. When parties’ agreement to arbitrate is featured within the framework of their main contractual relationship, the New Arbitration Law affirms the independence of the arbitration agreement from the other terms of the main contract in which it is contained. Arbitration agreements are not affected by the nullity, rescission or termination of the main contract, save for grounds arising out of a defective capacity.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Finally, Article 8 provides that the court shall dismiss any action that falls within the scope of an arbitration agreement, provided that the existence of the arbitration agreement is brought to the court’s attention before making any substantive claims or defences on the merits, unless the court decides that the arbitration agreement is invalid or impossible to perform. The filing of such an action does not preclude the commencement or continuance of arbitral proceedings or the issuance of the arbitral award.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong><img class=\"alignleft wp-image-7992 size-full\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_756750676.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"4243\" height=\"1636\" />Set and Stringent Time Limits</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In an effort to promote efficiency and prevent unnecessary prejudicial delays, the legislative draftsman of the New Arbitration Law have aimed to fit the arbitral proceedings within a clear set of, often stringent, time limits.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">For example, in the event of alleged non-compliance with the arbitration agreement or the Law, Article 25 provides that if a party does not object within the time limit agreed upon, or within seven days of becoming aware of the alleged non-compliance, that party is deemed to have waived its right to rely on this non-compliance subsequently. It is questionable whether the default seven-day period is reasonable from a practical perspective. However, such a waiver to challenge constitutes an important pro-arbitration provision, which shall have the effect of estopping a party from attempting to halt the conduct of the proceedings if it does not assert any objection in a prompt manner. With that said, we note that a party’s right to challenge an award, based on a defective arbitration agreement, or lack thereof, would still be preserved pursuant to Article 53. It is yet to be tested how the courts will interpret and eventually apply Articles 25 and 53.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In relation to the appointment and challenge of arbitrators, the New Arbitration Law has set a reasonable 15-day period. Specifically, pursuant to Article 11(2-3), the parties have a 15-day time limit to agree to the appointment of an arbitrator, from the date of receipt of a request to do so. Under Article 15(1-2), a 15-day time limit has been set for a party to challenge an arbitrator after becoming aware of the arbitrator appointment or after becoming aware of any circumstances justifying the challenge. Such a challenge shall be in a written application addressed to the challenged arbitrator, with a copy of the same addressed to the other members of the tribunal, if any, as well as the other parties. In the event that the arbitrator does not withdraw or the other party does not agree to the removal of the arbitrator, the party making the challenge may present it to the concerned body within 15-days after the lapse of the initial 15-day period.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">We note the express acknowledgment of the compétence-compétence principle in Article 19(2) under which the arbitral tribunal has the jurisdiction to rule on its own jurisdiction. Notwithstanding, a party still has the right to challenge a tribunal’s preliminary decision of jurisdiction before the courts within 15 days of the preliminary decision being notified. The Court then has then 30 days to render its decision. While the request is pending, the arbitral proceedings may continue at the request of a party. We note that this possibility to petition the court on the basis of a procedural order and not an award, is uncustomary in the UAE and may lead, at least in the beginning, to uncertainty.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Arbitrator Requirements</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The New Arbitration Law brings clarity on the requisite requirements for arbitrators. Article 10(1) specifies that an arbitrator must not be a minor, or be judicially declared as incapacitated, or one without civil rights for the reasons of bankruptcy (unless discharged), or conviction for a crime (even if she or he has been rehabilitated).</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Furthermore, Article 10(2) provides that an arbitrator cannot be a member of the Board of Trustees or of the administrative body of the arbitral institution administering the arbitration in which that person is asked to sit. We highlight the expansive application of this provision to arbitrations administered by both domestic arbitration centres, such as the Dubai International Arbitration Centre and the DIFC-LCIA Arbitration Centre, as well as international arbitration centres, such as the International Chamber of Commerce’s International Court of Arbitration, the London Court of International Arbitration and the Singapore International Arbitration Centre. The triggering event prompting the application of Article 10(2) is therefore the UAE seat of such arbitral proceedings. It is regrettable that the Law did not draw a distinction between party-appointed arbitrators, on one hand, and centre-appointed arbitrators, on the other, as we would be of the view that party-appointed arbitrators, even if members of the Board of Trustees or administrative body of an arbitral institution, should not be affected by this provision. Given the retrospective application of the New Arbitration Law to ongoing arbitrations, we note that the entry into force of the Law will most likely cause certain concerned arbitrators to resign.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">We also note that the Ministry of Justice or the Chairman of the competent judicial authority are to compile a list of arbitrators to be appointed in the event of a failure to agree upon the appointment of an arbitrator. As the list has not yet been published, we remain hopeful that the selection process of the prospective arbitrators would follow the international best practices in terms of both procedural knowledge and industry-specific expertise.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Finally, pursuant to Article 58, the Ministry of Economy is to issue a charter on the professional conduct of arbitrators in consultation with the arbitration institutions in the UAE. While the issuance of such a charter is likely to instil confidence within the parties to arbitration in the UAE, we are of the view that the effect of such a charter will remain for guidance purposes only. It is notable that the Law does not address the issues relating to the liability of arbitrators. In our view, it would have been desirable that for the Law to have included a provision confirming the civil immunity of arbitrators.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Arbitral Proceedings</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Commencement</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">According to Article 27(1), arbitral proceedings are deemed to have commenced from the following day after which the arbitral tribunal has been constituted, unless the parties agree otherwise. With that said, in relation to the procedural requirement for a substantive claim to confirm and sustain precautionary attachments, Article 27(2) provides that the arbitral proceedings are deemed to have commenced on the date of the notification of the request for arbitration. Even though the relationship between arbitral and court proceedings relating to arbitration is yet to be tested under the New Arbitration Law, the advancement of the date of commencement of the arbitral proceedings for the purpose of precautionary attachments is a positive provision.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>The Language of the Arbitration</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Under the New Arbitration Law, the default language of the arbitral proceedings, absent an agreement between the parties, will be Arabic. We therefore draw the attention of foreign parties in particular to the need to agree on a different language for the arbitration should they wish to avoid arbitral proceedings in Arabic, either explicitly, through for example their arbitration agreement, or implicitly, by agreeing to the application of institutional rules.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Acknowledgment of Modern Means of Communication</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The emphasis on the use and role of technology in the New Arbitration Law can be attributed to the desire for more efficient proceedings. There are indeed several references to the use of \"modern means of communication\" in the Law. For example, written correspondence can now be deemed to have been delivered if sent, amongst other means, by email. Article 28(2) provides that arbitral hearings and deliberations can be conducted by modern means of communication and electronic technology. In addition, Article 33(3) provides that hearing may be held through modern means of communication without the physical presence of the parties at the hearing. Pursuant to Article 35, the arbitral tribunal may question witnesses, including expert witnesses, through modern means of communication without their physical presence at the hearing. The emphasis on the use of technology will undoubtedly modernise arbitral proceedings in the UAE and help instil global confidence in such proceedings.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Confidentiality</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Contrary to common belief, arbitral proceedings are not confidential by default. The New Arbitration Law addresses the issue of confidentiality by stating, under Article 33(1), that hearings shall be confidential unless parties have otherwise agreed. The confidentiality of arbitral awards is implicitly recognised pursuant to Article 44. However, the Law does not explicitly provide for the confidentiality of documents, pleadings, evidence or submissions produced by the parties and the tribunal during the proceedings. We recommend that parties address the confidentiality of their arbitral proceedings either through an explicit agreement, or implicitly, through an agreement to apply institutional rules providing for the hoped for confidentiality obligations.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Conduct</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">It is clear that the New Arbitration Law attempts to instil discipline and efficiency in the conduct of the arbitral proceedings. As noted above, arbitral hearings can be held at any place, and the Law allows arbitral hearings and deliberations to be conducted by modern means of communication and electronic technology. Article 30(1-2) provides, absent an agreement between the parties, for a 14-day period from the date of the composition of the arbitral tribunal for the claimant to communicate the statement of claim in writing to the respondent and to the arbitrators. After receiving the statement of claim, the respondent has a further 14-day period to communicate its statement of defence. The practical difficulties associated with these relatively contracted time limits will most likely prompt parties to agree on different deadlines.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">It is worth noting that the New Arbitration Law attempts to put an end to disruptive guerrilla tactics through repetitive challenges of an arbitrator by providing under Article 15(3) that the challenge of an arbitrator does not suspend the arbitral proceedings.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Pursuant to Article 43 of the New Arbitration Law, the arbitral tribunal can decide to continue the arbitral proceedings (i) where there are issues that fall outside the scope of its jurisdiction; (ii) if a document submitted to it is challenged for forgery; or (iii) if criminal proceedings in respect of that document or for any other criminal act which has been instituted. This is a significant improvement as previously, according to the CPC, the tribunal was required to suspend its proceedings under such circumstances.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Law provides much needed clarity on the issue of the representation of the parties by non-UAE lawyers. Specifically, Article 33(5) provides that parties may seek the assistance of representatives for their representation in the arbitral proceedings and these representatives may or may not be lawyers. The non-restriction on the appearance of foreign counsel in UAE-seated arbitrations is welcome after the issuance of the 2017 Executive Regulations to the Federal Law No. 23 of 1991 on the Legal Professional, which was interpreted by some to restrict the appearance of non –UAE counsel in arbitral proceedings seated in the UAE.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Law also provides wide latitude to the parties and the arbitral tribunal to decide upon the conduct of the arbitral proceedings.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Interim and Conservatory Measures</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Interim and conservatory measures constitute crucial tools in arbitral proceedings. The CPC did not grant powers to the tribunal to order such measures, which were within the exclusive powers of the courts. In the event that parties agree to grant such powers to the tribunal, either explicitly or implicitly through the application of institutional rules, the enforcement of tribunal-ordered interim and conservatory measures was an impossible task in the UAE before the enactment of the New Arbitration Law.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">One of the much anticipated provisions of the New Arbitration Law is Article 21. Through this article, and unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the New Arbitration Law explicitly recognises the arbitral tribunal’s power to award interim or conservatory measures, either on the request of a party or of its own motion, including ordering a party to provide adequate security to cover the costs of such measures. Pursuant to Article 21(4), a party for whom an interim measure has been ordered in its favour may, with written permission from the tribunal, request the competent court to enforce the order of the tribunal within 15 days of receipt of the request.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Notwithstanding the arbitral tribunal’s newly attributed powers to order such interim and conservatory measures, the court also remains competent to grant interim and conservatory measures based on an application by the tribunal or one of the parties in relation to forthcoming or ongoing arbitral proceedings. As per Article 18(3), the arbitral proceedings shall continue notwithstanding any application for interim or conservatory measures relating to an ongoing arbitration and such an application to the court shall not constitute a waiver to the arbitration agreement.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">While the receptivity and approach of the courts in relation to these provisions are yet to be tested, we highly welcome these efforts to safeguard more efficient and equitable arbitral proceedings.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>The Award</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In relation to the issuance of the award, Article 42(1) provides that, unless agreed otherwise, an award must be issued within 6 months from the date of the first hearing of the arbitration. Contrary to the previous CPC regime, such a date can now be extended for an additional 6 months, unless the parties agree to a longer extension, either explicitly or implicitly through the application of institutional rules. Article 42(2) provides that absent such an agreement, further extension of time can only be made by the courts upon petition by the parties or the tribunal itself. It is important to bear in mind in this regard that the failure to meet this time limit is a ground for challenging an award pursuant to Article 53(1)(g) of the New Arbitration Law as discussed further below.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The time limits set forth in Article 42 lack any mechanism for arbitral institutions to grant an extension of time, though it may be argued that parties have agreed to such an extension by virtue of having agreed to the application of particular institutional rules. Under the previous regime, the CPC allowed the parties to agree to extensions of time whether expressly or by implication.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In our view, Article 41(6) is a very positive introduction, which provides that awards can be signed outside the seat of arbitration and can also be signed electronically. The issuance of the final award shall be deemed to mark the end of the arbitral proceedings. According to Article 44, parties are to be notified of the award within 15 days from the date of issue of the award.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Law explicitly recognises that an arbitral tribunal may interpret an award by issuing an explanatory award pursuant to Article 49. A party may request the tribunal to interpret any obscurity or ambiguity in its award within 30 days of receipt of the award, unless the parties have agreed to different procedures or time limits. The tribunal shall consider and issue its explanatory award within 30 days after the receipt of the request, which may extended by a further 15 days. Such an explanatory award is deemed to supplement the final arbitral award.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Enforcement of Arbitral Awards</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The New Arbitration Law clarifies the process for enforcing UAE arbitral awards with a fast-tracked and overhauled procedure. The New Arbitration Law provides that arbitral awards are binding on the parties, res judicata applies and that such awards shall be enforceable in the same manner as a judicial ruling provided ratification is obtained. If the enforcement of the award is sought in the UAE, a ratification of such an award by the court is required in order to proceed with the enforcement of such an award.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">A major development in the New Arbitration Law lies in the fact that enforcement proceedings shall now commence directly before the UAE federal or local Court of Appeal, not before the Court of First Instance as before. The form of the enforcement procedure has also been simplified. Instead of filing a case before the court, the award-creditor can seek the ratification and enforcement of an award through the filing of an application with the Chief Justice of the Court of Appeal. Pursuant to Article 55(2), the relevant authority will now have 60 days from the date of the application to order the ratification and enforcement of the award unless it finds grounds for annulment.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 57 provides for the possibility of filing a grievance against an order of the Court of Appeal ratifying an award and declaring it enforceable or order of the Court of Appeal denying enforcement. Such a grievance must be filed with the Court of Appeal within 30 days of the Court of Appeal’s notification of the order. We note that it would have been more appropriate for such a grievance to be filed before the Court of Cassation, as the higher appellate court, instead of the Court of Appeal.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In relation to foreign arbitral awards, we note that the Law lacks explicit provisions relating to the enforcement of such awards. It is our view that the CPC provisions, specifically Articles 235 to 238, remain applicable absent a convention or treaty entered into by the UAE dealing with the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. In the event of enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in the UAE sought on the basis of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 1958 (\"New York Convention\"), it is yet to be tested whether the new expedited enforcement provisions of the Law would apply to such enforcements given that Article III of the New York Convention provides that: \"(…) There shall not be imposed substantially more onerous conditions or higher fees or charges on the recognition or enforcement of arbitral awards to which this Convention applies than are imposed on the recognition or enforcement of domestic arbitral awards.\"</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Given the absence of any explicit provisions to the contrary within the Law, we are of the view that the new provisions of the Law should apply to enforcements of foreign arbitral awards under the New York Convention.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Award Challenge</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The grounds to challenge and set aside an award are limited and consistent with the spirit of Article 34 of the UNCITRAL Model Law. Article 53(1) of the New Arbitration Law provides for limited grounds for annulment, which include the lack of capacity of a party entering into the arbitration agreement, lack of authorisation to act on the matter or lack of notice. Unlike the UNCITRAL Model Law, the New Arbitration Law also provides that the issuance of a final award which does not apply the substantive law chosen by the parties or the arbitral tribunal’s failure to issue the award within the specified time-frame shall also constitute grounds for challenge. In addition, Article 53(2) provides that the court has the right to set aside the award on its own initiative, if the subject matter of the dispute is not arbitrable or if the award contravenes the public policy and morality of the UAE.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In an effort to preserve the arbitral proceedings, several articles purport to safeguard the sanctity of the arbitral proceedings.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">For example, pursuant to Article 50(1-2), a party may request the arbitral tribunal to correct any typographical or clerical errors in the award within 30 days of receipt of the award, unless the parties have agreed to different procedures or time limits. Such correction is to be made within 30 days after the tribunal issues the award or after receiving the request for correction by one of the parties, as the case may be. Such period may be extended by a further 15 days. The arbitral tribunal shall notify the parties after corrections are made within 15 days from the date of issue of correction. Also, Article 51(1-2) provides that a party may request the tribunal to issue an additional award if the party believes that the final award did not deal with some of the requests made. Such a request must be made within 30 days of receipt of the award. If such a request is justified, then the arbitral tribunal shall issue the additional award within 60 days after the receipt of the request and may extend by a further 30 days. In addition, pursuant to Article 54(6), the court may suspend the setting aside proceedings for a period of up to 60 days in order to give the arbitral tribunal an opportunity to take any action or make any amendment to the form of the award.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Whereas under the previous CPC regime, there was no specific deadline for the purpose of filing a set aside action, the New Arbitration Law, pursuant to Article 54(2) provides for a 30-day time limit from the date of receiving notice of the award for a party to commence annulment proceedings. This is a significant change to the previous regime, and we believe that this will contribute to the legal security of final awards. However, Article 54(1) provides that the decision to set aside is final and can only be appealed to the Court of Cassation. We note that there is no set time limit for the Court of Cassation to render its decision.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In line with the general spirit of the New Arbitration Law for more efficient proceedings, an action to set aside an arbitral award does not stay its enforcement. Nevertheless, the court may order a stay of enforcement if a party requests for a stay of enforcement. Such stay of enforcement is to be decided within 15 days after the date of the first scheduled hearing.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The UAE Federal Law No. 6 of 2018 on Arbitration undoubtedly constitutes a landmark development for arbitration in the UAE by providing a standalone arbitration law aligned with international best practices and standards. We consider that the overall preservation and respect of party autonomy and the focus on more streamlined and efficient proceedings will build the UAE’s reputation as a preferred seat for international arbitration in the region. We remain hopeful in the courts’ significant role in appropriately applying and preserving the spirit of the Law. The Executive Regulations, which are in the pipeline, will also undoubtedly clarify some of the issues raised in hope of a more rationalised and synchronised proceedings among the various players in UAE seated arbitrations.</p>\r\n<em>For further information, please contact <a href=\"https://www.tamimi.com/lawyer/essam-al-tamimi/\">Essam Al Tamimi</a> (e.tamimi@tamimi.com) or <a href=\"https://www.tamimi.com/lawyer/sara-aranjo/\">Sara Koleilat-Aranjo</a> (s.aranjo@tamimi.com).</em>');
INSERT INTO `tm_wsal_metadata` (`id`, `occurrence_id`, `name`, `value`) VALUES
(248452, 24252, 'MetaValueOld', '<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><img class=\"alignleft wp-image-7990 size-full\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_555491044.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"3868\" height=\"1481\" /></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The long-awaited Federal arbitration law of the UAE – Federal Law No. 6 of 2018 on Arbitration (\"New Arbitration Law\" or the \"Law\") – was published in the Federal Official Gazette no. 630 of 15 May 2018 and came into effect last June. This standalone piece of legislation repeals the previous outdated and non-comprehensive UAE Chapter on Arbitration contained in articles 203 to 218 of the UAE Civil Procedures Law No. 11 of 1992 (\"CPC\").</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The New Arbitration Law was long overdue, as the sporadic articles of the CPC did not provide much needed detail and clarity on some of the major points arising out of, or in connection with, arbitral proceedings. Furthermore, the provisions did not conform to the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration as adopted by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law of 1985 and amended in 2006 (\"UNCITRAL Model Law\").</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The New Arbitration Law provides for a more secure framework for the conduct of arbitral proceedings in the UAE. The six sections of the New Arbitration Law contain 61 articles, most of which can be traced in the UNCITRAL Model Law, and are expected to significantly revamp the UAE chapter on arbitration.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In this article, we intend to provide an overview of the key highlights of the New Arbitration Law with a focus on its practical effects.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Scope of Application</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">We note the extensive scope of application of the New Arbitration Law, both in terms of substance and time. Firstly, pursuant to Article 2, the New Arbitration Law shall apply to (i) arbitrations seated in the UAE unless the parties agree on the application of a different arbitration law, provided that such a law does not contravene UAE public policy and morality; (ii) commercial arbitrations taking place outside of the UAE where the parties have agreed to submit the arbitration to the provisions of the New Arbitration Law; and (iii) arbitrations arising out of a legal dispute, whether contractual or non-contractual, governed by the laws of the UAE, unless an exception applies. Accordingly, the New Arbitration Law shall generally apply unless the parties have agreed to apply another arbitration law, provided that other law is not in conflict with the public policy and morality of the UAE.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Furthermore, we welcome the application of the New Arbitration Law to both domestic and international arbitral proceedings. Contrary to the CPC, which did not contain any reference to international arbitration, Article 3 of the New Arbitration Law introduced the character of international arbitration, which adopts an extraterritorial approach. As such, and under certain circumstances, an arbitration is deemed international even if it is conducted within the UAE.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">We also note the absence of an express exclusion regarding the application of the New Arbitration Law to arbitrations seated in either the Dubai International Financial Centre or the Abu Dhabi Global Market. However, pursuant to Article 3(2) of Federal Law No. 8 of 2004 Regarding the Financial Free Zones, we conclude that the New Arbitration Law will not govern arbitrations seated in these two free zones, which will continue to be governed by the relevant free zone’s arbitration laws and regulations.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In relation to the timing of the introduction of the New Arbitration Law, it came into effect \"one month from the day following its publication in the Official Gazette\". It is therefore our view that the New Arbitration Law came into effect on 15 June 2018. It is interesting to note that contrary to recently enacted arbitration laws in the region, the New Arbitration Law will apply retrospectively. Specifically, Article 59 provides that the New Arbitration Law will apply to all ongoing arbitral proceedings at the time of its coming into effect, including arbitrations arising out of existing arbitration agreements. Such a retrospective application is without any prejudice to all proceedings having taken place prior to the entry into force of the New Arbitration Law.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>The Competent Court</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">One of the major procedural highlights of the New Arbitration Law is the designation of the Competent Court, which has been defined as the \"Federal or local Court of Appeal agreed upon by the parties or in whose jurisdiction the arbitration is conducted.\" We hope that going forward, and in line with other major global arbitration hubs, that a dedicated circuit will hear arbitration matters, with specialised and arbitration-focused members of the judiciary to further support and safeguard the arbitral process.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>The Arbitration Agreement</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 7 confirms the writing requirement for the validity of arbitration agreements. Noteworthy additions to the New Arbitration Law include the expansive interpretation of the writing requirement. As such, an arbitration agreement can be concluded by an exchange of correspondence, including e-mails. Furthermore, the writing requirement is satisfied through the reference in a written contract to an arbitration agreement contained in another document, model contract or international agreement. In Article 5, the Law expressly provides for the notion of arbitration agreements incorporated by reference. Also, an oral agreement to arbitrate during court proceedings is deemed valid if it is recorded in a judgment or if the other party asserts the existence of an arbitration party and the other party does not raise any objection.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Despite the softening of the writing requirement, the New Arbitration Law reconfirms, through Article 4(1), the requirement for arbitration agreements to be signed by persons with authority to do so. Therefore, we draw the attention of parties wishing to enter into an arbitration agreement to the requisite capacity requirements provided for under the relevant laws of the UAE, which remain unaffected by the introduction of the New Arbitration Law. For a UAE incorporated limited liability company, it is recommended that the company’s constituting documents are reviewed prior to the execution of an arbitration agreement in order to verify that authority to enter into arbitration agreements, granted by default to the company’s manager, has not been explicitly withdrawn. Article 4(4) explicitly provides that the ex-post lack of capacity of a party entering into an arbitration agreement, which occurs for example as a result of the death of an individual or the expiry of the entity’s term (as prescribed in its constitutional documents) after it has entered into an arbitration agreement, shall not cause the termination of such an arbitration agreement. It is however interesting to note that the Law seemingly intended for such a provision to be non-mandatory as parties may still otherwise agree. Furthermore, Article 4(2) reiterates that there shall not be an agreement to arbitrate matters which are non-conciliatory.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In relation to the validity of arbitration agreements, Article 6, in line with the UNCITRAL Model Law, confirms the separability principle of arbitration agreements. When parties’ agreement to arbitrate is featured within the framework of their main contractual relationship, the New Arbitration Law affirms the independence of the arbitration agreement from the other terms of the main contract in which it is contained. Arbitration agreements are not affected by the nullity, rescission or termination of the main contract, save for grounds arising out of a defective capacity.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Finally, Article 8 provides that the court shall dismiss any action that falls within the scope of an arbitration agreement, provided that the existence of the arbitration agreement is brought to the court’s attention before making any substantive claims or defences on the merits, unless the court decides that the arbitration agreement is invalid or impossible to perform. The filing of such an action does not preclude the commencement or continuance of arbitral proceedings or the issuance of the arbitral award.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong><img class=\"alignleft wp-image-7992 size-full\" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_756750676.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"4243\" height=\"1636\" />Set and Stringent Time Limits</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In an effort to promote efficiency and prevent unnecessary prejudicial delays, the legislative draftsman of the New Arbitration Law have aimed to fit the arbitral proceedings within a clear set of, often stringent, time limits.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">For example, in the event of alleged non-compliance with the arbitration agreement or the Law, Article 25 provides that if a party does not object within the time limit agreed upon, or within seven days of becoming aware of the alleged non-compliance, that party is deemed to have waived its right to rely on this non-compliance subsequently. It is questionable whether the default seven-day period is reasonable from a practical perspective. However, such a waiver to challenge constitutes an important pro-arbitration provision, which shall have the effect of estopping a party from attempting to halt the conduct of the proceedings if it does not assert any objection in a prompt manner. With that said, we note that a party’s right to challenge an award, based on a defective arbitration agreement, or lack thereof, would still be preserved pursuant to Article 53. It is yet to be tested how the courts will interpret and eventually apply Articles 25 and 53.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In relation to the appointment and challenge of arbitrators, the New Arbitration Law has set a reasonable 15-day period. Specifically, pursuant to Article 11(2-3), the parties have a 15-day time limit to agree to the appointment of an arbitrator, from the date of receipt of a request to do so. Under Article 15(1-2), a 15-day time limit has been set for a party to challenge an arbitrator after becoming aware of the arbitrator appointment or after becoming aware of any circumstances justifying the challenge. Such a challenge shall be in a written application addressed to the challenged arbitrator, with a copy of the same addressed to the other members of the tribunal, if any, as well as the other parties. In the event that the arbitrator does not withdraw or the other party does not agree to the removal of the arbitrator, the party making the challenge may present it to the concerned body within 15-days after the lapse of the initial 15-day period.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">We note the express acknowledgment of the compétence-compétence principle in Article 19(2) under which the arbitral tribunal has the jurisdiction to rule on its own jurisdiction. Notwithstanding, a party still has the right to challenge a tribunal’s preliminary decision of jurisdiction before the courts within 15 days of the preliminary decision being notified. The Court then has then 30 days to render its decision. While the request is pending, the arbitral proceedings may continue at the request of a party. We note that this possibility to petition the court on the basis of a procedural order and not an award, is uncustomary in the UAE and may lead, at least in the beginning, to uncertainty.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Arbitrator Requirements</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The New Arbitration Law brings clarity on the requisite requirements for arbitrators. Article 10(1) specifies that an arbitrator must not be a minor, or be judicially declared as incapacitated, or one without civil rights for the reasons of bankruptcy (unless discharged), or conviction for a crime (even if she or he has been rehabilitated).</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Furthermore, Article 10(2) provides that an arbitrator cannot be a member of the Board of Trustees or of the administrative body of the arbitral institution administering the arbitration in which that person is asked to sit. We highlight the expansive application of this provision to arbitrations administered by both domestic arbitration centres, such as the Dubai International Arbitration Centre and the DIFC-LCIA Arbitration Centre, as well as international arbitration centres, such as the International Chamber of Commerce’s International Court of Arbitration, the London Court of International Arbitration and the Singapore International Arbitration Centre. The triggering event prompting the application of Article 10(2) is therefore the UAE seat of such arbitral proceedings. It is regrettable that the Law did not draw a distinction between party-appointed arbitrators, on one hand, and centre-appointed arbitrators, on the other, as we would be of the view that party-appointed arbitrators, even if members of the Board of Trustees or administrative body of an arbitral institution, should not be affected by this provision. Given the retrospective application of the New Arbitration Law to ongoing arbitrations, we note that the entry into force of the Law will most likely cause certain concerned arbitrators to resign.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">We also note that the Ministry of Justice or the Chairman of the competent judicial authority are to compile a list of arbitrators to be appointed in the event of a failure to agree upon the appointment of an arbitrator. As the list has not yet been published, we remain hopeful that the selection process of the prospective arbitrators would follow the international best practices in terms of both procedural knowledge and industry-specific expertise.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Finally, pursuant to Article 58, the Ministry of Economy is to issue a charter on the professional conduct of arbitrators in consultation with the arbitration institutions in the UAE. While the issuance of such a charter is likely to instil confidence within the parties to arbitration in the UAE, we are of the view that the effect of such a charter will remain for guidance purposes only. It is notable that the Law does not address the issues relating to the liability of arbitrators. In our view, it would have been desirable that for the Law to have included a provision confirming the civil immunity of arbitrators.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Arbitral Proceedings</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Commencement</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">According to Article 27(1), arbitral proceedings are deemed to have commenced from the following day after which the arbitral tribunal has been constituted, unless the parties agree otherwise. With that said, in relation to the procedural requirement for a substantive claim to confirm and sustain precautionary attachments, Article 27(2) provides that the arbitral proceedings are deemed to have commenced on the date of the notification of the request for arbitration. Even though the relationship between arbitral and court proceedings relating to arbitration is yet to be tested under the New Arbitration Law, the advancement of the date of commencement of the arbitral proceedings for the purpose of precautionary attachments is a positive provision.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>The Language of the Arbitration</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Under the New Arbitration Law, the default language of the arbitral proceedings, absent an agreement between the parties, will be Arabic. We therefore draw the attention of foreign parties in particular to the need to agree on a different language for the arbitration should they wish to avoid arbitral proceedings in Arabic, either explicitly, through for example their arbitration agreement, or implicitly, by agreeing to the application of institutional rules.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Acknowledgment of Modern Means of Communication</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The emphasis on the use and role of technology in the New Arbitration Law can be attributed to the desire for more efficient proceedings. There are indeed several references to the use of \"modern means of communication\" in the Law. For example, written correspondence can now be deemed to have been delivered if sent, amongst other means, by email. Article 28(2) provides that arbitral hearings and deliberations can be conducted by modern means of communication and electronic technology. In addition, Article 33(3) provides that hearing may be held through modern means of communication without the physical presence of the parties at the hearing. Pursuant to Article 35, the arbitral tribunal may question witnesses, including expert witnesses, through modern means of communication without their physical presence at the hearing. The emphasis on the use of technology will undoubtedly modernise arbitral proceedings in the UAE and help instil global confidence in such proceedings.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Confidentiality</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Contrary to common belief, arbitral proceedings are not confidential by default. The New Arbitration Law addresses the issue of confidentiality by stating, under Article 33(1), that hearings shall be confidential unless parties have otherwise agreed. The confidentiality of arbitral awards is implicitly recognised pursuant to Article 44. However, the Law does not explicitly provide for the confidentiality of documents, pleadings, evidence or submissions produced by the parties and the tribunal during the proceedings. We recommend that parties address the confidentiality of their arbitral proceedings either through an explicit agreement, or implicitly, through an agreement to apply institutional rules providing for the hoped for confidentiality obligations.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong><img class=\"alignright wp-image-7991 \" src=\"http://www.tamimi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/shutterstock_315538304-145x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"291\" height=\"602\" />Conduct</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">It is clear that the New Arbitration Law attempts to instil discipline and efficiency in the conduct of the arbitral proceedings. As noted above, arbitral hearings can be held at any place, and the Law allows arbitral hearings and deliberations to be conducted by modern means of communication and electronic technology. Article 30(1-2) provides, absent an agreement between the parties, for a 14-day period from the date of the composition of the arbitral tribunal for the claimant to communicate the statement of claim in writing to the respondent and to the arbitrators. After receiving the statement of claim, the respondent has a further 14-day period to communicate its statement of defence. The practical difficulties associated with these relatively contracted time limits will most likely prompt parties to agree on different deadlines.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">It is worth noting that the New Arbitration Law attempts to put an end to disruptive guerrilla tactics through repetitive challenges of an arbitrator by providing under Article 15(3) that the challenge of an arbitrator does not suspend the arbitral proceedings.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Pursuant to Article 43 of the New Arbitration Law, the arbitral tribunal can decide to continue the arbitral proceedings (i) where there are issues that fall outside the scope of its jurisdiction; (ii) if a document submitted to it is challenged for forgery; or (iii) if criminal proceedings in respect of that document or for any other criminal act which has been instituted. This is a significant improvement as previously, according to the CPC, the tribunal was required to suspend its proceedings under such circumstances.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Law provides much needed clarity on the issue of the representation of the parties by non-UAE lawyers. Specifically, Article 33(5) provides that parties may seek the assistance of representatives for their representation in the arbitral proceedings and these representatives may or may not be lawyers. The non-restriction on the appearance of foreign counsel in UAE-seated arbitrations is welcome after the issuance of the 2017 Executive Regulations to the Federal Law No. 23 of 1991 on the Legal Professional, which was interpreted by some to restrict the appearance of non –UAE counsel in arbitral proceedings seated in the UAE.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Law also provides wide latitude to the parties and the arbitral tribunal to decide upon the conduct of the arbitral proceedings.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Interim and Conservatory Measures</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Interim and conservatory measures constitute crucial tools in arbitral proceedings. The CPC did not grant powers to the tribunal to order such measures, which were within the exclusive powers of the courts. In the event that parties agree to grant such powers to the tribunal, either explicitly or implicitly through the application of institutional rules, the enforcement of tribunal-ordered interim and conservatory measures was an impossible task in the UAE before the enactment of the New Arbitration Law.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">One of the much anticipated provisions of the New Arbitration Law is Article 21. Through this article, and unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the New Arbitration Law explicitly recognises the arbitral tribunal’s power to award interim or conservatory measures, either on the request of a party or of its own motion, including ordering a party to provide adequate security to cover the costs of such measures. Pursuant to Article 21(4), a party for whom an interim measure has been ordered in its favour may, with written permission from the tribunal, request the competent court to enforce the order of the tribunal within 15 days of receipt of the request.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Notwithstanding the arbitral tribunal’s newly attributed powers to order such interim and conservatory measures, the court also remains competent to grant interim and conservatory measures based on an application by the tribunal or one of the parties in relation to forthcoming or ongoing arbitral proceedings. As per Article 18(3), the arbitral proceedings shall continue notwithstanding any application for interim or conservatory measures relating to an ongoing arbitration and such an application to the court shall not constitute a waiver to the arbitration agreement.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">While the receptivity and approach of the courts in relation to these provisions are yet to be tested, we highly welcome these efforts to safeguard more efficient and equitable arbitral proceedings.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>The Award</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In relation to the issuance of the award, Article 42(1) provides that, unless agreed otherwise, an award must be issued within 6 months from the date of the first hearing of the arbitration. Contrary to the previous CPC regime, such a date can now be extended for an additional 6 months, unless the parties agree to a longer extension, either explicitly or implicitly through the application of institutional rules. Article 42(2) provides that absent such an agreement, further extension of time can only be made by the courts upon petition by the parties or the tribunal itself. It is important to bear in mind in this regard that the failure to meet this time limit is a ground for challenging an award pursuant to Article 53(1)(g) of the New Arbitration Law as discussed further below.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The time limits set forth in Article 42 lack any mechanism for arbitral institutions to grant an extension of time, though it may be argued that parties have agreed to such an extension by virtue of having agreed to the application of particular institutional rules. Under the previous regime, the CPC allowed the parties to agree to extensions of time whether expressly or by implication.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In our view, Article 41(6) is a very positive introduction, which provides that awards can be signed outside the seat of arbitration and can also be signed electronically. The issuance of the final award shall be deemed to mark the end of the arbitral proceedings. According to Article 44, parties are to be notified of the award within 15 days from the date of issue of the award.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The Law explicitly recognises that an arbitral tribunal may interpret an award by issuing an explanatory award pursuant to Article 49. A party may request the tribunal to interpret any obscurity or ambiguity in its award within 30 days of receipt of the award, unless the parties have agreed to different procedures or time limits. The tribunal shall consider and issue its explanatory award within 30 days after the receipt of the request, which may extended by a further 15 days. Such an explanatory award is deemed to supplement the final arbitral award.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Enforcement of Arbitral Awards</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The New Arbitration Law clarifies the process for enforcing UAE arbitral awards with a fast-tracked and overhauled procedure. The New Arbitration Law provides that arbitral awards are binding on the parties, res judicata applies and that such awards shall be enforceable in the same manner as a judicial ruling provided ratification is obtained. If the enforcement of the award is sought in the UAE, a ratification of such an award by the court is required in order to proceed with the enforcement of such an award.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">A major development in the New Arbitration Law lies in the fact that enforcement proceedings shall now commence directly before the UAE federal or local Court of Appeal, not before the Court of First Instance as before. The form of the enforcement procedure has also been simplified. Instead of filing a case before the court, the award-creditor can seek the ratification and enforcement of an award through the filing of an application with the Chief Justice of the Court of Appeal. Pursuant to Article 55(2), the relevant authority will now have 60 days from the date of the application to order the ratification and enforcement of the award unless it finds grounds for annulment.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Article 57 provides for the possibility of filing a grievance against an order of the Court of Appeal ratifying an award and declaring it enforceable or order of the Court of Appeal denying enforcement. Such a grievance must be filed with the Court of Appeal within 30 days of the Court of Appeal’s notification of the order. We note that it would have been more appropriate for such a grievance to be filed before the Court of Cassation, as the higher appellate court, instead of the Court of Appeal.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In relation to foreign arbitral awards, we note that the Law lacks explicit provisions relating to the enforcement of such awards. It is our view that the CPC provisions, specifically Articles 235 to 238, remain applicable absent a convention or treaty entered into by the UAE dealing with the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. In the event of enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in the UAE sought on the basis of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 1958 (\"New York Convention\"), it is yet to be tested whether the new expedited enforcement provisions of the Law would apply to such enforcements given that Article III of the New York Convention provides that: \"(…) There shall not be imposed substantially more onerous conditions or higher fees or charges on the recognition or enforcement of arbitral awards to which this Convention applies than are imposed on the recognition or enforcement of domestic arbitral awards.\"</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Given the absence of any explicit provisions to the contrary within the Law, we are of the view that the new provisions of the Law should apply to enforcements of foreign arbitral awards under the New York Convention.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Award Challenge</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The grounds to challenge and set aside an award are limited and consistent with the spirit of Article 34 of the UNCITRAL Model Law. Article 53(1) of the New Arbitration Law provides for limited grounds for annulment, which include the lack of capacity of a party entering into the arbitration agreement, lack of authorisation to act on the matter or lack of notice. Unlike the UNCITRAL Model Law, the New Arbitration Law also provides that the issuance of a final award which does not apply the substantive law chosen by the parties or the arbitral tribunal’s failure to issue the award within the specified time-frame shall also constitute grounds for challenge. In addition, Article 53(2) provides that the court has the right to set aside the award on its own initiative, if the subject matter of the dispute is not arbitrable or if the award contravenes the public policy and morality of the UAE.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In an effort to preserve the arbitral proceedings, several articles purport to safeguard the sanctity of the arbitral proceedings.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">For example, pursuant to Article 50(1-2), a party may request the arbitral tribunal to correct any typographical or clerical errors in the award within 30 days of receipt of the award, unless the parties have agreed to different procedures or time limits. Such correction is to be made within 30 days after the tribunal issues the award or after receiving the request for correction by one of the parties, as the case may be. Such period may be extended by a further 15 days. The arbitral tribunal shall notify the parties after corrections are made within 15 days from the date of issue of correction. Also, Article 51(1-2) provides that a party may request the tribunal to issue an additional award if the party believes that the final award did not deal with some of the requests made. Such a request must be made within 30 days of receipt of the award. If such a request is justified, then the arbitral tribunal shall issue the additional award within 60 days after the receipt of the request and may extend by a further 30 days. In addition, pursuant to Article 54(6), the court may suspend the setting aside proceedings for a period of up to 60 days in order to give the arbitral tribunal an opportunity to take any action or make any amendment to the form of the award.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">Whereas under the previous CPC regime, there was no specific deadline for the purpose of filing a set aside action, the New Arbitration Law, pursuant to Article 54(2) provides for a 30-day time limit from the date of receiving notice of the award for a party to commence annulment proceedings. This is a significant change to the previous regime, and we believe that this will contribute to the legal security of final awards. However, Article 54(1) provides that the decision to set aside is final and can only be appealed to the Court of Cassation. We note that there is no set time limit for the Court of Cassation to render its decision.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">In line with the general spirit of the New Arbitration Law for more efficient proceedings, an action to set aside an arbitral award does not stay its enforcement. Nevertheless, the court may order a stay of enforcement if a party requests for a stay of enforcement. Such stay of enforcement is to be decided within 15 days after the date of the first scheduled hearing.</p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\"><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>\r\n<p dir=\"LTR\" align=\"LEFT\">The UAE Federal Law No. 6 of 2018 on Arbitration undoubtedly constitutes a landmark development for arbitration in the UAE by providing a standalone arbitration law aligned with international best practices and standards. We consider that the overall preservation and respect of party autonomy and the focus on more streamlined and efficient proceedings will build the UAE’s reputation as a preferred seat for international arbitration in the region. We remain hopeful in the courts’ significant role in appropriately applying and preserving the spirit of the Law. The Executive Regulations, which are in the pipeline, will also undoubtedly clarify some of the issues raised in hope of a more rationalised and synchronised proceedings among the various players in UAE seated arbitrations.</p>\r\n<em>For further information, please contact <a href=\"https://www.tamimi.com/lawyer/essam-al-tamimi/\">Essam Al Tamimi</a> (e.tamimi@tamimi.com) or <a href=\"https://www.tamimi.com/lawyer/sara-aranjo/\">Sara Koleilat-Aranjo</a> (s.aranjo@tamimi.com).</em>'),
(241613, 23662, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=252&amp;action=edit'),
(241611, 23662, 'PostDate', '2017-09-18 08:56:53'),
(241612, 23662, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/locations/'),
(241610, 23662, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(241607, 23662, 'PostID', '252'),
(241608, 23662, 'PostType', 'page'),
(241609, 23662, 'PostTitle', 'Locations'),
(241605, 23661, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(241606, 23661, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(241603, 23661, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(241604, 23661, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(241602, 23661, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=5&amp;action=edit'),
(241599, 23661, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(241600, 23661, 'PostDate', '2017-09-06 07:15:00'),
(241601, 23661, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/'),
(241595, 23660, 'UserAgent', 'WordPress/4.9.7; https://www.tamimi.com'),
(241596, 23661, 'PostID', '5'),
(241597, 23661, 'PostType', 'page'),
(241598, 23661, 'PostTitle', 'Home'),
(241592, 23660, 'EventCount', '9'),
(241593, 23660, 'PruneQuery', 'DELETE FROM tm_wsal_occurrences ORDER BY created_on ASC LIMIT 9'),
(241594, 23660, 'ClientIP', '185.140.248.63'),
(241614, 23662, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(241615, 23662, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(241616, 23662, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(241617, 23662, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(241618, 23663, 'PostID', '1468'),
(241619, 23663, 'PostType', 'locations'),
(241620, 23663, 'PostTitle', 'UAE'),
(241621, 23663, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(241622, 23663, 'PostDate', '2017-10-05 13:36:13'),
(241623, 23663, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/locations/united-arab-emirates/'),
(241624, 23663, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=1468&amp;action=edit'),
(241625, 23663, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(241626, 23663, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(241627, 23663, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(241628, 23663, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(241629, 23664, 'PostID', '1471'),
(241630, 23664, 'PostType', 'locations'),
(241631, 23664, 'PostTitle', 'Qatar'),
(241632, 23664, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(241633, 23664, 'PostDate', '2017-10-05 13:37:05'),
(241634, 23664, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/locations/qatar/'),
(241635, 23664, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=1471&amp;action=edit'),
(241636, 23664, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(241637, 23664, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(241638, 23664, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(241639, 23664, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(241640, 23665, 'PostID', '1472'),
(241641, 23665, 'PostType', 'locations'),
(241642, 23665, 'PostTitle', 'Saudi Arabia'),
(241643, 23665, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(241644, 23665, 'PostDate', '2017-10-05 13:37:17'),
(241645, 23665, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/locations/saudi-arabia/'),
(241646, 23665, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=1472&amp;action=edit'),
(241647, 23665, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(241648, 23665, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(241649, 23665, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(241650, 23665, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(242947, 23792, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(242948, 23792, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(242949, 23792, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(242950, 23792, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(242951, 23793, 'PostID', '7927'),
(242952, 23793, 'PostType', 'news-room'),
(242953, 23793, 'PostTitle', 'New Data Protection Law in Bahrain criminalises non-compliance'),
(242954, 23793, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(242955, 23793, 'PostDate', '2018-07-30 18:01:58'),
(242956, 23793, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=news-room&p=7927'),
(242957, 23793, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7927&amp;action=edit'),
(242958, 23793, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(242959, 23793, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(242960, 23793, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(242961, 23793, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(242962, 23794, 'PostID', '7927'),
(242963, 23794, 'PostType', 'news-room'),
(242964, 23794, 'PostTitle', 'New Data Protection Law in Bahrain criminalises non-compliance'),
(242965, 23794, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(242966, 23794, 'PostDate', '2018-07-30 18:00:47'),
(242967, 23794, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=news-room&p=7927'),
(242968, 23794, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7927&amp;action=edit'),
(242969, 23794, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(242970, 23794, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(242971, 23794, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(242972, 23794, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(242973, 23795, 'PostID', '7927'),
(242974, 23795, 'PostTitle', 'New Data Protection Law in Bahrain criminalises non-compliance'),
(242975, 23795, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(242976, 23795, 'PostType', 'news-room'),
(242977, 23795, 'PostDate', '2018-07-30 18:00:47'),
(242978, 23795, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=news-room&p=7927'),
(242979, 23795, 'MetaID', '222640'),
(242980, 23795, 'MetaKey', 'content'),
(242981, 23795, 'MetaValueNew', '<span style=\"color: #00578f;\"><strong>Bahrain’s new Law on the Protection of Personal Data was published on 19 July 2018, and will come into effect on 1 August 2019</strong>.</span>\r\n\r\nThe Law will require a variety of changes to the way businesses process personal data in Bahrain or about residents of Bahrain. Historically, data protection has not been a high priority topic for most businesses in Bahrain, with the limited exception of international entities subject to data protection requirements in other jurisdictions in which they operate. While the publication of the new Law provides a considerable lead-in period within which entities subject to the Law will need to comply, the fact that the Law creates criminal offences means that compliance is all the more important and should be treated as a high priority.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style=\"color: #00578f;\"><strong>Application</strong></span>\r\n\r\nBahrain’s Data Protection Law describes the legal protection of personal privacy as among the main constitutional rights of the person, and notes that it should be protected, particularly in the context of the increasing use of electronic/digital means for processing information. The Law applies to:\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>Every individual residing normally in Bahrain or having a workplace in Bahrain, and every legal person (corporate) having a place of business in the Kingdom of Bahrain; and</li>\r\n 	<li>Every individual not residing normally in Bahrain or having a workplace in Bahrain, and every legal person (corporate) not having a place of business in the Kingdom of Bahrain, where such persons are processing data using means available in Bahrain, except where such processing means are solely for the purpose of passing data through Bahrain.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style=\"color: #00578f;\"><strong>Criminal provisions</strong></span>\r\n\r\nThe Law criminalises a variety of acts that would, at most, be the subject of administrative penalties in data protection laws elsewhere. Penalties generally comprise up to one year in prison and/or a fine of between BHD 1,000 and BHD 20,000 (between about USD 2,600 to about USD 53,000) (or a fine only in the case of corporate entities). The following are examples of activities that attract criminal penalties under the Law:\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>Processing sensitive personal data in violation of the provision specifying requirements for processing sensitive personal data;</li>\r\n 	<li>Transferring personal data outside Bahrain contrary to the provisions specifying requirements for transfers to jurisdictions that provide an adequate level of data protection, and associated exceptions;</li>\r\n 	<li>Processing personal data without notifying the new Data Protection Authority in accordance with the provision that sets out the obligation to notify the Authority before commencing any data processing activities (except where certain exceptions apply), or failing to update such notification to the Authority;</li>\r\n 	<li>Processing personal data contrary to the provision that requires prior authorization from the Authority before processing personal data in certain circumstances;</li>\r\n 	<li>Providing false or misleading information to the Authority or to a data subject, or withholding relevant information from the Authority, or otherwise hindering the Authority’s work; and</li>\r\n 	<li>Disclosing any data or information accessed due to work, or using the same for own benefit or for the benefit of others unreasonably and in violation of the provisions of this law.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style=\"color: #00578f;\"><strong>Security considerations</strong></span>\r\n\r\nGenerally, the security of processing provisions, and the confidentiality provisions, appear to be fairly standard. Data controllers are required to apply technical and organizational measures capable of protecting personal data against unintentional or unauthorized destruction, accidental loss, unauthorized alteration, disclosure or access, or any other form of processing. The measures adopted need to be appropriate, bearing in mind the nature of the data in question and the risks associated with processing it.\r\n\r\nData controllers are required to engage only data processors who provide sufficient guarantees regarding the application of technical and organisational measures. Importantly, there is an obligation on data controllers to take steps to verify compliance with such measures, and to enter into a written contract with the data processor requiring that the data processor shall only process data in accordance with the instructions of the data controller, and in accordance with the data controller’s requirements with regard to security and confidentiality.\r\n\r\nThere does not appear to be any specific obligation to notify the Authority in the event of a data breach incident. It is possible that this level of detail might be addressed in the regulations, or that the Authority is expected to address breaches only in the event that they become aware of them, and when the circumstances indicate a breach of the obligation to use suitable technical and organizational security measures.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style=\"color: #00578f;\"><strong>Data Protection Supervisor</strong></span>\r\n\r\nThe Law contemplates a role of ‘Data Protection Supervisor’ (not a data protection officer type role) intended to act as an independent and impartial intermediary between the data controller and the Authority. The data protection supervisor will help the data controller fulfil its rights and obligations, and coordinate between the data controller and the Authority. It will also be required to verify the data controller’s processing in compliance with the law, alert the data controller to any apparent non-compliance to enable the issue to be addressed, and alert the Authority where such non-compliance has not been addressed within a specified timeframe.\r\n\r\nThe concept of a data protection supervisor has the potential to result in a whole new industry in the Bahrain market. The regulations setting out the requirements for the registration of data protection supervisors may shed greater light on what is anticipated, in terms of who might be able to fulfil such roles. The most natural development may be for the role to be filled by consulting/audit firms with expertise in data protection related issues.\r\n\r\n<em>Al Tamimi &amp; Company regularly advises on data protection issues across the Middle East. For further information about the new Data Protection Law in Bahrain, or assistance in ensuring compliance, please do not hesitate to contact us.</em>'),
(241715, 23682, 'ClientIP', '185.140.248.63'),
(241716, 23682, 'UserAgent', 'WordPress/4.9.7; https://www.tamimi.com'),
(241717, 23683, 'FileLocation', '/home/tamimnew/public_html/wp-admin/admin-post.php'),
(241718, 23683, 'FileHash', '2625b2ff310fb3cd8b429e995ac3cbbf'),
(241719, 23683, 'ClientIP', '185.140.248.63'),
(241720, 23683, 'UserAgent', 'WordPress/4.9.7; https://www.tamimi.com'),
(241721, 23684, 'FileLocation', '/home/tamimnew/public_html/wp-includes/error_log'),
(241722, 23684, 'FileHash', '0789ff5ad675947a52234ca307b2704d'),
(241723, 23684, 'ClientIP', '185.140.248.63'),
(241724, 23684, 'UserAgent', 'WordPress/4.9.7; https://www.tamimi.com'),
(241725, 23685, 'FileLocation', '/home/tamimnew/public_html/wp-content/index.html'),
(241726, 23685, 'FileHash', 'c6c2a002df451699cbbade8dec2fbfa3'),
(241727, 23685, 'ClientIP', '185.140.248.63'),
(241728, 23685, 'UserAgent', 'WordPress/4.9.7; https://www.tamimi.com'),
(241729, 23686, 'FileLocation', '/home/tamimnew/public_html/wp-content/themes/tamimi/js-local.zip'),
(241730, 23686, 'FileHash', '094cd390a3ca054dc99ddf599e6ceafc'),
(241731, 23686, 'ClientIP', '185.140.248.63'),
(241732, 23686, 'UserAgent', 'WordPress/4.9.7; https://www.tamimi.com'),
(241733, 23687, 'FileLocation', '/home/tamimnew/public_html/wp-content/themes/tamimi/js.zip'),
(241734, 23687, 'FileHash', 'ac5a56abb3c90048da1529340d8d6783'),
(241735, 23687, 'ClientIP', '185.140.248.63'),
(241736, 23687, 'UserAgent', 'WordPress/4.9.7; https://www.tamimi.com'),
(241737, 23688, 'FileLocation', '/home/tamimnew/public_html/wp-content/themes/tamimi/tamimi.zip'),
(241738, 23688, 'FileHash', 'f4cf184215f6286163619775bd40f304'),
(241739, 23688, 'ClientIP', '185.140.248.63'),
(241740, 23688, 'UserAgent', 'WordPress/4.9.7; https://www.tamimi.com'),
(241741, 23689, 'FileLocation', '/home/tamimnew/public_html/wp-content/themes/tamimi/pagination.zip'),
(241742, 23689, 'FileHash', '133e3e495c0647b3f4623eb28d59362c'),
(241743, 23689, 'ClientIP', '185.140.248.63'),
(241744, 23689, 'UserAgent', 'WordPress/4.9.7; https://www.tamimi.com'),
(241745, 23690, 'FileLocation', '/home/tamimnew/public_html/wp-content/themes/tamimi-10-05-18.zip'),
(241746, 23690, 'ClientIP', '185.140.248.63'),
(241747, 23690, 'UserAgent', 'WordPress/4.9.7; https://www.tamimi.com'),
(241748, 23691, 'FileLocation', '/home/tamimnew/public_html/wp-content/themes/tamimi/error_log'),
(241749, 23691, 'FileHash', 'ae3a7e6a73286c8a030d412595c601ff'),
(241750, 23691, 'ClientIP', '185.140.248.63'),
(241751, 23691, 'UserAgent', 'WordPress/4.9.7; https://www.tamimi.com'),
(241752, 23692, 'FileLocation', '/home/tamimnew/public_html/wp-content/themes/tamimi/header.php'),
(241753, 23692, 'FileHash', '4224853ed3b45dfc4a9f93af0a8fabdb'),
(241754, 23692, 'ClientIP', '185.140.248.63'),
(241755, 23692, 'UserAgent', 'WordPress/4.9.7; https://www.tamimi.com'),
(242071, 23721, 'PostDate', '2017-10-12 16:21:53'),
(242072, 23721, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/careers/'),
(242073, 23721, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=3863&amp;action=edit'),
(242074, 23721, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(242075, 23721, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(242076, 23721, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(242077, 23721, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(242350, 23742, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/practice/banking-finance/'),
(242351, 23742, 'MetaID', '40504'),
(242352, 23742, 'MetaKey', 'related_pages_23_page'),
(242353, 23742, 'MetaValueNew', '889'),
(242354, 23742, 'MetaValueOld', '703'),
(242355, 23742, 'MetaLink', 'related_pages_23_page'),
(242356, 23742, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=411&amp;action=edit'),
(242357, 23742, 'ReportText', '703|889'),
(242358, 23742, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141');
INSERT INTO `tm_wsal_metadata` (`id`, `occurrence_id`, `name`, `value`) VALUES
(242359, 23742, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(242360, 23742, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(242361, 23742, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(242362, 23743, 'PostID', '411'),
(242363, 23743, 'PostTitle', 'Banking & Finance'),
(242364, 23743, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(242365, 23743, 'PostType', 'practice'),
(242366, 23743, 'PostDate', '2017-09-21 09:36:58'),
(242367, 23743, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/practice/banking-finance/'),
(242368, 23743, 'MetaID', '40506'),
(242369, 23743, 'MetaKey', 'related_pages_24_page'),
(242370, 23743, 'MetaValueNew', '603'),
(242371, 23743, 'MetaValueOld', '889'),
(242372, 23743, 'MetaLink', 'related_pages_24_page'),
(242373, 23743, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=411&amp;action=edit'),
(242374, 23743, 'ReportText', '889|603'),
(242375, 23743, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(242376, 23743, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(242377, 23743, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(242378, 23743, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(242379, 23744, 'PostID', '411'),
(242380, 23744, 'PostTitle', 'Banking & Finance'),
(242381, 23744, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(242382, 23744, 'PostType', 'practice'),
(242383, 23744, 'PostDate', '2017-09-21 09:36:58'),
(242384, 23744, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/practice/banking-finance/'),
(242385, 23744, 'MetaID', '40508'),
(242386, 23744, 'MetaKey', 'related_pages_25_page'),
(242387, 23744, 'MetaValueNew', '904'),
(242388, 23744, 'MetaValueOld', '603'),
(242389, 23744, 'MetaLink', 'related_pages_25_page'),
(242390, 23744, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=411&amp;action=edit'),
(242391, 23744, 'ReportText', '603|904'),
(242392, 23744, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(242393, 23744, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(242394, 23744, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(242395, 23744, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(242396, 23745, 'PostID', '411'),
(242397, 23745, 'PostTitle', 'Banking & Finance'),
(242398, 23745, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(242399, 23745, 'PostType', 'practice'),
(242400, 23745, 'PostDate', '2017-09-21 09:36:58'),
(242401, 23745, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/practice/banking-finance/'),
(242402, 23745, 'MetaID', '40510'),
(242403, 23745, 'MetaKey', 'related_pages_26_page'),
(242404, 23745, 'MetaValueNew', '728'),
(242405, 23745, 'MetaValueOld', '904'),
(242406, 23745, 'MetaLink', 'related_pages_26_page'),
(242407, 23745, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=411&amp;action=edit'),
(242408, 23745, 'ReportText', '904|728'),
(242409, 23745, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(242410, 23745, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(242411, 23745, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(242412, 23745, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(242413, 23746, 'PostID', '411'),
(242414, 23746, 'PostTitle', 'Banking & Finance'),
(242415, 23746, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(242416, 23746, 'PostType', 'practice'),
(242417, 23746, 'PostDate', '2017-09-21 09:36:58'),
(242418, 23746, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/practice/banking-finance/'),
(242419, 23746, 'MetaID', '40512'),
(242420, 23746, 'MetaKey', 'related_pages_27_page'),
(242421, 23746, 'MetaValueNew', '942'),
(242422, 23746, 'MetaValueOld', '728'),
(242423, 23746, 'MetaLink', 'related_pages_27_page'),
(242424, 23746, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=411&amp;action=edit'),
(242425, 23746, 'ReportText', '728|942'),
(242426, 23746, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(242427, 23746, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(242428, 23746, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(242429, 23746, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(242430, 23747, 'PostID', '411'),
(242431, 23747, 'PostTitle', 'Banking & Finance'),
(242432, 23747, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(242433, 23747, 'PostType', 'practice'),
(242434, 23747, 'PostDate', '2017-09-21 09:36:58'),
(242435, 23747, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/practice/banking-finance/'),
(242436, 23747, 'MetaID', '40514'),
(242437, 23747, 'MetaKey', 'related_pages_28_page'),
(242438, 23747, 'MetaValueNew', '757'),
(242439, 23747, 'MetaValueOld', '942'),
(242440, 23747, 'MetaLink', 'related_pages_28_page'),
(242441, 23747, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=411&amp;action=edit'),
(242442, 23747, 'ReportText', '942|757'),
(242443, 23747, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(242444, 23747, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(242445, 23747, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(242446, 23747, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(242447, 23748, 'PostID', '411'),
(242448, 23748, 'PostTitle', 'Banking & Finance'),
(242449, 23748, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(242450, 23748, 'PostType', 'practice'),
(242451, 23748, 'PostDate', '2017-09-21 09:36:58'),
(242452, 23748, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/practice/banking-finance/'),
(242453, 23748, 'MetaID', '30568'),
(242454, 23748, 'MetaKey', 'related_pages'),
(242455, 23748, 'MetaValueNew', '29'),
(242456, 23748, 'MetaValueOld', '30'),
(242457, 23748, 'MetaLink', 'related_pages'),
(242458, 23748, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=411&amp;action=edit'),
(242459, 23748, 'ReportText', '30|29'),
(242460, 23748, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(242461, 23748, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(242462, 23748, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(242463, 23748, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(242464, 23749, 'PostID', '411'),
(242465, 23749, 'PostType', 'practice'),
(242466, 23749, 'PostTitle', 'Banking &amp; Finance'),
(242467, 23749, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(242468, 23749, 'PostDate', '2017-09-21 09:36:58'),
(242469, 23749, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/practice/banking-finance/'),
(242470, 23749, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=411&amp;action=edit'),
(242471, 23749, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(242472, 23749, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(242473, 23749, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(242474, 23749, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(242475, 23750, 'PostID', '189'),
(242476, 23750, 'PostType', 'page'),
(242477, 23750, 'PostTitle', 'Awards'),
(242478, 23750, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(242479, 23750, 'PostDate', '2017-09-11 07:06:26'),
(242480, 23750, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/awards/'),
(242481, 23750, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=189&amp;action=edit'),
(242482, 23750, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(242483, 23750, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(242484, 23750, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(242485, 23750, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(242486, 23751, 'PostID', '191'),
(242487, 23751, 'PostType', 'page'),
(242488, 23751, 'PostTitle', 'CSR'),
(242489, 23751, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(242490, 23751, 'PostDate', '2017-09-11 07:06:34'),
(242491, 23751, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/our-firm/csr/'),
(242492, 23751, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=191&amp;action=edit'),
(242493, 23751, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(242494, 23751, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(242495, 23751, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(242496, 23751, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(242497, 23752, 'PostID', '1553'),
(242498, 23752, 'PostType', 'jurisdictions'),
(242499, 23752, 'PostTitle', 'Bahrain'),
(242500, 23752, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(242501, 23752, 'PostDate', '2017-10-08 08:05:28'),
(242502, 23752, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/jurisdictions/bahrain/'),
(242503, 23752, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=1553&amp;action=edit'),
(242504, 23752, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(242505, 23752, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(242506, 23752, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(242507, 23752, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(242508, 23753, 'PostID', '537'),
(242509, 23753, 'PostType', 'practice'),
(242510, 23753, 'PostTitle', 'Construction & Infrastructure'),
(242511, 23753, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(242512, 23753, 'PostDate', '2017-09-26 15:10:02'),
(242513, 23753, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/practice/construction-infrastructure/'),
(242514, 23753, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=537&amp;action=edit'),
(242515, 23753, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(242516, 23753, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(242517, 23753, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(242518, 23753, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(242519, 23754, 'PostID', '185'),
(242520, 23754, 'PostType', 'page'),
(242521, 23754, 'PostTitle', 'The Firm'),
(242522, 23754, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(242523, 23754, 'PostDate', '2017-09-11 07:05:15'),
(242524, 23754, 'PostUrl', 'https://www.tamimi.com/our-firm/the-firm/'),
(242525, 23754, 'EditorLinkPost', 'https://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=185&amp;action=edit'),
(242526, 23754, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(242527, 23754, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(242528, 23754, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(242529, 23754, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(242908, 23789, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(242909, 23789, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(242910, 23789, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(242911, 23789, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(242912, 23790, 'PostID', '7927'),
(242913, 23790, 'PostType', 'news-room'),
(242914, 23790, 'PostTitle', 'New Data Protection Law in Bahrain criminalises non-compliance'),
(242915, 23790, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(242916, 23790, 'PostDate', '2018-07-30 18:00:47'),
(242917, 23790, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=news-room&p=7927'),
(242918, 23790, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7927&amp;action=edit'),
(242919, 23790, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(242920, 23790, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(242921, 23790, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(242922, 23790, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(242923, 23791, 'PostID', '7927'),
(242924, 23791, 'PostType', 'news-room'),
(242925, 23791, 'PostTitle', 'New Data Protection Law in Bahrain criminalises non-compliance'),
(242926, 23791, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(242927, 23791, 'PostDate', '2018-07-30 18:00:47'),
(242928, 23791, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=news-room&p=7927'),
(242929, 23791, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7927&amp;action=edit'),
(242930, 23791, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(242931, 23791, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(242932, 23791, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(242933, 23791, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(242934, 23792, 'PostID', '7927'),
(242935, 23792, 'PostTitle', 'New Data Protection Law in Bahrain criminalises non-compliance'),
(242936, 23792, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(242937, 23792, 'PostType', 'news-room'),
(242938, 23792, 'PostDate', '2018-07-30 18:00:47'),
(242939, 23792, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=news-room&p=7927'),
(242940, 23792, 'MetaID', '222640'),
(242941, 23792, 'MetaKey', 'content'),
(242942, 23792, 'MetaValueNew', '<span style=\"color: #00578f;\"><strong>Bahrain’s new Law on the Protection of Personal Data was published on 19 July 2018, and will come into effect on 1 August 2019</strong>.</span>\r\n\r\nThe Law will require a variety of changes to the way businesses process personal data in Bahrain or about residents of Bahrain. Historically, data protection has not been a high priority topic for most businesses in Bahrain, with the limited exception of international entities subject to data protection requirements in other jurisdictions in which they operate. While the publication of the new Law provides a considerable lead-in period within which entities subject to the Law will need to comply, the fact that the Law creates criminal offences means that compliance is all the more important and should be treated as a high priority.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style=\"color: #00578f;\"><strong>Application</strong></span>\r\n\r\nBahrain’s Data Protection Law describes the legal protection of personal privacy as among the main constitutional rights of the person, and notes that it should be protected, particularly in the context of the increasing use of electronic/digital means for processing information. The Law applies to:\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>Every individual residing normally in Bahrain or having a workplace in Bahrain, and every legal person (corporate) having a place of business in the Kingdom of Bahrain; and</li>\r\n 	<li>Every individual not residing normally in Bahrain or having a workplace in Bahrain, and every legal person (corporate) not having a place of business in the Kingdom of Bahrain, where such persons are processing data using means available in Bahrain, except where such processing means are solely for the purpose of passing data through Bahrain.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<span style=\"color: #00578f;\"><strong>Criminal provisions</strong></span>\r\n\r\nThe Law criminalises a variety of acts that would, at most, be the subject of administrative penalties in data protection laws elsewhere. Penalties generally comprise up to one year in prison and/or a fine of between BHD 1,000 and BHD 20,000 (between about USD 2,600 to about USD 53,000) (or a fine only in the case of corporate entities). The following are examples of activities that attract criminal penalties under the Law:\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>Processing sensitive personal data in violation of the provision specifying requirements for processing sensitive personal data;</li>\r\n 	<li>Transferring personal data outside Bahrain contrary to the provisions specifying requirements for transfers to jurisdictions that provide an adequate level of data protection, and associated exceptions;</li>\r\n 	<li>Processing personal data without notifying the new Data Protection Authority in accordance with the provision that sets out the obligation to notify the Authority before commencing any data processing activities (except where certain exceptions apply), or failing to update such notification to the Authority;</li>\r\n 	<li>Processing personal data contrary to the provision that requires prior authorization from the Authority before processing personal data in certain circumstances;</li>\r\n 	<li>Providing false or misleading information to the Authority or to a data subject, or withholding relevant information from the Authority, or otherwise hindering the Authority’s work; and</li>\r\n 	<li>Disclosing any data or information accessed due to work, or using the same for own benefit or for the benefit of others unreasonably and in violation of the provisions of this law.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style=\"color: #00578f;\"><strong>Security considerations</strong></span>\r\n\r\nGenerally, the security of processing provisions, and the confidentiality provisions, appear to be fairly standard. Data controllers are required to apply technical and organizational measures capable of protecting personal data against unintentional or unauthorized destruction, accidental loss, unauthorized alteration, disclosure or access, or any other form of processing. The measures adopted need to be appropriate, bearing in mind the nature of the data in question and the risks associated with processing it.\r\n\r\nData controllers are required to engage only data processors who provide sufficient guarantees regarding the application of technical and organisational measures. Importantly, there is an obligation on data controllers to take steps to verify compliance with such measures, and to enter into a written contract with the data processor requiring that the data processor shall only process data in accordance with the instructions of the data controller, and in accordance with the data controller’s requirements with regard to security and confidentiality.\r\n\r\nThere does not appear to be any specific obligation to notify the Authority in the event of a data breach incident. It is possible that this level of detail might be addressed in the regulations, or that the Authority is expected to address breaches only in the event that they become aware of them, and when the circumstances indicate a breach of the obligation to use suitable technical and organizational security measures.\r\n\r\n<span style=\"color: #00578f;\"><strong>Data Protection Supervisor</strong></span>\r\n\r\nThe Law contemplates a role of ‘Data Protection Supervisor’ (not a data protection officer type role) intended to act as an independent and impartial intermediary between the data controller and the Authority. The data protection supervisor will help the data controller fulfil its rights and obligations, and coordinate between the data controller and the Authority. It will also be required to verify the data controller’s processing in compliance with the law, alert the data controller to any apparent non-compliance to enable the issue to be addressed, and alert the Authority where such non-compliance has not been addressed within a specified timeframe.\r\n\r\nThe concept of a data protection supervisor has the potential to result in a whole new industry in the Bahrain market. The regulations setting out the requirements for the registration of data protection supervisors may shed greater light on what is anticipated, in terms of who might be able to fulfil such roles. The most natural development may be for the role to be filled by consulting/audit firms with expertise in data protection related issues.\r\n\r\n<em>Al Tamimi &amp; Company regularly advises on data protection issues across the Middle East. For further information about the new Data Protection Law in Bahrain, or assistance in ensuring compliance, please do not hesitate to contact us.</em>'),
(242943, 23792, 'MetaValueOld', '<span style=\"color: #00578f;\"><strong>Bahrain’s new Law on the Protection of Personal Data was published on 19 July 2018, and will come into effect on 1 August 2019</strong>.</span>\r\n\r\nThe Law will require a variety of changes to the way businesses process personal data in Bahrain or about residents of Bahrain. Historically, data protection has not been a high priority topic for most businesses in Bahrain, with the limited exception of international entities subject to data protection requirements in other jurisdictions in which they operate. While the publication of the new Law provides a considerable lead-in period within which entities subject to the Law will need to comply, the fact that the Law creates criminal offences means that compliance is all the more important and should be treated as a high priority.\r\n\r\n<span style=\"color: #00578f;\"><strong>Application</strong></span>\r\n\r\n<strong>\r\n</strong>Bahrain’s Data Protection Law describes the legal protection of personal privacy as among the main constitutional rights of the person, and notes that it should be protected, particularly in the context of the increasing use of electronic/digital means for processing information. The Law applies to:\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>Every individual residing normally in Bahrain or having a workplace in Bahrain, and every legal person (corporate) having a place of business in the Kingdom of Bahrain; and</li>\r\n 	<li>Every individual not residing normally in Bahrain or having a workplace in Bahrain, and every legal person (corporate) not having a place of business in the Kingdom of Bahrain, where such persons are processing data using means available in Bahrain, except where such processing means are solely for the purpose of passing data through Bahrain.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<span style=\"color: #00578f;\"><strong>Criminal provisions</strong></span>\r\n\r\nThe Law criminalises a variety of acts that would, at most, be the subject of administrative penalties in data protection laws elsewhere. Penalties generally comprise up to one year in prison and/or a fine of between BHD 1,000 and BHD 20,000 (between about USD 2,600 to about USD 53,000) (or a fine only in the case of corporate entities). The following are examples of activities that attract criminal penalties under the Law:\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>Processing sensitive personal data in violation of the provision specifying requirements for processing sensitive personal data;</li>\r\n 	<li>Transferring personal data outside Bahrain contrary to the provisions specifying requirements for transfers to jurisdictions that provide an adequate level of data protection, and associated exceptions;</li>\r\n 	<li>Processing personal data without notifying the new Data Protection Authority in accordance with the provision that sets out the obligation to notify the Authority before commencing any data processing activities (except where certain exceptions apply), or failing to update such notification to the Authority;</li>\r\n 	<li>Processing personal data contrary to the provision that requires prior authorization from the Authority before processing personal data in certain circumstances;</li>\r\n 	<li>Providing false or misleading information to the Authority or to a data subject, or withholding relevant information from the Authority, or otherwise hindering the Authority’s work; and</li>\r\n 	<li>Disclosing any data or information accessed due to work, or using the same for own benefit or for the benefit of others unreasonably and in violation of the provisions of this law.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style=\"color: #00578f;\"><strong>Security considerations</strong></span>\r\n\r\nGenerally, the security of processing provisions, and the confidentiality provisions, appear to be fairly standard. Data controllers are required to apply technical and organizational measures capable of protecting personal data against unintentional or unauthorized destruction, accidental loss, unauthorized alteration, disclosure or access, or any other form of processing. The measures adopted need to be appropriate, bearing in mind the nature of the data in question and the risks associated with processing it.\r\n\r\nData controllers are required to engage only data processors who provide sufficient guarantees regarding the application of technical and organisational measures. Importantly, there is an obligation on data controllers to take steps to verify compliance with such measures, and to enter into a written contract with the data processor requiring that the data processor shall only process data in accordance with the instructions of the data controller, and in accordance with the data controller’s requirements with regard to security and confidentiality.\r\n\r\nThere does not appear to be any specific obligation to notify the Authority in the event of a data breach incident. It is possible that this level of detail might be addressed in the regulations, or that the Authority is expected to address breaches only in the event that they become aware of them, and when the circumstances indicate a breach of the obligation to use suitable technical and organizational security measures.\r\n\r\n<span style=\"color: #00578f;\"><strong>Data Protection Supervisor</strong></span>\r\n\r\nThe Law contemplates a role of ‘Data Protection Supervisor’ (not a data protection officer type role) intended to act as an independent and impartial intermediary between the data controller and the Authority. The data protection supervisor will help the data controller fulfil its rights and obligations, and coordinate between the data controller and the Authority. It will also be required to verify the data controller’s processing in compliance with the law, alert the data controller to any apparent non-compliance to enable the issue to be addressed, and alert the Authority where such non-compliance has not been addressed within a specified timeframe.\r\n\r\nThe concept of a data protection supervisor has the potential to result in a whole new industry in the Bahrain market. The regulations setting out the requirements for the registration of data protection supervisors may shed greater light on what is anticipated, in terms of who might be able to fulfil such roles. The most natural development may be for the role to be filled by consulting/audit firms with expertise in data protection related issues.\r\n\r\n<em>Al Tamimi &amp; Company regularly advises on data protection issues across the Middle East. For further information about the new Data Protection Law in Bahrain, or assistance in ensuring compliance, please do not hesitate to contact us.</em>'),
(242944, 23792, 'MetaLink', 'content'),
(242945, 23792, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7927&amp;action=edit'),
(242946, 23792, 'ReportText', '<span style=\"color: #00578f;\"><strong>Bahrain’s new Law on the Protection of Personal Data was published on 19 July 2018, and will come into effect on 1 August 2019</strong>.</span>\r\n\r\nThe Law will require a variety of changes to the way businesses process personal data in Bahrain or about residents of Bahrain. Historically, data protection has not been a high priority topic for most businesses in Bahrain, with the limited exception of international entities subject to data protection requirements in other jurisdictions in which they operate. While the publication of the new Law provides a considerable lead-in period within which entities subject to the Law will need to comply, the fact that the Law creates criminal offences means that compliance is all the more important and should be treated as a high priority.\r\n\r\n<span style=\"color: #00578f;\"><strong>Application</strong></span>\r\n\r\n<strong>\r\n</strong>Bahrain’s Data Protection Law describes the legal protection of personal privacy as among the main constitutional rights of the person, and notes that it should be protected, particularly in the context of the increasing use of electronic/digital means for processing information. The Law applies to:\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>Every individual residing normally in Bahrain or having a workplace in Bahrain, and every legal person (corporate) having a place of business in the Kingdom of Bahrain; and</li>\r\n 	<li>Every individual not residing normally in Bahrain or having a workplace in Bahrain, and every legal person (corporate) not having a place of business in the Kingdom of Bahrain, where such persons are processing data using means available in Bahrain, except where such processing means are solely for the purpose of passing data through Bahrain.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<span style=\"color: #00578f;\"><strong>Criminal provisions</strong></span>\r\n\r\nThe Law criminalises a variety of acts that would, at most, be the subject of administrative penalties in data protection laws elsewhere. Penalties generally comprise up to one year in prison and/or a fine of between BHD 1,000 and BHD 20,000 (between about USD 2,600 to about USD 53,000) (or a fine only in the case of corporate entities). The following are examples of activities that attract criminal penalties under the Law:\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>Processing sensitive personal data in violation of the provision specifying requirements for processing sensitive personal data;</li>\r\n 	<li>Transferring personal data outside Bahrain contrary to the provisions specifying requirements for transfers to jurisdictions that provide an adequate level of data protection, and associated exceptions;</li>\r\n 	<li>Processing personal data without notifying the new Data Protection Authority in accordance with the provision that sets out the obligation to notify the Authority before commencing any data processing activities (except where certain exceptions apply), or failing to update such notification to the Authority;</li>\r\n 	<li>Processing personal data contrary to the provision that requires prior authorization from the Authority before processing personal data in certain circumstances;</li>\r\n 	<li>Providing false or misleading information to the Authority or to a data subject, or withholding relevant information from the Authority, or otherwise hindering the Authority’s work; and</li>\r\n 	<li>Disclosing any data or information accessed due to work, or using the same for own benefit or for the benefit of others unreasonably and in violation of the provisions of this law.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style=\"color: #00578f;\"><strong>Security considerations</strong></span>\r\n\r\nGenerally, the security of processing provisions, and the confidentiality provisions, appear to be fairly standard. Data controllers are required to apply technical and organizational measures capable of protecting personal data against unintentional or unauthorized destruction, accidental loss, unauthorized alteration, disclosure or access, or any other form of processing. The measures adopted need to be appropriate, bearing in mind the nature of the data in question and the risks associated with processing it.\r\n\r\nData controllers are required to engage only data processors who provide sufficient guarantees regarding the application of technical and organisational measures. Importantly, there is an obligation on data controllers to take steps to verify compliance with such measures, and to enter into a written contract with the data processor requiring that the data processor shall only process data in accordance with the instructions of the data controller, and in accordance with the data controller’s requirements with regard to security and confidentiality.\r\n\r\nThere does not appear to be any specific obligation to notify the Authority in the event of a data breach incident. It is possible that this level of detail might be addressed in the regulations, or that the Authority is expected to address breaches only in the event that they become aware of them, and when the circumstances indicate a breach of the obligation to use suitable technical and organizational security measures.\r\n\r\n<span style=\"color: #00578f;\"><strong>Data Protection Supervisor</strong></span>\r\n\r\nThe Law contemplates a role of ‘Data Protection Supervisor’ (not a data protection officer type role) intended to act as an independent and impartial intermediary between the data controller and the Authority. The data protection supervisor will help the data controller fulfil its rights and obligations, and coordinate between the data controller and the Authority. It will also be required to verify the data controller’s processing in compliance with the law, alert the data controller to any apparent non-compliance to enable the issue to be addressed, and alert the Authority where such non-compliance has not been addressed within a specified timeframe.\r\n\r\nThe concept of a data protection supervisor has the potential to result in a whole new industry in the Bahrain market. The regulations setting out the requirements for the registration of data protection supervisors may shed greater light on what is anticipated, in terms of who might be able to fulfil such roles. The most natural development may be for the role to be filled by consulting/audit firms with expertise in data protection related issues.\r\n\r\n<em>Al Tamimi &amp; Company regularly advises on data protection issues across the Middle East. For further information about the new Data Protection Law in Bahrain, or assistance in ensuring compliance, please do not hesitate to contact us.</em>|<span style=\"color: #00578f;\"><strong>Bahrain’s new Law on the Protection of Personal Data was published on 19 July 2018, and will come into effect on 1 August 2019</strong>.</span>\r\n\r\nThe Law will require a variety of changes to the way businesses process personal data in Bahrain or about residents of Bahrain. Historically, data protection has not been a high priority topic for most businesses in Bahrain, with the limited exception of international entities subject to data protection requirements in other jurisdictions in which they operate. While the publication of the new Law provides a considerable lead-in period within which entities subject to the Law will need to comply, the fact that the Law creates criminal offences means that compliance is all the more important and should be treated as a high priority.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style=\"color: #00578f;\"><strong>Application</strong></span>\r\n\r\nBahrain’s Data Protection Law describes the legal protection of personal privacy as among the main constitutional rights of the person, and notes that it should be protected, particularly in the context of the increasing use of electronic/digital means for processing information. The Law applies to:\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>Every individual residing normally in Bahrain or having a workplace in Bahrain, and every legal person (corporate) having a place of business in the Kingdom of Bahrain; and</li>\r\n 	<li>Every individual not residing normally in Bahrain or having a workplace in Bahrain, and every legal person (corporate) not having a place of business in the Kingdom of Bahrain, where such persons are processing data using means available in Bahrain, except where such processing means are solely for the purpose of passing data through Bahrain.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<span style=\"color: #00578f;\"><strong>Criminal provisions</strong></span>\r\n\r\nThe Law criminalises a variety of acts that would, at most, be the subject of administrative penalties in data protection laws elsewhere. Penalties generally comprise up to one year in prison and/or a fine of between BHD 1,000 and BHD 20,000 (between about USD 2,600 to about USD 53,000) (or a fine only in the case of corporate entities). The following are examples of activities that attract criminal penalties under the Law:\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>Processing sensitive personal data in violation of the provision specifying requirements for processing sensitive personal data;</li>\r\n 	<li>Transferring personal data outside Bahrain contrary to the provisions specifying requirements for transfers to jurisdictions that provide an adequate level of data protection, and associated exceptions;</li>\r\n 	<li>Processing personal data without notifying the new Data Protection Authority in accordance with the provision that sets out the obligation to notify the Authority before commencing any data processing activities (except where certain exceptions apply), or failing to update such notification to the Authority;</li>\r\n 	<li>Processing personal data contrary to the provision that requires prior authorization from the Authority before processing personal data in certain circumstances;</li>\r\n 	<li>Providing false or misleading information to the Authority or to a data subject, or withholding relevant information from the Authority, or otherwise hindering the Authority’s work; and</li>\r\n 	<li>Disclosing any data or information accessed due to work, or using the same for own benefit or for the benefit of others unreasonably and in violation of the provisions of this law.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style=\"color: #00578f;\"><strong>Security considerations</strong></span>\r\n\r\nGenerally, the security of processing provisions, and the confidentiality provisions, appear to be fairly standard. Data controllers are required to apply technical and organizational measures capable of protecting personal data against unintentional or unauthorized destruction, accidental loss, unauthorized alteration, disclosure or access, or any other form of processing. The measures adopted need to be appropriate, bearing in mind the nature of the data in question and the risks associated with processing it.\r\n\r\nData controllers are required to engage only data processors who provide sufficient guarantees regarding the application of technical and organisational measures. Importantly, there is an obligation on data controllers to take steps to verify compliance with such measures, and to enter into a written contract with the data processor requiring that the data processor shall only process data in accordance with the instructions of the data controller, and in accordance with the data controller’s requirements with regard to security and confidentiality.\r\n\r\nThere does not appear to be any specific obligation to notify the Authority in the event of a data breach incident. It is possible that this level of detail might be addressed in the regulations, or that the Authority is expected to address breaches only in the event that they become aware of them, and when the circumstances indicate a breach of the obligation to use suitable technical and organizational security measures.\r\n\r\n<span style=\"color: #00578f;\"><strong>Data Protection Supervisor</strong></span>\r\n\r\nThe Law contemplates a role of ‘Data Protection Supervisor’ (not a data protection officer type role) intended to act as an independent and impartial intermediary between the data controller and the Authority. The data protection supervisor will help the data controller fulfil its rights and obligations, and coordinate between the data controller and the Authority. It will also be required to verify the data controller’s processing in compliance with the law, alert the data controller to any apparent non-compliance to enable the issue to be addressed, and alert the Authority where such non-compliance has not been addressed within a specified timeframe.\r\n\r\nThe concept of a data protection supervisor has the potential to result in a whole new industry in the Bahrain market. The regulations setting out the requirements for the registration of data protection supervisors may shed greater light on what is anticipated, in terms of who might be able to fulfil such roles. The most natural development may be for the role to be filled by consulting/audit firms with expertise in data protection related issues.\r\n\r\n<em>Al Tamimi &amp; Company regularly advises on data protection issues across the Middle East. For further information about the new Data Protection Law in Bahrain, or assistance in ensuring compliance, please do not hesitate to contact us.</em>'),
(244782, 23945, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244744, 23943, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244745, 23943, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244746, 23943, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 11:37:26'),
(244747, 23943, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7936'),
(244748, 23943, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices_1_lawUpdateArticlePractice'),
(244749, 23943, 'MetaValue', '627'),
(244750, 23943, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices_1_lawUpdateArticlePractice'),
(244751, 23943, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7936&amp;action=edit'),
(244752, 23943, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244753, 23943, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244754, 23943, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244755, 23943, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244756, 23944, 'PostID', '7936'),
(244757, 23944, 'PostTitle', 'Global Legal Insights: Initial Public Offerings 2018 United Arab Emirates Chapter'),
(244758, 23944, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244759, 23944, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244760, 23944, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 11:37:26'),
(244761, 23944, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7936'),
(244762, 23944, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices'),
(244763, 23944, 'MetaValue', '2'),
(244764, 23944, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices'),
(244765, 23944, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7936&amp;action=edit'),
(244766, 23944, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244767, 23944, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244768, 23944, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244769, 23944, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244770, 23945, 'PostID', '7936'),
(244771, 23945, 'PostTitle', 'Global Legal Insights: Initial Public Offerings 2018 United Arab Emirates Chapter'),
(244772, 23945, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244773, 23945, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244774, 23945, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 11:37:26'),
(244775, 23945, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7936'),
(244776, 23945, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticleSectors'),
(244777, 23945, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticleSectors'),
(244778, 23945, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7936&amp;action=edit'),
(244779, 23945, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244780, 23945, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244781, 23945, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244737, 23942, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7936&amp;action=edit'),
(244738, 23942, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244731, 23942, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244732, 23942, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 11:37:26'),
(244733, 23942, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7936'),
(244734, 23942, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices_0_lawUpdateArticlePractice'),
(244735, 23942, 'MetaValue', '645'),
(244736, 23942, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices_0_lawUpdateArticlePractice'),
(244730, 23942, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244728, 23942, 'PostID', '7936'),
(244729, 23942, 'PostTitle', 'Global Legal Insights: Initial Public Offerings 2018 United Arab Emirates Chapter'),
(244724, 23941, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244725, 23941, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244726, 23941, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244727, 23941, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244699, 23939, 'EventCount', '71'),
(244700, 23939, 'PruneQuery', 'DELETE FROM tm_wsal_occurrences ORDER BY created_on ASC LIMIT 71'),
(244701, 23939, 'ClientIP', '185.140.248.63'),
(244702, 23939, 'UserAgent', 'WordPress/4.9.7; https://www.tamimi.com'),
(244703, 23940, 'PostID', '7936'),
(244704, 23940, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244705, 23940, 'PostTitle', 'Global Legal Insights: Initial Public Offerings 2018 United Arab Emirates Chapter'),
(244706, 23940, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244707, 23940, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 11:37:26'),
(244708, 23940, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7936'),
(244709, 23940, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7936&amp;action=edit'),
(244710, 23940, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244711, 23940, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244712, 23940, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244713, 23940, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244714, 23941, 'PostID', '7936'),
(244715, 23941, 'PostTitle', 'Global Legal Insights: Initial Public Offerings 2018 United Arab Emirates Chapter'),
(244716, 23941, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244717, 23941, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244718, 23941, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 11:37:26'),
(244719, 23941, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7936'),
(244720, 23941, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticleMonth'),
(244721, 23941, 'MetaValue', '7928'),
(244722, 23941, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticleMonth'),
(244723, 23941, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7936&amp;action=edit'),
(244934, 23959, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7938'),
(244930, 23959, 'PostTitle', 'UAE continues to lead the way for Foreign Investment'),
(245632, 24015, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(245633, 24015, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(245631, 24015, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7945&amp;action=edit'),
(245628, 24015, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices_1_lawUpdateArticlePractice'),
(245629, 24015, 'MetaValue', '627'),
(245630, 24015, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices_1_lawUpdateArticlePractice'),
(244931, 23959, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244932, 23959, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244933, 23959, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 12:28:00'),
(244927, 23958, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244928, 23958, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244929, 23959, 'PostID', '7938'),
(244922, 23958, 'MetaValue', '542'),
(244923, 23958, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices_0_lawUpdateArticlePractice'),
(244924, 23958, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7938&amp;action=edit'),
(244925, 23958, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244926, 23958, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244921, 23958, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices_0_lawUpdateArticlePractice'),
(244918, 23958, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244919, 23958, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 12:28:00'),
(244920, 23958, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7938'),
(244915, 23958, 'PostID', '7938'),
(244916, 23958, 'PostTitle', 'UAE continues to lead the way for Foreign Investment'),
(244917, 23958, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244910, 23957, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7938&amp;action=edit'),
(244911, 23957, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244912, 23957, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244913, 23957, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244914, 23957, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244907, 23957, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticleMonth'),
(244908, 23957, 'MetaValue', '7928'),
(244909, 23957, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticleMonth'),
(244903, 23957, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244904, 23957, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244905, 23957, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 12:28:00'),
(244906, 23957, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7938'),
(244898, 23956, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244899, 23956, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244900, 23956, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244901, 23957, 'PostID', '7938'),
(244902, 23957, 'PostTitle', 'UAE continues to lead the way for Foreign Investment'),
(244897, 23956, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244895, 23956, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7938'),
(244896, 23956, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7938&amp;action=edit'),
(244872, 23954, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticleSectors'),
(244873, 23954, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticleSectors'),
(244874, 23954, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7937&amp;action=edit'),
(244875, 23954, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244876, 23954, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244877, 23954, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244878, 23954, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244879, 23955, 'PostID', '7937'),
(244880, 23955, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244881, 23955, 'PostTitle', 'Now Coming to the DIFC: The Infinitely Flexible and Versatile Corporate Scheme of Arrangement'),
(244882, 23955, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244883, 23955, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 12:20:40'),
(244884, 23955, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7937'),
(244885, 23955, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7937&amp;action=edit'),
(244886, 23955, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(244887, 23955, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(244888, 23955, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(244889, 23955, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(244890, 23956, 'PostID', '7938'),
(244891, 23956, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(244892, 23956, 'PostTitle', 'UAE continues to lead the way for Foreign Investment'),
(244893, 23956, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(244894, 23956, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 12:28:00'),
(245298, 23989, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(245299, 23989, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(245300, 23989, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(245301, 23989, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(245302, 23990, 'PostID', '7942'),
(245303, 23990, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(245304, 23990, 'PostTitle', 'Getting to Grips with VAT Implementation'),
(245305, 23990, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(245306, 23990, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 15:34:49'),
(245307, 23990, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7942'),
(245308, 23990, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7942&amp;action=edit'),
(245292, 23989, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(245293, 23989, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 15:34:49'),
(245294, 23989, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7942'),
(245295, 23989, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticleSectors'),
(245296, 23989, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticleSectors'),
(245297, 23989, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7942&amp;action=edit'),
(245291, 23989, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(245281, 23988, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices'),
(245282, 23988, 'MetaValue', '1'),
(245283, 23988, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices'),
(245284, 23988, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7942&amp;action=edit'),
(245285, 23988, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(245286, 23988, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko');
INSERT INTO `tm_wsal_metadata` (`id`, `occurrence_id`, `name`, `value`) VALUES
(245287, 23988, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(245288, 23988, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(245289, 23989, 'PostID', '7942'),
(245290, 23989, 'PostTitle', 'Getting to Grips with VAT Implementation'),
(245277, 23988, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(245278, 23988, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(245279, 23988, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 15:34:49'),
(245280, 23988, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7942'),
(245272, 23987, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(245273, 23987, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(245274, 23987, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(245275, 23988, 'PostID', '7942'),
(245276, 23988, 'PostTitle', 'Getting to Grips with VAT Implementation'),
(245271, 23987, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(245269, 23987, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices_0_lawUpdateArticlePractice'),
(245270, 23987, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7942&amp;action=edit'),
(245267, 23987, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices_0_lawUpdateArticlePractice'),
(245268, 23987, 'MetaValue', '651'),
(245261, 23987, 'PostID', '7942'),
(245262, 23987, 'PostTitle', 'Getting to Grips with VAT Implementation'),
(245263, 23987, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(245264, 23987, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(245265, 23987, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 15:34:49'),
(245266, 23987, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7942'),
(245260, 23986, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(245245, 23985, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(245246, 23985, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(245247, 23986, 'PostID', '7942'),
(245248, 23986, 'PostTitle', 'Getting to Grips with VAT Implementation'),
(245249, 23986, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(245250, 23986, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(245251, 23986, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 15:34:49'),
(245252, 23986, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7942'),
(245253, 23986, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticleMonth'),
(245254, 23986, 'MetaValue', '7928'),
(245255, 23986, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticleMonth'),
(245256, 23986, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7942&amp;action=edit'),
(245257, 23986, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(245258, 23986, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(245259, 23986, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(245243, 23985, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(245244, 23985, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(245237, 23985, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(245238, 23985, 'PostTitle', 'Getting to Grips with VAT Implementation'),
(245239, 23985, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(245240, 23985, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 15:34:49'),
(245241, 23985, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7942'),
(245242, 23985, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7942&amp;action=edit'),
(245236, 23985, 'PostID', '7942'),
(245233, 23984, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(245640, 24016, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 15:41:19'),
(245641, 24016, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7945'),
(245638, 24016, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(245639, 24016, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(245634, 24015, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(245635, 24015, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(245636, 24016, 'PostID', '7945'),
(245637, 24016, 'PostTitle', 'From Stadion to E-Gaming in the UAE: A look at Stadium'),
(245234, 23984, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(245235, 23984, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(245231, 23984, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7941&amp;action=edit'),
(245232, 23984, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(245225, 23984, 'PostID', '7941'),
(245226, 23984, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(245227, 23984, 'PostTitle', 'Arabian Nights or Northern Lights: Observing Global Anti-Corruption Practices in Full Daylight'),
(245228, 23984, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(245229, 23984, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 15:32:23'),
(245230, 23984, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7941'),
(245222, 23983, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(245223, 23983, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(245224, 23983, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(245219, 23983, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticleSectors'),
(245220, 23983, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7941&amp;action=edit'),
(245221, 23983, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(245214, 23983, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(245215, 23983, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(245216, 23983, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 15:32:23'),
(245217, 23983, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7941'),
(245218, 23983, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticleSectors'),
(245211, 23982, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(245212, 23983, 'PostID', '7941'),
(245213, 23983, 'PostTitle', 'Arabian Nights or Northern Lights: Observing Global Anti-Corruption Practices in Full Daylight'),
(245208, 23982, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(245209, 23982, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(245210, 23982, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(245191, 23981, 'MetaValue', '631'),
(245192, 23981, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices_0_lawUpdateArticlePractice'),
(245193, 23981, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7941&amp;action=edit'),
(245194, 23981, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(245195, 23981, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(245196, 23981, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(245197, 23981, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(245198, 23982, 'PostID', '7941'),
(245199, 23982, 'PostTitle', 'Arabian Nights or Northern Lights: Observing Global Anti-Corruption Practices in Full Daylight'),
(245200, 23982, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(245201, 23982, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(245202, 23982, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 15:32:23'),
(245203, 23982, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7941'),
(245204, 23982, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices'),
(245205, 23982, 'MetaValue', '1'),
(245206, 23982, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices'),
(245207, 23982, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7941&amp;action=edit'),
(245188, 23981, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 15:32:23'),
(245189, 23981, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7941'),
(245190, 23981, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices_0_lawUpdateArticlePractice'),
(245185, 23981, 'PostTitle', 'Arabian Nights or Northern Lights: Observing Global Anti-Corruption Practices in Full Daylight'),
(245186, 23981, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(245187, 23981, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(245180, 23980, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(245181, 23980, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(245182, 23980, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(245183, 23980, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(245184, 23981, 'PostID', '7941'),
(245169, 23979, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(245170, 23980, 'PostID', '7941'),
(245171, 23980, 'PostTitle', 'Arabian Nights or Northern Lights: Observing Global Anti-Corruption Practices in Full Daylight'),
(245172, 23980, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(245173, 23980, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(245174, 23980, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 15:32:23'),
(245175, 23980, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7941'),
(245176, 23980, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticleMonth'),
(245177, 23980, 'MetaValue', '7928'),
(245178, 23980, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticleMonth'),
(245179, 23980, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7941&amp;action=edit'),
(245166, 23979, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(245167, 23979, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(245168, 23979, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(245162, 23979, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(245163, 23979, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 15:32:23'),
(245164, 23979, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7941'),
(245165, 23979, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7941&amp;action=edit'),
(245159, 23979, 'PostID', '7941'),
(245160, 23979, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(245161, 23979, 'PostTitle', 'Arabian Nights or Northern Lights: Observing Global Anti-Corruption Practices in Full Daylight'),
(245156, 23978, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(245157, 23978, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(245158, 23978, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(245151, 23978, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(245152, 23978, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 15:29:56'),
(245153, 23978, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7940'),
(245154, 23978, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7940&amp;action=edit'),
(245155, 23978, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(245148, 23978, 'PostID', '7940'),
(245149, 23978, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(245150, 23978, 'PostTitle', 'Stuck between a rock and a hard place… : The UK’s Unexplained Wealth Orders and the effect in the Middle East'),
(245145, 23977, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(245146, 23977, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(245147, 23977, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(245140, 23977, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7940'),
(245141, 23977, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticleSectors'),
(245142, 23977, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticleSectors'),
(245143, 23977, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7940&amp;action=edit'),
(245144, 23977, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(245137, 23977, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(245138, 23977, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(245139, 23977, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 15:29:56'),
(245134, 23976, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(245135, 23977, 'PostID', '7940'),
(245136, 23977, 'PostTitle', 'Stuck between a rock and a hard place… : The UK’s Unexplained Wealth Orders and the effect in the Middle East'),
(245129, 23976, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices'),
(245130, 23976, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7940&amp;action=edit'),
(245131, 23976, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(245132, 23976, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(245133, 23976, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(245128, 23976, 'MetaValue', '1'),
(245101, 23974, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticleMonth'),
(245102, 23974, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7940&amp;action=edit'),
(245103, 23974, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(245104, 23974, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(245105, 23974, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(245106, 23974, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(245107, 23975, 'PostID', '7940'),
(245108, 23975, 'PostTitle', 'Stuck between a rock and a hard place… : The UK’s Unexplained Wealth Orders and the effect in the Middle East'),
(245109, 23975, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(245110, 23975, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(245111, 23975, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 15:29:56'),
(245112, 23975, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7940'),
(245113, 23975, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices_0_lawUpdateArticlePractice'),
(245114, 23975, 'MetaValue', '631'),
(245115, 23975, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices_0_lawUpdateArticlePractice'),
(245116, 23975, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7940&amp;action=edit'),
(245117, 23975, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(245118, 23975, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(245119, 23975, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(245120, 23975, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(245121, 23976, 'PostID', '7940'),
(245122, 23976, 'PostTitle', 'Stuck between a rock and a hard place… : The UK’s Unexplained Wealth Orders and the effect in the Middle East'),
(245123, 23976, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(245124, 23976, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(245125, 23976, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 15:29:56'),
(245126, 23976, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7940'),
(245127, 23976, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices'),
(245075, 23971, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(245076, 23971, 'ClientIP', '176.65.30.137'),
(245077, 23971, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36'),
(245069, 23970, 'EventCount', '23'),
(245070, 23970, 'PruneQuery', 'DELETE FROM tm_wsal_occurrences ORDER BY created_on ASC LIMIT 23'),
(245071, 23970, 'ClientIP', '185.140.248.63'),
(245072, 23970, 'UserAgent', 'WordPress/4.9.7; https://www.tamimi.com'),
(245073, 23971, 'Attempts', '5'),
(245074, 23971, 'Username', 'admin'),
(245100, 23974, 'MetaValue', '7928'),
(245097, 23974, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 15:29:56'),
(245098, 23974, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7940'),
(245099, 23974, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticleMonth'),
(245095, 23974, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(245096, 23974, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(245089, 23973, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(245090, 23973, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(245091, 23973, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(245092, 23973, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(245093, 23974, 'PostID', '7940'),
(245094, 23974, 'PostTitle', 'Stuck between a rock and a hard place… : The UK’s Unexplained Wealth Orders and the effect in the Middle East'),
(245087, 23973, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7940'),
(245088, 23973, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7940&amp;action=edit'),
(245084, 23973, 'PostTitle', 'Stuck between a rock and a hard place… : The UK’s Unexplained Wealth Orders and the effect in the Middle East'),
(245085, 23973, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(245086, 23973, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 15:29:56'),
(245078, 23972, 'EventCount', '2'),
(245079, 23972, 'PruneQuery', 'DELETE FROM tm_wsal_occurrences ORDER BY created_on ASC LIMIT 2'),
(245080, 23972, 'ClientIP', '185.140.248.63'),
(245081, 23972, 'UserAgent', 'WordPress/4.9.7; https://www.tamimi.com'),
(245082, 23973, 'PostID', '7940'),
(245083, 23973, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(245676, 24018, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(245674, 24018, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(245675, 24018, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(245673, 24018, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7945&amp;action=edit'),
(245670, 24018, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticleSectors'),
(245671, 24018, 'MetaValue', '1'),
(245672, 24018, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticleSectors'),
(245666, 24018, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(245667, 24018, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(245668, 24018, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 15:41:19'),
(245669, 24018, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7945'),
(245661, 24017, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(245662, 24017, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(245663, 24017, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(245664, 24018, 'PostID', '7945'),
(245665, 24018, 'PostTitle', 'From Stadion to E-Gaming in the UAE: A look at Stadium'),
(245660, 24017, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(245658, 24017, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticleSectors_0_lawUpdateArticleSector'),
(245659, 24017, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7945&amp;action=edit'),
(245655, 24017, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7945'),
(245656, 24017, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticleSectors_0_lawUpdateArticleSector'),
(245657, 24017, 'MetaValue', '667'),
(245649, 24016, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(245650, 24017, 'PostID', '7945'),
(245651, 24017, 'PostTitle', 'From Stadion to E-Gaming in the UAE: A look at Stadium'),
(245652, 24017, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(245653, 24017, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(245654, 24017, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 15:41:19'),
(245648, 24016, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(245646, 24016, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(245647, 24016, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(245642, 24016, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices'),
(245643, 24016, 'MetaValue', '2'),
(245644, 24016, 'MetaLink', 'lawUpdateArticlePractices'),
(245645, 24016, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7945&amp;action=edit'),
(245717, 24021, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(245718, 24021, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(245708, 24021, 'PostStatus', 'draft'),
(245709, 24021, 'PostType', 'law_update_articles'),
(245710, 24021, 'PostDate', '2018-07-31 15:41:19'),
(245711, 24021, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/?post_type=law_update_articles&p=7945'),
(245712, 24021, 'MetaKey', 'lawUpdateArticleNoWriters'),
(243856, 23871, 'PostType', 'news-room'),
(243857, 23871, 'PostDate', '2018-07-30 18:00:47'),
(243858, 23871, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/news-room/new-data-protection-law-in-bahrain-criminalises-non-compliance/'),
(243859, 23871, 'MetaID', '222640'),
(243860, 23871, 'MetaKey', 'content'),
(243861, 23871, 'MetaValueNew', '<span style=\"color: #00578f;\"><strong>Bahrain’s new Law on the Protection of Personal Data was published on 19 July 2018, and will come into effect on 1 August 2019</strong>.</span>\r\n\r\nThe Law will require a variety of changes to the way businesses process personal data in Bahrain or about residents of Bahrain. Historically, data protection has not been a high priority topic for most businesses in Bahrain, with the limited exception of international entities subject to data protection requirements in other jurisdictions in which they operate. While the publication of the new Law provides a considerable lead-in period within which entities subject to the Law will need to comply, the fact that the Law creates criminal offences means that compliance is all the more important and should be treated as a high priority.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style=\"color: #00578f;\"><strong>Application</strong></span>\r\n\r\nBahrain’s Data Protection Law describes the legal protection of personal privacy as among the main constitutional rights of the person, and notes that it should be protected, particularly in the context of the increasing use of electronic/digital means for processing information. The Law applies to:\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>Every individual residing normally in Bahrain or having a workplace in Bahrain, and every legal person (corporate) having a place of business in the Kingdom of Bahrain; and</li>\r\n 	<li>Every individual not residing normally in Bahrain or having a workplace in Bahrain, and every legal person (corporate) not having a place of business in the Kingdom of Bahrain, where such persons are processing data using means available in Bahrain, except where such processing means are solely for the purpose of passing data through Bahrain.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style=\"color: #00578f;\"><strong>Criminal provisions</strong></span>\r\n\r\nThe Law criminalises a variety of acts that would, at most, be the subject of administrative penalties in data protection laws elsewhere. Penalties generally comprise up to one year in prison and/or a fine of between BHD 1,000 and BHD 20,000 (between about USD 2,600 to about USD 53,000) (or a fine only in the case of corporate entities). The following are examples of activities that attract criminal penalties under the Law:\r\n<ul>\r\n 	<li>Processing sensitive personal data in violation of the provision specifying requirements for processing sensitive personal data;</li>\r\n 	<li>Transferring personal data outside Bahrain contrary to the provisions specifying requirements for transfers to jurisdictions that provide an adequate level of data protection, and associated exceptions;</li>\r\n 	<li>Processing personal data without notifying the new Data Protection Authority in accordance with the provision that sets out the obligation to notify the Authority before commencing any data processing activities (except where certain exceptions apply), or failing to update such notification to the Authority;</li>\r\n 	<li>Processing personal data contrary to the provision that requires prior authorization from the Authority before processing personal data in certain circumstances;</li>\r\n 	<li>Providing false or misleading information to the Authority or to a data subject, or withholding relevant information from the Authority, or otherwise hindering the Authority’s work; and</li>\r\n 	<li>Disclosing any data or information accessed due to work, or using the same for own benefit or for the benefit of others unreasonably and in violation of the provisions of this law.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style=\"color: #00578f;\"><strong>Security considerations</strong></span>\r\n\r\nGenerally, the security of processing provisions, and the confidentiality provisions, appear to be fairly standard. Data controllers are required to apply technical and organizational measures capable of protecting personal data against unintentional or unauthorized destruction, accidental loss, unauthorized alteration, disclosure or access, or any other form of processing. The measures adopted need to be appropriate, bearing in mind the nature of the data in question and the risks associated with processing it.\r\n\r\nData controllers are required to engage only data processors who provide sufficient guarantees regarding the application of technical and organisational measures. Importantly, there is an obligation on data controllers to take steps to verify compliance with such measures, and to enter into a written contract with the data processor requiring that the data processor shall only process data in accordance with the instructions of the data controller, and in accordance with the data controller’s requirements with regard to security and confidentiality.\r\n\r\nThere does not appear to be any specific obligation to notify the Authority in the event of a data breach incident. It is possible that this level of detail might be addressed in the regulations, or that the Authority is expected to address breaches only in the event that they become aware of them, and when the circumstances indicate a breach of the obligation to use suitable technical and organizational security measures.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<span style=\"color: #00578f;\"><strong>Data Protection Supervisor</strong></span>\r\n\r\nThe Law contemplates a role of ‘Data Protection Supervisor’ (not a data protection officer type role) intended to act as an independent and impartial intermediary between the data controller and the Authority. The data protection supervisor will help the data controller fulfil its rights and obligations, and coordinate between the data controller and the Authority. It will also be required to verify the data controller’s processing in compliance with the law, alert the data controller to any apparent non-compliance to enable the issue to be addressed, and alert the Authority where such non-compliance has not been addressed within a specified timeframe.\r\n\r\nThe concept of a data protection supervisor has the potential to result in a whole new industry in the Bahrain market. The regulations setting out the requirements for the registration of data protection supervisors may shed greater light on what is anticipated, in terms of who might be able to fulfil such roles. The most natural development may be for the role to be filled by consulting/audit firms with expertise in data protection related issues.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<em>Al Tamimi &amp; Company regularly advises on data protection issues across the Middle East. For further information about the new Data Protection Law in Bahrain, or assistance in ensuring compliance, please do not hesitate to contact us.</em>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\nNick O\'Connell, Partner, TMT - <a href=\"mailto:n.oconnell@tamimi.com\">n.oconnell@tamimi.com</a>\r\nFoutoun Hajjar, Partner, Head of Office - Bahrain - <a href=\"mailto:f.hajjar@tamimi.com\">f.hajjar@tamimi.com</a>\r\nCamelia Quinnell, Senior Data Protection Adviser, TMT - <a href=\"mailto:c.quinnell@tamimi.com\">c.quinnell@tamimi.com</a>'),
(243855, 23871, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(243852, 23870, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(243853, 23871, 'PostID', '7927'),
(243854, 23871, 'PostTitle', 'New Data Protection Law in Bahrain criminalises non-compliance'),
(243849, 23870, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(243850, 23870, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(243851, 23870, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(243845, 23870, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(243846, 23870, 'PostDate', '2018-07-30 18:00:47'),
(243847, 23870, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/news-room/new-data-protection-law-in-bahrain-criminalises-non-compliance/'),
(243848, 23870, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=7927&amp;action=edit'),
(243844, 23870, 'PostTitle', 'New Data Protection Law in Bahrain criminalises non-compliance'),
(243840, 23869, 'CurrentUserID', '5'),
(243841, 23869, 'CurrentUserRoles', 'a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"administrator\";i:1;s:10:\"superadmin\";}'),
(243842, 23870, 'PostID', '7927'),
(243843, 23870, 'PostType', 'news-room'),
(243837, 23869, 'EditorLinkPost', 'http://www.tamimi.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=893&amp;action=edit'),
(243838, 23869, 'ClientIP', '83.111.236.141'),
(243839, 23869, 'UserAgent', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko'),
(243833, 23869, 'PostTitle', 'Nick O’Connell'),
(243834, 23869, 'PostStatus', 'publish'),
(243835, 23869, 'PostDate', '2017-09-28 08:17:21'),
(243836, 23869, 'PostUrl', 'http://www.tamimi.com/lawyer/nick-oconnell/'),
(243827, 23868, 'EventCount', '48'),
(243828, 23868, 'PruneQuery', 'DELETE FROM tm_wsal_occurrences ORDER BY created_on ASC LIMIT 48'),
(243829, 23868, 'ClientIP', '185.140.248.63'),
(243830, 23868, 'UserAgent', 'WordPress/4.9.7; https://www.tamimi.com'),
(243831, 23869, 'PostID', '893'),
(243832, 23869, 'PostType', 'lawyer');
